Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Current Flight Simulator Series
›
Flight Simulator X
› Problems with FSX
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
Problems with FSX (Read 4219 times)
Apr 24
th
, 2012 at 12:26pm
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
I keep having problems with FSX, for over a year already. Can anyone help me get FSX installed propperly?
I'm not a flightsim-pro, I have no need for the ultimate FSX-experience, I only want to relax with a fun flight, so now and then.
I have one decent computer for all my work, which runs all the normal programs as msn, skype, firefox, photo and video editing, etc and I simply want to run a fun game at the side.
Some of the problems I get stuck with:
-Traffic signs/wind direction poles on the runway.
-Wheels, shadows, or flying lights drive over the roads on the airports, with no vehicle attatched.
-Being directed back and forth between 2 ATC sources, like Rotterdam hands me to Schiphol, schiphol hands me back to Rotterdam, back to Schiphol, back to Rotterdam and so on and so on...(Is there a 'make up your fucking mind'-button to use in ATC? A 'fuck you'-button would be satisfying as well). Then when I get handed to another controller I often only get the option to go back to the one that just handed me off and I keep getting back to the same controller all the time.
-Engines wont start. When I run a freshly installed FSX all aircrafts work fine, the engine is running when I load the game and they keep running all through the flight, but after a while the engines arent running when I get in and I cant get them to start, or they turn off once they're started. I also notice that the left engine does start(for a short while), but the right doesnt start at all.
-ATC window closes when I switch frequencies on any radio.
-Progressive taxing only shows when looking at it from one direction and disappears when you turn your point of view, which mostly means I have to look at the nose of the aircraft and drive the aircraft towards my point of view. In other words, I have to drive backwards with my point of view over the markings.
-As soon as I start installing addon scenery or aircrafts, all kinds of wierd bugs show themselves once or a couple of times and this can be a lot of different things, this isnt constantly the same thing with the same addon, but differs every time. Can be that GPS guided flight misses turns, that instruments go wack, ATC controllers stop giving commands halfway a flight, buildings show in impossible places(for instance, on the runway), roads run over buildings, ground vihicles drive through buildings, I get a different GPS in the GPS screen then the one that's present in the aircraft, aircrafts are parked in blocks and covers and I cant remove those, HDG and/or ALT are already switched on when I turn on autopilot, al kinds of bugs appear when switching from GPS-mode to NAV-mode, and a lot more things that have shown themselves once or twice, but nothing seems to appear as a consistant effect from a specific procedure.
Advised by FSX support from Microsoft, I already rebuild most of my computer, installed a 64bit win7 and I've been trying all kinds of things for almost a year and Microsoft cant give me one single fix for any of the problems.
I also tried to install the whole computer for FSX only and followed all instruction from Nick N, but this didnt make any difference concerning the problems I just mentioned.
So... HELP! Can anyone hand me any advise to get my FSX running propperly?
Thanks
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Apr 24
th
, 2012 at 12:55pm
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
If you're just looking for fun and relaxation, without having any interest in top-of-realism simulation, then I would advise you to switch to FS9.
FSX is quite difficult to set up properly, especially when it comes to finding a good quality/performance balance. Given the description you gave about what kind of experience you're looking for, I believe FS9 will be more than enough, and will be much easier to install and set up.
Concerning your specific problems:
- wind poles on the runways are due to bad default sceneries. Solution is to edit the airport with appropriate tools, or to download a replacement scenery (if there is one).
- wheels+shadows+flying lights = car traffic with no textures. This happens in the demo and the retail version of the sim. Didn't you install SP1 and SP2 (or Acceleration) for FSX ?
- the ATC redirections happens when the route is too close to the limits of each tower controlled area. No solutions appart from NOT contacting the other tower when you are told to do so.
- check the icing switches, check your fuel levels, check your mixtures/prop picth etc... CTRL+E can switch any of the default planes and most of the addon planes. If it doesn't work, then probably there is a problem with your default flight. Switch to the default Baron, press CTRL+E, see if it runs.
- ATC window closes ? Check your in-game options.
- Progressive taxi display problems sometime happens with some sceneries, I don't know the origin of the problem.
- instrument problems are usually the sign of lack of electricity. Did you turn the generators ON ? Other bugs are due to bad sceneries. Replace with either freeware or payware addons.
Or switch to FS9.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Apr 24
th
, 2012 at 9:46pm
Ang2dogs
Offline
Colonel
No matter where you go,
there you are.
black mountain hills of Dakota
Gender:
Posts: 848
Demious wrote
on Apr 24
th
, 2012 at 12:26pm:
...(Is there a 'make up your f@#king mind'-button to use in ATC? A 'f!%k you'-button would be satisfying as well).
So... HELP! Can anyone hand me any advise to get my FSX running propperly?
Thanks
, same here,but please remember this is a family friendly forum,and have a nice soft pillow on your desk so your head wont hurt as much when your beating your self on it.
I feel your pain, and I'm sure most everyone on this site does too, but you came to the right place to get the best info on the web to find out how to get your FSX up and running. As Daube said, FS9 is a much more user friendly sim and will get you flying right out of the box. FSX takes awhile to set up, your on the right track by going to Nick N's sticky. My advice is to take one problem at a time, don't add any add-on's untill you get the base FSX running. Once you get it going good it's well worth it. Fegedabout the ATC, sorry to say, that's the virtual government for ya
.
Goodluck and welcome to the headbangers club!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
May 2
nd
, 2012 at 3:24pm
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
@Ang2dogs -Sorry if I offended anyone with my phrasing, I thought that the language my kid can hear on daytime TV wouldnt be a problem on a family forum, but I guess that's not the case...
@Daube -yes, i've got SP1, SP2 and Acceleration installed.
I've been experiencing those problems for over a year already and I checked for updates, but there arent any.
If there's any bug in the software, there will be an update in a matter of weeks at the most, I've been working with plenty of programs and games to know how that works. Are you telling me there are bugs in the software and Microsoft isnt doing anything about it? That would be a killer for the awful reputation they already have...
And a legal sale can only be made once the product is dellivered in propper working condition, if a product isnt working propperly, there's no official sale. So if bugs arent fixed within reasonable time, non of the FSX packages are actually sold... Its really hard to believe Microsoft will risk 100% of their sales will be returned, to be honest.
I could give FS9 a try, of course, but do all my FSX addons work in FS9 as well? By now I've bought quite some addons to fix scenery and aircraft issues by replacing the original with addons (they dont fix any of the problems, by the way) and of course to create a nice environment to look at, I'm not planning on buying everything new...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
May 3
rd
, 2012 at 11:37am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Demious wrote
on May 2
nd
, 2012 at 3:24pm:
@Ang2dogs -Sorry if I offended anyone with my phrasing, I thought that the language my kid can hear on daytime TV wouldnt be a problem on a family forum, but I guess that's not the case...
@Daube -yes, i've got SP1, SP2 and Acceleration installed.
I've been experiencing those problems for over a year already and I checked for updates, but there arent any.
If there's any bug in the software, there will be an update in a matter of weeks at the most, I've been working with plenty of programs and games to know how that works. Are you telling me there are bugs in the software and Microsoft isnt doing anything about it? That would be a killer for the awful reputation they already have...
And a legal sale can only be made once the product is dellivered in propper working condition, if a product isnt working propperly, there's no official sale. So if bugs arent fixed within reasonable time, non of the FSX packages are actually sold... Its really hard to believe Microsoft will risk 100% of their sales will be returned, to be honest.
I could give FS9 a try, of course, but do all my FSX addons work in FS9 as well? By now I've bought quite some addons to fix scenery and aircraft issues by replacing the original with addons (they dont fix any of the problems, by the way) and of course to create a nice environment to look at, I'm not planning on buying everything new...
No your FSX addons will not work at all with FS9.
However, FS9 has quite a great base of freeware and payware addons to choose from. If you're looking for fun and relaxation, you won't need to buy any payware, a lot of freeware addons will bring you just that.
Concerning the bugs in FSX, there has been two patches, SP1 and SP2 (and Acceleration, which is SP2 with some additionnal and specific stuff). There were no additionnal updates. FSX still has a lot of bugs but nowadays with a little bit of info gathering on the forums, anybody can find the explanations on how to configure the sim properly.
I'm using FSX and I absolutely love it. But I do not only use it for fun and relaxation, I also use it because of the unmatched realism of some of its addons (paywares), which is why I cannot switch back to FS9. On the contrary, you should not get any problems with FS9:
- you will get tons of freeware planes (fun, sci-fi, airliners, general aviation etc...) that won't get any display problems
- you won't get anything like OrbX sceneries, but you will nevertheless find quite a lot of nice airport sceneries, nice-enough landclasses, nice-enough meshes etc...
- you won't get any crisp photorealistic sceneries, only 5m/pixel ones, but they already look quite good once you reach a certain altitude. Check out
http://www.blueskyscenery.com/
to discover some excellent examples.
FS9 is definitely worth a try in your case.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
May 4
th
, 2012 at 7:13am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
I think I'd go for the explination to setup FSX propperly...
I'd like to get to a reasonably realistic way of flying, aimed at enjoying the scenery at low altitude flight. That's why I want to fly by controlling autopilot as much as I can, so I got time to look at scenery.
I'm not after a high-end pilot training, that's what I meant with 'I have no need for the ultimate FSX-experience', for me its all about building and looking at scenery, not about flying every type of aircraft up to realistic perfection.
Thats why bugs in scenery bother me and the overload of bugs in ATC commands, that distract me from my flight.
And to me it seems a bit hars to to switch to FS9 and flush well over 300euros of GEX, UTX, REX, OrbX and airport addons down the drain, to be honest. That's what its all about for me, building scenery and then fly a nice simple flight by controlling autopilot, to enjoy what I build and exploring the world like that.
I'm probably looking at it from a whole different perspective then people who have a thing for the aircrafts themselves.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
May 4
th
, 2012 at 11:18am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Ok, if you liked the OrbX sceneries, then there is indeed no way back to FS9, so let's forget about this.
What is your current hardware ?
Getting FSX to work properly will require multiple steps, from setting up the game settings, the video card settings, and finally optimizing the FSX.cfg.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
May 6
th
, 2012 at 10:01am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
This computer is like 5 years old, already and I'm gonna get a new one in a couple of months tops, but this is what I got now:
Motherboard: Asus P5QL-E
Processor: Intel Core Duo CPU E8200 @ 2.66GHz
Hard disc: 2x Seagate Baracuda 7200rpm (from which one for FSX only)
Video card: Nvidia, MSI N460GTX Hawk
Ram: 4GB (not exactly sure which type)
Operating system: Win7 64-bit
Controller: Saitek X52-pro
Maybe you can advise me on what I have to pay attention to when I buy the new computer? If it capable of running FSX properly, it sure will run the rest I need the machine for. For starts I was planning to take the video card from this one, since its hardly a year old.
And thanks for all your effort, mate.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
May 6
th
, 2012 at 10:44am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
There are only four things that you need to keep in mind when you buy a new computer for FSX:
1- FSX wants cores and GHz. Dual cores are not a good choice. Go for quad-cores or higher. Also, don't even think about buying any CPU running at less than 3,2 GHz. The rule is simple: the more cores, the fewer blurries. The more GHz, the more FPS. Go for an i7. A 2600K is a great start, but even my i7 960 gives some nice results already, as you could see on my various screenshots.
2- FSX doesn't need a high end video card, but cheap video card (low range) are forbidden. NVidia card names are quite easy to understand:
- first number (hundreds) = the generation (more or less, because the tend to lie from time to time). The higher, the more recent.
- second number (tens)= the quality. '9' are for extreme gamers. '8' are perfect. '6' are minimums. Anything below 6 is for Word, Excel and Powerpoint.
- the third number is useless.
- the letters are relative to the power as well, but I'm not too sure about this.
Anyways, I have a NVidia GTX480 from Asus and it gives fantastic results. The card power is important to deal with high screen resolutions, AntiAliasing and Anisotropic filtering, and finally to handle the high-res textures on some airplanes or sceneries. You don't need the top, you must avoid the cheap, you must aim for the "good".
3- Power supply: ensure the power supply unit in your computer case is a powerfull one, enough to handle your video card (!!), the various harddrives (you might want to add some in future), the memory, the additionnal fans for the CPU, and the CPU itself.
4- cooling: summer is coming. FSX will transform your PC into a volcano and your CPU+video card will become lava if your computer case is not cooled properly. As we're just getting out of winter, people are not thinking about this too much at the moment. But in just a few weeks, we will start seeing so much topics about computers crashing on all forums, just like EVERY year !
So plan some money to get an efficient computer case, or AT LEAST a serious CPU cooling system.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
May 6
th
, 2012 at 10:53am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Now, when it comes to your current computer, its main problem is the CPU:
- it's a dual core.
- it has a very low frequency.
That means that you should probably alter the FSX settings in order to match the graphical quality of FS9 if you want to maintain a flyable sim. That means:
- bloom disabled
- terrain mesh to 19 meters or greater
- terrain complexity to 50% or less
- terrain texture to 5 meters per pixel
- autogen density to normal or more sparse
- autogen limited in the FSX.cfg to 300 trees and 300 buildings (with the autogen tweaks)
- scenery complexity to normal
- ground scenery shadows disabled
- water to 1x only. You can try 2x low, but there will be a cost
- cloud/weathe settings to maximum, but the draw distance should be kept at the minimum. Also, the cloud textures should be replaced, because the default ones are big BUT ugly and FPS-killers. Go for the HDE clouds, keep the cumulus to 512 pixels size, beautiful and easy on the frames
- AI: disabled. All of them, air, water and ground. You can install some companies from WOAI once the default traffic file is removed if you want, but that will have a cost on the FPS.
- FPS limit set to 20 FPS for first tests.
Of course, a correct tweaking of the FSX.cfg is mandatory. Check Bojote's website.
And finally, concerning Nick's advises for tunning the video card, I would especially recommend you to ENSURE the "transparency AntiAliasing" is totally disabled in the FSX profile of your NVidia drivers. Ensure as well that the AntiAliasing is disabled in the game settings, but forced ON in the NVidia drivers settings ("override any application settings"), and set to a correct value (8xS is a good start).
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
May 7
th
, 2012 at 4:35am
todayshorse
Offline
Colonel
'Ten Thousand Blister.....'
England
Gender:
Posts: 2806
Interesting reading.
For all the love in the world, and hours of faffing, i finally admitted defeat trying to get FSX to run anything like properly on my old Intel based core duo iMac running Win 7. However it ran fs9 to perfection.
The solution? I bought a Quad core i5 iMac. Ive not even touched the cfg, and it runs FSX beautifully. With the sliders maxed it still runs ok suprisingly, knock them back a little and its very smooth, now ive gone from win 7 32bit to 64 anyway! Using 32bit was a mistake!
With your PC, i dont think youll ever get there - sorry to say, but only based on my core duo experience. Fs9 on the other hand, can be made to look very good and run very well. I still think it can give FSX a run for its money.
Good luck!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
May 9
th
, 2012 at 6:06am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
Just wondering... FSX is released in 2006, so the development period has been 2005-2006, I guess that it's made for the relevant computers of that age, which were a whole lot less then my curent one, which is from early 2008.
If a 2008 computer isnt fit to run 2006 program, how could the 2006 computers ever have been capable to run it to full capacity, since that is what the program was originally created for?
And a few questions: If I buy a new computer, which brand of processor would be best, AMD, or Intell?
And the same for the video card, would I best choose for GeForce or Radeon? And is there a difference between AMD Radeon and ATI Radeon, or are both the same, as is with all the different GeForce brands?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
May 9
th
, 2012 at 6:23am
Fozzer
Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.
Posts: 24861
Demious wrote
on May 9
th
, 2012 at 6:06am:
Just wondering... FSX is released in 2006, so the development period has been 2005-2006, I guess that it's made for the relevant computers of that age, which were a whole lot less then my current one, which is from early 2008.
If a 2008 computer isn't fit to run 2006 program, how could the 2006 computers ever have been capable to run it to full capacity, since that is what the program was originally created for?
What a wonderful question!...
...!
...and one which still has me baffled, even today!...
...!
Paul...
...!
As an 8-Bit, Zilog Z80, Computer programmer from long, long ago, I have always suspected that it was due to Ace's coding of FSX which maybe was rushed, and not very efficient at the time...Microsoft delivery demands?
Perhaps, if they were to do it all over again, it may be much improved, and more efficient?
Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
May 9
th
, 2012 at 6:59am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Demious wrote
on May 9
th
, 2012 at 6:06am:
Just wondering... FSX is released in 2006, so the development period has been 2005-2006, I guess that it's made for the relevant computers of that age, which were a whole lot less then my curent one, which is from early 2008.
If a 2008 computer isnt fit to run 2006 program, how could the 2006 computers ever have been capable to run it to full capacity, since that is what the program was originally created for?
That's why there are sliders to adjust the level of quality.
FSX, in its original version, had a problem: it was developped for single-core CPUs, the team was hoping that the CPU frequencies would continue to grow, eventually reaching very high speeds with more efficient architectures, stuff like "Pentium 5", sort of. Unfortunately, things took a different path shortly before the release of FSX: instead of increasing the speed, they increased the number of cores in our CPUs. It was too late to alter the game engine already, so they decided to make the SP1 and SP2 patches that brought multi-core support for the heaviest taks in the sim: the building of the terrain as you fly.
Once the SP2 went available, modern computers of that time could successfully run FSX with a level of details equivalent or superior to FS9. Of course they could not run it at maximum settings, but appart from a few kids, nobody really cared.
I can make a simple example about this: what if I make a road sim that can display hundreds of buildings and vehicule in a perfectly fluid way ? That would be cool, people would call it "optimized", etc... Now, what if I introduce a slider that controls the amount of displayed vehicules and buildings, and I set a totally unrealistic maximum value for this slider ? Something like 1.000.000.000 buildings and vehicules ? The computer would melt in a lake of lava instantly, right ? And people would start crying about the fact that the game cannot run at max settings, and that it's not optimized, it's crap coding etc....
When FSX went out, very few people understood that:
- the default ground textures were 25x more precise than the FS9 ones
- the ground textures could become 2500x more precise than any FS9 ground texture !
- the terrain mesh could become 361x more precise than FS9 (1m instead of 19m in FS9)
- FS9 could display a maximum of 600 autogen objects per terrain cell (1,2km square) while FSX was set to a default of 4000 buildings and 4500 trees (provided the ground textures were set to display such dense autogen, which was not the case for desert for example...)
- etc...
Truth is that it was quite easy to lower the FSX settings to match FS9 quality and performance, and still benefit from the features of the new sim that the old sim didn't have. But very few people wanted to do that, most kept complaining about not being able to run at a level of quality that was way above FS9. In my case, I could finally fly FSX with a very nice graphic detail (compared to FS9) at the end of 2007, when I could finally get rid of my outdated Pentium IV computer.
Quote:
And a few questions: If I buy a new computer, which brand of processor would be best, AMD, or Intell?
And the same for the video card, would I best choose for GeForce or Radeon? And is there a difference between AMD Radeon and ATI Radeon, or are both the same, as is with all the different GeForce brands?
Go for Intel with NVidia graphic card.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
May 11
th
, 2012 at 5:01am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
Bought a new computer this week, think this one is gonna do a lot better already.
Processors: intell core i5-2310
RAM: 6GB DDR3
Video card: Geforce GT550
Hard discs: Seagate Baracuda 7200rpm & Kingston SSDnow200 (got FSX on this drive)
OS: Win7 64bit
Everything seems to run very smooth and aircrafts fly more stable and easy then ever before.
I just started testing and only problem I'm experiencing so far, is that once I start using ATC, there are no voices and the volume of the overall sound goes down by a lot.
Do you know what the problem is here?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
May 11
th
, 2012 at 5:11am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Check the sounds settings inside the FSX advanced settings.
Ensure the "voice" channel is directed to the same kind of output than the rest of the sounds.
By default, I believe FSX is set to send the general sounds to your speakers, but the ATC voices (and multiplayer voices) to headsets. You have to cancel this redirection.
Glad to see your flight experience is getting smoother. Once you learn how to properly configure the sim, you should be able to find the perfect balance between graphics and performance, leading to an even more pleasant experience.
And the usual warning: don't buy any addon before researching on the forum for feedbacks from previous customers.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
May 14
th
, 2012 at 4:30am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
Thanks, I'm used that the sound just works, never had to choose another option then the one that was setup as default and since the rest of the sound worked, I didnt think it would have been the output choice.
I got most running properly now, Aircrafts are flying better and smoother then ever before, got a lot less wrong ATC commands(sending back and forth between the same 2 controlers), Progressive taxiing doesnt bug anymore, AP landings work fine for every aircraft I tried so far. The only serious problem is the screen going black, showing only parts of the view and I need to switch to map/choose aircraft etc, minimize the program and so back and forth, until I got normal view back. This mostly works, but it takes several minutes of going through different screens before it resets. It can start with going to map, or other screens, or when I pause the sim. Any ideas on how to fix this?
A second thing is that my ATC window disappears when I start or stop the push tractor.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
May 14
th
, 2012 at 5:10am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Screen going black could have several causes:
- overheating (unlikely to happen, given the fact that your computer is new and thus clean)
- bad tweaking
Have you put your FSX.cfg through the Venetubo (Jesus Altuve) website ? There are a few usefull tweaks that are added from there. Some other tweaks, you have to add them yourself, mainly:
- the disablepreload, to prevent the initial loading of a situation before getting to the main menu when starting the sim
- the autogen limitation tweaks, because even with a powerfull CPU it's still good to limit the autogen in the CFG while increasing the autogen density in the game settings.
- playing around with the bufferpools (to keep it activated or to disable it completely) also has a great impact on the sim performance... and stability :/
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
May 14
th
, 2012 at 9:01am
Bass
Offline
Colonel
Love flying.
Scandinavia
Gender:
Posts: 996
Maybe this could help a bit about buffer
http://www.mycockpit.org/forums/showthread.php/20310-Jack-s-guide-to-the-BufferP...
"Just try to be YOU".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw23LQkvg_k
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
May 14
th
, 2012 at 5:26pm
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
Adding the buffer made a big change, indeed, these problems seem to be fixed.
The only thing thats still there is a flicker of the picture when I open/close ATC with 'scroll lock', or when I pause/unpause with 'pause break', but when I do it with keys on the main keyboard(P for pause and I assigned ATC to the ,) and then they both work fine, no glitches in the picture at all...
So I guess we can call this fixed, thanks.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
May 15
th
, 2012 at 4:28am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
Hmmm, didnt have any problems all evening and could switch between different screens without any problems, but now I requested new IFR and everything starts over again.
I've been trying different pool sizes, but this doesnt seem to help.
Restarting the sim helps and not I cant seem to trigger the problem again, but question is: for how long?
Can it be the poolsize has to be tuned more precise and if so, how can I do this without having to try 490000000 different options? Or is there something else that can be going wrong?
Another thing I find is that I get asked to report other traffic in sight and apparently they do see me, but I havent seen any other traffic at all, ever! For over a year, I havent seen any other flying aircraft then my own. Can this point to some issue is my system?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
May 15
th
, 2012 at 5:03am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
BufferPools are a double-side sword. It can help as much as it can destroy everything.
Your value is quite high. Try 8.000.000 first, that was the value that was providing me the greatest stability, back when my bufferpools were not disabled.
Also, have you replaced your uiautomationcore.dll already ? I don't remember...
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
May 15
th
, 2012 at 5:41am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
I noticed that the problems occur when the sim has been running for a while and now it only seems to get triggered by requesting new IFR. Restarting the sim solves it, but of course its not meant to stop every flight halfway and start over...
I tried the 8.000.000 setting and it seems to work a lot better already, but I'm still testing this. I changed it while my current flight, in which I already noticed this problem, was on pause, and in the same flight I cant trigger the problem anymore, only some glitches when returning from flightplan screen back to the flightscreen.
For further tuning, by what amounts should I go up or down?
No, I havent replaced the uiautomationcore.dll yet. What can I replace this with?
I also notice that when I change back to flightscreen, from several other screens, or when I use 'scroll lock' or 'pause break', I get a small item in lower right corner of my main screen with 3 squares, one green with a 1 in it, one white with an A in it and one green with a down pointing arrow in it. My guess is this is from the HP win7 version, but I cant tell for sure. Is this something I should worry about? Can I switch it off, somewhere?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
May 15
th
, 2012 at 6:46am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
No idea about those squares that you see :/
Concerning the bufferpools, increase it 4.000.000 at a time.
For the uiautomationcore.dll, make a search from google over the various FS forums (including this one), search something like "FSX uiautomationcore.dll", you'll get a lot of links to topics, but a lot of them will be quite old and the download links inside will surely be dead. Just a bit of patience, try focusing on the most recent topics only, that should do it.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
May 15
th
, 2012 at 7:27am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
quick question, I fond posts that tell me to replace the file in the syswow64 folder and others tell me to put it in the FSX folder, which one do I follow?
Far as I tried now, I cant replace the one in the syswow64 folder, because I need permission... I got admin access, so not sure what permission they ask for.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
May 15
th
, 2012 at 7:30am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Do not, DO NEVER replace any Windows file, EVER !
The downloaded file has to go into the FSX folder, period.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
May 15
th
, 2012 at 8:52am
Bass
Offline
Colonel
Love flying.
Scandinavia
Gender:
Posts: 996
Demious, PLEASE listen to Daube here!!!
"Just try to be YOU".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw23LQkvg_k
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
May 15
th
, 2012 at 11:18am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
ok, noted
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
May 15
th
, 2012 at 12:17pm
garymbuska
Offline
Colonel
I would rather be flying
Jacksonville, Florida
Gender:
Posts: 2850
Demious wrote
on May 11
th
, 2012 at 5:01am:
Bought a new computer this week, think this one is gonna do a lot better already.
Processors: intell core i5-2310
RAM: 6GB DDR3
Video card: Geforce GT550
Hard discs: Seagate Baracuda 7200rpm & Kingston SSDnow200 (got FSX on this drive)
OS: Win7 64bit
Everything seems to run very smooth and aircrafts fly more stable and easy then ever before.
I just started testing and only problem I'm experiencing so far, is that once I start using ATC, there are no voices and the volume of the overall sound goes down by a lot.
Do you know what the problem is here?
I suggest that you make sure all of your drivers are installed for your sound. If you did not get a CD or DVD for the mother board you will have to go to the web site of the manufacturer and down load it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
May 17
th
, 2012 at 1:03am
Ang2dogs
Offline
Colonel
No matter where you go,
there you are.
black mountain hills of Dakota
Gender:
Posts: 848
If your having problems switching screens, it could be the resolution that your using.I was having the same problem, especially when going from full screen to windows mode. What I found out from researching the situation is this;
Match your resolution to your native res which is your desk top. In other words if your native res on your monitor is set at 1600 x 900, match your sim to the native res ( or visa versa), that took care of black screens or parts of the screen not showing up.And glad to hear your gettin FSX running, you'll be quite happy when your done with it, and very happy to see how well FSX really flys.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #30 -
May 20
th
, 2012 at 12:43pm
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
I got the UIAutomationCore.dll in my FSX main folder now and tuned the bufferpool up to a point where the screenflashes are minimal, when returning from map or flightplan page back to my aircraft. I still have some fast flashes and I can see a strange texture in the window, but that for a fraction of a second and even after 3 hours flight, I cant seem to trigger the black areas and missing parts of the picture anymore.
I'm still looking for newer UIAutomationCore.dll, the one I've got now is from 2008, but so far things are going very well, better then ever before.
Hope I can keep this up and maybe even tune it a little further, but for now I'm glad I got things working in a way that I can make a decent flight and dont have to worry about things getting messed up.
Thanks a whole lot guys!!!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
May 27
th
, 2012 at 7:44am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
Now I dont understand anymore...
I tuned everything so that I had some very minor glitches when switching between different screens and everything went fine, I made quite a few flights with the Bombardier Learjet and had no problems at all.
Now I started with another aircraft, the Bombardier CRJ700 and all the problems that were fixed are all back and even more.
When the cockpit screen gets messed up I cant seem to get it back to normal at all, so I have to quit the flight and then the window that should show the aircraft, stays black.
I notice that resolution of the ground textures is very low and out of focus. And when panning the view I regularly get that cloud textures turn into horizontal lines that are all the same.
What happens with different aircrafts that with one the program runs fine and with another problems that were fixed all come back?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
May 27
th
, 2012 at 8:00am
Bass
Offline
Colonel
Love flying.
Scandinavia
Gender:
Posts: 996
I would try to remove that ac (save it in another place), and try again.
"Just try to be YOU".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw23LQkvg_k
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
May 27
th
, 2012 at 9:33am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
I think I found the problem. I checked my FSX.CFG file and my edits were all gone.
Now Saitek had me start up FSX with CTRL+Shift held down, can it be that this made those changes?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
May 29
th
, 2012 at 9:20am
Bass
Offline
Colonel
Love flying.
Scandinavia
Gender:
Posts: 996
If i understand you right!??
This is the first time i ever heard of a flightstick, telling how to start up a sim/game
"Just try to be YOU".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw23LQkvg_k
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2012 at 11:47am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
Saitek is the name of the company that makes sticks, they're trying to fix my calibration problems. The stick itself is called the controller, or by product name X-52pro.
After a lot of trying out different things, I thought it was time to reinstal everything, so I did and now things are working fine again.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2012 at 6:18pm
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Starting FSX and maintain these two keys.... that reminds me something... perhaps this forces FSX to generate a totally new FSX.cfg... that would explain why all your tweaks were gone...
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Jun 3
rd
, 2012 at 9:30am
Bass
Offline
Colonel
Love flying.
Scandinavia
Gender:
Posts: 996
Demious wrote
on Jun 2
nd
, 2012 at 11:47am:
Saitek is the name of the company that makes sticks, they're trying to fix my calibration problems. The stick itself is called the controller, or by product name X-52pro.
After a lot of trying out different things, I thought it was time to reinstal everything, so I did and now things are working fine again.
I know Saitek, by name! I use the cougar.
Daube must be on to something here. If your edits in cgf file dissapears, then fsx is in control! No wonder you're having problems. Hope you gets it up and running.
"Just try to be YOU".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw23LQkvg_k
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
Jun 15
th
, 2012 at 4:25am
Demious
Offline
Colonel
Holland
Gender:
Posts: 130
I'm completely baffled now...
I reinstaled the whole machine again, after trying so many different things and instaling and deinstaling programs and addons and I had everything running perfectly again, everything seemed to work propperly and the movements and picture were so smooth, but now all for sudden I'm getting loads of problems again. Only thing I did was instal a couple of side programs like vroute, ultimate checklist, a demo of SimplatesX and a couple of aircraft addons.
-The settings of my controls within FSX are gone every time I start up FSX. Sensitivity and nulzone, as well as the control axes I programmed for mixture and prop.
-When I ask for pushoff, with a simple shift-P, so I dont ask to turn, the push does turn somehow and when I ask to turn in the push, it keeps going staight out.
-I always had the aircrafts drift off to the left on the taxiway and when taking off, so I made it easy for myself and activated autorudder and the aircrafts went perfectly straight out, but now from one moment to the next, they start drifting off to the right. When I try to steer, the slightest movement of the rudder already makes them turn enough to not be able to keep the aircraft driving straight out, I have to steer left-right-left-right and the aircraft keeps moving from side to side on the taxiway. The movement of the rudder is minimal, one tick less and it doesnt turn at all.
-I entered my heading at 035, the coarse of the runway straight out, but when I took off after taxiing and activated the AP, my aircraft turned a hard right and checking the heading indicator, it was set to 172 all for sudden.
-Every time I change frequencies on the radio, my ATC window disappears.
-Every time I change camera view, all my instruments on my right monitor (GPS, engine panel, electrical panel) disappear.
-When changing altitude the aicraft wil not automaticly set the VS and I have to do it by hand.
-When I'm already descending, ATC keep telling me to please expedite my descent
-The beacons next to the runway wont show up untill I'm just several yard from the runway, I cant see them when flying up to it.
-Once landed ATC tells me no less then 8 times to exit next taxiway, even before I had a chance to reach the first upcomming taxiway and it keeps telling me to exit next taxiway, even after entering the taxiway.
Those are all things I've never seen before, except for the instruments disappearing after changing camera view, not even with all the issues I've had before with FSX.
Does anyone have any idea what is happening here?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
Jun 18
th
, 2012 at 9:44am
Bass
Offline
Colonel
Love flying.
Scandinavia
Gender:
Posts: 996
How i would like to try another flightstick on your system!
"Just try to be YOU".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw23LQkvg_k
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X ««
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.