Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
FS2004 OR FSX? (Read 1390 times)
Aug 30th, 2010 at 5:45pm

cx826   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!

Gender: male
Posts: 30
*****
 
Currently I am having this stupid trouble with my FSX, my POSKY B777 that I downloaded here never works.
I know that POSKY only support FS2004, so I am going to ask, is FS2004 really better than FSX?
If so why? And what are the negative effects of FS2004?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:25pm

machineman9   Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England

Gender: male
Posts: 5255
*****
 
The benefits of FS2004 are that there are many more addons for it. It has been around longer and is still popular. For a flight simulator (jump in and fly) it is still incredibly modern. FSX uses Gamespy for multiplayer which is utterly awful and very glitchy. FSX does have some stunning graphics (if you can run them well) and has missions which add interest and things to do which you might not have known about at first.

FS2004 is far more compatible with addons and to this day it still looks great. FSX has some compatibility issues with addons, most of which can be worked around.


So really, which is better? The one that suits you. If you're able to run FSX well, and want missions and some up to date graphics, go for it. If you want just to fly, want a less taxing simulator (as FS2004 is older, built for older hardware) and want the bulk of the addons, then go for that. Both are great though.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:38pm

JBaymore   Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!

Gender: male
Posts: 10261
*****
 
This subject has been beaten to death in many many threads in the past.  If you want the full spectrum of discussion.... you should look in the older threads here in this forum as well as in the FSX section.

This subject has a tendency to get two different camps "warring" with each other.  Wink Cheesy Grin Angry

As stated above.... the one that works for you.

best,

................john
« Last Edit: Aug 30th, 2010 at 8:04pm by JBaymore »  

... ...Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M,  Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:39pm

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 
YES, FS2004 is much friendly to compatibility and almost no issues (it can run in a Pentium 3) and it still popular .

What FSX has its more Graphics,much more realism ,and better flight Dynamics..as machineman9 said "The one that suits you" you need to have a very powerful machine to run FSX decently
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:57pm

Rocket_Bird   Offline
Colonel
Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 1214
*****
 
Though FSX is currently resident on my machine, in a lot of ways I do agree with machineman9.  I couldn't find that many addons for FSX, and even today, the addon community doesn't seem close to what is there for FS9.  While there are indeed excellent addons for FSX, I would say a majority of those addons reside in the payware sector.  Perhaps I haven't delve deep enough into FSX, but I do find it difficult finding free stuff that I like with that sim.  Maybe my tastes are incompatible with FSX.  Undecided

Where FSX excels in compared to FS2004 is of course, the support from payware developers.  Also, stuff like the shiny bloom effects, and the ability to configure water reflection and waves are pretty nice.  Then of course, there are the missions, which I find very enjoyable.  The airport environments are also a notch better than FS2004.  Realism is the same.

I wouldn't say FS2004 is necessarily better than FSX or vice versa, but it has its own perks, which is why a lot of people have stuck with it.  Myself, I can easily reinstall FS2004 on my harddrive and still fly it.  Only problem is, last time I tried having both on my hard drive, my computer had a fit, and wouldn't accept one over the other. 

 

Cheers,
RB

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:58pm

cx826   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!

Gender: male
Posts: 30
*****
 
Ah sorry JBaymore, I should look at the older ones.

Thanks for the opinions, certainly I guess FS2004 would be a better choice if it is still available in the store... since photoshops and other video editior can make it look better if you ever wanted to put it in youtube.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Aug 30th, 2010 at 11:29pm

Capt.Propwash   Offline
Colonel
Let's get a little mud
on the tires!
KCHS, Charleston, SC, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1958
*****
 
cx826.... take your pick of which one you want of the top 3: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_8_7?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords...
 

The thoughts and expressions contained in the post above are solely my own, and not necessarily those of Simviation.com, its Moderators, its Staff, its Members, or other guests. They can not, are not, and will not be held liable for any thoughts, or expressions, or posts that I have made, or will make in the future.

Computer Specs:: Acer Aspire Laptop..Win7 Home Premium 64-bit (sp1), AMD Athlon II X2 P340 (Dual Core) [2.2 Ghz], ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 (256mb), 4GB DDR3......FS9.1(sp3) / FSX (sp2)..... Ultimate Terrain X, Ground Environment X, REX, FTX ORBX PNW-PFJ-NRM-CRM, OZx, Tongass Fjords, Misty Moorings
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:39am

Daube   Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)

Gender: male
Posts: 5833
*****
 
cx826 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 5:45pm:
Currently I am having this stupid trouble with my FSX, my POSKY B777 that I downloaded here never works.
I know that POSKY only support FS2004, so I am going to ask, is FS2004 really better than FSX?
If so why? And what are the negative effects of FS2004?


If you didn't succeed installing the POSKY in FSX, you probably won't succeed installing it in FS9 either.
The POSKY planes are usually a bit complex to install, there are a lot of steps to follow. They are no complex, but you have to do everything in the right order.

The difference between installing the 777 in FSX and FS9 is that in FSX, after the installation, you'll have to:
- disable a gauge that displays the fingerprints in the panel.cfg
- move the 777 FS9 gauges into the FSX gauges folder
- move a mscvr...dll file in the FSX folder.
OR
- edit the panel.cfg to call the gauges from the default 737 instead.
And that's all.

Now, when it comes to switching to FS9, it's probably the best choice for you. FS9 has more addons, since it exists since much more time than FSX. You'll find much more sceneries and planes to install in your sim. Also the performance will be better, but of course the quality of the graphics will be lower.

When it comes to realism, if we speak about freewares, you won't see much differences between those two, excepted that you won't be able to land on moving carriers in FS9.

When it comes to payware, some addons for FSX will be light-years ahead of anything available for FS9:
- sceneries with incredible ground textures and autogen (Switzerland Pro, OrbX PNW etc...)
- airplanes with amazing features, details and realism (A2A Accusim, etc...)

However, FS9 addons have already an excellent quality. The airport sceneries will be as detailled as in FSX, the landscape sceneries will look blurry but detailled nevertheless, and some of the planes will be mind-blowing (PMDG etc....)

So no, you probably won't regret your move to FS9. It will allow you to get more confortable with the FS environment much faster and easier, and after some years of fun, you will still be able to jump back into FSX to check the addons from the dark side  Cool
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Aug 31st, 2010 at 5:50am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Daube wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:39am:
- move a mscvr...dll file in the FSX folder.
I'm not sure that's necessary if you have FSX + SP2 or Acceleration installed. All the FS9 default gauges work in my FSX without it. Perhaps someone can confirm this one way or the other.

The Posky aircraft are notoriously difficult to install. I believe that some of the 777 repaints posted here at Simviation have already been updated with a VC. All necessary files included.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Aug 31st, 2010 at 8:50am

Daube   Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)

Gender: male
Posts: 5833
*****
 
Hagar, I confirm the msvcr.... err msvcr70.dll or msvcr80.dll, I can't remember right now, however I confirm this file is absolutely necessary, else the 777 gauge file from the default FS9 777 will not work in FSX Acceleration (like FSX SP2).

When I first installed the POSKY 777, I recognized that the default 777 gauges would not work, even after deletion of the fingerprints. My 777 gauges were copied in the panel folder as well as in the Gauges folder. I had to edit the panel.cfg to call the default 738 gauges instead, and that worked like a charm.

Later on, I read about this msvcr file and downloaded it, changed the panel.cfg back to original (with removed fingerprints, though) and I could finally see the gauges in the POSKY 777 (and in the FS9 777 too, by the way)
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Aug 31st, 2010 at 3:46pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Daube wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 8:50am:
Hagar, I confirm the msvcr.... err msvcr70.dll or msvcr80.dll, I can't remember right now, however I confirm this file is absolutely necessary, else the 777 gauge file from the default FS9 777 will not work in FSX Acceleration (like FSX SP2).

Hi Daube. It was msvcr70.dll. I know it was necessary to install this module to FSX RTM (& the FSX Demo) for FS9 default gauges in GAU format to display. I think this might have been fixed in SP1 or SP2.* I have a recent install of FSX + Acceleration & there are no msvcr modules anywhere in the FSX directory. I have several 3rd party aircraft that use the FS9 default gauges & they work fine. I don't remember trying a Posky 777 since. I'll try one later & report back.

*PS. I did a search of my C: drive & found msvcr70.dll in my Windows\system32 directory. I don't remember putting it in there.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:04pm

Daube   Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)

Gender: male
Posts: 5833
*****
 
Having myself quite a lot of FS9 planes in my FSX hangar with .GAU gauges, they have all always worked flawlessly since the beginning, even before this msvcr70.dll file.

The 777 was really the one and only addon that caused a problem and lead me to install this dll. But this might be because there are not so much planes that use the 777 gauges. Most of them would use the default 737 gauges instead. Everytime I tried a FS9 liner in my FSX, I had to edit the panel to link to the 737_800, instead of 737_400 Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Aug 31st, 2010 at 5:51pm

cx826   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!

Gender: male
Posts: 30
*****
 
Thanks Daube, is the above steps the exact steps to keep the original 777VC (NOT the 737 panel) that would make it work in FSX?
I know im stupid but do you have a video or a link that would help guide me do it?

Also I tried FS2004 at my friends house, its super fast, can you use the mouse as your joystick, my friend had one, i dont, I cant find the button that helps you switch to the mouse control
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 5:19am

Daube   Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)

Gender: male
Posts: 5833
*****
 
Forget the mouse control, you won't be able to fly this way.
Get a real joystick, no need to take the top of the top, a simple joystick with throttle control and rudder control will already be very good.

Concerning the above steps, yes they make the 777 work in FSX. I did that with my FSX Acceleration for example.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 11:39am

cx826   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!

Gender: male
Posts: 30
*****
 
Simple Joystick with throttle and rudder? Wow thats simple enough Tongue
My definition of simple is just a joystick with nothing else Tongue

Thanks
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print