Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Current Flight Simulator Series
›
Flight School
› ILS pattern speeds
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
ILS pattern speeds (Read 1038 times)
Nov 20
th
, 2009 at 9:46pm
snippyfsxer
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 404
I'm not a real world pilot, only a fake one, so I pose this question to those who are:
Using a generic Twin Engine GA aircraft:
Using a generic pattern that has a procedure turn and a LOM:
What speeds (Vso reference is fine) should I aim for as I approach the IAF?
As I enter the procedure turn?
Approaching the FAF?
Final approach to threshold?
general flap deployments (i.e first notch, at the turn outbound, or whatever)?
I know this is an extraordinarily general question, but there must be some rule of thumb. I gather that real pilots fly the approach at a much higher speed than if they were just going around the circuit VFR and that the standard Vso1.3 is really only a threshold speed, at least in IFR?. For instance I read some real world tutorial where the guy flys the Twin Comanche at 120knots all the way down and throws the flaps down at the last minute for a threshold speed of ~80knots. Additionally, I gather from reading the manual of the wonderful DA Cheyenne that you properly approach at around 130knots, but pull it back to around 100 to actually land? I would like to hear from several different r/l pilots, if possible, to see how they do it personally. (its not like Microsoft is going to yank my Sim-Pilot certificate if I don't do it right, but I prefer to do it the real way)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Nov 20
th
, 2009 at 10:48pm
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
I have no twin experience, but in 172s, I usually fly everything after the IAF and until the last few hundred feet at 90 kts because it's easy to figure out time to distance calcs in my head (@90kts: 1.5nm per 1 min), and MAP timing is done at 30kt intervals starting at 60 kts (up to 180 kts), so you don't have to try to figure out the timing if you're flying at something in-between. Also, waiting until you have the runway in sight to slow down means your MAP timing won't be off if you slow down too soon.
Speed is really up to you and what the airplane can do. Don't fly too fast that you can't slow down when you need to, or you exceed your gear/flap speeds and don't fly too slow that you fall out of the sky. Usually fly cruise until IAF, then approach speed (60m 90, 120, 150, or 180 kts) from IAF to runway in sight/final approach, then fly 1.3Vso as final approach speed.
Also, be prepared to fly faster or slower than you're used to. I've flown ILS's at 120 kts because ATC asked us to keep the speed up and you may want to fly slower for other reasons that I can't really think of right now.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Nov 20
th
, 2009 at 11:30pm
Splinter562
Offline
Colonel
Tampa, FL
Gender:
Posts: 217
I'm in nearly the same camp as Mobius for light GA. I fly most of the approach at cruise speed. Full approaches are a nearly a cross country in and of themselves, so it's best to setup for a cruise configuration.
When I slow down to an approach speed depends on the approach I'm flying. For approaches with lots of tight maneuvering, like many VOR approaches for small airports, I'll slow down at the Initial Approach Fix (IAF). For approaches built for jets at bigger airport, I'll wait until I'm approaching the Final Approach Fix (FAF) to slow down. Sometimes, on ILSs with miles between the FAF and the runway, I'll keep the speed up until I'm on short final.
So, for as far as a "rule-of-thumb" for approach speeds:
Light single - 90-100 KTS
Light multi - 100-120 KTS
Here's my general order of operations:
IAF - Cruise or slowing to approach speed
Procedure turn - Cruise or approach speed
FAF - Approach speed, gear down
Runway environment in sight (or short final) - Slowing to normal final approach speed, extend flaps to desired setting for landing when inside white arc.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Nov 21
st
, 2009 at 7:45pm
snippyfsxer
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 404
Excellent! Thanks for the info. I'm happy to say thats how I've been doing it, but I wasn't sure
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Nov 22
nd
, 2009 at 7:43am
flaminghotsauce
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 181
I go the opposite direction. My instructors used to ask me why I didn't slow down more?
When doing instrument approaches with procedure turns, trying to stay inside the ten mile radius with a twin at cruise isn't logical. This is a safety issue, as that ten miles is your protection at the altitude on the approach.
I had the most trouble with NDB approaches carrying too much speed. We had one approach where we had four miles between the final approach fix and the runway, and had to lose, I forget, 1800' ? before reaching the runway. Slow down! In the 172, 90 kts as mentioned above makes it easier to time the approach. I use that as my max speed in that airplane!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Nov 22
nd
, 2009 at 8:00am
BSW727
Offline
Colonel
Please upload all images
to SimV.
Inside a Boeing 727
Gender:
Posts: 202
I was taught at that speed as well in the 172 & Mooney.
Sometimes faster at larger airports or they won't let you in if they can't sequence you during high traffic (big aluminum tube) periods.
The first time I was told to "keep your speed up, 737 in trail", I thought WTF?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Nov 22
nd
, 2009 at 11:13pm
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
BSW727 wrote
on Nov 22
nd
, 2009 at 8:00am:
I was taught at that speed as well in the 172 & Mooney.
Sometimes faster at larger airports or they won't let you in if they can't sequence you during high traffic (big aluminum tube) periods.
The first time I was told to "keep your speed up, 737 in trail", I thought WTF?
I've had that too. I rode right seat on a flight to O'Hare a few months ago and our cruise speed on the way down was 135 kts and we were asked to maintain 160 kts on the approach because everyone else was flying the approach at 200 kts. We got 1 mile out and dumped all gear and flaps to get down to our final approach speed. That was interesting.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jun 29
th
, 2010 at 6:46pm
Andy Hughes
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!
Silverton, Oregon
Gender:
Posts: 5
Twins are different.
You need to land the twin at the speed that you can go-around on ONE ENGINE.
That's usually called "blue line", it's Vyse - Vy single engine, and it's usually (almost always) faster than Vy.
in a C310 for example, Vy is like 90kts, but blue line is 120.
You end up almost driving the plane onto the runway and not cutting power until the wheels touch.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jul 1
st
, 2010 at 9:23pm
olderndirt
Offline
Colonel
Flying is PFM
Rochester, WA
Gender:
Posts: 3574
Andy Hughes wrote
on Jun 29
th
, 2010 at 6:46pm:
Twins are different.
You need to land the twin at the speed that you can go-around on ONE ENGINE.
That's usually called "blue line", it's Vyse - Vy single engine, and it's usually (almost always) faster than Vy.
in a C310 for example, Vy is like 90kts, but blue line is 120.
You end up almost driving the plane onto the runway and not cutting power until the wheels touch.
Things have changed since 1970 - when I got my MEL. Landings were always straightforward, no speed requirements other than be comfortably above the stall. Takeoff, however, required blueline speed.
THIS IS NOT A PANAM CLIPPER
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School ««
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.