Hey everyone, great to be on this forum.
I have a dilemma: should I or should I not upgrade my CPU to E8600?
Currently I use E4500 with ASUS P5B motherboard along with 2 gigs of RAM and 8600GT graphics card.
I max out my settings except some (scenery densities are "very dense", not "extremely dense"; also for the weather settings I use the "Ultra high" preset with detailed clouds set to maximum). And I use 4XAA and set traffic to 100%.
The FPS I get from VC at the LAX is around 35-40 with stock 747, but with PMDG 747 it's something like 21-26 (mostly low-ish 20s).
I would buy the E8600 processor if that would get me 30-40% higher FPS figures, but I have my reservations. I mean, I read (even on this forum) people stating that they get those kind of FPSs with E8600 processors, not with E4500s.
Not to mention the fact that the problem could be easily solved if there was a patch for the FS9 that makes it use multiple CPU cores.
Maybe it would be helpful if I rephrased my question: what kind of hardware would I need to run the most demanding scenario in FS9, with FPS that
never dips below 40? I'm talking about things like LAX or Dallas airport, totally maxed settings, PMDG Boeing 747, and AA & AF at least 4X.
Any suggestion from people with experience would be appreciated.
Regards
Ivan