Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Poll Poll
Question: Which heavy cargo/transport plane is more eye pleasing?

C-5    
  4 (12.5%)
C-17    
  11 (34.4%)
C-141    
  5 (15.6%)
An-225    
  9 (28.1%)
An-124    
  0 (0.0%)
Other    
  3 (9.4%)




Total votes: 32
« Created by: Aerophile on: Jun 16th, 2007 at 8:07pm »

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Which one is more attractive? (Read 752 times)
Jun 16th, 2007 at 8:07pm

Aerophile   Offline
Colonel
CFI looking for higher
Earth

Gender: male
Posts: 721
*****
 
As the result of a recent thread and raw boredom, I decided to post this poll and find out which airplane you find more eye pleasing.  If you select "other", post a reply and tell us what airplane (in this category) you had in mind and a link to it on a.net if you can.

Below I have listed links to pictures of these airplanes in their respective order to help you out... 

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1217573/M/

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1222343/M/

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1216383/M/

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1211693/M/

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0174324/M/
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jun 16th, 2007 at 10:36pm

a1   Offline
Colonel
Tied In A Knot I Am

Gender: male
Posts: 8217
*****
 
Well I like the C-130. Looks so soothing to me.  Kiss
 

...
790i : QX9650 : 4Gb DDR3 : GeForce 8800 GTX : 1 WD Raptor : 1 WD VelociRaptor 150
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jun 16th, 2007 at 10:59pm

bok269   Offline
Colonel
I've become a badger lover.
Make badgers not war!!
HPN

Gender: male
Posts: 1461
*****
 
I think what this shows us is that transport planes are designed form before function.  WE find them attractive because of what they do.  For example, the 747 is sa beautiful bird because it has a great design.  The An-225 is a great plane because it is such a feat.  But it is pretty ugly.

My vote went for the C-17.  I hope Boeing goes ahead with the commercial version.  That will look great in UPS colors.
 

Check out my around the world tour!
&&http://fsxaroundtheworld.blogspot.com/
&&Reality is wrong; Dreams are for real.  -Tupac&&&&No bird soars too high, if he soars with his own wings.  -William Blake&&&&The way I see it, you can either work for a living or you can fly airplanes. Me, I'd rather fly.  -Len Morgan&&&&To invent an airplane is nothing. To build an airplane is something. But to fly ... is everything.  -Otto Lilienthal&&&&
I will not be silenced by a stupid badger!
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jun 17th, 2007 at 7:28am

JA 37 Viggen   Offline
Colonel
I like to fly deltas,
trainers, and airliners.
KORH

Gender: male
Posts: 252
*****
 
Well the Antonovs are just ugly. The C-17 is fat. The C-5 is ok. The C-130 is also good. Mine went to the C-141. It looks beautiful minus the refueling hump. Tongue
 

&&&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jun 17th, 2007 at 7:35am

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
An-225. But I do like the C-17 though... Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jun 17th, 2007 at 8:15am

Omag 2.0   Offline
Colonel
No badger comes close!
Somewhere, Belgium

Gender: male
Posts: 11985
*****
 
AN 225... but that's my personal opinion...  Wink
 

&&...&&&&Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be&&&&Or go straight to Omag's Album
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jun 17th, 2007 at 9:23am
CharlottesDad   Ex Member

 
An-225 for me too..

On a side note your links to the photos of the 2 Antonovs are the wrong way round, and shouldn't this be Real Aviation?  Wink

Rob the Pedant.  Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Jun 17th, 2007 at 9:41am

matt2190   Offline
Colonel
Pittsburgh,PA

Gender: male
Posts: 1539
*****
 
It was between the C-17 and the AN-225. I chose the C-17 in the end.
 

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.2 GHz&&2 GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8500&&8800GTX 768MB&&22" Monitor&&Vista Ultimate
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Jun 17th, 2007 at 10:27am
Björn   Ex Member

 
"Other" -> C-27
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Jun 17th, 2007 at 11:04am

Aerophile   Offline
Colonel
CFI looking for higher
Earth

Gender: male
Posts: 721
*****
 
Björn wrote on Jun 17th, 2007 at 10:27am:
"Other" -> C-27


I don't believe the C-27 is considered a "heavy" aircraft and if I'm not mistaken the C-130 isn't either.  But then again I don't suppose I specified that did I?  I originally did and then my web browser gave me some trouble and I had to start all over again.  Oh well.  Both are great aircraft though.  I'll be seeing more of the C-27s at my airport here shortly.  L-3 Communications was just awarded a defense contract involving the C-27 for the US Army and Air Force.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Jun 17th, 2007 at 11:40am
Björn   Ex Member

 
Hey, it carries stuff from A to B. Not as much as a C-5 'tho but still more than most other military aircraft. Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Jun 17th, 2007 at 3:31pm

pepper_airborne   Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands

Posts: 2390
*****
 
I think the 225 is pretty Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print