Quote:"Microsoft does not compete on the merits. Microsoft doesn't let users choose ... it chooses itself what users will have as product."
From the link Hagar posted
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4937840.stmI don't see what that lawyer is talking about, not letting the users choose.
My choices
Firefox
I use Musicmatch (third party) media player
Various third party Email programs not Outlook
Nod32 third party AntiVirus
etc... seems I as a user have many choices.
Another choice I have made as anyone else can is to use Windows
Now to quote the other complaints:
Quote:Microsoft licensed its operating system more cheaply to computer makers such as Dell and Compaq, if they exclusively installed its software.
Very smart business decision that they try to make sound evil. Most companies will offer great discounts on multiple sales or bulk orders.
Quote:When IBM refused to drop sales of its own rival operating system and software packages, it lost millions of dollars worth of sales by not receiving the crucial details of Windows 95 until 15 minutes before it launched. Other PC makers had computers with it installed and ready to ship.
Sounds like IBM screwed up themselves
Quote:But the key element involved the way in which Microsoft forced its Internet Explorer browser to leadership in a market which had been dominated by Netscape's Navigator
Quote:The trial heard that Microsoft not only gave away Internet Explorer but also "bundled" it into its Windows operating system, forcing manufacturers to pre-load it on to their computers.
Even if users wanted to use Navigator instead, the trial heard that its performance was not as quick, and that Internet Explorer would be triggered as the default browser for a variety of functions.
Its part of the OS you load the OS and you load the features it comes with , performance loss of another browser is crap and any person with the least bit of computer knowledge knows how to change default settings.
Seems the Navigator guys were mad that they got competition. After all was there a fuss over Netscape's dominance prior to IE?
So sorry I don't see any case at all, I am not a MS fanboy although I use and enjoy many of their products, but many I also refuse to use that is my choice. Just like you have a choice you don't like it then go elsewhere there is Apple.
I don't see it as a monopoly MS came in at the right time with a product that no one could match and to this day still can't.
Do you see the Governments getting into sports? You know your favorite team sucks becasue the other team has better players, well better get rid of that teams players becasue it is unfair to the rest, same scenario.
It is a business and that is what businesses do they are in it to dominate and make money, to be in business for any other reason is bound to end in failure.
It is free enterprise , problem is no one has yet been able to come out with the next "Windows" to put MS back down on a even playing field, monopoly it is not, domination it is