Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Current Flight Simulator Series
›
Flight Simulator X
› There is no denying...
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
There is no denying... (Read 845 times)
Oct 23
rd
, 2006 at 8:54pm
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
Since we've been having a string of negative around here, I just like to make a thread that points to the positive side of FSX.
The following are FSX-based features that FS9 will NEVER support:
1. 18,000-mile height barrier which allows the user to travel beyond low-earth orbit and better enjoy trips in a SR-71 Blackbird [the hot rod of jet travel IMO].
2. The capacity to finally reach the poles. Therefore, no more invisible barriers near the poles.
3. Skin and bones that are both animated using inverse kenetics [ie: wing flex] and are affected by the wind [ie: wind flags].
4. Moving surface platforms that allow you to land on them as they're moving.
No, this thread is not about the graphics. It's about the features that you don't normally see in a screenshot. If you like to talk about how bad a stupid ground texture looks in the US or how ugly the UK appears to be in FSX, then do that on another thread as this thread is about non-graphical features.
This thread is also NOT about performance. If you like to talk about that, do it another thread.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Oct 23
rd
, 2006 at 8:57pm
SkyNoz
Offline
Colonel
Project Kfir!
Gender:
Posts: 1720
Quote:
4. Moving surface platforms that allow you to land on them as they're moving.
I've had a thought and possibal project that I might persue, which is doing a aircraft carrier with functional Ramps that rise and fall, to the lower deck. Do you agree with my hypothesis, Kat?
Project Kfir!&&
&&
My Gmax page
&&Aircraft modeler/Aircarft painter&&&&Aye the key!&&[GeneralEngineData]&&//0=Piston, 1=Jet, 2=None, 3=Helo-Turbine, 4=Rocket, 5=Turboprop
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Oct 23
rd
, 2006 at 8:58pm
flyboy 28
Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 13323
Quote:
I've had a thought and possibal project that I might persue, which is doing a aircraft carrier with functional Ramps that rise and fall, to the lower deck. Do you think that is possibal?
I think it's been tried in FS9 with minimal success. If you want to give a shot for FSX I'd support it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Oct 23
rd
, 2006 at 8:59pm
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
Quote:
I've had a thought and possibal project that I might persue, which is doing a aircraft carrier with functional Ramps that rise and fall, to the lower deck. Do you think that is possibal?
My knowledge with scenery is still limited, so I don't know.
FS95 or FS98 use to support rising and falling platforms, but they were jerky and are sometimes the cause of crashes in those versions.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Oct 23
rd
, 2006 at 9:00pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
No, this thread is not about the graphics. It's about the features that you don't normally see in a screenshot. If you like to talk about how bad a stupid ground texture looks in the US or how ugly the UK appears to be in FSX, then do that on another thread as this thread is about non-graphical features.
If that's what you think the complaints are about you're completely missing the point Kat.
Quote:
4. Moving surface platforms that allow you to land on them as they're moving.
This is hardly a new feature. We had it in CFS2 6 years ago.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Oct 23
rd
, 2006 at 9:01pm
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
Quote:
This is hardly a new feature. We had it in CFS2 6 years ago.
I'm talking FS series. Not CFS.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Oct 23
rd
, 2006 at 9:06pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I'm talking FS series. Not CFS.
Well, like it or not FS & CFS were originally the same program. CFS2 is FS7.5. If they'd developed this properly we could have had those moving landable platforms in FS2002.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Oct 23
rd
, 2006 at 9:09pm
SkyNoz
Offline
Colonel
Project Kfir!
Gender:
Posts: 1720
Quote:
Well, like it or not FS & CFS were originally the same program. CFS2 is FS7.5. If they'd developed this properly we could have had those moving landable platforms in FS2002.
They bothe imply different parameters, which only designers can really imply too. Which means, it' will require a altereation in it's function.
Project Kfir!&&
&&
My Gmax page
&&Aircraft modeler/Aircarft painter&&&&Aye the key!&&[GeneralEngineData]&&//0=Piston, 1=Jet, 2=None, 3=Helo-Turbine, 4=Rocket, 5=Turboprop
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Oct 23
rd
, 2006 at 9:15pm
Fly2e
Offline
Global Moderator
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere!
KFRG
Gender:
Posts: 199132
Quote:
Since we've been having a string of negative around here, I just like to make a thread that points to the positive side of FSX.
The following are FSX-based features that FS9 will NEVER support:
1. 18,000-mile height barrier which allows the user to travel beyond low-earth orbit and better enjoy trips in a SR-71 Blackbird [the hot rod of jet travel IMO].
2. The capacity to finally reach the poles. Therefore, no more invisible barriers near the poles.
3. Skin and bones that are both animated using inverse kenetics [ie: wing flex] and are affected by the wind [ie: wind flags].
4. Moving surface platforms that allow you to land on them as they're moving.
1. Don't care as I like to fly the bush!
2. Don't have any reason to fly to the barren poles of the earth.
3. Posky invented wing flex and to be honest, does not really add anything except a split second "wow" when the wings do flex.
4. Don't need to land on anything moving.
Ahhhhhh,
Love me FS9!
Intel Core i7 Extreme Processor 965, 4.2GHz/8MB L3 Cache, Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Intel X58 Chipset Cross
Fire & SLI Supported, Mushkin Redline 6GB (3X2GB) Memory, eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285, Vista 64.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 12:18am
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
My, my, my. Just by looking at all these posts, I can tell that this forum is really feeling down at the moment.
Why am I not surprised?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 2:15am
Bindoe
Ex Member
fs9 dosn't support shaders
fs9 dosn't support missions
fs9 has bad camera system (excluding Active Camera)
fs9 has bad studders
fs9 dosn't support bump mapping
fs9 dosn't support shadows from VC.
fs9 has terrible low visability weather, with high frame hit from clouds. fsX has no hit. (512x512 DXT3 textures on X850)
fs9 dosn't have ships driving around
fs9 has bad sky blending
fs9 has
terrible
sound
fs9 terrain engine is weak
fs9 UI is bad
fs9 multiplayer is one work, terrible
fs9 now supports DDS
fs9 reflections aren't very good
fs9 dosn't support shared cockpits
fs9 has bad trees
fsX corrects all of them
Eh. Only disadvantages are:
Low frame rate
messed up terrain in some areas
bad terrain textures sometimes
Quote:
3. Posky invented wing flex and to be honest, does not really add anything except a split second "wow" when the wings do flex.
The wings don't bounce correctly and the wing flex animations aren't smooth. (Not saying bad things about POSKY, only the fs9 engine).
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 5:09am
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
My thoughts Bindoe and kathahu.
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 5:20am
vololiberista
Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia
Posts: 1042
Quote:
fs9 has terrible sound
RUBBISH!! Get yourself a decent sound card.
I run FS9 with 7.1 surround Creative Audigy. When I open the throttle of the 4 conway jets on my VC10 I get the same roar and crackle that takes me back to when they were in commercial service.
Reverse thrust has to be heard to be believed!!!
If anyone has heard Concorde take off then they will know what I mean!!!
Vololiberista
Andiamo in Italia&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 5:57am
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
Quote:
RUBBISH!! Get yourself a decent sound card.
I run FS9 with 7.1 surround Creative Audigy. When I open the throttle of the 4 conway jets on my VC10 I get the same roar and crackle that takes me back to when they were in commercial service.
Reverse thrust has to be heard to be believed!!!
If anyone has heard Concorde take off then they will know what I mean!!!
Vololiberista
FS9 doesnt fully support surround sound anyway
What it can do is to emulate the sound so it is distributed to 4 speakers (like when we listen to Mp3's on 5.1 systems...mp3 is only stereo)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 6:52am
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
Without a expensive speaker set makes the FSX sound way better then the FS9 sound.
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 7:46am
Bindoe
Ex Member
Quote:
RUBBISH!! Get yourself a decent sound card.
I run FS9 with 7.1 surround Creative Audigy. When I open the throttle of the 4 conway jets on my VC10 I get the same roar and crackle that takes me back to when they were in commercial service.
Reverse thrust has to be heard to be believed!!!
If anyone has heard Concorde take off then they will know what I mean!!!
Vololiberista
Uh. I have a Sound Blaster X-fi Xtreme Music.
My point was fs9 didn't have soround sound, while fsX does.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 8:22am
Fly2e
Offline
Global Moderator
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere!
KFRG
Gender:
Posts: 199132
Quote:
fs9 doesn't support shaders
fs9 dosn't support missions
fs9 has bad camera system (excluding Active Camera)
fs9 has bad studders
fs9 dosn't support bump mapping
fs9 dosn't support shadows from VC.
fs9 has terrible low visibility weather, with high frame hit from clouds. fsX has no hit. (512x512 DXT3 textures on X850)
fs9 dosn't have ships driving around
fs9 has bad sky blending
fs9 has terrible sound
fs9 terrain engine is weak
fs9 UI is bad
fs9 multiplayer is one work, terrible
fs9 now supports DDS
fs9 reflections aren't very good
fs9 dosn't support shared cockpits
fs9 has bad trees
fsX corrects all of them
Eh. Only disadvantages are:
Low frame rate
messed up terrain in some areas
bad terrain textures sometimes
First off I find it funny that so many newbies feel they need to "support" Microsoft's new flight Sim. It is like they need to be accepted by the company or something. God forbid if they have something negative to say about it. I commend Rollerball for voicing his honest opinion! I also find it funny that somebody can rattle off a dozen or so "things" that the new version has that in reality, most can't even enjoy!!
And the joke here is, My machine seems to be doing very, very well with FSX. I don't have any problems at the moment with it. That would have to do with many things, one having the
www.fs-gs.com
service on my machine! There are the talked about issues but like I said, I will not really fly it until DX10 & Vista comes out. Then and only then is when I will move over to FSX.
1. I don't need shaders. It may add to the realism and will like it when taking my professional screenshots for the payware companies, but it is not a "selling point"
2. Missions, who needs missions? Yes they are cool, but if you are creative, invent your own mission. After a while the missions will be just like the old "flight plans".
3. Not too worried about the FS9 camera system as I have had both Active Camera & Walk & Follow installed for years now.
4. I do not ever, ever have one single stutter. My system is locked at 34fps[s, way above the 21 where your eyes will actually notice a stutter. And I repeat, I never have stutters.
5. Bump mapping..... read my answer to #1.
6. Weather? HAHAHAHAHA, my system is running the best real time weather out there! Flight environment coupled with Active sky give me the most realistic, real world weather and clouds around. It is one of the best things about my machine. Incredible clouds, multiple layers, real fog lines, real visibility. I can't say enough about it!
7. Ships driving around Ehhrrrmm, I have had ships driving around my seas for over 4 years. It isn't that difficult to create to download from the web. .
8. Terrain engine too weak! Not for me! Go get yourself a lifetime membership at
www.fsgenesis.com
and then tell me what you think. My mountains are high, my values are low and my aircraft is right there with them. 38m for USA, Canada & Puerto Rico, 19 for parts of Canada. The terrain is your "base" when building your Sim. It is also one of the most important parts of my Sim.
9. My AI is not bads when I have "Ultimate Traffic" clogging up my skies!!
10. I only do multi-player with close friends!
11. Now supports DDS, OK.
12. Reflections are the best around. Come fly in my world!
13. Shared cockpits, Hey I am the driver so go get your own!
14. Trees? Believe me, my trees are so abundant and real, I needed to get myself a chainsaw and a dozen virtual beavers!
Quote:
Eh. Only disadvantages are:
Low frame rate
messed up terrain in some areas
bad terrain textures sometimes
HAHAHAHA! You mean basically the important things when flying? First off, If you have bad frame rates you might as well not even be using it. How real can it be or how do you perfect trying to land with crosswinds when you are about to touch down and your system is stuttering? I just don't get it? You need to have a fluid machine to fly, learn and enjoy the hobby we all like!
Messed up terrain. That will not fly with me!! My terrain NEEDS TOP BE Perfect!! No "double coastlines, offset objects, unrealistic terrain is a big NO!
Bad terrain textures are a thing of the past with Ground Environment Pro and Ultimate Terrain.
Off course you will need to add everything below to achieve what I have just described.
Oh yeah, and it is about $5,000 more than FSX
Intel Core i7 Extreme Processor 965, 4.2GHz/8MB L3 Cache, Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Intel X58 Chipset Cross
Fire & SLI Supported, Mushkin Redline 6GB (3X2GB) Memory, eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285, Vista 64.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 8:22am
Fly2e
Offline
Global Moderator
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere!
KFRG
Gender:
Posts: 199132
Microsoft Flight Simulator Installation
World Mesh, Terrain & Environment
SIMULATOR BUILD.
1. Microsoft Flight Simulator “A Century of Flight” 4 discs DONE
2. FS 9 “Update Patch”. DONE
3. FSUIPC Module DONE
4. FS9 “No CD Patch”. DONE
5. FS Global 2005 78 Meter World Mesh (Updates from Site) DONE
6. Real Scene USA, Puerto Rico & Hawaii 38meter Mesh DONE
7. FS Genesis Landclass ALL UPDATES! DONE
8. FS Genesis 38m Cordillera Mesh (Update in folder) see the tongass update DONE
9. FS Genesis 38m Yukon Territory Mesh & 2nd Disc DONE
10. FS Genesis 9.6m Grand Canyon Mesh DONE
11. FS Genesis 38m Mexico Mesh DONE
12. FS Genesis 9.6m Hawaiian Islands Mesh DONE
13. FS Genesis 38m Atlantic Canada Mesh DONE
14. FS Genesis 19m Alps Mesh DONE
14. FS Genesis 10m Monument Valley DONE
14. FS Genesis Worldwide Buffer Mesh Lod4/5/6 ALL Updates DONE
15. Install Anti Virus Software (Adware, Nod32, CWShredder,Reg Mechanic) DONE
16. Install O&O Defrag DONE
17. Ultimate Terrain USA DONE
18. Ultimate Terrain Canada Alaska DONE
19. Ultimate Terrain Europe DONE
19. Install HOTAS Cougar Joystick Software DONE
20. Flight Environment DONE
21. Sound Environment DONE
22. Ground Environment (all updates) DONE
23. FS Configurator DONE
24. Vancouver FSAddon DONE
25. Aerosoft Freight Scenery DONE
26. Aerosoft Freight Dogs the Scenery ) DONE
27. Misty Fjords FS Addon (Install Misty Patch) DONE
28. Caribe Mesh (Antilles & 3 other islands) DONE
29. Ultimate Traffic (All updates & schedules) DONE
30. New Zealand 20m by Red Baron Ent. DONE
31. New Zealand TOPO Scenery for 20m DONE
32. New Zealand Godzone Airport Rotorua DONE
33. New Zealand Godzone Airport Tauranga DONE
34. Roads & Rails of new Zealand DONE
35. Flight Scenery Rhode Island DONE
36. Rhode Island Patches
http://www.flightscenery.com/flightzone01/links.htm
DONE
37. FS Addon Orcas Island (afcad update) (manual install!!) DONE
38. Aerosoft Martha’s Vineyard Scenery (Beech aircraft installs also) DONE
39. Active Camera (New and patch} DONE
40. Vistas Australis & .Net Framework Software DONE
41. Airport Environment V7 DONE
42. FS Autostart DONE
43. Radio Tower Lighting DONE
44. Snow Ice Runways DONE
45. Touchdown Effect DONE
46. France VFR Flight Riviera [Base pack) DONE
47. France VFR Flight Riviera [autogen pack]
48. Salt Lake City FSAddon (texture patch) DONE
49. Newark Imaginesim (Afcad package) (not good) DONE
50. Aircraft Sound Enhancements DONE
51. Nav light package [must do!!] DONE
52. Airport Lighting V2 BEST! [there are 3 others but all halo.bmp} DONE
53. Aerosoft Cape Canaveral DONE
54. Aerosoft France 1 DONE
55. Aerosoft France 2 DONE
56. Aerosoft Germany 1 DONE
57. Aerosoft Germany 2 DONE
58. Aerosoft Germany 3 DONE
59. Aerosoft Germany 4 DONE
60. Aerosoft VFR Berlin DONE
61. Aerosoft Mega Frankfurt Airport DONE
62. Aerosoft Life in Elba (fly the lakes) DONE
63. Aerosoft Manhattan DONE
64. Aerosoft Islands of Malta DONE
65. France VFR La Reunion DONE
66. Fly the Lakes “Cloud9” DONE
67. Bremmerton DONE
68. S10 Chelan Muni (patch?) DONE
69. All Coastal Ship Enhancements DONE
70. Gerish Greys Trees V3 DONE
71. Vancouver Airport DONE
72. Lago - Georender Emma Field DONE
73. Lago - Georender 1 Ranger Creek-Flying Ranch DONE
74. Lago - Georender 2 Bryce Canyon DONE
75. Lago – Georender 3 Diamond Point DONE
76. Lago - Georender 4 Darrington Muni DONE
77. Lago – Georender 5 Forks DONE
78. Lago – Georender 6 Strom Sky Harbor DONE
79. Lago – Georender Harvey Monroe DONE
80. Lago – Georender Wenache Skykomish DONE
81. Lago – Georender Honolulu DONE
82. France VFR Corsica DONE
83. Wonderful Rio DONE
84. Mt Rainer Scenery DONE
85. Aerosoft VLNK DONE
86. Flight Zone LFRD DONE
87. France VFR Mayotte Island DONE
88. FlyTampa Midway DONE
89. FlyTampa San Francisco DONE
90. FlyTampa Seattle DONE
91. FlyTampa Tampa DONE
92. FlyTampa Dubai DONE
93. FlyTampa Miami DONE
94. FlyTampa San Diego DONE
95. FlyTampa Boston Logan DONE
96. California Coast Scenery “CCCOAST4” DONE
97. Simflyers Pearson Toronto DONE
98. Imagine Sim New Orleans DONE
99. Bridge replacements DONE
100. Republic Airport KFRG DONE
100. Swiss 2004 (nova Gold installed at this time] DONE
101. Weather Scenes DONE
102. Thunder Bay Ontario DONE
103. Ontario Three Airports (1 package) DONE
100. Etretat DONE
104. BaiedeSomme DONE
105. Dieppe DONE
106. Italy Roads DONE
107. Italy Waters DONE
108. Italy Landclass DONE
109. All versions of Ultimate GA DONE
110. Teteboro DONE
111. Puerto Rico & Virgin Islands roads DONE
112. St. Thomas Afcad & Landclass DONE
113. France 38meter Mesh DONE
114. France VFR Quibeon DONE
115. France VFR Ouesant DONE
116. IWI #3 1&2&4 need to be figured out! DONE
117. Puerto Rico All Adons DONE
118. Grand Case St Maartin TFFG (inside Antilles Carribe folder) DONE
119. St. Martin Boats (inside Antilles Carribe folder) DONE
120. ENVMap (nice reflective texture] DONE
121. Auckland Scenery Add on
122. BORA BORA DONE
123. French Polynesia Archipelago DONE
124. Real New Zealand Tekapo & Wanaka DONE
125. 5S9 Valley View Oregon DONE
126. Dover Airforce Base DONE
127. Sitka ,Alaska DONE
128. Tongass Fjords DONE
129. Dave’s SITKA ADD ON (in the fsaddon tongass folder) DONE
130. Tongass Fjords & FS Cargo & Tongass updateV1 DONE
131. Maine DONE
132. 4th of July DONE
133. Sottish VFR DONE
134. Chambery DONE
135. Meigs 06 DONE
136. Scandanavian 2 Airports Aerosoft DONE
137. Salzburg RGFlight DONE
138. Austrian Airports DONE
139. KJFK Addon DONE
140. Georender Yosemite DONE
141. LaGuardia DONE
142. Grove Washington StAte.
143. TREEGEN DONE
144. Long Island Airports DONE
145. FlightZone Portland DONE
Intel Core i7 Extreme Processor 965, 4.2GHz/8MB L3 Cache, Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Intel X58 Chipset Cross
Fire & SLI Supported, Mushkin Redline 6GB (3X2GB) Memory, eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285, Vista 64.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 9:05am
vololiberista
Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia
Posts: 1042
you don't get to use the sim much then!!!
I agree with every point, well put.
Vololiberista
Andiamo in Italia&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 11:38am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
So, FS9 with a lot of Paywares is better than FSX stock...Incredible.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 11:49am
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
This happens everytime a new FS comes out. When FS2k2 first came out and I got the Ti4600 card everyone was amazed by the quality you could get. I'm still using the same rig with FS9 and I've stopped posting screenshots 'cos mine are so pants compared with what everyone else is doing.
When I get my new rig next year I'm sure everyone will briefly be amazed out how good my screenies are and within 6 months everyone will be posting shots far better than mine....
This pattern of history repeating itself sometimes makes me dizzy! The software is nearly always ahead of the hardware. Just relax, enjoy your flying and have another beer
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 11:52am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
Off course you will need to add everything below to achieve what I have just described.
Oh yeah, and it is about $5,000 more than FSX
Indeed.
Not sure what point you're making there Dave but that's a lot of money by any standards. No wonder you're sticking with FS9. It's none of my business but it strikes me you could have a real PPL by now with what that cost you.
PS. I agreed with you up to this point.
Quote:
First off I find it funny that so many newbies feel they need to "support" Microsoft's new flight Sim. It is like they need to be accepted by the company or something. God forbid if they have something negative to say about it. I commend Rollerball for voicing his honest opinion! I also find it funny that somebody can rattle off a dozen or so "things" that the new version has that in reality, most can't even enjoy!!
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 12:08pm
Fly2e
Offline
Global Moderator
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere!
KFRG
Gender:
Posts: 199132
Quote:
Indeed. Not sure what point you're making there Dave but that's a lot of money by any standards. No wonder you're sticking with FS9. It's none of my business but it strikes me you could have a real PPL by now with what that cost you.
LOL Doug, I know
Quote:
PS. I agreed with you up to this point. Quote:First off I find it funny that so many newbies feel they need to "support" Microsoft's new flight Sim. It is like they need to be accepted by the company or something. God forbid if they have something negative to say about it. I commend Rollerball for voicing his honest opinion! I also find it funny that somebody can rattle off a dozen or so "things" that the new version has that in reality, most can't even enjoy!!
What part?
Intel Core i7 Extreme Processor 965, 4.2GHz/8MB L3 Cache, Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Intel X58 Chipset Cross
Fire & SLI Supported, Mushkin Redline 6GB (3X2GB) Memory, eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285, Vista 64.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 12:34pm
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
Quote:
fs9 dosn't support shaders
fs9 dosn't support missions
fs9 has bad camera system (excluding Active Camera)
fs9 has bad studders
fs9 dosn't support bump mapping
fs9 dosn't support shadows from VC.
fs9 has terrible low visability weather, with high frame hit from clouds. fsX has no hit. (512x512 DXT3 textures on X850)
fs9 dosn't have ships driving around
fs9 has bad sky blending
fs9 has
terrible
sound
fs9 terrain engine is weak
fs9 UI is bad
fs9 multiplayer is one work, terrible
fs9 now supports DDS
fs9 reflections aren't very good
fs9 dosn't support shared cockpits
fs9 has bad trees
fsX corrects all of them
Eh. Only disadvantages are:
Low frame rate
messed up terrain in some areas
bad terrain textures sometimes
The wings don't bounce correctly and the wing flex animations aren't smooth. (Not saying bad things about POSKY, only the fs9 engine).
I'm sorry, but one-third of what you listed there can be corrected with addons. Remember, the list I made consists of features that addons can't do in FS9.
As for the wing flex in POSKY and all other FS9 addons that use it, there is an issue with that. The FS9-based animations for the wing flex behaive in almost the same way as the landing gear. Notice how the wings in FS9 twitch up and down rapidly seconds before takeoff. In FSX, the wing flex doesn't have such an issue due to the inverse kenetics applied to them as opposed to standard animations done for FS9-based aircraft.
PS: You people need to slow down with the posts. I can't catch up.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 12:44pm
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Quote:
PS: You people need to slow down with the posts. I can't catch up.
That's the new FSX-style Natural Selection, you know.
First, FSX kills your PC, and then FSX forums kill you !
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 12:48pm
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
Quote:
That's the new FSX-style Natural Selection, you know.
First, FSX kills your PC, and then FSX forums kill you !
I think it's time for another round of injections.
Ok everyone, line up against the wall and roll up your sleeves.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 1:03pm
RollerBall
Ex Member
I think that with all the arguments and counter-arguments , agreements and disagreements these topics have been the most memorable that I can recall in the whole of my time here at SimV. Bearing in mind the language and cultural differences that exist and the potential there is for anger and misunderstandings between members, this is the forum at its best.
Long may it be so.
I don't know whether the level and quality of discussion is happening elsewhere - but I doubt it.
Now, where were we......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 1:05pm
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Quote:
I think that with all the arguments and counter-arguments , agreements and disagreements these topics have been the most memorable that I can recall in the whole of my time here at SimV. Bearing in mind the language and cultural differences that exist and the potential there is for anger and misunderstandings between members, this is the forum at its best.
Long may it be so.
I don't know whether the level and quality of discussion is happening elsewhere - but I doubt it.
Now, where were we......
Agree 100%
And I've seen some... "discussions" (?) on FS2004.com or avsim.com... and I'm very happy to be here.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 2:40pm
n_richardson05
Offline
Colonel
some where pretending
im flying
massachussets
Gender:
Posts: 285
aaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
If you dont like it dont buy it. if you like it buy it if you hate microsoft why are you here. and if you like microsoft get a girlfriend
and the point of this topic was to say nice things cant we respect the request
i like the backwords compatability and the shiny new aircraft
even if they are to complicated for my computer
big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right&&slew mode dose not count as flying&&737-700aholic
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 3:11pm
freedomhays
Offline
Colonel
I'll take on that chump,
and you fight the other
Catonsville, Md.
Posts: 650
And you an administrator,
Re: There is no denying...daaaaaaaaaaaa
&&&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #30 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 3:13pm
freedomhays
Offline
Colonel
I'll take on that chump,
and you fight the other
Catonsville, Md.
Posts: 650
They should keep a check on thease admin's...........
I see no credibility in this forum,
&&&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 3:27pm
Fly2e
Offline
Global Moderator
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere!
KFRG
Gender:
Posts: 199132
Neither do I
Intel Core i7 Extreme Processor 965, 4.2GHz/8MB L3 Cache, Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Intel X58 Chipset Cross
Fire & SLI Supported, Mushkin Redline 6GB (3X2GB) Memory, eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285, Vista 64.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 3:30pm
Tweek
Ex Member
Quote:
They should keep a check on thease admin's...........
I see no credibility in this forum,
Why? Because he voiced an opinion?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 3:56pm
JBaymore
Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!
Gender:
Posts: 10261
Quote:
They should keep a check on thease admin's...........
I see no credibility in this forum,
Checks? Checks for the admins.......
Send the BIG check to............ JBaymore
crediblessly yours,
.................john
Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M, Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 4:02pm
vololiberista
Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia
Posts: 1042
[quote author=pepper_airborne link=1161651272/0#14 date=1161687134]Without a expensive speaker set makes the FSX sound way better then the FS9 sound.[/quote]
Again RUBBISH, get a decent sound card!!!
You do realise that apart from the American accents and occasional errors the ATC voices are quite accurately done in FS9. That's how they sound in real life. Slightly high pitch and slightly Donald Duck. It's intentional in order to be heard more clearly above the noise of engines etc etc.
Also it really doesn't make much difference if you have 4 speakers or seven. FSX is not the latest Hollywood release. FS9 is still the better sim
Vololiberista
Andiamo in Italia&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 4:36pm
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
Quote:
Again RUBBISH, get a decent sound card!!!
You do realise that apart from the American accents and occasional errors the ATC voices are quite accurately done in FS9. That's how they sound in real life. Slightly high pitch and slightly Donald Duck. It's intentional in order to be heard more clearly above the noise of engines etc etc.
Also it really doesn't make much difference if you have 4 speakers or seven. FSX is not the latest Hollywood release. FS9 is still the better sim
Vololiberista
Actually, in terms of ATC, the voices are smoother than in FS9. Notice how I used the word "smoother" and not "smoothest".
The voices in FS9 sound like HAL from "2001: A Space Odessy" while the voices in FSX sound like the Computer from "Star Trek".
[HAL]
What - are - you - doing - Dave - ?
I - can't - let - you - do - that - Dave.
Day - See - Day - See - ...
[/HAL]
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 5:02pm
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
[quote author=vololiberista link=1161651272/30#34 date=1161720135]
Again RUBBISH, get a decent sound card!!!
You do realise that apart from the American accents and occasional errors the ATC voices are quite accurately done in FS9. That's how they sound in real life. Slightly high pitch and slightly Donald Duck. It's intentional in order to be heard more clearly above the noise of engines etc etc.
Also it really doesn't make much difference if you have 4 speakers or seven. FSX is not the latest Hollywood release. FS9 is still the better sim
Vololiberista[/quote]
The sounds in FS X is WAAAY superior.
Just compare both sims....put it in tower view and let the default 737's do fly by's.
Then come back and tell me which sim sounds most real!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 5:11pm
Tweek
Ex Member
[quote author=Nexus link=1161651272/30#36 date=1161723737]Just compare both sims....put it in tower view and let the default 737's do fly by's.
Then come back and tell me which sim sounds most real![/quote]
And how much of that is down to the sim, rather than a quality sound set?
Tell you what, for those of us who don't have FSX, would someone perhaps be able to record a short video clip of just that, in the two sims (with a decent sound set in FS9), to compare the sound? I'd like to hear the difference! :)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 5:14pm
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
I got onboard voli. So there is the big differance, FS9 compared to FSX on a onboard card with a headset is superior in all sights, when i first heard the 206 engines reving up i was bloody impressed.
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 5:19pm
vololiberista
Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia
Posts: 1042
Wow a 737 can do a fly by in FSX Wow!! I MUST rush out and buy a copy.
C'mon Fly bys are old hat. FLYII did them before you were out of your nappies. And as for ATC just download editvoicepack. Cheaper than spending money on a new sim just to hear marginally modified voices oh and I almost forgot watching a flyby Woweeeeeeeeee!!!
Vololiberista
PS and the elephants seen from 37,000feet double Woweeeeeeeeeeee
Andiamo in Italia&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #40 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 5:23pm
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
Its not about the flyby, read again, its about the sound differance......
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #41 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 5:47pm
vololiberista
Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia
Posts: 1042
Quote:
Its not about the flyby, read again, its about the sound differance......
I'm sorry I just don't believe you!
I have a good sound card well set up and with quite decent speakers. good enough to listen to good music, films etc., and in FS9 my jet engines and props are realistic.
I say again and again a top notch FS9 is still way ahead of FSX oops i mean FS9.3. All your arguments are totally unconvincing. Get a life and Get yourself a REAL flight and see the difference. Then maybe you'll understand what REAL pilots like myself get from a sim. REAL pilotswith REAL hours of training. Yes you've told everybody that you think the sun shines out of M(qualcosa)s's nether regions. The reality is that what comes out from there is a different colour and a different consistency. Everything you have quoted are nothing but marginal "improvements" that still do not excel FS9.
If and when Vista comes to Europe, If and when FSX works with DX10 as they "hope" it will then maybe in the graphics we'll see an improvement
Vololiberista
Andiamo in Italia&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #42 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 6:20pm
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
Quote:
All your arguments are totally unconvincing. Get a life and Get yourself a REAL flight and see the difference.
Done that
Quote:
Then maybe you'll understand what REAL pilots like myself get from a sim.
I'm a pilot too, whats your point...trying to show boat?
Quote:
REAL pilotswith REAL hours of training.
This is getting old, did you say you were a REAL pilot or did I just imagine that?
So you think the jet engine sound is realistic when you make tower view fly by in FS 9? Interesting....VERY interesting. Since I have heard both sims, and I'm competent enough to make a statement. Which opinion has more credibility?
a) My view, since I have heard them both
b) Your opinion, who has NEVER even heard the improved sound in FS X. Where is your fundamentals of your arguments? Personal bias?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #43 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 6:34pm
RollerBall
Ex Member
I'm staying well clear of this one..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #44 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 6:39pm
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
Roger, you had at least a valid point, since you have bought the game and found a serious glitch.
But Volo has yet to hear what I am talking about, and HE says that my arguments dont make sense. I'm sorry but I can't buy that attitude for one bit.
FS X is far from perfect, but one area where it excels (compared to FS X) is infact the sound department.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #45 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 7:54pm
Steve_Butka
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Poughkeepsie, NY
Gender:
Posts: 373
im taking a VERY slight graphics hit and only to the aircraft itself, i get great performance (maybe even better than FS9), the default aircraft in FSX are very nice this time around so I'm not worried about clogging it all up with add-ons jsut yet (to date i've only downloaded an Easyjet livery for the default 737), and the missions justbring a whole new aspect of FUN to the sim.
if you guys need better performance, buy more RAM, or a better vid card, and so on!
well that's my two cents
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #46 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 10:25pm
n_richardson05
Offline
Colonel
some where pretending
im flying
massachussets
Gender:
Posts: 285
ok i think there should be some kind of rule saying you cant complaine about somthing if you have never used it.
fsx is better than fs9. why its new and comparing a hevaly modified fs9 to the default fsx is just plane un fair. wait for some good addons to come out then start making those calls we have had the game for a week. we are yet to see what we can do with this system. just before 11 comes out a hevaly modified fsx will make fs9 look like poo
so why are you defending fs9 aneway there the same dam game just different vershion
one more time the puropse of this topic was to say nice things about fsx ok if you want to complaine start a fsx bashing thread
big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right&&slew mode dose not count as flying&&737-700aholic
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #47 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 10:44pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
FSX sound is better.. The difference in what you hear, relative to your position, is very distinct.. (that would really shine in a fly-by)
As far as sound quality goes .. card and speakers being equal.. it's all about the number and quality of the .wav files.. and the complexity of the sound.cfg.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #48 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 10:57pm
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
Quote:
ok i think there should be some kind of rule saying you cant complaine about somthing if you have never used it.
fsx is better than fs9. why its new and comparing a hevaly modified fs9 to the default fsx is just plane un fair. wait for some good addons to come out then start making those calls we have had the game for a week. we are yet to see what we can do with this system. just before 11 comes out a hevaly modified fsx will make fs9 look like poo
so why are you defending fs9 aneway there the same dam game just different vershion
one more time the puropse of this topic was to say nice things about fsx ok if you want to complaine start a fsx bashing thread
So far, the criticism has been nice and steady on this thread. And I like to keep it that way. IF anyone tries to derail this thread and turn it into another petty-argument discussion [we've had enough of those already] I'll ask one of the mods to
temperarly
lock this thread for another cool down.
In that case: Vololiberista, I'm keeping an eye on you as you seem to be walking a very fine line there. I know I have to respect your opinions, however you should respect other people's opinions as well. And so far, you don't seem to doing that.
Take my advice: Cool down, chill and relax, take a ritalin once a day and all will be fine.
And don't ever forget, Vololiberista: I handle your daily injections.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #49 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 11:07pm
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Quote:
In that case: Vololiberista, I'm keeping an eye on you as you seem to be walking a very fine line there. I know I have to respect your opinions, however you should respect other people's opinions as well. And so far, you don't seem to doing that.
Take my advice: Cool down, chill and relax, take a ritalin once a day and all will be fine.
And don't ever forget, Vololiberista: I handle your daily injections.
Forget that. Vololiberista is just able to say the following things, without bringing any argumentation:
- FSX is FS9.3
- FSX is a downgrade
- FSX is not better than FS9 because the graphics are not good
- FSX has nothing more than FS9 excepted elephants
That's it basically.
If you try to discuss with him by bringing real arguments, he will ignore your answer, or leave the topic and start again in another one. That doesn't really help the discussions, I would say.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #50 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 11:09pm
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
Quote:
Forget that. Vololiberista is just able to say the following things, without bringing any argumentation:
GOOD! Let's keep it that way.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #51 -
Oct 24
th
, 2006 at 11:45pm
BAW0343
Offline
Colonel
No, now go away or I shall
taunt you a second time
Mesa, AZ
Gender:
Posts: 3294
Ok, so I totally agree anyone is alowed to voice an opinion, but coming into the FSX forum, in a PRO FSX thread and trying to smash it is not the thing to do.
Vololiberista, if you dont like FSX, simply stay out of the FSX forum... let us who havent spent $5000 on FS9 enjoy ourselves. I personally feal FSX's sound, flight dynamics, and most textures are 100x better then FS9. Now your argueing FS9
PAYWARE ADD-ONS
with FSX
DEFAULT
not exactly a fair competition.
In a few months I garuntee FSX will blow FS9 out of its unrealistic water. And yes you needed to buy/download updates to FS9, we will need to do the same with FSX. Yes you need a monster computer to run it on full but only time will fix that. More capeable cards are being developed and soon will be affordable to the general public. Untill then FS9 PAYWARE will be better then FSX DEFAULT.
just my 2 cents...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #52 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 1:19am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Quote:
Ok, so I totally agree anyone is alowed to voice an opinion, but coming into the FSX forum, in a PRO FSX thread and trying to smash it is not the thing to do.
Vololiberista, if you dont like FSX, simply stay out of the FSX forum... let us who havent spent $5000 on FS9 enjoy ourselves. I personally feal FSX's sound, flight dynamics, and most textures are 100x better then FS9. Now your argueing FS9
PAYWARE ADD-ONS
with FSX
DEFAULT
not exactly a fair competition.
In a few months I garuntee FSX will blow FS9 out of its unrealistic water. And yes you needed to buy/download updates to FS9, we will need to do the same with FSX. Yes you need a monster computer to run it on full but only time will fix that. More capeable cards are being developed and soon will be affordable to the general public. Untill then FS9 PAYWARE will be better then FSX DEFAULT.
just my 2 cents...
And what if you import those paywares into FSX ?
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #53 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 4:16am
Bindoe
Ex Member
Quote:
First off I find it funny that so many newbies feel they need to "support" Microsoft's new flight Sim. It is like they need to be accepted by the company or something. God forbid if they have something negative to say about it. I commend Rollerball for voicing his honest opinion! I also find it funny that somebody can rattle off a dozen or so "things" that the new version has that in reality, most can't even enjoy!!
Heh.
I am new to this awsome site but I aren't really a newbie at the MSFS.
Quote:
2. Missions, who needs missions? .
I DO!!1
You're right though, but who knows what interesting scenarios modders might come up with?
Quote:
4. I do not ever, ever have one single stutter. My system is locked at 34fps[s, way above the 21 where your eyes will actually notice a stutter. And I repeat, I never have stutters.
I don't get stutters either, but comeon, that's after TONS and TONS of tweaks.
Quote:
6. Weather? HAHAHAHAHA, my system is running the best real time weather out there! Flight environment coupled with Active sky give me the most realistic, real world weather and clouds around. It is one of the best things about my machine. Incredible clouds, multiple layers, real fog lines, real visibility. I can't say enough about it!
Hook them upto fsX, then you'll have smooth visibility transitions (when climbing above hase), and better low visibility conditions. The sky blending is better than fs9.
Try putting Peter Wildings textures in fsX, and you'd probably notice the sky looks better than fs9, even with the same textures.
Quote:
8. Terrain engine too weak!
fsG is great. However, fsX supports 1m mesh, with textures accurate to 7cm.
So yes, the terrain engine is fairly weak in comparisin
If someone takes advantage of those, imagine the results.
Quote:
10. I only do multi-player with close friends!
But fs9 multiplayer atleast for me, is jumpy. I play other multiplayer games dosn't matter if the server is located in the USA or UK, it's still smooth, unlike fs9.
fsX has an all new mp experiance where everything is smooth.
Quote:
12. Reflections are the best around. Come fly in my world!
Awsome, which ones are you using? Though fs9 still cannot use advanced reflections using shaders.
The water in fs9 is also severely lacking in reflections.
Quote:
14. Trees? Believe me, my trees are so abundant and real, I needed to get myself a chainsaw and a dozen virtual beavers!
fsX trees are more 3d, since they're made using textures facing horisontal and vertical, so forests actaully look thick when flying above them.
Quote:
HAHAHAHA! You mean basically the important things when flying? First off, If you have bad frame rates you might as well not even be using it. How real can it be or how do you perfect trying to land with crosswinds when you are about to touch down and your system is stuttering? I just don't get it? You need to have a fluid machine to fly, learn and enjoy the hobby we all like!
Messed up terrain. That will not fly with me!! My terrain NEEDS TOP BE Perfect!! No "double coastlines, offset objects, unrealistic terrain is a big NO!
Bad terrain textures are a thing of the past with Ground Environment Pro and Ultimate Terrain.
Off course you will need to add everything below to achieve what I have just described.
The messed up terrain is only in a few areas. Seattle, and Sydney (Where I usually fly), both look amazing, with no faults. The 1m textures there both rock, it looks like you're flying above a photo.
MY frame rate is awsome, I only mentioned the fps because of whingers who turn on bloom and max 2.0x water and expect it to run on there Geforce 5.
The textures, well, fs9 will never support the 7cm textures. Wait for GE pro for fsX with 7cm textures. Imagine the results!
Also if you somehow put bump mapping in fsX ground textures it will make them appear more 3d. Example:
*Note: Both 3d models are actually completly the same, and the 3d'ness of the surface is created entirely by bump mapping:
Without:
With:
Water, runways, and aircraft all use some kind of bump mapping. fs9 dosn't support it.
Shaders do bump mapping. Shaders do water, shaders can do almost anything without a big frame rate hit.
If you think it's a big fps hit, disable shaders all together then do all the effects by manually, using 3d models.
If you think shaders are a useless feature, you may as well disable all shadows in ALL new games, and not buy DX10 cards.
It may be just graphics, but I love graphics, it builds a more immersive game.
Quote:
9. My AI is not bads when I have "Ultimate Traffic" clogging up my skies!!
Sorry, I meant UI. User Interface.
Keep in mind, I am arguing for the fsX engine, and not so much for the actual game.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #54 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 4:56am
Tweek
Ex Member
Is anyone going to take up my sound recording challenge (hardly a challenge, really)?
I geniunely want to hear the difference between FS9 and FSX. It'd probably be wise to try it with the same aircraft and same sound set, in both sims.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #55 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 5:01am
Bindoe
Ex Member
Quote:
Is anyone going to take up my sound recording challenge (hardly a challenge, really)?
I geniunely want to hear the difference between FS9 and FSX. It'd probably be wise to try it with the same aircraft and same sound set, in both sims.
Sure, I'll make a video w/ sound.
Quote:
I'm sorry, but one-third of what you listed there can be corrected with addons. Remember, the list I made consists of features that addons can't do in FS9.
I counted one which was:
Quote:
fs9 dosn't have ships driving around
Quote:
All your arguments are totally unconvincing. Get a life and Get yourself a REAL flight and see the difference.
I'm sorry, but you're argument is unconvincing. You are only focusing on the graphics.
Look at the missions, space flight, new helo dynamics, thermals, amazing MP experiance and how the game is easier to mod.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #56 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 5:05am
Tweek
Ex Member
Thanks.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #57 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 5:59am
RollerBall
Ex Member
STOP PRESS ------ EDIT ------ SEE END OF POST
Tell you one of the things that's cheesing me off - it's the sheer unpredictability of FSX.
I installed it originally on my main PC drive (ATA 160GB Samsung) on which I have my '04 and '02 both of which work really well. However, due to 'issues' I decided to put my FSX on a dedicated drive (ATA 120GB Maxtor) with a minimal XP Pro install and physically swap the drives when I wanted to fire up FSX.
It was a good plan because I've achieved much better performance on the dedicated drive even though I've got the same drivers, settings and everything.
But I find that my FR varies each time I run FSX! 'Yesterday' I was pretty happy popping along with my steady 15FPS but 'today' it's as jerky and hesitant as anything, and when I look I see I'm getting fluctuations from say 3 up to my 15 figure.
So I decide to reinstall FSX on my main drive, now I've made my changes to my cfg file and I know what settings to apply.
But what do I find (same drivers etc mind) - when I fire it up I get the wildly flickering screen back, that I had in the demo too, which only stops in windowed mode (but then your AA and graphics definition are shot to pieces).
For goodness sake why? I moved 04 all over the place, from drive to drive on my PC, with never a problem. Why should FSX be so different? Or more realistically, why should FSX be so FLAKEY?
EDIT - NEXT BIT ADDED
In the interests of making fair unbiased comments I'm adding this bit. Better to add it rather than delete the posting because it might help someone else.
After typing the above I went back and reinstalled by graphics drivers (nVidia 81.95 - not the latest but I've found them to be the best so far for my card).
Result - the flickering screen disappeared and I now
appear
to be getting similar performance on my main drive as I was before on the dedicated on.
Can't say more at this stage.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #58 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 6:21am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
I think I heard something about the very latest NVidia drivers not performing as good as the previous ones...
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #59 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 7:35am
Fly2e
Offline
Global Moderator
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere!
KFRG
Gender:
Posts: 199132
Touché Bindoe!
Intel Core i7 Extreme Processor 965, 4.2GHz/8MB L3 Cache, Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Intel X58 Chipset Cross
Fire & SLI Supported, Mushkin Redline 6GB (3X2GB) Memory, eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285, Vista 64.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #60 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 7:43am
Bindoe
Ex Member
Quote:
Touché Bindoe!
*Googles Touché*. LOL! Thanks.
Anyway, sorry if I came accross as a, ummm, 'troll'.
But of course I know fsX dosn't compare to YOUR fs9. Though it is significantly better than MINE, especially with the enhanced engine and all.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #61 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 8:11am
Fly2e
Offline
Global Moderator
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere!
KFRG
Gender:
Posts: 199132
I did not think you were troll at all!
Everybody is free to say what they want here. As long as it does not become a personal matter where members are being destructive to one another.
FSX certainly has its good points and bad points.
The flight sim community sits "in-between" all of this and we are left all wondering if this next generation of the Sim will fly... 8)
Dave
Intel Core i7 Extreme Processor 965, 4.2GHz/8MB L3 Cache, Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Intel X58 Chipset Cross
Fire & SLI Supported, Mushkin Redline 6GB (3X2GB) Memory, eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285, Vista 64.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #62 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 10:49am
Katahu
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 6920
Quote:
After typing the above I went back and reinstalled by graphics drivers (nVidia 81.95 - not the latest but I've found them to be the best so far for my card).
Like Daube said, some older drivers work better than the latest ones. This is most certainly true with the IL-2 series as Oleg and his team pointed out that certain older drives give a better gaming experience than the new ones.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #63 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 10:58am
RollerBall
Ex Member
No, I wrote the book on old drivers
and I've been telling people for years NOT to go for the latest drivers if they have older cards.
But the point is that even with the same (older) drivers on different drives I was getting different results and re-installing them on the drive with the problems sorted (most of) them out.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X ««
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.