Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Minimum System Specs (Read 1977 times)
Reply #15 - Aug 13th, 2006 at 6:23am

Gixer   Offline
Colonel
Lets go fly a kite!!

Posts: 1540
*****
 
So Nick would it not be worth me getting the 2gig of ram if I am not going to go to Windows Vista?

Sounds like ram is not the issue with my stutter low down close to autogen.

Do you think I would be better off saving up and doing a complete upgrade of the mobo / cpu / g-card?
 

AMD64 3500+ @ 2200MHz 400FSB&&MSI K8N Neo 2 mobo nForce3 chipset&&1gig Corsair XMS PC3200 timings @ 10.2.2.2 &&XFX 6800 Ultra @ 450/1200&&80gig HDD&&Loadsa fans!!!
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Aug 13th, 2006 at 12:19pm
Nick N   Ex Member

 


In your case I think waiting and saving up for good hardware is the best choice.

Be aware the demo has missing files and although the full version may be somewhat smoother than the demo, more memory is not going to fix what you were experiencing.

FSX is going to be a DX10 flagship product. You will want DX10 when it arrives in March-May 07 because FSX performance a visuals will increase dramatically with DX10. The only downfall is you must install Vista to have DX10 as well which will not be cheap.

My advice is to wait. Unless you just have to have it and cant wait, purchasing todays top end hardware would be the best solution for FSX future-proofing but there will be shifts in the hardware market after xmas which I intend to wait for myself before purchasing anything.





 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Aug 13th, 2006 at 4:09pm

MattNW   Offline
Colonel
Indiana

Gender: male
Posts: 1762
*****
 
I think the chief question or at least the one I have is what is the minumum specs to run FSX at a level that would make it worth switching from FS9. What's the use spending $60 on a sim when the highest settings you can use result in less features and appearance than the sim you already have.

In other words what will it take to have a sim with flyable FRs that graphically is superior to FS9? For my part if the choice is $1,000 - $2,000 of hardware upgrades to run the latest sim vs sticking with what I have until the needed hardware to run FSX is affordable then I'll have to wait.
 

In Memory of John Consterdine (FS Tipster)1962-2003
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Aug 13th, 2006 at 4:27pm

Arnimon   Offline
Colonel
Whats up Bugs?
Germany

Gender: male
Posts: 345
*****
 
At last everyone has to decide by himself.Wether he should upgrade his Computer or buy a new one.
Btw. this makes me thinking of a marketing idea.The SimV Computer!Designed to play FSX!In Germany some bigger Store Companies(like Aldi) have already a Computer in their stock which was designed to proove good performance for a low price.Maybe we should do the same? WinkBut as you can read above,some Hardware is not available yet.So,lets just wait...and see! Grin
 

It looks like chicken,smells like chicken,tastes like chicken,but when Chuck Norris says its Beef...then damnit...its Beef!!!
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Aug 14th, 2006 at 10:35pm

dodger   Offline
Colonel
Similkameen Valley, BC, Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 123
*****
 
Let me tell you all what it (the demo) WONT run on, with more than 10 FPS, anyway. Sempron 2400 in a year-old Asus Socket A board, 512 RAM, NVidia 5200 128 graphics card, 80 GB SATA Seagate HD,and XP SP 2. Not that I expected a miracle, but the demo convinced me to wait till I build an AM2 based (Athlon 64X2) machine with Vista and DX10. Maybe next year when I'll  be able to do it for cheap. Meanwhile, keep all us poor folks up to date, thank you very much folks.Grin Grin
 

AMD 64 X2-5200, NVidia 9600GT 512, 2048 DDR, 2x250 GB SATA, Saitek X45, Win XP SP3 (Win7-64bitRC1 and FSX on 2nd HD)
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Aug 15th, 2006 at 1:38am

coulterww   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Fort Hood, Texas

Gender: male
Posts: 168
*****
 
I'm running an AMD 3400 + Athalon 64 with XP SP2, 2 GB RAM and a Radeon X1900 and the game runs smooth until things get a bit cluttered then it stutters and the scenery takes a hit, flickering and whatnot... How do you check your frame rates?  I have max frame rates set... but I couldnt tell you what its actually pushing out...

(edit)  I just wanted to chime in on the hardware debate...  Does it really make sense to spend $1000-$2000 to upgrade just to play a $60 game?  It depends on who you ask...  I have a lot of games here that would benefit from an upgrade, so I was planning to build my own dedicated gaming computer to be used only for games... I was going for the low price range of the high end hardware to keep cost down... Planning on Dual core, dual channel, dual vid card... SLI Raid0 Striped HDs... plenty of fans to keep everything nice and cool... no neon lighting...  its too distracting!  The price for this dedicated gaming system is looking at about $1500...  I havent decided yet if it would be worth it...  It would be nice, but do I NEED it?  For someone who is a hardcore gamer, and has plenty of money to throw away, I would say the answer is yes.  To someone who struggled to even buy his last computer that was obsolete before he got it off the shelf, I would probably have to say no.  Me?  I fall blissfully somewhere in the middle...  I have a modicum of disposable income, but I still struggle with the question, is it worth it?

Wayne
 

Computer Specs:&&Intel E6750 Core2Duo 2.66 gHz @ 1333mhZ&&2GB Corsair DDR2 PC6400 RAM&&twin Nvidia 8600GT SLI
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Aug 21st, 2006 at 11:47am

lintonam   Offline
Colonel
7 Time State Marching
Champions
Cumberland WI

Gender: male
Posts: 94
*****
 
I have just installed FSX on my system

Intel Celeron 1.1ghz
256mb Corsair Ram
Nvidia GeForce FX 5500 (PCI)

I am getting about 15-20 FPS on bare minimal settings and when put the settings to med the frames drop to about 3-8. FSX is playable on my system but sometimes looks worse than FS2002.

As for a comparison to FS2004, it will not even run on my system as the FX5500 is not supported by it.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print