Simviation Forum - What to include in FS2006

(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)

Poll
Question: What would you like to see in Fs2006
* This poll has now closed *
Better water effects 23 (12.4%) More aircraft selections 25 (13.5%) Improved Air Force Bases 19 (10.3%) More flight plans with military aircraft 21 (11.4%) Better flight school training 14 (7.6%) Better airport textures 25 (13.5%) Add ATC and parking to all small airports 20 (10.8%) Improved scenery 38 (20.5%) Total votes: 185 Polls have re opened « Last Modified by: ryan6802 on: May 3^rd, 2004 at 8:32pm »

Pages: 1 2 3

What to include in FS2006 (Read 1891 times)

Apr 26^th, 2004 at 8:57pm

ryan6802 Offline
Colonel
Tucson

Gender:
Posts: 36

What else would you like to see in future flight sim games?

IP Logged

Reply #1 - Apr 26^th, 2004 at 9:22pm

Jaffa Offline
Colonel
What the...?
New York

Gender:
Posts: 1430

Polls don't work, but I checked nearly every box.

I'm not so sure it is such a wise poll, I mean, who wouldn't want improvements? ???

IP Logged

Reply #2 - Apr 26^th, 2004 at 9:28pm

14bis Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 10

i think adding the "camera shake" effect inside the cockpit when u land or when the weather is bad would really add to the realism...i just noticed that the other day...u can only tell u have landed by the sound of the wheels touching down...

IP Logged

Reply #3 - Apr 26^th, 2004 at 9:49pm

Sterk Offline
Colonel

Posts: 316

Yea,for some reason poll daznt work... Undecided

Improved scenery definitly...more exact scenery for all world,dynamic scenery for all airports-moving vehicles,buses,people,all must be animated,including
scenery out of airports-animals, birds,road traffic,trains,ships-shortly-MORE LIFE TO SCENERY!!! Sad

&&&&

IP Logged

Reply #4 - Apr 26^th, 2004 at 9:53pm

Nexus Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...

Gender:
Posts: 3282

Sterk, I don't know about you, but I'm not willing to lose FPS just because of some moving buses and people...

This question has been brought up several times, and my answer is still the same:Better aircrafts

IP Logged

Reply #5 - Apr 26^th, 2004 at 10:03pm

tsunami_KNUW Offline
Colonel
Life is good.
Oak Harbor, Washington

Gender:
Posts: 1215

I agree with you Nexus! More aircraft! I wonder why microsoft only uses Boeing aircraft; they should put in Airbus! I wouldn't mind if Microsoft added real-life airlines. It doesn't need to be every airline, just the popular ones like United, British, Qantas, ect. I think it would be neat too if the weather included more dramatic thunderstorms that includes tornadoes and such Grin

« Last Edit: Apr 27^th, 2004 at 8:44pm by tsunami_KNUW »

&&Home Airport: NAS Whidbey Island (KNUW)-Oak Harbor Airpark (76S)&&Current FS Location: Seoul/Incheon, South Korea

IP Logged

Reply #6 - Apr 26^th, 2004 at 10:44pm

Jakemaster Ex Member

Now that microsoft has made ACOF, which travels through the history of flight, I think it should be:

FLIGHT SIMULATOR 2006: THE FUTURE OF FLIGHT

Basically, it should include(as new planes) the BWB, 7E7, Embraer 170, A380, and any other planes that are either brand new or in the works.

PLEASE reply if you agree, I really think this is what it should be. HINT HINT to microsoft.

IP Logged

Reply #7 - Apr 26^th, 2004 at 11:32pm

cleobis Offline
Colonel
OPorto, Portugal

Gender:
Posts: 417

I agree with all above, and would like to add vectorial nozzles capabilities, for true VTOL operations!

&&*** Força Aérea Portuguesa *** www.emfa.pt/

IP Logged

Reply #8 - Apr 27^th, 2004 at 12:31am

Stratobat Offline
Colonel
To fly... Or not to fly?

Posts: 1165

Quote:

I wouldn't mind if Microsoft added real-life airlines.

I don't think that would be feasible as it would push the price of the sim up by quite a bit. It's easier and more practical for third-party texturers to provide the textures as add-ons.

Regards,
Stratobat

&&&&'If the literal sense makes good sense, seek no other sense lest you come up with nonsense'

IP Logged

Reply #9 - Apr 27^th, 2004 at 5:29am

stick_carson Offline
Major

Posts: 4

A practice range for Military aircraft where guns and bombs would work..

IP Logged

Reply #10 - Apr 27^th, 2004 at 11:01am

Scottler Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender:
Posts: 5989

Two words: Inflight Emergencies.

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com

IP Logged

Reply #11 - Apr 27^th, 2004 at 11:16am

ashaman Offline
Colonel
I'm from Italy, errors
in my text are a given.
LIRN

Gender:
Posts: 1752

Quote:

Two words: Inflight Emergencies.

Agreed completely.

There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.&&&&At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".&&&&Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novice of Orbiter.&&&&Seen the GREAT service pack for FSX and its usefulness, really awaiting for FS11 to upgrade.&&&&AMD Athlon Xp 2400@2700&&MB Asus A7V8XX&&1Gb ram DDR 400 @ 333&&ASL Nvidia Geforce 6600gt 128Mb DDR3 AGP&&Creative Sound Blaster Live&&Windows XP Professional Sp2&&2 HD Maxtor 40Gb - 1 HD Maxtor 80Gb

IP Logged

Reply #12 - Apr 27^th, 2004 at 11:29am

zcottovision Offline
Colonel
YaBB 1G - SP1 loves me!
N. Ireland / EGAC

Gender:
Posts: 598

One of the must-haves in FS10 should be a built-in Active Camera-style feature like 14bis recommended. Also, some more detailed aircraft, how about a 7E7 with an FMC?

IP Logged

Reply #13 - Apr 27^th, 2004 at 8:09pm

xtremdav45 Offline
Colonel
Future Pilot
Santa Clarita, CA USA

Gender:
Posts: 79

I would really like to see military aircraft with guns and bombs, and missions, and I WOULD LOVE to see aerial refueling capabilities with aircraft like the KC 135, and KC 10. Even though this isnt combat flight simulator, i think Microsoft should include military capabilities for FS 10.

AND Microsoft should put some classic jet aircraft like the Boeing 707 and the Douglas DC8.

I think either some or all should be available for this in the near future, (a downloadable patch would be the best) Either way I want these things in FS.

Replace Internet Explorer with a better, safer browser.&&&&http://getfirefox.com&&&&Windows XP Pro&&P4 Celeron 2Ghz&&ECS Motherboard P4VXASD+&&Onboard AC'97 Audio&&ATI Radeon 7000&&Netgear MA 311 802.11b Wi-Fi PCI card&&Microsoft Sidewinder Precision Pro joystick&&&&There's no place like 127.0.0.1&&&&Squirrels are nothing more than rats with good PR

IP Logged

Reply #14 - Apr 27^th, 2004 at 8:21pm

Daz Offline
Colonel
in the morning im making
WAFFLES!
Leeds, UK

Gender:
Posts: 1171

yeah although i agree on the stuff above the scenery and the aircraft can be created so it aint much of a problem its the stuffthat is not coded into the sim like VTOL and inflight emergencies and camera shaking when landing etc. they need to work on these for fs10 and also a few other thigns would be good like

moving airport traffic...ramps that close inwards towards the door and fuel trucks, stairs etc that come to your aircraft when landed would be cool. also tows and tugs to push u back in certain aircraft

we are suggesting a lot of stuff here that isnt feasible in fs9..if microsoft could only provde the workings to create these thigns would be better...then 3rd party utilities aircraft , effects etc would come along

on the military side i think there should be an entirely new sim or at least an addon for the fs10 which uses MODERN combat scnerarios..scenery from fs10 will be sufficient and air to air combat a must..effect missiles etc carriers that work and move amongst other stuff.

AMD athlon XP2800+ @2.34ghz&&Epox 8RDA3G 400 fsb, 8x AGP&&1024MB DDR400 PC3200&&XFX 256MB FX5950 Ultra (oc 525/1.04)&&40 gig maxtor 7200rpm&&80 gig seagate baracuda 7200rpm&&

IP Logged

Pages: 1 2 3

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

	Search the archive: