Simviation Forum - Favourite Wide Body Long Range Jet

Aug 20^th, 2003 at 6:25am

Vic Offline
Colonel
Russia - 1060 Years and
Still Strong!
Moscow, Russian Federation

Gender:
Posts: 234

So if you would just pick your favourite one out of those 8 Grin

Sorry if I missed anyone, I tried to include the best and most popular ones.

« Last Edit: Aug 21^st, 2003 at 6:33am by Vic »

When you ASSUME, you make an ASS out of U and ME.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #1 - Aug 20^th, 2003 at 7:03am

Craig. Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender:
Posts: 18590

if anyone has to ask Grin

DC10 all the way

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #2 - Aug 20^th, 2003 at 12:36pm

Ivan Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender:
Posts: 6058

Il-96, even while it's missing the nice airstairs of it's predecessor the Il-86

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones), Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #3 - Aug 20^th, 2003 at 12:36pm

Mr. Bones Offline
Colonel

Posts: 4304

of course the 777! Wink

Raw power...the J-58.&&&&&&My Anet collection.&&

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #4 - Aug 20^th, 2003 at 2:10pm

Fly2e Offline
Global Moderator
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere!
KFRG

Gender:
Posts: 199132

Quote:

Favourite Wide Body Long Range Let......

I vote for the let! Wink

Dave 8)

Intel Core i7 Extreme Processor 965, 4.2GHz/8MB L3 Cache, Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Intel X58 Chipset Cross
Fire & SLI Supported, Mushkin Redline 6GB (3X2GB) Memory, eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285, Vista 64.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #5 - Aug 20^th, 2003 at 2:23pm

ozzy72 Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender:
Posts: 37122

The 747, one of my favourite stunt planes Grin

Ozzy 8)

There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #6 - Aug 20^th, 2003 at 4:26pm

Vic Offline
Colonel
Russia - 1060 Years and
Still Strong!
Moscow, Russian Federation

Gender:
Posts: 234

Quote:

Il-96, even while it's missing the nice airstairs of it's predecessor the Il-86

True true, I flew on that once, lucky airports Grin

All they gotta do is give it fuel and other than that its independent...too bad it isnt classified as 'long range' so it cant participate in this poll! And something really makes me not like the 747...lol, I feel that it has much more noise in the cabin and the vibrations are worse than that on an Airbus, 777 or Il-96

When you ASSUME, you make an ASS out of U and ME.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #7 - Aug 20^th, 2003 at 4:44pm

Craig. Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender:
Posts: 18590

thats because any airbus bigger than an A320 doesnt produce enough power to hear or feel anything anyway:)

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #8 - Aug 20^th, 2003 at 4:53pm

Ivan Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender:
Posts: 6058

I've travveled on 747's 4 times in my life, and you don't get to sleep until you are completely exhausted in the economy class... behind the wing so you have the vibrations and the noise of the engines

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones), Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #9 - Aug 21^st, 2003 at 6:36am

Vic Offline
Colonel
Russia - 1060 Years and
Still Strong!
Moscow, Russian Federation

Gender:
Posts: 234

Quote:

I've travveled on 747's 4 times in my life, and you don't get to sleep until you are completely exhausted in the economy class... behind the wing so you have the vibrations and the noise of the engines

Absolutely true, and I bet that you flew on the 400 model, (so did I once) but when I was 11 I flew on TWA and I dont think they use 400's but that was 5 years ago and at that time I didnt keep track of all the models) but the 400 is the newer one...imagine what it must have been like to fly on the other models...like as soon as it takes off, reaches cruising altitude, and in 10 minutes for some reason starts shaking for the rest of the flight, but you eventually get used to it.

When you ASSUME, you make an ASS out of U and ME.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #10 - Aug 21^st, 2003 at 6:45am

Craig. Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender:
Posts: 18590

we didnt have any of those problems on the 747 when my family flew on one. admitidly it wasnt the quietes plane i have ever been on but wasnt shakey. the quietest belongs to a KLM 737 i was on. best for takeoff noise and feeling def goes to the DC10 those engines are absolutly amazing, the power and sound is unbelievable. sadly the 777 which should sound and feel like a rocket doesnt because of the size of it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #11 - Aug 21^st, 2003 at 10:22am

Vic Offline
Colonel
Russia - 1060 Years and
Still Strong!
Moscow, Russian Federation

Gender:
Posts: 234

Well, I dont think that sound means power, I see the idea engine as powerfull AND quiet. Lets say the IL-86, yes it is powerfull, but its crazy loud, and IL-96 is MORE powerfull by about 20% but its about 50% of the noise! And it gets extremely annoying if the vibrations and noise is through the roof. However, it also depends on the airline to how they soundproof their planes, and yes KLM is one of the best.

When you ASSUME, you make an ASS out of U and ME.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #12 - Aug 21^st, 2003 at 11:02am

Craig. Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender:
Posts: 18590

oh i know that:), if it did a 737-200 would be used to goto the moon. about the only plane sound means power for is concorde.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #13 - Aug 21^st, 2003 at 4:35pm

Vic Offline
Colonel
Russia - 1060 Years and
Still Strong!
Moscow, Russian Federation

Gender:
Posts: 234

Hehehe, true true, I do find it entartaining how the old old 707's were insanely noisy yet the power output was miniscule! And you are right about that, sound=power only on Concorde and Tu-144 Grin

Also interesting is how the IL-96 is tied with the 777 for first place, and how MD11 or the Airbuses have gotten no votes, what happen to all the people defending the airbus in previous posts?? Dont more people come to this board ???

When you ASSUME, you make an ASS out of U and ME.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #14 - Aug 21^st, 2003 at 4:53pm

Craig. Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender:
Posts: 18590

sadly the Md11 was a big failure, what should have been a perfect replacement for the DC10 and could have been easly updated with technology as times changed. turned out because of a few design flaws as a big flop. As for the airbus, who knows what happend to them:) as far as i am concerned, they are just nothing special, they are to plain and basic. and as i have beaten to death, underpowered:)

Back to top

IP Logged

	Search the archive: