Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
As Real As It Gets - Not (Read 690 times)
Reply #15 - Jun 28th, 2003 at 1:58am

BFMF   Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender: male
Posts: 19820
*****
 
Thanks mate Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Jun 28th, 2003 at 2:19am
visitor;AKA:X   Ex Member

 
Andrew;

Go back and read my last post, I
posted it too soon, I saw your  ???
on Kimbers post and this will clear it up Grin

X
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Jun 28th, 2003 at 2:45am

ysteinbuch   Offline
Colonel
A little turbulence doesn't
hurt!
Croton-on-Hudson, NY

Gender: male
Posts: 742
*****
 
As far as realistic airport ground support, I noticed that in LAX you'll see refueling trucks and baggage vehicles moving around (with sound), but frame rates are definitely affected. By the way, while I was "walking" around the runway area at LAX (using Active Camera Pro), I enjoyed seeing planes coming in for landings, but, alas, some simply disappeared right after touchdown. Go figure.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Jun 28th, 2003 at 2:52am
visitor;AKA:X   Ex Member

 
Ysteinbuch;

Quote:
some simply disappeared right after touchdown


The one with my bags Cheesy Cheesy

How do you walk around with active camara?
all I can get mine to do is flyby??????????

X
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Jun 28th, 2003 at 3:26am

BFMF   Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender: male
Posts: 19820
*****
 
The reason why some aircraft disappear is because there is not enough gates to support that type of aircraft Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Jun 28th, 2003 at 10:36am

Lethal.Ambition   Offline
Colonel
They call me John.
Florida

Gender: male
Posts: 1563
*****
 
Where can i find active camera?
 

Oderint Dum Metuant - Let them hate as long as they fear.&&Proud member of the =XE= Xtreme Eagles&&Oderint Dum Metuant&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Jun 28th, 2003 at 3:42pm

GreG   Offline
Colonel
Cape Town, South Africa.

Gender: male
Posts: 1074
*****
 
The new Active Camera Pro is at www.avsim.com, try running a search for it.  Love it!  Especially the approach view, terrific, feels like you're really standing right on the runway, watching a 747-400 or whatever fly right over your head, the only difference between this and the real world is that in real life, you'd be blown about 100 metres back after the plane had touched down! Grin (Anyone watched "Pushing Tin"! Grin)  I'd personally, love to do that!! 8)  I'm sure it feels just like flying!!! Grin

And I can't even begin to talk about the FS2002 glitches again!!  Hell, I could write a book about them! Grin  Hopefully most of them, all of them would be nice, will be fixed for FS2004!  I really do, I reckon that FS2002 had so many problems because M$ had a deadline to meet, when it was meant to be ready for sale, and they were behind schedule, so they just rushed the rest of it, and missed all the little glitches while testing.

Greg
 

If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough.
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Jun 28th, 2003 at 6:34pm

zcottovision   Offline
Colonel
YaBB 1G - SP1 loves me!
N. Ireland / EGAC

Gender: male
Posts: 598
*****
 
I think you're all forgetting that it's a flight simulator, not an airport simulator! The airports are just fancy car parks for planes. All the good stuff happens in the air, as you'd expect from a flight simulator!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Jun 28th, 2003 at 10:05pm

BFMF   Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender: male
Posts: 19820
*****
 
Quote:
All the good stuff happens in the air


If you look at some of the things Mark and Ken do, that's not always the case Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Jun 29th, 2003 at 2:33am

MattNW   Offline
Colonel
Indiana

Gender: male
Posts: 1762
*****
 
Quote:
You guys need to take up step back about ten years. Can anyone here say "286 processor",I-new-you-could.  Just think about the progress they've made.


I still have the floppy with one of the earliest MS Flight Simulators. Try saying "8086 processor" in a TRS80 Color Computer. The computer died so I can't play it anymore.

Your windshield was the screen. Everything was drawn in green lines including the horizon. No difference between sky and ground, both basic black. Your runway was a little green rectangle box that you landed in. God, I had hours of fun with that program.
 

In Memory of John Consterdine (FS Tipster)1962-2003
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Jun 29th, 2003 at 12:29pm

hiflyphil   Offline
Colonel
Is that UFO bugging me
again.
England

Gender: male
Posts: 132
*****
 
Hi

Well that was a good topic - yes i'll admit flight sims have come a long way since my commodore and atari days Cry god what great days.  And at least I can get some realism by dressing the wife in a flight attendants outfit and bringing me a cuppa now and again, and maybe a lap dance at 30,000 feet. Grin

See you all in the skies

Phil
 

Tower : Flight 2-0-9er, you're cleared for take off.&&Oever : Roger!&&Murdock : Huh?&&Tower : L.A. departure frequency 1-2-3 point 9er.&&Oever : Roger!&&Murdock : Huh?&&: Re-quest Vector, over!&&Oever : What?&&Tower : 2-0-9er clear for vector 2-3-4.&&Murdock : We have clearance Clarence.&&Oever : Roger, Roger. What's our Vector Victor?&&Oever : That's Clarence Oever! Oever.
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Jun 30th, 2003 at 12:24pm

codered   Offline
Colonel
Flight Plan Closed?

Posts: 1622
*****
 
FS2002 will never be as real as it gets!  Why can't people understand that!  It is a flight sim that replicates civilian flying.  For $50 you cannot expect to have the full blown real thing!  With all the addons that FS allows you to do you can make it to your liking, but it will never be real.  If you want real go to your local FBO and sign up for flight lessons and learn to fly the real thing.  I learned to fly the real thing way before I started using FS.  And when I started using the FS series I found it to be an enjoyable game.  I would never equate it to the real thing, because it is not and never will be.  Even COF will not be real.  In my opinion people should just enjoy FS for what it is and what it allows you to do.  I certainly enjoy it, and find it to be a wonderful hobby.
 

Windows XP SP1&&Motherboard: Epox 8RDA + main board&&Processor: AMD XP2500 Barton CPU&&Memory: PC2700 1gb Geil DDR&&Hard Drive: SEA HDD IDE 40GB 7M 40GPP&&Hard Drive: Western Digital 40gb 8mb cache&&Monitor 15 LCD Flat Panel Display (15 viewable)&&Video Card: ATI Radeon 9500 Pro&&Sound Card: Creative Labs Audigy 2
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Jun 30th, 2003 at 1:03pm

OTTOL   Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)

Gender: male
Posts: 918
*****
 
Now that you mention it for $50 you are definitely getting your money's worth. I have to go to recurrent training at SimCom in Orlando annually. Their Lear simulator feels like a
bad amusement park ride, and don't even get me started on
the graffics. This simulator costs more than the real airplane
to aquire. The best I've flown so far is the A340 sim at PanAm in Miami. This has better dynamics(including a slight jolt that can be felt every time you cross an expansion joint while taxiing), but the graffics are still no better than FS. The 
Tech at Pan Am told me that this sim also costs more than the actual aircraft!  I have been told that the sim for the Canadair RJ has incredible attention to detail, including pedestrians on sidewalks as you approach the runway.
 

.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print