Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
did anyone saw something weird near Orion constelation last night? (Read 2778 times)
Reply #15 - Dec 27th, 2011 at 11:19am

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 
Groundbound1 wrote on Dec 27th, 2011 at 10:48am:
it may have been a satellite in geo-sync orbit making a position adjustment. (You may have seen it's reflection)



It shined too much for being moved  ,but what would be the best way to destroy and obsolete GPS, TV, antenna satellites? in other words:  to destroy a geo-sync satellite?.....by pushing them into the atmosphere ,due that IT won't reach enough speed this could be WHY It last that long burning , that could be also the reason why didn't move horizontally except when It got cold (turned into orange)

Colors determinate the temperature (this is how we know how hot are some of the stars) ,if you start to heat a iron knife it would become red then Orange and if you could without evaporate it heat enough the iron it would become blue ,so the object entry into the atmosphere blast into blue very hot then slow down turned into orange then by the air  moved into one of it sides making the small horizontal move..

this is the only reason I can figure it out and solve my mystery and my misery  Grin    
Cool
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Dec 28th, 2011 at 11:17am

Bud Greene   Offline
Colonel
What's up, doc?
Up, up in the air...

Gender: male
Posts: 480
*****
 
Fozzer wrote on Dec 27th, 2011 at 9:51am:
Whatever is is...

..the truth is out there!... Wink...!

Quote:
"Seen in Nevada and Calarada"
End Quote.

Paul.... Cool...!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X-Files

Thank you Agent Mulder. Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Dec 29th, 2011 at 11:41am

Club508   Offline
Colonel
I like repainting aircraft!
Planet Earth

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
alrot wrote on Dec 27th, 2011 at 11:19am:
Groundbound1 wrote on Dec 27th, 2011 at 10:48am:
it may have been a satellite in geo-sync orbit making a position adjustment. (You may have seen it's reflection)



It shined too much for being moved  ,but what would be the best way to destroy and obsolete GPS, TV, antenna satellites? in other words:  to destroy a geo-sync satellite?.....by pushing them into the atmosphere ,due that IT won't reach enough speed this could be WHY It last that long burning , that could be also the reason why didn't move horizontally except when It got cold (turned into orange)
Colors determinate the temperature (this is how we know how hot are some of the stars) ,if you start to heat a iron knife it would become red then Orange and if you could without evaporate it heat enough the iron it would become blue ,so the object entry into the atmosphere blast into blue very hot then slow down turned into orange then by the air  moved into one of it sides making the small horizontal move..

NOW HOOOLD ON THERE BUSTER!!!
NOT TRUE on the flames.
Now please take the time to read my rant, even if you don't read my theory.
On most common flames, it is commonly mistaken, and I've done my research, both inside the classroom and out.  The blue part on most common flames is actually the COLDEST part of the flame, the orangy and red are the mid parts, and the very outer whites are the very hottest.  Those are parts of the reasons you may occaisionally (if ever) see someone hold fire in their hands, and why you occaisionally hear the term or phrase "burning white-hot".

And do not forget, the different elements on the periodic table all burn diffrent colors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flame_test

That's primarily create all the different colors you see in fireworks.  And in what you said above, you're forgetting that iron burns gold if you followed the link down to the nice little table they made.



And also, who said it was a flame? Huh
For all we know, it could be a light.



Now here's my theory.  I'm not saying any of you are wrong, and I'm not going to say I'm right either.  This is an unown object, in an unknown event.  This is just what I've figured uing what I've taken in using the information I've been given combined with my backround knowledge of space.  Now most of my theory on the black holes is pulled from Hawkings, and the stuff of the planet pull is my own.  I have read very much into these, so please do some intense reasearch of you own as wel if you haven't already before you tr to blast part of my theory.

Now, what you may have seen, was a nearby solar system's star turning into a black hole.
Now, I'm not going to go through and describe every long word in my theory, becouase there are a lot.  Use google, dictionary.com, or something else.


In my theory, the star was running out of fuel, and is either below or right around the Chandrasekhar limit.
Now, it's running out of fuel, and is about on the verge of collapse.  Now, being right around, or below the Chandrasekhar limit, it tried to keep on burning, by trying to turn itself into either a white dwarf star or a neutron star, possibly explaining the bright white or blue you saw.  Now, it probably got close to succeeding, but after a while essently "failed out" and started to turn into a black hole.
Now, when a black hole starts to form by means of a star collapse, many things happen.
As it collapses, the star starts shrinking dramtically, and it's mass increases significantly as well.  Now, all large masses in space have atleast some gravitational pull, and bend the space around them.  The larger the mass, the more so.  Now, light acts as both a particle and a wave a the same time.  Therefore, it IS infact, effected by gravity.
Now, as I already stated, as the size decreases, the mass increases, and therefor the gravity is increased.  Now, as the mass is increased, the light has a more and more difficult time escaping, and at some point, the gravity becomes so intense, it actually starts bending the light, bringing the light closer to orange and red, possibly explaining the decaying into orange you saw.
Now, puase in your thinking for a moment, and you may even have to rewind a bit. 
It's a star.  We on a planet orbit a star.  There's a possible chance that a large massed planet orbits close to this star.  The gravitational fields tossed by stars are pretty good, part of what keeps us all in orbit.  As the gravitational pull of the star increases due to the increased mass of trying to transform into a white dwarf or neutron star and then becoming a black hole, the planets would be drawn toward the star.  As the large massed planet is drawn to the star, the gravitational pull due to the planet's large mass would start to work more and more on the star, and the star more on the planet.
Now the planet is already moving towards the star, we have that in place, though we can't really see it.  But as the planet's pull starts to work on the star, the star will also start to be pulled towads the planet, possibly explaining the slight movement you saw it go though the sky.
Now, back to where we were, wherever you incorperated the planet in, just make sure it hasn't collided yet.
The star is already seeming red or orange to us.  It's in it's final stages.  It finally becomes so small, and it's mass has increased so much, light finally can not escape it.  If I'm right, it probably would have dissapeared from your view a few seconds later.
Now the planet would be sucked in.  Due to the gravitational pull, which wouldn't let the stuff escape the black hole anyway, and the fact you couldn't even see the planet to begin with, you probably wouldn't see anything.

And from there, it would pretty much be over.



Sound like it could be anything you saw?  And also, if you actually read through my entire rant and theory, thanks!
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Dec 29th, 2011 at 12:02pm

jetprop   Offline
Colonel
A freeware addict!
a chair infront of a monitor.

Posts: 1523
*****
 
well:
i had a few weird things in the sky,but those where most likely meteors(seen about 5 in my life ,nearly ALWAYS cloudy)and one of them i don't know what it was,looked like it was at realy high altitude and it was moving slowly,don't know what it was,maybe a satelite.

but was it a line or a dot?
i don't have a clue what it was either but this may help others.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Dec 29th, 2011 at 1:00pm

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 
Club508 wrote on Dec 29th, 2011 at 11:41am:
NOW HOOOLD ON THERE BUSTER!!!
NOT TRUE on the flames.
Now please take the time to read my rant, even if you don't read my theory.
On most common flames, it is commonly mistaken, and I've done my research, both inside the classroom and out.  The blue part on most common flames is actually the COLDEST part of the flame, the orangy and red are the mid parts, and the very outer whites are the very hottest.  Those are parts of the reasons you may occaisionally (if ever) see someone hold fire in their hands, and why you occaisionally hear the term or phrase "burning white-hot".

And do not forget, the different elements on the periodic table all burn diffrent colors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flame_test

That's primarily create all the different colors you see in fireworks.  And in what you said above, you're forgetting that iron burns gold if you followed the link down to the nice little table they made.



And also, who said it was a flame? Huh
For all we know, it could be a light.



Now here's my theory.  I'm not saying any of you are wrong, and I'm not going to say I'm right either.  This is an unown object, in an unknown event.  This is just what I've figured uing what I've taken in using the information I've been given combined with my backround knowledge of space.  Now most of my theory on the black holes is pulled from Hawkings, and the stuff of the planet pull is my own.  I have read very much into these, so please do some intense reasearch of you own as wel if you haven't already before you tr to blast part of my theory.

Now, what you may have seen, was a nearby solar system's star turning into a black hole.
Now, I'm not going to go through and describe every long word in my theory, becouase there are a lot.  Use google, dictionary.com, or something else.


In my theory, the star was running out of fuel, and is either below or right around the Chandrasekhar limit.
Now, it's running out of fuel, and is about on the verge of collapse.  Now, being right around, or below the Chandrasekhar limit, it tried to keep on burning, by trying to turn itself into either a white dwarf star or a neutron star, possibly explaining the bright white or blue you saw.  Now, it probably got close to succeeding, but after a while essently "failed out" and started to turn into a black hole.
Now, when a black hole starts to form by means of a star collapse, many things happen.
As it collapses, the star starts shrinking dramtically, and it's mass increases significantly as well.  Now, all large masses in space have atleast some gravitational pull, and bend the space around them.  The larger the mass, the more so.  Now, light acts as both a particle and a wave a the same time.  Therefore, it IS infact, effected by gravity.
Now, as I already stated, as the size decreases, the mass increases, and therefor the gravity is increased.  Now, as the mass is increased, the light has a more and more difficult time escaping, and at some point, the gravity becomes so intense, it actually starts bending the light, bringing the light closer to orange and red, possibly explaining the decaying into orange you saw.
Now, puase in your thinking for a moment, and you may even have to rewind a bit. 
It's a star.  We on a planet orbit a star.  There's a possible chance that a large massed planet orbits close to this star.  The gravitational fields tossed by stars are pretty good, part of what keeps us all in orbit.  As the gravitational pull of the star increases due to the increased mass of trying to transform into a white dwarf or neutron star and then becoming a black hole, the planets would be drawn toward the star.  As the large massed planet is drawn to the star, the gravitational pull due to the planet's large mass would start to work more and more on the star, and the star more on the planet.
Now the planet is already moving towards the star, we have that in place, though we can't really see it.  But as the planet's pull starts to work on the star, the star will also start to be pulled towads the planet, possibly explaining the slight movement you saw it go though the sky.
Now, back to where we were, wherever you incorperated the planet in, just make sure it hasn't collided yet.
The star is already seeming red or orange to us.  It's in it's final stages.  It finally becomes so small, and it's mass has increased so much, light finally can not escape it.  If I'm right, it probably would have dissapeared from your view a few seconds later.
Now the planet would be sucked in.  Due to the gravitational pull, which wouldn't let the stuff escape the black hole anyway, and the fact you couldn't even see the planet to begin with, you probably wouldn't see anything.

And from there, it would pretty much be over.



Sound like it could be anything you saw?  And also, if you actually read through my entire rant and theory, thanks!


Light/ Flames ? I don't understand what would be the diference? both came from the same thing "Heat" one uses the air become flames and the other can't because is in and empty space

You are wrong about the temperatures longitude waves of light

...

http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/kdeedu/kstars/ai-colorandtemp.html


I'm going to give you a practical way to understand this

http://es.dreamstime.com/antorcha-del-acetileno-y-tubo-del-hierro-thumb7520401.j...

the white part and the blue ones are hotter than the read and orange ,we use the blue/white part of the torch to cut or weld

it wasn't a black hole or in what you mean is a gamma burst which would be the only thing that last 4 minutes Common and less powerless supernova last a little bit longer , other wise we all by now would be in all news all over the world ,besides they don't move horizontally .. 

Oh God Club508 !!  Sad I don't want to sound presumptuous ,I know the mechanism of a supernova (according to theorist)I know how it works since I was 13 ,and I know how gamma burst mechanism too (the star becoming a black hole) This is new BTW..

http://astro.berkeley.edu/research/grbs/grbinfo.html  

It definitely  was something as I said before and by the movement horizontally outside of the inter atmosphere ,that burn out ,following a slow descend ,in a straight  trajectory according to my humble common sense . that's for sure , and the most obvious ,..a satellite

I won't denied the minute I began to watch this objects many thoughts like your came into my mind I even thought that could be and explosion of and airplane  

I love your enthusiasm  Cheesy 

Alex

Quote:
but was it a line or a dot?


a dot
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Dec 30th, 2011 at 10:26am

Club508   Offline
Colonel
I like repainting aircraft!
Planet Earth

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
alrot wrote on Dec 29th, 2011 at 1:00pm:
Light/ Flames ? I don't understand what would be the diference? both came from the same thing "Heat" one uses the air become flames and the other can't because is in and empty space
You are wrong about the temperatures longitude waves of light

[img]

http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/kdeedu/kstars/ai-colorandtemp.html
I'm going to give you a practical way to understand this
http://es.dreamstime.com/antorcha-del-acetileno-y-tubo-del-hierro-thumb7520401.j...
the white part and the blue ones are hotter than the read and orange ,we use the blue/white part of the torch to cut or weld
it wasn't a black hole or in what you mean is a gamma burst which would be the only thing that last 4 minutes Common and less powerless supernova last a little bit longer , other wise we all by now would be in all news all over the world ,besides they don't move horizontally .. 
Oh God Club508 !!  Sad I don't want to sound presumptuous ,I know the mechanism of a supernova (according to theorist)I know how it works since I was 13 ,and I know how gamma burst mechanism too (the star becoming a black hole) This is new BTW..
http://astro.berkeley.edu/research/grbs/grbinfo.html  
It definitely  was something as I said before and by the movement horizontally outside of the inter atmosphere ,that burn out ,following a slow descend ,in a straight  trajectory according to my humble common sense . that's for sure , and the most obvious ,..a satellite
I won't denied the minute I began to watch this objects many thoughts like your came into my mind I even thought that could be and explosion of and airplane  
I love your enthusiasm  Cheesy 
Alex
Quote:
but was it a line or a dot?

a dot

But think, when camping, why do you usually hold the marshmallows right above the very tips of the flames?  Stick one marshmallow inside the very heart and base of the campfire, and another right on the very outer tips of the flames.  Wait about 30sec., then pull them both out and see which is more brown.  (or on fire or discintigrated)
For most flames you see, this would be the typical color to temperature rating.
Red
Just visible: 525 °C (980 °F)
Dull: 700 °C (1,300 °F)
Cherry, dull: 800 °C (1,500 °F)
Cherry, full: 900 °C (1,700 °F)
Cherry, clear: 1,000 °C (1,800 °F)
Orange
Deep: 1,100 °C (2,000 °F)
Clear: 1,200 °C (2,200 °F)
White
Whitish: 1,300 °C (2,400 °F)
Bright: 1,400 °C (2,600 °F)
Dazzling: 1,500 °C (2,700 °F)

And do not forget, stars are not necessarily fire.  They are actually doing nuclear fusion.  And even if they were all fire, what would they be burning?  elements.  And each one burns a different color.

And no, I never mentioned anything about gamma bursts or supernovas. Huh
and besides, a supernova is pretty much a star EXplosion, becoming a black hole is very much an IMplosion.

And as to the thing of the blowtorch...  Please read the first line of this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blow_torch
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Dec 30th, 2011 at 11:00am

Club508   Offline
Colonel
I like repainting aircraft!
Planet Earth

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
Alright.  I went in my image editor and attempted to create something that would look close to what my theory would look like.  I don't know how close it is, and just add the part where it shifts wherever you want.
...
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Dec 30th, 2011 at 1:11pm

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 
Club you can't change decades scientific results , on the contrary Red Giants star are colder that Blue stars,..
like Antares (a dying red) and Sirius (Blue) massive violent and die fast  . this is fact  Smiley

it seems according to astrophysicist that a normal Snova comes when the core of the star makes iron which its their death sentence and a new theory of gamma burst saidsa new type of gamma burst could be that when the core a super giant star its so dense that becomes a black hole then  it blows becoming a super nova  (Ordinary theory saids that two neutron star spin one each other and then collapse )

  This is yet a theories ,this its very complex to me to speech in English

  Temperatures from blue to red its from Hot to cold This is not my theory this is a fact and well known before Edwin Hubble were born  ..

there are other thing you have to keep in mind the Doppler effects, the chemical composition also determinate by different wave longitudes and colors 

  I still like your enthusiasm  Cheesy      
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Dec 30th, 2011 at 2:17pm

Club508   Offline
Colonel
I like repainting aircraft!
Planet Earth

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
alrot wrote on Dec 30th, 2011 at 1:11pm:
Club you can't change decades scientific results , on the contrary Red Giants star are colder that Blue stars,..
like Antares (a dying red) and Sirius (Blue) massive violent and die fast  . this is fact  Smiley

it seems according to astrophysicist that a normal Snova comes when the core of the star makes iron which its their death sentence and a new theory of gamma burst saidsa new type of gamma burst could be that when the core a super giant star its so dense that becomes a black hole then  it blows becoming a super nova  (Ordinary theory saids that two neutron star spin one each other and then collapse )

  This is yet a theories ,this its very complex to me to speech in English

  Temperatures from blue to red its from Hot to cold This is not my theory this is a fact and well known before Edwin Hubble were born  ..

there are other thing you have to keep in mind the Doppler effects, the chemical composition also determinate by different wave longitudes and colors 

  I still like your enthusiasm  Cheesy      

This just so goes against what I was taught in science class last year. Cheesy

Agggh!  All the theories!  They hurt! Cheesy



Though I do have to qustion this:  How can we tell?
Last time I checked, we can only even get estimates of our OWN sun.  Have we even gotten past mercury yet without any of our stuff burning up?
We can only get so close, so we can only get so close an estimate. Sad

And here's some interesting things I've been wondering about for AGES on space and heat, if you can even help me understand them.
1.  If space is a vaccum, why is the space station rusting?
2.  If space is a vaccum, and heat is the vibration of the atoms, particles, etc., how is heat cast through space where there's nothing TO vibrate?  And how is it a wave when we're taught that its the vibration, so technically it's the object?  Wouldn't that make it a particle?
3.  If heat is the vibration of particles, and space is a vaccum, then if you were to hold a thermometer out in space, what temperature would it read?
4. If space were a vaccum, wouldn't the extreme low pressure cause ANYTHING that goes out there to be torn and spread across the entire reach of space?
5.  If light and heat are so much the same, why are heat and light energy seperate, and why are they in different parts of the wave spectrum?
(Microwaves---Visible Light Spectrum---X-Rays---Gamma Rays)
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Dec 30th, 2011 at 3:18pm

jetprop   Offline
Colonel
A freeware addict!
a chair infront of a monitor.

Posts: 1523
*****
 
1.  I think the space station isn't in total vacuum,its in the thinnest part of athmosphere i think...

2. Dark matter and the wave IS the vibration(?)

3. I don't have a clue. Tongue

4. Why doesn't it happen to aircraft?

5. Light is energy,and heat is a form of energy,the spectrums are just the different kinds of energy.

these are all my oppinions...
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Dec 31st, 2011 at 11:22am

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 
Club508 wrote on Dec 30th, 2011 at 2:17pm:
This just so goes against what I was taught in science class last year. Cheesy

Agggh!  All the theories!  They hurt! Cheesy



Though I do have to qustion this:  How can we tell?
Last time I checked, we can only even get estimates of our OWN sun.  Have we even gotten past mercury yet without any of our stuff burning up?
We can only get so close, so we can only get so close an estimate. Sad

And here's some interesting things I've been wondering about for AGES on space and heat, if you can even help me understand them.
1.  If space is a vaccum, why is the space station rusting?
2.  If space is a vaccum, and heat is the vibration of the atoms, particles, etc., how is heat cast through space where there's nothing TO vibrate?  And how is it a wave when we're taught that its the vibration, so technically it's the object?  Wouldn't that make it a particle?
3.  If heat is the vibration of particles, and space is a vaccum, then if you were to hold a thermometer out in space, what temperature would it read?
4. If space were a vaccum, wouldn't the extreme low pressure cause ANYTHING that goes out there to be torn and spread across the entire reach of space?
5.  If light and heat are so much the same, why are heat and light energy seperate, and why are they in different parts of the wave spectrum?
(Microwaves---Visible Light Spectrum---X-Rays---Gamma Rays)


I like you kid ,I really do ,you are spontaneous and one of the most important of all you make your own theories which is very good and positive   Smiley

i'll try to explain I could be wrong ,I'm not a Physicist, I have met some of them and actually I'm a good friend of a Phd which have a great theory about dark and enery matter UN-existance, but I wont talk about this ...again
Quote:
If space is a vaccum, and heat is the vibration of the atoms, particles, etc., how is heat cast through space where there's nothing TO vibrate?


What cast the heat to spread is Infrared rays among many other types of the same phenomena , each one has its on Phisical property like X rays can pass thought solids
take a look at this

...

radio waves , Microwaves <--close to infrared, Visible light with all its colors ,x ray are the same thing ,

Infrared : transfer the heat , however when we exposure to the sun on a beach we burn not by infrared ,that is cause by ultraviolet rays , Our Sun bring us a full cocktail of all longitude waves and some rare things like Neutrinos particles

this is something I found and is what most of the peope explain about it (but I think is incomplete)

http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/cosmic_classroom/light_lessons/thermal/heat.h...

however ,I always thought that heat was determinate (and i think it is) by the speed of the electrons on every atom and chaos in plasma stages inside of stars , remember it transfer though the infrared rays..

THE EARTH Its hot in the core because atoms and its electrons orbits are being squeeze by the enormous amount of pressure  and most of the big objects in our solar system are hot in their core ,Jupiter Venus ,sun etc

Quote:
4. If space were a vaccum, wouldn't the extreme low pressure cause ANYTHING that goes out there to be torn and spread across the entire reach of space?


No pressure at all ,to make things easier we are the one who are weird, we live in a Tank of also enormous amount of atmosphere pressure take this as and example, If you would go very deep into the ocean ,said 11km beneath the surface and grab one of those fishes and take it to the surface the fish will die and increase the size and maybe the eyes will jump out of their orbits ,see my point?

Quote:
5.  If light and heat are so much the same, why are heat and light energy seperate, and why are they in different parts of the wave spectrum?
(Microwaves---Visible Light Spectrum---X-Rays---Gamma Rays)


This question and the rest are answered with what I told you above  that light which is also a part  electromagnetic radiation  does not transfer heat like the infrared   

   
I'm not a Physicist ,I am and amateur astronomer I could be wrong but most of this is what I been told and read though my life


I fact guess who made all of these?

...

I have made many more included one 6 inch refractor one ,this photo is very old I still had black hair ....and hair  Grin
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Dec 31st, 2011 at 8:22pm

Club508   Offline
Colonel
I like repainting aircraft!
Planet Earth

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
I'd probably close to blow the character limit of the forum if I quoted you, so I'll skip that and save everyone some scrolling. Cheesy

But thanks!  6 times over!  (You look good in the picture by the way)
And really, an AMATEUR?!?!?  You seem pretty knowledgeable to me.
This world's going mad. Tongue


And a thing of heat being the vibration of particles etc., if that is correct, how can objects cool down?  Once they start hitting each other, they'll start heating up more, causing them to hit each other more and at higher speed, generating even more heat, until the atoms were finally going at or past he speed of light, and unable to slow down!

Though I am developing a slight theory on heat over here myself, and I have been for a while.

Alright, now here's the deal.  I actually go on creating many theories, many of them I don't quite know or understand myself.  I often keep them extremely private, but I'm going to let this heat one slip.  Just if this one actually somehow turns out correct, please don't go taking my credit.

Heat Theory #01
What if heat actually exists not within the vibrations or the atoms and items themselves, but actually in the empty vaccum BETWEEN them?  More specifically, what if heat is a wave, that can only exist in a vaccum?  Even more specifically, what if heat is CREATED by the collision of things like atoms and their parts, but EXISTS as a wave that can only exist in a vaccum?  Even MORE specifically, when the wave hits any particle, it is destroyed completely or weakened wherever the contact was made.

It could also help define the heat generated by friction.  Even when two objects are (seemingly) right against each other, there's always that tiny bit of vaccum, even if it's smaller than a quark.
The atoms of the object will clash, creating the heat.  The heat will exist in the vaccum between the objects and in the space between the object's atom's parts.

It would explain why warm air essentially "rises".  It doesn't.  Due to gravity, the particles in the air are pulled twoard the earth, making for less pressure at higher altitude, meaning more space between particles, meaning more room for heat to exist.  It also means there will be less atom collisions, meaning there will be less generation of heat, causing why the tops of mountains are usually colder.

It would explain why the tips of flames always attempt to go upwards.  The heat exists above where there is more vaccum.

It woukld explain why objects can cool down. Tongue
The heat is cut off by interfereing particles. Tongue

This is all I can remember about my theory without going back through and digging it back up. Tongue
I hope you enjoyed my rant!  by the way, please let me know if you can find any problems with my theory and I'll try to bat them out to fix my theory. Smiley
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Jan 1st, 2012 at 6:18am

expat   Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!

Gender: male
Posts: 8499
*****
 
Slightly off topic, but NASA has just put a new satellite in orbit around the moon. Will it be possible to view it with a small telescope (the satellite that is, not the moon.......Just though I would preempt the usual SimV jokers Grin Grin)

Matt
 

PETA ... People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
IP Logged
 
Reply #28 - Jan 1st, 2012 at 6:26am

jetprop   Offline
Colonel
A freeware addict!
a chair infront of a monitor.

Posts: 1523
*****
 
club: hhmmm,thats actutaly a decent theory,haven't read through properly but it seems good.
but the main problem is:theories,will always stay theories.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #29 - Jan 1st, 2012 at 6:43am

Fozzer   Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.

Posts: 24861
*****
 
expat wrote on Jan 1st, 2012 at 6:18am:
Slightly off topic, but NASA has just put a new satellite in orbit around the moon. Will it be possible to view it with a small telescope (the satellite that is, not the moon.......Just though I would pre-empt the usual SimV jokers Grin Grin)

Matt


Lots of Comets, Asteroids, exploding Nebula's, and collapsing Stars in the sky last night!... Smiley...!

My nest-door neighbour suggested it may be something to do with Fireworks, and New Year's celebrations?... Undecided...!

Paul...Sim V Joker... Wink... Grin...!
 

Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print