Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› First, there was this gun...
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
First, there was this gun... (Read 1880 times)
Mar 8
th
, 2011 at 6:47pm
patchz
Offline
Colonel
What, me worry?
IN THE FUNNY PAPERS
Gender:
Posts: 10589
Not sure if this should be in Real Aviation or here, but because it is written somewhat tongue in cheek, I put it here. I got it in an email from H.
First, there was this gun...
It was developed by General Electric, the "We bring good things to life" people. It's one of the modern-day Gatling guns. It shoots very big bullets. It shoots them very quickly. Someone said, "Let's put it in an airplane." Someone else said, "Better still, let's build an airplane around it."
So they did. And "they" were the Fairchild-Republic airplane people. And they had done such a good job with an airplane they developed back in WWII...
...called the P-47 Thunderbolt, they decided to call it the A 10 Thunderbolt
They made it so it was very good at flying low and slow and shooting things with that fabulous gun. But since it did fly low and slow, they made it bulletproof, or almost so. A lot of bad guys have found you can shoot an A-10 with anything from a pistol to a 23mm Soviet cannon and it just keeps on flying and
shooting. When they got through, it looked like this...
It's not sleek and sexy like an F18 or the stealthy Raptors and such, but I think it's such a great airplane because it does what it does better than any other plane in the world. It kills tanks.
Not only tanks, as Sadam Hussein's boys found out to their horror, but armored personnel carriers, radar stations, locomotives, bunkers, fuel depots...just about anything the bad guys thought was bulletproof turned out to be easy pickings for this beast.
See those engines. One of them alone will fly this puppy. The pilot sits in a very thick titanium alloy "bathtub." That's typical of the design.They were smart enough to make every part the same whether mounted on the left side or right side of the
plane, like landing gear, for instance. Because the engines are mounted so high (away from ground debris) and the landing gear uses such low pressure tires, it can operate from a damaged airport, interstate highway, plowed field, or dirt road.
Everything is redundant. They have two of almost everything. Sometimes they have three of something. Like flight controls. There's triple redundancy of those, and even if there is a total failure of the double hydraulic system, there is a set of manual flying controls.
Capt. Kim Campbell sustained this damage over Bagdad and flew for another hour before returning to base. But about that gun...
It's so hard to grasp just how powerful it is.
This is the closest I could find to showing you just what this cartridge is all about. What the guy is holding is NOT the 30mm round, but a "little" .50 Browning machinegun round and the 20mm cannon round which has been around for a long time.
The 30mm is MUCH bigger.
Down at the bottom are the .50 BMG and 20x102 Vulcan the
fellow was holding. A t the bottom right is the bad boy we're discussing. Let's get some perspective here: The .223 Rem (M16 rifle round) is fast. It shoots a 55 or so grain bullet at
about 3300 feet/sec, give or take. It's the fastest of all those rounds shown (except one). When you move up to the .30 caliber rounds, the bullets jump up in weight to 160-200 grains. Speeds run from about 2600 to 3000 FPS or so.The .338 Lapua is the king of the sniper rifles these days and shoots a 350 grain bullet at 2800 FPS or so. They kill bad guys at over a mile with that one. The .50 BMG is really big. Mike Beasley has one on his desk. Everyone who picks it up thinks it's some sort of
fake, unless they know big ammo. It's really huge with a bullet that weighs 750 grains and goes as fast the Lapua. I don't have data on the Vulcan, but hang on to your hat.The bullet for the 30x173 Avenger has an aluminum jacket around a spent uranium core and weighs 6560 grains (yes, over 100 times as heavy as the M16 bullet, and flies through the air at 3500 fps (which is faster than the M16 as well). (By the way - 6560 grains is 425 grams ; there are 454 grams in a pound, so this thing is shoving ~two tons of bullets - more than a Volkswagen - a minute out the front door) The gun shoots at a rate of 4200 rounds per minute. Yes, four thousand. Pilots typically shoot either one- or two-second burst which set loose 70 to 150 rounds. The system is optimized for shooting at 4,000 feet.
OK, the best for last. You've got a pretty good idea of how big that cartridge is, but I'll bet you're like me and you don't fully
appreciate how big the G A G A U-8 Avenger really is.
Take a look...
Each of those seven barrels is 112" long. That's almost ten feet. The entire gun is 19-1/2 feet long. Think how impressive it would look set up in your living room. Oh, by the way, it doesn't eject the empty shells but runs them back into the storage drum. There's just so dang many flying out, they felt it might damage the aircraft. Like I said, this is a beautiful design.
I'm glad it's ours!
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Mar 8
th
, 2011 at 7:29pm
Flying Trucker
Offline
Colonel
An Old Retired Rocking
Chair Flying Geezer
Gender:
Posts: 11425
Good evening Larry...
Very well done with great commentary...
I myself find the aircraft beautiful...but hell what does an old radial engine driver know?...
Now I think it is time I called some of those Air Force Generals you all got down there and have that aircraft put on Armoured Amphibious Floats and pay me for the idea...
A United States Air Force Squadron or two would do all right with an Amphibious A-10 Thunderbolt II....
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Mar 8
th
, 2011 at 7:34pm
Skunkworks
Offline
Colonel
Frazzle Dazzle!
Central California
Gender:
Posts: 2102
Wow, I spend some free time daily flying the Hog in a game not a sim and have accumulated some novice knowledge over the years. But when you condense it into a post, it really makes you think, "
thunderbolt and lightning, very very frightening
".
Thanks H and L.T. for sharing this
FSX, we've come a long way baby! Skunk Works is an official alias for Lockheed Martin’s Advanced Development Programs (ADP), formerly called Lockheed Advanced Development Projects. Skunk Works is responsible for a number of famous aircraft designs, including the U-2, the SR-71 Blackbird, the F-117 Nighthawk, and the F-22 Raptor. Its largest current project is the F-35 Lightning II
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Mar 8
th
, 2011 at 8:26pm
TacitBlue
Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Gender:
Posts: 5391
Ahhh the A-10, One of my favorite aircraft. Some neat stuff in this post too, I knew the gun was big, but I've never seen it sitting next to a Volkswagen like that. I've heard the bullets described as being "The size and shape of a Coke bottle". Now I actually believe it.
It's easy being an A-10 fan because it seems that there is one at every air show that the USAF is involved with. The air displays are never a letdown either.
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y
Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 12:02am
RaptorF22
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 1643
One of my favorites, really beautiful aircraft!
I've heard of A-10 mantinence crews pulling cattails out of the gear because they fly so low.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 6:22am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Nice article Larry
Additional, the TF-34 that powers the A10 also powers the CRJ range of aircraft under the name CF-34. The only real difference is that the TF-34 has an "A" sump scavenge pump for when the aircraft is pulling negative G's. Understandably, the CF-34 uses gravity scavenge from the "A" sump, that's if I remember my manufacturers course correctly (a fair few moons ago)
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 8:01am
TacitBlue
Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Gender:
Posts: 5391
RaptorF22 wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 12:02am:
One of my favorites, really beautiful aircraft!
I've heard of A-10 mantinence crews pulling cattails out of the gear because they fly so low.
Poor cats...
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y
Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 8:35am
patchz
Offline
Colonel
What, me worry?
IN THE FUNNY PAPERS
Gender:
Posts: 10589
expat wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 6:22am:
Nice article Larry
Additional, the TF-34 that powers the A10 also powers the CRJ range of aircraft under the name CF-34. The only real difference is that the TF-34 has an "A" sump scavenge pump for when the aircraft is pulling negative G's. Understandably, the CF-34 uses gravity scavenge from the "A" sump, that's if I remember my manufacturers course correctly (a fair few moons ago)
Matt
That's interesting Matt. Thanks for the info.
Guess if I wanted to do some aerial maneuvers with my CRJ, I could just change to a TF-34. But how would I fit a GAU 8/A?
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 8:37am
patchz
Offline
Colonel
What, me worry?
IN THE FUNNY PAPERS
Gender:
Posts: 10589
TacitBlue wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 8:01am:
RaptorF22 wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 12:02am:
One of my favorites, really beautiful aircraft!
I've heard of A-10 mantinence crews pulling cattails out of the gear because they fly so low.
Poor cats...
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 8:52am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
patchz wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 8:35am:
expat wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 6:22am:
Nice article Larry
Additional, the TF-34 that powers the A10 also powers the CRJ range of aircraft under the name CF-34. The only real difference is that the TF-34 has an "A" sump scavenge pump for when the aircraft is pulling negative G's. Understandably, the CF-34 uses gravity scavenge from the "A" sump, that's if I remember my manufacturers course correctly (a fair few moons ago)
Matt
That's interesting Matt. Thanks for the info.
Guess if I wanted to do some aerial maneuvers with my CRJ, I could just change to a TF-34. But how would I fit a GAU 8/A?
In a CRJ, who needs a co-pilot, though ear protection may be a bit of a challenge
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 11:51am
patchz
Offline
Colonel
What, me worry?
IN THE FUNNY PAPERS
Gender:
Posts: 10589
expat wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 8:52am:
patchz wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 8:35am:
expat wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 6:22am:
Nice article Larry
Additional, the TF-34 that powers the A10 also powers the CRJ range of aircraft under the name CF-34. The only real difference is that the TF-34 has an "A" sump scavenge pump for when the aircraft is pulling negative G's. Understandably, the CF-34 uses gravity scavenge from the "A" sump, that's if I remember my manufacturers course correctly (a fair few moons ago)
Matt
That's interesting Matt. Thanks for the info.
Guess if I wanted to do some aerial maneuvers with my CRJ, I could just change to a TF-34. But how would I fit a GAU 8/A?
In a CRJ, who needs a co-pilot, though ear protection may be a bit of a challenge
Matt
Very big silencer maybe?
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 1:34pm
Souichiro
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 1092
Was reading an article about the original tankbuster the IL-2 series. Seems this warthog is an improvement then XD Awe inspiring gun!
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 3:04pm
patchz
Offline
Colonel
What, me worry?
IN THE FUNNY PAPERS
Gender:
Posts: 10589
Souichiro wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 1:34pm:
Was reading an article about the original tankbuster the IL-2 series. Seems this warthog is an improvement then XD Awe inspiring gun!
I had no idea how big it is, until now.
BTW, I have been confused by 'XD' in your posts for a while now Soui. Finally had to look it up.
Now my age is showing.
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 3:29pm
Steve M
Offline
Colonel
Cambridge On.
Gender:
Posts: 4097
patchz wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 3:04pm:
Souichiro wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 1:34pm:
Was reading an article about the original tankbuster the IL-2 series. Seems this warthog is an improvement then XD Awe inspiring gun!
I had no idea how big it is, until now.
BTW, I have been confused by 'XD' in your posts for a while now Soui. Finally had to look it up.
Now my age is showing.
I always thought it was a bra size until now. Great post Larry and H, loved it!
Flying with twins is a lot of fun..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 4:53pm
patchz
Offline
Colonel
What, me worry?
IN THE FUNNY PAPERS
Gender:
Posts: 10589
Steve M wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 3:29pm:
patchz wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 3:04pm:
Souichiro wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2011 at 1:34pm:
Was reading an article about the original tankbuster the IL-2 series. Seems this warthog is an improvement then XD Awe inspiring gun!
I had no idea how big it is, until now.
BTW, I have been confused by 'XD' in your posts for a while now Soui. Finally had to look it up.
Now my age is showing.
I always thought it was a bra size until now. Great post Larry and H, loved it!
Now I'm really going to show my age, because that never 'crossed' my mind.
You never know what 'H' is liable to send...
but it's usually worth sharing.
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.