Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Houston, we've had a problem (Read 452 times)
Apr 11th, 2010 at 7:21pm

Webb   Ex Member
I Like Flight Simulation!

*
 
Wikipedia

Quote:
Apollo 13 was the third Apollo mission intended to land on the Moon, but a mid-mission oxygen tank rupture caused sufficient damage to force the lunar landing to be aborted. The flight was commanded by James A. Lovell, with John L. "Jack" Swigert command module pilot, and Fred W. Haise lunar module pilot.

The mission launched on April 11, 1970 at 13:13 CST. Two days later, en route to the Moon, a fault in the electrical system of one of the Service Module's oxygen tanks produced an overpressure rupture which caused a loss of electrical power and failure of both oxygen tanks. The Command Module remained functional on its own batteries and oxygen tank, which were only designed to support the vehicle during the last hours of flight. The crew shut down the Command Module and used the Lunar Module as a "lifeboat" during the return trip to earth. Despite great hardship caused by limited power, loss of cabin heat, shortage of potable water, and the critical need to jury-rig the carbon dioxide removal system, the crew returned safely to Earth on April 17, and the mission was termed a "successful failure".

A misquotation of the radio transmission made by Swigert and repeated by Lovell ("...Houston, we've had a problem...") has become widely quoted in popular culture as "Houston, we have a problem."
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Apr 16th, 2010 at 12:33am

Webb   Ex Member
I Like Flight Simulation!

*
 
University of Toronto engineers helped save ill-fated Apollo 13 crew

Quote:
MONTREAL — High above the Earth, the lives of the Apollo 13 astronauts depended on a series of calculations by Canadian engineers. The slightest miscalculation could have meant death for the three-man crew.

“It carried the seeds of disaster if it went wrong,” says Ben Etkin, who was part of the University of Toronto Institute of Aerospace Studies team who helped rescue the astronauts 40 years ago ...

It was in the separation of the lunar and command modules that the Toronto team played a vital role.

Rockets that usually would have split the two vehicles were inoperable and it was decided to use pressure in the tunnel that connected the two units to perform the manoeuvre.

A ring of explosives located just 10 centimetres from the command module’s hatch would blow away the tunnel connecting the lunar module and the re-entry command module.

“That short tunnel had air in it that was pressurized and when the ring of explosives was set off, the two parts of the returning spacecraft would be pushed apart by the pressure in that tunnel,” Etkin said.

The University of Toronto team was asked to figure out exactly how much pressure was needed to separate the two modules.

“If the pressure was too low, the two parts of the spacecraft would not be pushed apart with sufficient speed,” Etkin noted.

“Above a certain pressure, the shock wave caused by the explosive could damage the entry hatch to the re-entry module.”

Etkin said if the hatch had been damaged it could have meant death for the astronauts during their return.

“During the approach, if the hatch was damaged and they lost air pressure inside the compartment due to leakage through that hatch, it would have been game over,” he said ...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Apr 19th, 2010 at 11:18pm

B-Valvs   Offline
Colonel
Jaggie Police
5B2

Gender: male
Posts: 5949
*****
 
The book about Apollo 13 is a great account of what happened by Jim Lovell. The movie is also one of my favorites.

Cool

 

...
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print