Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› Polish President plane crash in Russia
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
Polish President plane crash in Russia (Read 2377 times)
Reply #30 -
Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 10:58am
Al_Fallujah
Ex Member
FYI, new story out today, from a Russian news source that states that the previous attempts were flybys, and that the pilot did not have permission to attempt a landing.
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20100413/158559617.html
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 3:51pm
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
Why does half of the people in here still think in the civil chain of command...
This was a military crew with both the chief of staff and the highest airforce general on board. As a soldier on duty, you respond to the highest rank available... If they say land, you simply do it or face the consequences.
And when an Il-76 crew decides that the weather is too bad to land, you'd better do the same... as these things have a lot better low-visibility equipment on board
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 4:37pm
Al_Fallujah
Ex Member
Ivan wrote
on Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 3:51pm:
Why does half of the people in here still think in the civil chain of command...
This was a military crew with both the chief of staff and the highest airforce general on board. As a soldier on duty, you respond to the highest rank available... If they say land, you simply do it or face the consequences.
And when an Il-76 crew decides that the weather is too bad to land, you'd better do the same... as these things have a lot better low-visibility equipment on board
It is not that simple.
As someone who is military, I understand the chain of command. I also understand that the consequneces of crashing and getting dead, vs courts-martial.
As I understand it the Polish military also has a similar idea to the American military, that you are bound to follow all
lawful orders
.
I will seek a reference. Finding one not in Polish is proving tricky, as I do not speak or read it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 7:44pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
expat wrote
on Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 8:49am:
beaky wrote
on Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 8:25am:
expat wrote
on Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 3:51am:
beaky wrote
on Apr 12
th
, 2010 at 9:38pm:
expat wrote
on Apr 12
th
, 2010 at 2:23pm:
So add a life as a grounded, embarrassed, shamed and jobless flight crew into the equation, it would appear that the presidents demise could have been of his own making
Matt
No, the PIC has the last word, no matter what. He or she decides, based not on money or politics or anything except safety. At least, that's the way it's
supposed
to work.
Perhaps he was faced with such a with a choice, and the PIC just made the wrong call.
To me, it's a no brainer:
The two possible worst-case results are:
Unemployment, if one diverts and angers the VIPs on board, or... or death, which, after a few missed approaches, looks extremely likely.
Hmmmmm...
I don't believe I'd need to think that one over for even half a second.
On the ground, given this scenario to ponder, this same pilot would probably say "screw the job- I'm not going to try anything crazy!"
But... that's what they all say. In the air, they're more inclined to say "well... one more try, why not..."
If it was a Western airline/air force/accident I would agree with you 100%, but we are talking about a former Eastern Block country and old habits, traditions and work practices die hard. Sadly the pilot would not have the last word. They did what ground controllers and superiors would tell them and nothing else. When that sort of thing is part of the aviation set up and deeply ingrained, if the president tells you (if that actually happened) then you do it. If as an American, President Obama said, "right Sean, your WILL do XYZ", under your constitution, you would have the right to say, "not today Mr President". A luxury that people in other parts of the world do not have. Also not helping is press-on-itus, because an accident, that always happens to the next guy.
Matt
Doesn't matter what the culture is, or even the written rules under which a pilot is flying- unless the VIP passenger wants to have a whack at the approach himself, and has the qualifications and authority to take that seat, it's up to the PIC.
It doesn't matter who's sitting back there- the boss, the President, God Himself- the PIC has to make the call. It's simply a matter of what's possible and what isn't- if the prez wanted to fly to the Moon, he'd have to accept that it's just not possible. Likewise an approach below minimums for that aircraft and airport landing system. One attempt? sure, why not. But two? Three? Four?
The reports I've read so far say they went missed
three times
. All the PIC had to do was say "Very sorry, Mr. President, but as you can see, this isn't going to work.For safety's sake, we must land at an alternate."
These pilots weren't even Polish military, who could be ordered by the president to try again, in some situation where it was absolutely vital to make the attempt... but even then, I can't imagine what situation would require endangering so many top-level officials.
In the end, assuming there was no malfunction involved, and there was sufficient fuel to go to an alternate, it doesn't matter whether or not there was official pressure or the PIC was just in denial about his chances of making a safe landing at that airport on that day... it was his responsibility, and his mistake, IMHO.
Sorry Sean we will have to disagree, you are using your Western mindset and principle as a pilot in a part of the world that does not use or have such standards. Discussing aviation West to East is like trying to discuss religion East to West..........and we all know how that generally ends.
Matt
PS the pilots it turns out were Polish Air Force.
Well, the stereotypical "Eastern fatalism" aside, I don't see it as a cultural imperative- I'm talking about common sense, here.
I know that "common sense is not so common", but among pilots worldwide, it certainly is, despite glaring exceptions in all corners of the world.
And on the other side of the coin,this sort of mistake could have been made by pilots of any nationality, creed, status, etc.
After the third missed approach, it's probably time to go somewhere else, unless you want to die. All pilots would probably agree with me... at least when they're sitting in the hangar talking about it.
Anyway,I don't believe, that there is no room at all in Polish aviation culture for common sense... I know a very good pilot who learned to fly in Poland; he's maybe a little crazy (
), but I don't think he'd take such a chance as these guys seem to have taken, even if the plane was full of "brass hats" and his career was on the line.
I know he'd be tempted- most pilots would- but I doubt he'd lay his life- and the lives of those who he is trying to please- on the line, only for the sake of a schedule.
As for the crew being PAF personnel, possibly given a direct order by their CIC to try again, I could be wrong, but I think
they would have the right to refuse, on the grounds that the order itself constitutes a violation of the rules.
It's not like there was some sound reason why they should all die, therefore such an order would make no sense (remember, this was attempt number
four
).
And here's a thought: what if the approach had gone bad, killing the VIPs, but the PIC had survived? I think any military pilot would fear the repercussions of
that
more than death itself!
I could be wrong... maybe this crew saw things exactly as you described- CIC says "try again" so you try again, even though it's pretty obvious that it will not end well. We'll never really know, I guess.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 10:02pm
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
The President putting pressure may or may not have had something to do with the accident, but we all know of someone who pushed a little too far trying to make the approach work, and didn't make it. It happens to a lot more people, not just those transporting the big VIP. I read the NTSB reports everyday as part of my job, and I can tell you it is a common occurence.
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 11:03pm
Jeff.Guo
Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Posts: 283
I don't know how it is in Poland, but here, no officer (flag or not) can override the judgment of a sane captain as long as the aircraft is airborne.
To be fair, the TU-154 has an very AVERAGE safety record, it ain't dangerous, but it ain't a bundle of bubble wrap either. In my opinion, that pilot was nothing short of a complete dumbass putting his aircraft in a situation like that, especially when carrying VERY PRECIOUS cargo. There is absolutely no reason to fly through a thunderstorm in peacetime. Given the alternatives of a funeral on a sunny day or a ride in a limousine, I'm almost certain that man's president would've most certainly opted for the latter.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Apr 14
th
, 2010 at 3:16am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Quote:
FYI, new story out today, from a Russian news source that states that the previous attempts were flybys, and that the pilot did not have permission to attempt a landing.
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20100413/158559617.html
Well that article is full of contradictions, maybe lost in translation. I think that this incident will never ever have a hard and fast chain of events that all can agree on. I would imagine that any recording have been "lost" already and that the the data recorder (does this aircraft have one) has been too badly damaged or the recording is way, way to good
Russian and Poland are never going to agree about what happened.
There is a possibility that the US military has a dam good idea, but that would involve admitting to activities that are always denied
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Apr 14
th
, 2010 at 4:28am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
expat wrote
on Apr 14
th
, 2010 at 3:16am:
Quote:
FYI, new story out today, from a Russian news source that states that the previous attempts were flybys, and that the pilot did not have permission to attempt a landing.
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20100413/158559617.html
Well that article is full of contradictions, maybe lost in translation.
Quite. This is what it actually says in the article.
"
The [control tower] head said three times to execute a flyby procedure.
When the crew did not listen, the control tower could only continue to guide the plane and watch it.
It was the only landing approach
, the plane crashed at once," he added.
The way I read it the pilot was
advised
three times during the approach to execute a fly-by. He ignored the advice & the aircraft crashed on its only attempt at landing.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
Apr 14
th
, 2010 at 8:40am
Al_Fallujah
Ex Member
It is my understanding the recorders were found and in good condition, opened in front of both Polish and Russian officials. That was reported over the weekend.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article7094338.ece
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
Apr 14
th
, 2010 at 10:20am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Just been reading an interview in the German press with the pilots father. Seems he is poring scorn on the language barrier aspect of the crash. He says his son spoke excellent Russian. I wonder if the voice recorder will be made public, but somehow I doubt it. The pilot also has 1930 hour on type.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #40 -
Apr 15
th
, 2010 at 1:02pm
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
SaultFresh wrote
on Apr 13
th
, 2010 at 4:20am:
1) just because you can tell the President of the United States something like that, does not mean that it will be said. I think many pilots would go for it if they were in those shoes. I mean, I've never heard of Air Force One having to go to their alternate, they probably never even have to overshoot. The case is, when your superior is your passenger, you clearly want to look impressive, you're going to want to stand out. Decision making processes can become compromised, judgment can become non-existent. The result is about 97 people dead in an airplane accident including much of the Polish government (so I've been told)
Not gonna happen on Air Force One.
Protecting the President is JOB #1, this includes, the safe arrival of the plane to and from its destination.
And yes it does have alternate landing sites, they go over this days before the flight, from every taxi route, to bad weather, to alternate landing. And they do not gung-ho it or "go for it". Failure to do so will result in your immediate termination from the 89th Air Wing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/89th_Airlift_Wing
, and 99.9% of the time from the USAF.
After all if you can't follow Job #1, Keeping the Commander And Chief Safe, then why would they want you around any other plane?
And I'm not speaking as an airplane enthuses, I'm speaking from experience, from preparing planes at my level to carry: Generals, Senators, Secretary Of Defense, Secretary of State, the Vice President, and the President. The chain starts from Maintenance and goes up to the pilots, If any part of the chain becomes weak you have problems.
_____________________________________________________
So if every thing the reports say is true, and the pilot did ignore the ATC, that is poor training, and poor judgment on his part as a Pilot, and as a soldier.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #41 -
Apr 15
th
, 2010 at 1:35pm
SeanTK
Ex Member
It was a case of either:
1. Try the approach with a chance of success.
2. Abort the approach and have a 100% guarantee that your career is ruined and that you will be blacklisted by future employers. (Going by reports that the brass has dismissed pilots from the force for such actions before.)
Yes, it may be considered a "poor decision", but it's either take the chance of success, or take the 100% chance of dishonorable career termination.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.