Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Upgrading to INTEL i5 for FSX SP2 (Read 725 times)
Mar 15th, 2010 at 9:41pm

BHILL2   Offline
Colonel
Hello!

Gender: male
Posts: 20
*****
 
I am looking at upgrading my computer to an 'i5' P55 Socket. My current specs are as follows

Q6600 Core Quad 2.40ghz (O.C. to 2.70ghz)
ASUS P5N-D Mobo nforce750 chipset
6GB 800mhz DDR2 RAM
ASUS 8800GTX 869mb GPU
600W PSU

And I want it to look something like the Following (with Slash's dividing the Options)

Intel Core i5 750 2.66Ghz (Quad Core)   /   Intel Core i5 661 3.33Ghz (Daul Core)
Asus P7P55D LE Intel P55 (Socket 1156) PCI-Express DDR3 Motherboard
4GB DDR3 1600mhz Ram    /    4GB DDR3 1333mhz RAM
ASUS 8800GTX 869mb GPU
600W PSU

I want to stay with my trusty 8800GTX GPU but I am unsure as to whether a 2.66ghz Quad core would be better than a 3.33ghz daul core. And because both chips say they can only support under 1333mhz DDR3 Ram, Would there be any point in going for 1600mhz RAM.


-Which CPU is best for FSX SP2 and Win7 64bit?

-Which should I choose?

-Will my 8800GTX be compatable with these Specs?

-Will 600W be enough for what I want?


Info: www.novatech.co.uk

Thanks
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Mar 16th, 2010 at 4:25am

Thai09   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!

Gender: male
Posts: 144
*****
 
Not sure if this is an upgrade!

Why not clock the Q6600 up to around 3.6 or 3.8?

Should be easy with proper cooling...

IMO a real upgrade for running FSX is no less than an i7 920 @ 4.0 Ghz / 285 GTX / DDR 3 RAM low lat.



 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Mar 16th, 2010 at 5:03am
NNNG   Ex Member

 
I don't think the Core i5 750 performance increase over the Q6600 warrants the price of upgrading. I'd probably overclock the Q6600 some more, should go to 3.0ghz on stock cooling, and 3.6ghz on improved cooling, maybe more, maybe less depending on your chip.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Mar 16th, 2010 at 5:50am

Daube   Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)

Gender: male
Posts: 5833
*****
 
I agree with the two comments above.
Although a i5 @ 2,6 GHz might be a bit faster than a Q6600 @ 2,6 GHz, the CPUs you're listing above are not so interesting for FSX:
- an i5 @ 2,66GHz is too slow for good FPS.
- a dual core is not good for blurries, especially with photoreal sceneries.

Now, if you can overclok that i5 at more than 3GHz, then it might be interesting. A speed below 3GHz is not enough for FSX.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Mar 16th, 2010 at 1:33pm

BHILL2   Offline
Colonel
Hello!

Gender: male
Posts: 20
*****
 
Thanks for your replys and thoughts,

I have already tried overclocking the cpu more and I just keep getting boot errors or system lock ups after 30mins or so. And I have already been on tomshardware website to try and resolve it but it seems i cannot go above 2.7 without problems.

The i5 would still have a faster speed than my q6600 and has lot of new features which come with it like turbo boost which will automaticlly overclock the quad core from 2.66ghz to 3.2ghz on one of its cores , and the daul core from 3.33ghz up to 3.6ghz. And DDR3 running at a faster speed must also make a difference.... surely it would still be an upgrade.  Undecided

but the biggest question would be whether I should go for the 3.33ghz daul core or 2.66ghz quad
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print