IMO it would look better without the snow.

Or have it moving.

specter177 wrote on Mar 1^st, 2010 at 9:48pm:

I kind of like it without cars, the lack of action makes the picture feel desolate.




Is this post against the rules?

I'm not too sure if I like the sky that much.  It would be better if it had a little more definition to it.

As far as overall, it's too white for my tastes.  Colour is an important aspect of a good photo.  I feel like the photo needs to have a little more jump to it.

Landing A/C in the background, with 3D lights.  The A/C should be whatever plane(s) frequent the airport.  Another thing is, there should be ATC guys in the tower.  Also, a car behind a building and bush, does not count!  There should be 2 or 3 cars on the road.

Finaly, have to agree with patchz.

Now it's pink, and the snow still looks fake. 

JakesF14 wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2010 at 6:39am:





It's hard to rip a good shot.  Take a bad one and give it to us. 

ShaneG wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2010 at 7:27am:

So very true.

From a photographic perspective, the partial tree on the right is bad, it doesn't quite hit the "thirds" guidelines for the horizon.

Other than that, it perfectly represents an overcast (as it would generally be with snow falling) winters day.

The control tower is central giving a nice visual divide between the domain of the aircraft and the domain of the motor vehicle, with each taking up fairly equal space in the image. It shouldn't have any blur, as there is nothing being focussed on in the foreground to force the DOF effect, blur for blurs sake would ruin it.. and it would be wrong.

It's not very good as an aircraft screen shot mind you, there's a definite lack of interesting planes in there. 

Bottom line, we need more fail!! There is not enough fail in this image.