Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› USAF Vs RAAF
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
USAF Vs RAAF (Read 991 times)
Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 5:14am
Leigh
Offline
Colonel
"Its not the destination
its the journey."
somewhere over the rainbow
Gender:
Posts: 1503
Hello all
Well many of who may know who i am but im 17 years old and i live i Australia, im lucky enough to have dual citizenship with the US and Aus.
But my question for you guys today is.
what is easier to get into and what sort of academic requirements do you need to become a pilot in well both air forces.
also who has the better "pass" rate to become a pilot, i have heard of a few people in the RAAF who have tried and got to the final exam and now are instrument fitters.
any answers would be good
Thanks and S!
RAF_Leigh
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 5:27am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Leigh wrote
on Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 5:14am:
Hello all
Well many of who may know who i am but im 17 years old and i live i Australia, im lucky enough to have dual citizenship with the US and Aus.
But my question for you guys today is.
what is easier to get into and what sort of academic requirements do you need to become a pilot in well both air forces.
also who has the better "pass" rate to become a pilot, i have heard of a few people in the RAAF who have tried and got to the final exam and now are instrument fitters.
any answers would be good
Thanks and S!
RAF_Leigh
I would look more at the amount of required aircrew. The Australian air force, is, well, not the largest in the world and therefore, they can be very, very choosy (if Discovery Wings and a series about training F18 pilots is to be believed). I think that there are more personal in the Welsh National Guard
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 6:50am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
I'd say the USAF every time. The variation of aircraft, the numbers and so on make it a much better option. If you dont want to leave australia then its obvious.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 7:49am
Vodka Burner
Ex Member
USAF - less competition. I mean, less competition from you, for me, I want to fly for the RAAF.
In the ADF it's about 1 in 30,000 applicants that get in, I know that.
Serious answer - I don't know which one. Try both?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 9:30am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Leigh wrote
on Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 5:14am:
what is easier to get into ...
...become a pilot in well both air forces.
Be very careful with how you put things - mention that to a recruiter and they'll lose interest very quickly.
Only you can answer your question. Which do
you
want to be a part of? Which country to you have a better allegiance with - do you want to be in what I've seen as a home based air force (RAAF), or one where you could spend yourself permanently stationed elsewhere (on top of operational detactchments).
Certainly the USAF has more aircraft, and a greater variety of them, but would you prefer to be part of (and no disrespect meant here) a smaller, closer knit, air force, or a very very large force.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 11:11am
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
I would imagine neither is "easy". I only know about the Air Force, nothing about the RAAF.
To be considered for a pilot position, you need a four year college degree and a 3.2 or higher GPA in any program, but the science/engineering/business programs look better than basket weaving and interpretive dance. You have to take the AFOQT, which is similar to the SAT, but with additional spacial orientation, aviation, and table/chart reading sections. From that, you get scores in 5 different areas: pilot/navigator/arithmetic reasoning/verbal/quantitative. Minimum scores for pilot selects are usually in the 90/85/75/75/75. After that, you have to take the TBAS which tests your hand eye coordination, reaction time, visual tracking abilities, and multitasking. Your TBAS score, AFOQT pilot score, and previous flight hours are combined to give you a PCSM score, which scores your "chances" of completing flight training. Average select PCSM scores are in the 90 range.
All in all, it's not "easy", but it's certainly doable if you put the time and effort into it. Even if you do everything you can and get average scores on everything, you still have to go through the selection process of applications, medical tests, and interviews then your application is reviewed by a group of active duty officers along with all the other applications from the past 6 months and they make the selections. On my board there were just over 750 applicants and 27 were selected as pilots, and just under ~70 were selected as navigators.
But, don't let me scare you away at all, in the end, if you do get selected, you'll have the best job in the world, so don't give up and work your behind off, and be ready for long hard days with no end in sight, both before and after you are selected.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 11:21am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Mobius wrote
on Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 11:11am:
and previous flight hours are combined to give you a PCSM score, which scores your "chances" of completing flight training. Average select PCSM scores are in the 90 range.
Interesting. In 99.9% of cases the RAF don't really take into account previous flying (unless it was completed on a University Air Squadron, so with the RAF effectively), or you already have and ATPL and have been flying professionally (of which I've come across one).
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 12:23pm
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
C wrote
on Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 11:21am:
Mobius wrote
on Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 11:11am:
and previous flight hours are combined to give you a PCSM score, which scores your "chances" of completing flight training. Average select PCSM scores are in the 90 range.
Interesting. In 99.9% of cases the RAF don't really take into account previous flying (unless it was completed on a University Air Squadron, so with the RAF effectively), or you already have and ATPL and have been flying professionally (of which I've come across one).
Yeah, the USAF will increase your PCSM score somewhere around 5-10 points for 1-10 hours of flying, then 3-5 points for 10-20 hours, then 1 or 2 points for 20-50 hours, etc..., all the way up to 200 hours of flight time. From what I understand it's to eliminate the people that get in an airplane for the first time and decide they don't like flying after the Air Force spends time an money training them. I understand how that can be a problem for the government, and I can't complain about their methods seeing as I had almost 190 hours when I took the test.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 11:39pm
Leigh
Offline
Colonel
"Its not the destination
its the journey."
somewhere over the rainbow
Gender:
Posts: 1503
Thanks very much for all of your answers
Ys i know its not "easy" and i know itll take a fair bit of time to complete.
One thing that suprised me is that they like flight hours in the USAF. I was speaking to a cariboo pilot a few years ago and he said the RAAF dont really like it if you have more hours up, strange ist it
Thanks for all the info mobius but a few questions. what do these acronyms mean? GPA, AFOQT, SAT, TBAS, PCSM. I problay should know them but i am is Aus
anyway thanks for the help
S! RAF_Leigh
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jul 11
th
, 2009 at 12:27am
flavio
Offline
Colonel
USA
Posts: 157
Mobius pretty much laid it out for you in relation to the USAF, hes very knowledgeble having gone through the process himself!
I would only add one thing: 1/2 the reason that motivates me is that I love my country and will fight for it to the death. Look, even if you do make it in the USAF, what if you wash out? Are you okay working a desk job or doing some other type of service in which you will have to dig deep in your commintment to your country in order to endure? IF the answer is no, I would say the USAF is not for you. Remember, officer first, pilot second. Of course, the other half of my reason is that I love the hell out of flying
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jul 11
th
, 2009 at 2:02am
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
flavio wrote
on Jul 11
th
, 2009 at 12:27am:
I would only add one thing: 1/2 the reason that motivates me is that I love my country and will fight for it to the death. Look, even if you do make it in the USAF, what if you wash out? Are you okay working a desk job or doing some other type of service in which you will have to dig deep in your commintment to your country in order to endure? IF the answer is no, I would say the USAF is not for you.
Remember, officer first, pilot second.
Of course, the other half of my reason is that I love the hell out of flying
Well said, especially the bold part. Depending on what you fly, once you're done with training, you'll be spending 2-3 days a week doing a 1-3 hour flight and several hours with brief and debrief, but the rest of the week (the other 35-45 hours) doing what essentially will be paperwork related to administration of the unit. It's not a regular 9-5 job, but those that do it usually love it and wouldn't do anything else. The Air Force doesn't want to spend several million dollars training someone that they aren't sure is willing to put the time and effort into it, which is why they go through these processes to select officers.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jul 11
th
, 2009 at 7:45am
Mitch.
Offline
Global Moderator
If you don't like my driving,
get off the footpath
Australia
Gender:
Posts: 3923
There are alot of new entities that the RAAF are taking online (Super's, F-35s, KC-30 Tanker, C-27J, C-130J, AEW&C Wedgetail, P-8 Poseidon and perhaps more C-17s) within the next decade and they will be requiring new pilots, perhaps there's a chance you could catch a wave.
---------->Currently building a native FSX Beechcraft Starship 2000<----------
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
^^^ Click above to check out MySimshots.net ^^^
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jul 11
th
, 2009 at 3:54pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Leigh wrote
on Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 11:39pm:
One thing that suprised me is that they like flight hours in the USAF. I was speaking to a cariboo pilot a few years ago and he said the RAAF dont really like it if you have more hours up, strange ist it
This is quite possibly due to the close links between the RAF and the RAAF, and their respective training units, which both come under the umbrella of each air forces "Central Flying School" (see the link?). The RAF is very particular in the way they teach you to fly, which is often why they prefer someone who's near enough a complete ab initio, as opposed to someone who may have had 100hrs of being taught, or developing (when solo on a PPL etc) bad habits. It's worked for nearly 100 years.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jul 11
th
, 2009 at 8:17pm
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
C wrote
on Jul 11
th
, 2009 at 3:54pm:
Leigh wrote
on Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 11:39pm:
One thing that suprised me is that they like flight hours in the USAF. I was speaking to a cariboo pilot a few years ago and he said the RAAF dont really like it if you have more hours up, strange ist it
This is quite possibly due to the close links between the RAF and the RAAF, and their respective training units, which both come under the umbrella of each air forces "Central Flying School" (see the link?). The RAF is very particular in the way they teach you to fly, which is often why they prefer someone who's near enough a complete ab initio, as opposed to someone who may have had 100hrs of being taught, or developing (when solo on a PPL etc) bad habits. It's worked for nearly 100 years.
It's strange, but it's the almost the same with the USAF, they give you extra points for having flight hours, but once you're in, they essentially reteach you everything you learned, just in a different way. An interesting example is the pattern that the USAF flies at their training bases. There is no ATC, but a huge pattern, with two different circuits and different reporting points and types of approaches so apparently you can have around 15 aircraft in the pattern at a time with a minimum of radio traffic!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jul 12
th
, 2009 at 1:22am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Mobius wrote
on Jul 11
th
, 2009 at 8:17pm:
C wrote
on Jul 11
th
, 2009 at 3:54pm:
Leigh wrote
on Jul 10
th
, 2009 at 11:39pm:
One thing that suprised me is that they like flight hours in the USAF. I was speaking to a cariboo pilot a few years ago and he said the RAAF dont really like it if you have more hours up, strange ist it
This is quite possibly due to the close links between the RAF and the RAAF, and their respective training units, which both come under the umbrella of each air forces "Central Flying School" (see the link?). The RAF is very particular in the way they teach you to fly, which is often why they prefer someone who's near enough a complete ab initio, as opposed to someone who may have had 100hrs of being taught, or developing (when solo on a PPL etc) bad habits. It's worked for nearly 100 years.
It's strange, but it's the almost the same with the USAF, they give you extra points for having flight hours, but once you're in, they essentially reteach you everything you learned, just in a different way.
That's the way it works in the services. They don't want you having preconceived ideas. In the days of National Service if you happened to be a bus driver in civilian life they would give you a job in the radio department or somewhere completely unconnected with driving. It makes a lot of sense.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Jul 14
th
, 2009 at 12:50am
tcco94
Offline
Colonel
Go Avs!
Bay Area, California
Gender:
Posts: 4241
Go Navy!
Air Force is my second option
Sincerely, Tyler
www.tylerconnell.com
http://www.phoenixva.org/index.php/profile/view/PVA1557
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Jul 21
st
, 2009 at 12:10pm
EJW
Offline
Colonel
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 2786
USAF, as they are always expanding their air force, and the number of employees!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Jul 22
nd
, 2009 at 12:17pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
EJW wrote
on Jul 21
st
, 2009 at 12:10pm:
and the number of employees!
Not always a good thing.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Jul 24
th
, 2009 at 8:07am
Leigh
Offline
Colonel
"Its not the destination
its the journey."
somewhere over the rainbow
Gender:
Posts: 1503
what do you mean "not always a good thing" ??
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Jul 26
th
, 2009 at 10:57am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Leigh wrote
on Jul 24
th
, 2009 at 8:07am:
what do you mean "not always a good thing" ??
The old "quality versus quantity" argument.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Jul 28
th
, 2009 at 8:40am
Leigh
Offline
Colonel
"Its not the destination
its the journey."
somewhere over the rainbow
Gender:
Posts: 1503
i see
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.