Simviation Forum - got some new parts for my comp and need your input

May 10^th, 2009 at 3:40am

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

so i got a new graphics card= http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814129117

and a 500 watt power supply along with an additional (2) 1 GIG memory cards.

will this make my gameplay good? Undecided

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #1 - May 10^th, 2009 at 3:44am

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

ohh yeah i forgot to tell u guys that i have 2 gigs right now and i just bought 2 more so a totall of 4 gigs, and my procceesor is a intel pentium dual core E2200 @ 2.20 ghz.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #2 - May 10^th, 2009 at 7:37am

Mazza Offline
Colonel
:D
Melbourne, Australia.

Gender:
Posts: 3184

What did you have before?

The card is Okay, it wont run crysis on full, or most new games. But you get what you pay for with this line Wink

Sunset Chasing...RULES

AMD 9550 2.43 X4 - 2Gb RAM 800Mhz DDRII - Asus 4670
Corsair TX-750W

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #3 - May 10^th, 2009 at 3:17pm

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

like i stated above i had 2 gigs of ram and that processor. i had a integrated graphics card, that caused terrible game play and it didn't support dx 10 so i could play acceleration. also i have a 22" viewsonic so that's why i went with the 1 gig cuz some guys said it would be better to have the 1 gig for that size screen.

with the vid card i have a ram should i be able to run the game at the highest quality?

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #4 - May 10^th, 2009 at 3:54pm

machineman9 Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England

Gender:
Posts: 5255

Are you running a 64-bit operating system? If not, you are only going to be able to use about 2.75GB of that 4GB memory you have. The limit recognised by 32-bit operating systems is about 3.75GB. Graphics card memory (I'd say you have a bit of an excessive amount of memory for the graphics card - Could've gotten less memory for a better card at the same price) is taken away from this.

3.75-1 = 2.75GB system memory. So unless you have a 64-bit operating system, one RAM module will be sat doing nothing.

Which game are we talking about when you ask if it can be run at highest quality? I'd say no for things such as FSX, Crysis and all that. You have fairly average parts.... Nothing extremely good. You could expect to play FSX on mid-high settings I would've said.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #5 - May 10^th, 2009 at 6:34pm

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

wait so why do they sell 32 bit os comp with 4 gigs of ram? if u cant use all of it

and yes its fsx gold

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #6 - May 10^th, 2009 at 6:37pm

Faceman Offline
Colonel
Fly Fly Fly

Posts: 50

You can use 4GBs in x86 systems, there is a lot of info about it here and all over the web but you can in no way use more and you have to do a lot of work/tricks to get your system to see all of it and use it. Get ready for a lot blue screens in your future while you get it going if you are going to use 4 sticks though.

Most DDR2 motherboards really don't like to run 4 sticks of ram. I'm using four sticks right now in a striker extreme and it took a lot of trial and error to get them all to run smoothly. I've dealt with more restarts and boots into bios with only 3 sticks in for troubleshooting than I care to think about or admit! I had to underclock it really push the voltages so I lose bandwidth but can load more stuff into the ram and use the HDDs less: better but not as good as 2x2GB.

I do notice a benefit of the extra memory but as soon as I can, I'm taking it all out and putting in two 2GB sticks instead and using at least two of them (if not all 4, we'll see) in a small media center machine I am building for the living room.

You can get 2x2GB sticks for cheaper than you paid for the original 2x1GB sticks you are using now....

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #7 - May 10^th, 2009 at 6:59pm

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

Faceman wrote on May 10^th, 2009 at 6:37pm:

You can use 4GBs in x86 systems, there is a lot of info about it here and all over the web but you can in no way use more and you have to do a lot of work/tricks to get your system to see all of it and use it. Get ready for a lot blue screens in your future while you get it going if you are going to use 4 sticks though.

Most DDR2 motherboards really don't like to run 4 sticks of ram. I'm using four sticks right now in a striker extreme and it took a lot of trial and error to get them all to run smoothly. I've dealt with more restarts and boots into bios with only 3 sticks in for troubleshooting than I care to think about or admit! I had to underclock it really push the voltages so I lose bandwidth but can load more stuff into the ram and use the HDDs less: better but not as good as 2x2GB.

I do notice a benefit of the extra memory but as soon as I can, I'm taking it all out and putting in two 2GB sticks instead and using at least two of them (if not all 4, we'll see) in a small media center machine I am building for the living room.

You can get 2x2GB sticks for cheaper than you paid for the original 2x1GB sticks you are using now....

im so confused my os is 32 bit and my mother bord has room for 4 cards of ram. right now i have 2) 1 gig cards stock. and i bought 2 more 1 gig cards to put in the other 2 slots. will that work?

i have a dell inspiron 530 and you can buy them with 4 gigs of ram from dell so i dotn see what the problem is?

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #8 - May 10^th, 2009 at 9:18pm

Faceman Offline
Colonel
Fly Fly Fly

Posts: 50

It will work, but will most likely be a pain in your ass. Don't be surprised if it doesn't post the first time you fire it up after you put all four sticks in. You will be well served to do research on your specific motherboard and the timings, voltages, and clock speed that other people have used to get four sticks to work.

You may as well run some bench marks while you are at it before and after to see just what gains/losses you are making. I ran a lot benchmark tests when I was working on mine because there is no guarantee that you will benefit from the addition.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #9 - May 11^th, 2009 at 2:22am

NickN Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317

This myth that Windows x32 does not use 4GB is just that.. a myth

The OS does in fact address up to a max of 4GB regardless of what the Task Manager readout displays - part of that is an error in how Windows x32 works

The internet is full of horse manure

The primary issue is not the OS but the program in use. It must be LARGE ADDRESS AWARE or >2GB aware

The 2nd issue is the address space problem created by software that wants more the 2GB and the size of the PCIe video memory which must be mapped or addressed with the OS. Physical memory and Virtual Address Space are 2 different things and what causes out of memory errors has NOTHING to do with >2GB in Windows x32.. OOM means OUT OF address space mapped MEMORY

It is advisable to use a 64bit OS with a >2GB aware program such as FSX-SP2 simply because of todays video cards and how much they impact the default address space and squeeze the OS

I explain the entire process for working out OOM issue with Vista/XP 32 in the FSX tuning threads. Those who do not see OOM issues do not need to mess with any of that and if they are on FSX SP2 (SP1 is not >2GB aware) and using 4GB they will

Motherboard companies place the 4GB warning in their manuals in order to circumvent the flood of support contacts they got at one time about the memory use counter not showing their memory in use. What they put in those manuals is very misleading

I do agree anyone using the better video cards are FAR better off on a 64bit OS even if they only use 2GB! The user will avoid more headaches (that may or may not show up) that way. But I really wish people would learn how memory works with 32bit OS's and stop posting the myths as it would make my job a lot easier

Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #10 - May 11^th, 2009 at 2:26am

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

NickN wrote on May 11^th, 2009 at 2:22am:

This myth that Windows x32 does not use 4GB is just that.. a myth

The OS does in fact address up to a max of 4GB regardless of what the Task Manager readout displays - part of that is an error in how Windows x32 works

The internet is full of horse manure

The primary issue is not the OS but the program in use. It must be LARGE ADDRESS AWARE or >2GB aware

The 2nd issue is the address space problem created by software that wants more the 2GB and the size of the PCIe video memory which must be mapped or addressed with the OS. Physical memory and Virtual Address Space are 2 different things and what causes out of memory errors has NOTHING to do with >2GB in Windows x32.. OOM means OUT OF address space mapped MEMORY

It is advisable to use a 64bit OS with a >2GB aware program such as FSX-SP2 simply because of todays video cards and how much they impact the default address space and squeeze the OS

I explain the entire process for working out OOM issue with Vista/XP 32 in the FSX tuning threads. Those who do not see OOM issues do not need to mess with any of that and if they are on FSX SP2 (SP1 is not >2GB aware) and using 4GB they will

Motherboard companies place the 4GB warning in their manuals in order to circomvent the flood of support contacts they got at one time about the memory use counter not showing their memory in use. What they put in those manuals is very misleading

I do agree anyone using the better video cards are FAR better off on a 64bit OS even if they only use 2GB! The user will avoid more headaches (that may or may not show up) that way. But I really wish people would learn how memory works with 32bit OS's and stop posting the myths as it would make my job a lot eaiser

Grin

WOW very helpful thanks alot.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #11 - May 11^th, 2009 at 3:30am

NickN Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317

Just be aware.. its always best to replace/add memory with matched sticks only

so if you intend to run 4GB its best to purchase matched 2x2GB of the lowest timing memory you can get than trying to run more than 2 sticks and especially if those sticks are mismatched and different timng

Motherboards typically slow the memory down when you add more than 2 sticks through raising their timing so its always best to only use 2

i7 changes that

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #12 - May 11^th, 2009 at 10:32am

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

all right well i guess all just wait and see what i can figure out when i get all my stuff today. all let u guys know

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #13 - May 11^th, 2009 at 5:42pm

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

quick question. will fs 04 downloaded planes work in fsx?

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #14 - May 12^th, 2009 at 10:18am

NickN Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317

some do and some dont.. if FSX SP2 is used even more limits to that are seen

There are fixes for some aircraft.. and many of them have been relisted in the library with conversions built into them for FSX

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #15 - May 12^th, 2009 at 7:00pm

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

wow wtf i download planes and then i cant figure out how to import them to the game. so do and some dont. seems like basically all the downloads are different im so confuised Angry

any suggestions?

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #16 - May 12^th, 2009 at 7:28pm

NickN Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317

Yes.. download for the FSX section only

and if you wish to try something from the FS9 section know it may or may not work right

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #17 - May 12^th, 2009 at 7:34pm

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

NickN wrote on May 12^th, 2009 at 7:28pm:

Yes.. download for the FSX section only

and if you wish to try something from the FS9 section know it may or may not work right

yeah i get that all of my downloads r from fsx section. i get them downloaded fin and extract them and then i cant get them into the game. i go to microsoft game and all that junk. sim objects then airplanes, and then i copy the folder in there and it doesnt always work.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #18 - May 12^th, 2009 at 11:40pm

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

hey my dads a electrician and we both are into rc planes and rc cars. now with the lithium(lipo) batteries we use, we have to have a special charger that is dc only, not ac. so its kinda a hassle to have to hook it up to a battery. and now i that i got my new power supply i have no use for my old 300w PSU. i gave it to my dad and he looked it over and was trying to determine if he can get 12 volts dc power out of it. he hooked up his meter to a few of the cords and got no were. just wondering if there is a schematic or a way of somehow getting dc out of my old PSU with out having it hooked up to a comp.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #19 - May 13^th, 2009 at 3:22pm

NickN Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317

Look up AXT power supply wiring, or, external use of ATX power supply in google

To start the newer ones there must be a load on the 12v line as well as the correct pins on the 20/24 in molex jumped to start the PSU even with the swtich 'on'

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #20 - May 13^th, 2009 at 5:17pm

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

NickN wrote on May 13^th, 2009 at 3:22pm:

Look up AXT power supply wiring, or, external use of ATX power supply in google

To start the newer ones there must be a load on the 12v line as well as the correct pins on the 20/24 in molex jumped to start the PSU even with the swtich 'on'

thanks all take a look into that

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #21 - Jun 25^th, 2010 at 12:02am

motostu93 Offline
Colonel
Santa Barbara, CA

Gender:
Posts: 32

Back again with another quick comp spec question. Im in the market for a new comp. my previous one is old and tired. It had E2200 dual core @ 2.2 Ghz and a ati 4350 card on 4gb of ram. it barely could handle FSX on okay setting.

Im looking to upgrade.

heres what im thinking for part spec. can anybody tell me how well this will do playing FSX and on what setting? thanks

Intel core i7 930 @ 2.8 GHz
Liquid Cooling
8GB DDR3-1333
ATI Radeon HD 5670 1GB
MSI X58 PRO-E Mobo
700 Watt PSU
1 TB HDD
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit

Any input is greatly aprecciated.

Thanks

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #22 - Jun 25^th, 2010 at 12:48am

NNNG Ex Member

You only need to post it once.

The PC I suggest in your thread here:

http://205.252.250.26/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1277438781

Should run FSX very well.

Back to top

IP Logged

	Search the archive: