Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› C-17 Belly Landing
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
C-17 Belly Landing (Read 2174 times)
Feb 7
th
, 2009 at 4:14pm
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
Found this on the USAF website:
(U.S. Air Force photo)
Quote:
Bagram Airmen recover crippled aircraft
Crash recovery and emergency management crews survey a C-17 Globemaster III Jan. 31 as it rests on the active runway of Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, after landing Jan. 30 with its landing gear retracted. More than 120 Airmen, Defense Department civilians and contractors successfully removed the crippled aircraft from the runway Feb. 2 and restored full airfield operations shortly thereafter. The "belly up," or no landing gear, recovery effort was the first in the airframe's 16-year Air Force history.
http://www.af.mil/photos/index.asp?galleryID=2
www.af.mil
Not much else on it on the USAF web site, just waiting for investigation and see if they release any more info. But all things considered, the crew did an excellent job of putting it down with minor damage.
Looks like it can be repaired and flying in no time.
«
Last Edit: Feb 8
th
, 2009 at 4:32pm by OVERLORD_CHRIS
»
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Feb 7
th
, 2009 at 4:23pm
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Unusaul to have acomplete system failure to include manaul letdown as well
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Feb 8
th
, 2009 at 5:26pm
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
Probably too low already for manual...
Repair is basically patching it up till its safe to fly around and then get it to seattle or so to do the rest
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Feb 8
th
, 2009 at 8:49pm
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Ivan wrote
on Feb 8
th
, 2009 at 5:26pm:
Probably too low already for manual...
Repair is basically patching it up till its safe to fly around and then get it to seattle or so to do the rest
You are never too low for a manual let down unless your engines have failed and then no gear becomes a very minor point. As for the repair, it will involve a bit more than patching it up. Cabin pressurisation will have to be 101%. If not it will be limited to low level, that being no higher than 10,000 and that will be one very, very, very long flight back to the USA. Probably find Boeing will find a couple of people willing to go to Bagram and fix it.........at the same time earning more danger money than 10 troops earns in a lifetime.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Feb 9
th
, 2009 at 5:02pm
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
Well we were showing a guy how to manually lower the gear and lock them down on C-17, and we came to a bad conclusion: It takes way to long to secure the MLG, the stupid troop seats are in the way, and you literally have to rip them from the walls to be able to pin the gear down.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Feb 10
th
, 2009 at 5:54pm
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
They have some what of a video of it on you tube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AupPdRVJioY
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Feb 11
th
, 2009 at 4:49am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
OVERLORD_CHRIS wrote
on Feb 10
th
, 2009 at 5:54pm:
They have some what of a video of it on you tube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AupPdRVJioY
Seemed to be lots of civilians in that video, sign of the times I suppose.
Matt
PS (Herman Munster does not make a good news caster
)
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Feb 11
th
, 2009 at 4:57am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
OVERLORD_CHRIS wrote
on Feb 10
th
, 2009 at 5:54pm:
They have some what of a video of it on you tube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AupPdRVJioY
Since I first saw the photos I've been wondering whether this was a deliberate wheels-up landing. From what they're saying on that video it was caused by a "hard landing". I suppose that means the undercarriage collapsed.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Feb 11
th
, 2009 at 6:02am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Hagar wrote
on Feb 11
th
, 2009 at 4:57am:
OVERLORD_CHRIS wrote
on Feb 10
th
, 2009 at 5:54pm:
They have some what of a video of it on you tube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AupPdRVJioY
Since I first saw the photos I've been wondering whether this was a deliberate wheels-up landing. From what they're saying on that video it was caused by a "hard landing". I suppose that means the undercarriage collapsed.
I wondered that, but it looks like a wheels up landing for two reasons. Firstly, an aircraft of that size and weight suffering a heavy landing that collapses the gear, I would have though that after a they jacked it up, it would be taken away on dolly's and not on it's own gear, major structural damage to the gear bays and surrounding structures would have prevented that
. Also if you freeze the video at 26 seconds and then go to full screen mode, you can see that the gear doors are not up. On a C17 they remain open with extended gear. If the gear had collapsed, then I would have though that the doors would either be open or laying flat on the ground on the ground owing to the gear door sweep being a lot lower than the gear hang. They would have no chance to close before the aircraft hit the ground. In fact they would probably be the first thing to hit the ground after (
if
) the gear collapsed.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Feb 11
th
, 2009 at 6:13am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Good point Matt. I was trying to make out what the newsreader was saying rather than watching the vid.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Feb 19
th
, 2009 at 6:51pm
heynav
Offline
1st Lieutenant
Fly FS
Orlanod, FL
Gender:
Posts: 2
I saw some photos taken of the cockpit and the gear handle is in the up position. Looks like they forgot to put the gear down. When I was flying C-5's at Travis AFB we had a C-5 that did a gear up landing during local flying. The two pilots never flew again. I flew a C-141 back from Spain that had a nose gear break off on landing and it did much damage to the bottom of the plane, crack a main part of the belly. Had to fly back to Charleston at 10,000 unpressurized...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 2:53am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
heynav wrote
on Feb 19
th
, 2009 at 6:51pm:
I saw some photos taken of the cockpit and the gear handle is in the up position. Looks like they forgot to put the gear down. When I was flying C-5's at Travis AFB we had a C-5 that did a gear up landing during local flying. The two pilots never flew again. I flew a C-141 back from Spain that had a nose gear break off on landing and it did much damage to the bottom of the plane, crack a main part of the belly. Had to fly back to Charleston at 10,000 unpressurized...
A cockpit picture would seem to confirm our collective thoughts, the only remaining question being why. Lets hope it was a system failure
As for an unpressurised 10,000' trip, done one of those too. During my air force time I was in Turkey. The VC10 turned up and was promptly driven into by the baggage wagon. A very long and bumpy flight followed back to the UK.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 11:47am
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
expat wrote
on Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 2:53am:
heynav wrote
on Feb 19
th
, 2009 at 6:51pm:
I saw some photos taken of the cockpit and the gear handle is in the up position. Looks like they forgot to put the gear down. When I was flying C-5's at Travis AFB we had a C-5 that did a gear up landing during local flying. The two pilots never flew again. I flew a C-141 back from Spain that had a nose gear break off on landing and it did much damage to the bottom of the plane, crack a main part of the belly. Had to fly back to Charleston at 10,000 unpressurized...
A cockpit picture would seem to confirm our collective thoughts, the only remaining question being why. Lets hope it was a system failure
As for an unpressurised 10,000' trip, done one of those too. During my air force time I was in Turkey. The VC10 turned up and was promptly driven into by the baggage wagon. A very long and bumpy flight followed back to the UK.
Matt
Those pictures of the flight deck, i'm not sure if they are floating around the net yet. Even thought I have seen them all, they have not said if:
-there was an IFE and during the Emergency, they over looked it
-Something prevented them from dropping the gear
-There check list was missing a page, and they landed in the dark with what they thought was an up to date book.
-Or just Pilot and Co Pilot error
For there sakes, I hope it was one of the first three, and not the latter. Alot easier to to show that you were following the book page by page, and you did not notice the book missing a page, then to say "I forgot" or "I did not use the check list"
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 2:31pm
heynav
Offline
1st Lieutenant
Fly FS
Orlanod, FL
Gender:
Posts: 2
Go to this site to see several photos of the C-17.
http://cencio4.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/c-17-gear-up-landing-in-bagram-images/
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 2:43pm
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
heynav wrote
on Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 2:31pm:
Go to this site to see several photos of the C-17.
http://cencio4.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/c-17-gear-up-landing-in-bagram-images/
Interesting set of pictures. Also some valid points in the blog too. GPWS and config alarm, flaps down and close to the ground. Lots of questions and very thin on the answers. I am thinking that as the Air Force are not pushing that it was an IFE now that the pictures are in the public domain that there are a couple of pilots, to use a line from a well know film, who will be flying plane loads of rubber dog turds out of Hong Kong for a living
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Feb 21
st
, 2009 at 7:12am
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
Wheels safely up in at least one of the maingear closeups.
About losing the gear doors... they tend to snag on runway bumps.
And in damage its just a few scratches... nothing big looks damaged and the main areas hit are the underfloor open spaces... might be some wiring and pipes in there but nothing too expensive
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Feb 21
st
, 2009 at 10:50am
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
expat wrote
on Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 2:43pm:
heynav wrote
on Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 2:31pm:
Go to this site to see several photos of the C-17.
http://cencio4.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/c-17-gear-up-landing-in-bagram-images/
Interesting set of pictures. Also some valid points in the blog too. GPWS and config alarm, flaps down and close to the ground. Lots of questions and very thin on the answers. I am thinking that as the Air Force are not pushing that it was an IFE now that the pictures are in the public domain that there are a couple of pilots, to use a line from a well know film, who will be flying plane loads of rubber dog turds out of Hong Kong for a living
Matt
Well....now that those are out.
When the flaps are passed a certain point, the voice gives you a count down to the runway, but from the photo as you can see the gear handle on the Co Pilots side, does glow red after a while. After all in that config, the planes computer thinks you are landing, so it would not tell you "pull up, terrain"
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Feb 21
st
, 2009 at 1:42pm
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
OVERLORD_CHRIS wrote
on Feb 21
st
, 2009 at 10:50am:
expat wrote
on Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 2:43pm:
heynav wrote
on Feb 20
th
, 2009 at 2:31pm:
Go to this site to see several photos of the C-17.
http://cencio4.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/c-17-gear-up-landing-in-bagram-images/
Interesting set of pictures. Also some valid points in the blog too. GPWS and config alarm, flaps down and close to the ground. Lots of questions and very thin on the answers. I am thinking that as the Air Force are not pushing that it was an IFE now that the pictures are in the public domain that there are a couple of pilots, to use a line from a well know film, who will be flying plane loads of rubber dog turds out of Hong Kong for a living
Matt
Well....now that those are out.
When the flaps are passed a certain point, the voice gives you a count down to the runway, but from the photo as you can see the gear handle on the Co Pilots side, does glow red after a while. After all in that config, the planes computer thinks you are landing, so it would not tell you "pull up, terrain"
Why would the system monitor all the above and not the gear position. Even a 737-300 will scream Gear to you with flaps out at a certain hight
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Feb 22
nd
, 2009 at 8:14am
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
Perhaps one gear wouldn't lower and the pilot opted to land with the gear retracted.
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Feb 22
nd
, 2009 at 8:35am
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
expat wrote
on Feb 21
st
, 2009 at 1:42pm:
Why would the system monitor all the above and not the gear position. Even a 737-300 will scream Gear to you with flaps out at a certain hight
Matt
Remember this is a military aircraft designed to fly low and slow if it needed to. You really would not want the plane always screaming "Check GEAR! Check Gear!" every time you had to do low level passes, or sneak into a LZ at night while fling below 1000ft..(which is how they train almost every other day), I think that is why the gear handle just glows red when you are that point, to remind the Co Pilot "that if you decide to land, you may want this down for best results" C-130 also train like this too.
And also since McDonald Douglass Original made the C-17, there is no telling what there engineers were thinking, before the "merger" with Boeing.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Mar 4
th
, 2009 at 9:50pm
porky310
Offline
2nd Lieutenant
Fly FS
Posts: 1
Well for you guys who are curious about that C-17 I have some news. I am a SSGT aircraft mechanic deployed to Bagram Airfield. I witnessed the C17 belly in that night and also assited in removing the aircraft from the runway. It has been determined aircrew error. The pilots forgot to put the gear handle down. After we were able to lift the aircraft and put jacks underneath and place the gear handle in the down postion the gear came down and locked. Im not sure the accident report is out yet, but thats the news I have for you.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Mar 5
th
, 2009 at 4:37am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
porky310 wrote
on Mar 4
th
, 2009 at 9:50pm:
Well for you guys who are curious about that C-17 I have some news. I am a SSGT aircraft mechanic deployed to Bagram Airfield. I witnessed the C17 belly in that night and also assited in removing the aircraft from the runway. It has been determined aircrew error. The pilots forgot to put the gear handle down. After we were able to lift the aircraft and put jacks underneath and place the gear handle in the down postion the gear came down and locked. Im not sure the accident report is out yet, but thats the news I have for you.
Not so often we get such a definitive accident report that is first hand
What was the damage to the aircraft like. I take it she slid quite a way before coming to a stop.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Mar 8
th
, 2009 at 10:53pm
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
porky310 wrote
on Mar 4
th
, 2009 at 9:50pm:
Well for you guys who are curious about that C-17 I have some news. I am a SSGT aircraft mechanic deployed to Bagram Airfield. I witnessed the C17 belly in that night and also assisted in removing the aircraft from the runway. It has been determined aircrew error. The pilots forgot to put the gear handle down. After we were able to lift the aircraft and put jacks underneath and place the gear handle in the down position the gear came down and locked. Im not sure the accident report is out yet, but that's the news I have for you.
We figured as much, but we figured you would give the aircrew the benefit of the dought.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Mar 9
th
, 2009 at 12:01am
Thumper04
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
Bender-O-Wrenches
Hurlburt Field, FL
Gender:
Posts: 8
OVERLORD_CHRIS wrote
on Mar 8
th
, 2009 at 10:53pm:
porky310 wrote
on Mar 4
th
, 2009 at 9:50pm:
Well for you guys who are curious about that C-17 I have some news. I am a SSGT aircraft mechanic deployed to Bagram Airfield. I witnessed the C17 belly in that night and also assisted in removing the aircraft from the runway. It has been determined aircrew error. The pilots forgot to put the gear handle down. After we were able to lift the aircraft and put jacks underneath and place the gear handle in the down position the gear came down and locked. Im not sure the accident report is out yet, but that's the news I have for you.
We figured as much, but we figured you would give the aircrew the benefit of the dought.
I would have figured that any NCO ought to know better than to release his opinions before the AIB made a conclusion and released their report. Whether or not that's what happened, it is most certainly not his place to be announcing it as fact on a public forum. Pretty sure anyone who's ever been involved in an AIB should know that.
And in all fairness Overlord, I rarely give aircrews the benefit of the doubt.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Mar 10
th
, 2009 at 2:14am
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
Thumper04 wrote
on Mar 9
th
, 2009 at 12:01am:
OVERLORD_CHRIS wrote
on Mar 8
th
, 2009 at 10:53pm:
porky310 wrote
on Mar 4
th
, 2009 at 9:50pm:
Well for you guys who are curious about that C-17 I have some news. I am a SSGT aircraft mechanic deployed to Bagram Airfield. I witnessed the C17 belly in that night and also assisted in removing the aircraft from the runway. It has been determined aircrew error. The pilots forgot to put the gear handle down. After we were able to lift the aircraft and put jacks underneath and place the gear handle in the down position the gear came down and locked. Im not sure the accident report is out yet, but that's the news I have for you.
We figured as much, but we figured you would give the aircrew the benefit of the dought.
I would have figured that any NCO ought to know better than to release his opinions before the AIB made a conclusion and released their report. Whether or not that's what happened, it is most certainly not his place to be announcing it as fact on a public forum. Pretty sure anyone who's ever been involved in an AIB should know that.
And in all fairness Overlord, I rarely give aircrews the benefit of the doubt.
I agree 100%, just like when they decide to figure out who put the photos on the net before they were released, that person is going to have a lot to answer for.
As for the aircrew thing, I'm usually like you and blame them first, but decided they needed a break this time, as it "could have" been a freak accident, but turned out not to be.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.