Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› 747-200 and A380-800 capacity
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
747-200 and A380-800 capacity (Read 2213 times)
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 11:07am
chornedsnorkack
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 363
How much usable floor area does a Boeing 747-200 (VC-25/E-4B) have? And how does A380-800 compare against this?
Roughly how are the usable spaces of VC-25 and E-4B divided? I mean, the basic layout of both is public domain, and there should be a rough idea of the numbers.
E-4B layout:
http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace/photos/militaryaviation1946-2006cutaways/im...
Parts of the interior are similar. Both VC-25 and E-4B have principal´s bedroom in the nosecone and office/council rooms nearby. However, other parts are different. E-4B-s have large communications and command rooms taking up most of the rear of the main deck; VC-25s have a small communication room on the upper deck, and most of the rear main deck is given to guests/press/publicity.
An Airbus 380-800 is not the size of two 747-s. But seeing how a large part of VC-25 and E-4B interior and functionality matches, would it be feasible to furnish an A380-800 with the entire functionality of both VC-25 and E-4B?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 11:55am
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
Sounds feasible to me.. But I don't think they'd want to drag national emergency communication and control hardware around on every junket, campaign, public relations, political and and "appearance" flight. Like.. would you want the E-4B systems parked somewhere in the Middle East while the President is attending a funeral or something ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 12:09pm
Mictheslik
Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England
Gender:
Posts: 6011
And would the American military buy an airbus product *cough*KC-X*cough*....perhaps not
.mic
[center]
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 12:54pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Mictheslik wrote
on Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 12:09pm:
And would the American military buy an airbus product *cough*KC-X*cough*....perhaps not
.mic
What are you trying to say?
History proves they'll buy (makes a change, we like to lease things over here, as we're daft) the best kit for the job - just look at the US-101, and as you said, KC-X...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 1:36pm
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
I think they should go with a 707
. Atleast it looks sleak and majestic!
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 9:14pm
specter177
Offline
Colonel
Check out the Maverick
Flying Car!
I-TEC - X35
Gender:
Posts: 1406
Brett_Henderson wrote
on Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 11:55am:
Sounds feasible to me.. But I don't think they'd want to drag national emergency communication and control hardware around on every junket, campaign, public relations, political and and "appearance" flight. Like.. would you want the E-4B systems parked somewhere in the Middle East while the President is attending a funeral or something ?
Actually, they
do
drag a E4 around every time the president goes overseas.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jan 15
th
, 2009 at 4:18am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Brett_Henderson wrote
on Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 11:55am:
. Like.. would you want the E-4B systems parked somewhere in the Middle East while the President is attending a funeral or something ?
I'm fairly sure it'd be parked in a secure location, and there's only a couple of huge USAF bases in the middle east.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jan 15
th
, 2009 at 6:01am
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
Quote:
I'm fairly sure it'd be parked in a secure location, and there's only a couple of huge USAF bases in the middle east.
That's why this is a bad idea.. We can't have THE E-4B going everywhwere that the President would go. Secure base or not. We can't have THE command and control platform hopping around the globe.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jan 15
th
, 2009 at 6:39am
An-225
Ex Member
Well, to add my two cents, and to highlight what I think Brett is getting at...
...I belive such a platform would cost far too much to be viable. The beauty of the VC-25 is that it is furbished mainly for its role of carrying the president. With some satellite communications. The airframe is relatively cheap.
The beauty of the E-4B, is that it has a dedicated purpose of being the doomsday airplane. Radiation filters, hi-band satellite antenna etc. There is a relatively high need for multiple aircraft too.
ONE A380 costs around 317 MILLION USD. An A380 without a comms suite, and other military requirements.
One E-4B costs about 200 million.
One VC-25 costs 325 million.
These two Boeing aircraft have different roles and are therefore required in different numbers.
Buying two A380s and refurbishing them as a cross between the VC-25 and the E-4B would be too expensive.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jan 15
th
, 2009 at 7:25am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Brett_Henderson wrote
on Jan 15
th
, 2009 at 6:01am:
We can't have THE command and control platform hopping around the globe.
Never seen one of the hop. I thought they flew?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jan 15
th
, 2009 at 12:17pm
chornedsnorkack
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 363
Quote:
Well, to add my two cents, and to highlight what I think Brett is getting at...
...I belive such a platform would cost far too much to be viable. The beauty of the VC-25 is that it is furbished mainly for its role of carrying the president. With some satellite communications. The airframe is relatively cheap.
The beauty of the E-4B, is that it has a dedicated purpose of being the doomsday airplane. Radiation filters, hi-band satellite antenna etc. There is a relatively high need for multiple aircraft too.
ONE A380 costs around 317 MILLION USD. An A380 without a comms suite, and other military requirements.
One E-4B costs about 200 million.
One VC-25 costs 325 million.
Priced when?
Without comms suite and other military requirements, a VC-25 is a standard green 747-200. E-4B ditto. B747-200 is not for sale now, it is out of production. A green B747-800 is about US$ 250 millions or so. Fitting it out extra with comms suite would cost a lot on top of that.
Quote:
Buying two A380s and refurbishing them as a cross between the VC-25 and the E-4B would be too expensive.
US AF is asking for 3 planes, to be delivered in 2017, 2019 and 2021. And they are considering A380 as option.
If they use this only to replace VC-25, they are spending huge sums to replace two VC-25 747-s with 3 A380-s that are VC-25 plus a lot of unused space, and they still have to be trailed by the then very old E-4B-s. If they equipped that excess space of those three A380-s with the E-4B functionality, they could ground most of the 4 E-4B-s and achieve savings thereby.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jan 15
th
, 2009 at 2:20pm
Anxyous
Offline
Colonel
I can has cheezburger?
Posts: 2670
Slightly unrelated, but I could see why the president would use an A380. He's the most powerful man in the world, having the largest plane as well works as a symbol. He couldn't fly all over in a C172, now could he?
&&
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jan 16
th
, 2009 at 11:08am
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
Mictheslik wrote
on Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 12:09pm:
And would the American military buy an airbus product *cough*KC-X*cough*....perhaps not
.mic
Yes the MILITARY would......Congress however will not
specter177 wrote
on Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 9:14pm:
Actually, they
do
drag a E4 around every time the president goes overseas.
Ditto
Brett_Henderson wrote
on Jan 15
th
, 2009 at 6:01am:
That's why this is a bad idea.. We can't have THE E-4B going every whwere that the President would go. Secure base or not. We can't have THE command and control platform hopping around the globe.
Like what was said, yes the E-4 goes with the President every where. It shadows the President ever place he goes when he leaves United States Air Space, encluding the back up VC-25. The plane itself keeps a low profile for it's size and nature.
Kuwait City:
http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/E-4B%2047B.jpg
http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/E-4B%2048B.jpg
http://www.flightlevel350.com/Aircraft_Boeing_VC-25A-Airline_USA_-_Air_Force_Avi...
But for the question at hand, with today's computers being 10-times faster then what they were in the late 70's-early 80's, not to mention smaller too with flat screens, you can use the 747-400 or 800 airframe and still maximize space, while retaining the ability to use current facilities. If any thing the French President should have an Vip-A380.
Oh and you should look to see if you can find the lay out of JASDF 747-400 used for the Emperor & Prime Minister. They may have a completely different lay out.
http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/747-400JSDF%202B.jpg
http://www.flightlevel350.com/Aircraft_Boeing_747-400-Airline_Japan_-_Air_Force_...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jan 16
th
, 2009 at 11:45am
chornedsnorkack
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 363
OVERLORD_CHRIS wrote
on Jan 16
th
, 2009 at 11:08am:
But for the question at hand, with today's computers being 10-times faster then what they were in the late 70's-early 80's, not to mention smaller too with flat screens,
This is a flagrant violation of Moore´s law.
But while the computers are faster and screens smaller, brains have not got any faster nor bellies flatter.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jan 16
th
, 2009 at 12:50pm
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Offline
Colonel
No C-17B's, C-5M's for
Every One!
Chalreston SC
Gender:
Posts: 1148
chornedsnorkack wrote
on Jan 16
th
, 2009 at 11:45am:
This is a flagrant violation of Moore´s law.
But while the computers are faster and screens smaller, brains have not got any faster nor bellies flatter.
Better computers=fatter lazier people to run them? Good point, then the 4 Planes needs for a command post/vip transport are: AN-225, AN-124, A380, and C-5M.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.