Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Core i7 overclocking raise mult, BClock, or Both? (Read 4410 times)
Reply #15 - Jan 7th, 2009 at 10:07pm

raptorx   Offline
Colonel
There's too much confusion...
San Diego, CA

Gender: male
Posts: 434
*****
 
djt wrote on Jan 7th, 2009 at 12:01pm:
NickN wrote on Jan 7th, 2009 at 10:12am:
[quote author=djt link=1231258145/0#5 date=1231300538]  

and there goes that mouth again.. you are assuming you know what people are doing here by looking at a forum post.. .sort of like your powers of observation around operating system features ..




Was it not you who admitted that you don’t use or have experience with Vista over at AVSIM when questions about the operating system came up?



NickN wrote on Jan 7th, 2009 at 10:12am:
[quote author=djt link=1231258145/0#5 date=1231300538]  
Unfortunately you are not all ears, you are all mouth. You lost the opportunity to get a response from an experienced expert when you decided to challenge with a smart mouth instead of ask.
I think you and Sam are much better suited for that job. I hope the best for your mutual admiration society.



I don’t agree with Sam very often either but while we’re on the subject of smart mouth’s you seemed to have pretty good one at AVSIM a few months back, but that’s you so it’s OK right?  

Oh, I forgot that I shouldn’t challenge the opinion’s of the great Nick N. Don’t worry Nick I wasn’t trying to knock you down from king of chit pile status.



Dude, get off my thread! Angry

You're not welcomed here.  What'cha do, sign up here so you can spit in the face of someone who's helped more folks with this hobby than you'll ever know?

Go back to Avsim.  Or at least post a while on something valuable rather than immature spewage.

I don't want to start another thread about this same subject.  Get the hell out.

-Jim
 

Rampage II Gene, i7 965 4GHz
Mushkin Redline DDR3 1600
XP x64 SP2
ASUS Matrix GTX285
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Jan 8th, 2009 at 12:13am

djt   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
New York

Gender: male
Posts: 29
*****
 
raptorx wrote on Jan 7th, 2009 at 10:07pm:
[quote author=djt link=1231258145/0#12 date=1231347716][quote author=NickN link=1231258145/0#8 date=1231341160][quote author=djt link=1231258145/0#5 date=1231300538]  

 What'cha do, sign up here so you can spit in the face of someone who's helped more folks with this hobby than you'll ever know?

Go back to Avsim.  Or at least post a while on something valuable rather than immature spewage.




No I didn’t sign up to spit in some ones face; sorry if you feel I high jacked the thread with immature spewage.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Jan 18th, 2009 at 5:58am

macca22au   Offline
Colonel
There are no old and bold
pilots
Melbourne, Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 892
*****
 
If I can return to the topic.

Nick, I wimped out on overclocking my i7 940.  Instead I have used the in-built TurboV and settled with an increase of 6%.  I understand that is not a clock speed as such, but like a turbine cuts in when the load comes on.

With the GTX280 it is giving a very good performance with the Matrox TH2Go and is closer to all over smooth than I have ever enjoyed before.

I would be grateful for a 'cookbook' recipe to overclocking to say 3.2ghz - no more as at this stage I don't want to buy a new case and additional cooling.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Jan 18th, 2009 at 9:06am

jwenham   Offline
Colonel
Clear to Land... Are you
sure?

Posts: 266
*****
 
macca22au wrote on Jan 18th, 2009 at 5:58am:
If I can return to the topic.

Nick, I wimped out on overclocking my i7 940.  Instead I have used the in-built TurboV and settled with an increase of 6%.  I understand that is not a clock speed as such, but like a turbine cuts in when the load comes on.

With the GTX280 it is giving a very good performance with the Matrox TH2Go and is closer to all over smooth than I have ever enjoyed before.

I would be grateful for a 'cookbook' recipe to overclocking to say 3.2ghz - no more as at this stage I don't want to buy a new case and additional cooling.


You could most likely get it to 3.5 as is. It is after that point you will need to up the vcore which is what will produce the heat.
 

Intel i7 940 2.93 clocked to 4.0ghz Asus P6T Deluxe 6gb OCZ 1600 8-8-8-24 EVGA GTX 260 Superclocked Edition Thermalright 120 CPU Cooler Power PC & Cooling 750w PSU 1 tb Seagate Barracuda HD 500 gb Seagate Barracude HD 22" Viewsonic Widescreen Track IR 4 XP Pro x64 www.fairtax.org
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Jan 18th, 2009 at 1:09pm

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
macca22au wrote on Jan 18th, 2009 at 5:58am:
If I can return to the topic.

Nick, I wimped out on overclocking my i7 940.  Instead I have used the in-built TurboV and settled with an increase of 6%.  I understand that is not a clock speed as such, but like a turbine cuts in when the load comes on.

With the GTX280 it is giving a very good performance with the Matrox TH2Go and is closer to all over smooth than I have ever enjoyed before.

I would be grateful for a 'cookbook' recipe to overclocking to say 3.2ghz - no more as at this stage I don't want to buy a new case and additional cooling.



There is no cookbook really

jwenham is correct. i7 is the easiest proc to overclock on the market

Simply enter the BIOS and find the setting BCLOCK. Its default is 133

Raise it

As you raise BCLOCK it will MULTIPLY by the CPU multiplier in use. At 133 your multiplier on a 2930MHz CPU is 22

So if you raise BCLOCk to 150 your CPU speed (x22) is now 3.3GHz or 3300MHz

What you must watch for is the memory speed. The memory speed increases with BCLOCK as well based on its multiplier. You do not want to exceed (unstable) the memory speed. Unstable memory or CPU speed wont hurt anything it will just be unstable or wont boot and run Windows.

Typically when you clock the user will shut down the turbo feature in the BIOS under the Advanced CPU menu in order to avoid the processor exceeding its thermal spec and start reducing its multiplier to compensate.

You will not damage the processor as long as you do not raise DRAM VOLTAGE higher than 1.65 (actaully 1.69 is the limit.. 1.65/1.66 is just fine) and do not exceed the CPU VOLTAGE of 1.5 (something you will not touch anyway) AND do not exceed 100c

80c is the max temp for running stable, above that the proc starts shutting down to protect itself. In a basic clock (3.3-3.4GHz) and not rasing the CPU voltage I doubt you would ever have to worry about that.



Hyperthreading or Intel HT Technology should be DISABED in the Advanced CPU settings as it has absolutely no value to FSX and will run the processor hotter at the same time.


So in a very basic and simplistic clock all you need to do is shut down Intel HT and TURBO, raise BCLOCK and make sure the memory does not run unstable at the higher speed.. if it does then you must set the memory speed to


Now.. unfortunately in your case as I recall you purchased 1066 memory and that MAY be a problem here. All you can do is experiment and see how it goes.

To get your feet wet, do not change anything other than Intel HT Technology (shut it down) and then find BCLOCK in the BIOS. Just nudge it up to 140 and see what the CPU speed reads and how the system runs... then nudge it up again.

If you shut down Intel HT first that will give you good headroom on the temps to work with.


With Asus boards if a Overclock fails you wi get that warning on boot... it will ask you to press F1 to enter the BIOS or F2 to load setup defaults.... Press F1 ONLY.. enter the BIOS and make a change to correct the settings problem..  and then F-10 save and exit



Before you make any changes in the BIOS.. write down any BIOS setting default value before you make your change.. that way you have a list of what to return to to place it back to its previous state
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Jan 19th, 2009 at 9:25am

macca22au   Offline
Colonel
There are no old and bold
pilots
Melbourne, Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 892
*****
 
OK, last naive question.

The hyperthreading option in nVidia I know about, but where in the CPU - or its software do I find the Intel hyperthreading technology so I can turn it off.

Then I shall try my first overclock ever ....  virginity can't last for ever.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Jan 19th, 2009 at 11:24am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
HT is enabled/disabled in the BIOS under the ADVANCED CPU CONFIGURATON features

Typically when a user intends to clock the following items are all DISABLED


Intel SpeedStep Tech Disabled
Intel Turbo Mode Tech Disabled
CPU Spread Spectrum Disabled
PCI Spread Spectrum Disabled
C1E Support Disabled
Intel Virtualization Tech Disabled
CPU TM Function Disabled
Intel HT Technology Disabled <--- Hyperthreading (Note: Enabled for video encoding., disabled for coolest temp in clock as FSX has no i7 type HT support)
Intel C-State Technology: Disable




The only issue I see you may need to deal with is memory speed. As I recall you said that you purchased DDR3 1066 memory (if I am not mistaken). Most people who clock purchase 1600 memory so they can clock and run higher mem speed at the same time.


As you increase the BCLOCK the memory speed will increase and you will need to adjust it so it is not unstable and running as close to 1066 as possible

In example.. if the CPU MULTIPLIER is 21 and BCLOCK is set to 155 that would produce a CPU speed of 155 x 21 or rounded 3260MHz (3.26GHz) at the same time the base memory multiplier is more than likely 8 because 8 x 133 (default BCLOCK) = 1066 <--- your DDR3 memory speed

NOTE: Default BCLOCK is actually 133.25 but you do not see the fraction in the BIOS


OK so if you went to 155 x21 for CPU then the memory would run 155 x 8 or 1242 which is too high for those sticks so you must DROP the memory speed (multiplier) to obtain a speed that would be stable for your 1066 memory. It can probably be a bit higher than 1066 and sometimes you must accept lower

So in the case of 155 we drop memory multiplier to 7 and get a memory speed of 1087. That may or may not be unstable since its over 1066

Since that pushes out memory speed up over what may be unstable (you must test to see if it is or not) Another direction would be to see if the CPU multiplier of 22 is available.. if it is use it instead and DROP BCLOCk

so at 22 x 150 BCLOCK our CPU speed is now about 3300 or 3.3GHz and our memory speed if we go to the 7 multiplier would be 150 x7 or about 1050 which is UNDER 1066 and should be perfectly stable at the same time



Understand?



You will no longer be using TURBO functions





 
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Jan 20th, 2009 at 9:24pm

macca22au   Offline
Colonel
There are no old and bold
pilots
Melbourne, Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 892
*****
 
Nick:  after reading the book that came with the P6T, then following your instructions by stopping all those other cpu functions, I raised BClock to 155.

Incidentally I did say initially my RAM was 1066, but later corrected that to say it is actually 3x2 gig of 1600 OCCZ DDR3.  Therefore I have had no stability problems.

spu-z tells me that I have o'clocked and I am getting a stable 3.41ghz. Seems the multiplier is x52.

My question is whether this will be too hot for conventional air cooling (there is an additional fan installed) and therefore I should change the multiplier or drop the BClock.

But so far a pretty impressive outcome for a septuagenerian.  Thank you very much for your patient instruction.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Jan 20th, 2009 at 10:42pm

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 

DDR3 1600?

OK, now thats different... !!

If you have the heatsink replaced with a Thermalright 120 Extreme 1366 or something equal to that you can run 4GHZ (4050MHz) and DDR3 1600 on that system



TEMPS require you LOAD TEST the system and monitor for 1 hour

Use this BETA program called OCCT

http://www.ocbase.com/download.php?fileext=beta

install

the CPU OCCT 1 hour automatic test is fine

do not mess with any other test in the list.,.. its a beta program and those are new.. just the first option CPU: OCCT

In the OPTIONS click the yellow settings icon and see if the temp is set to 80c.. if it is you are ready

Click the ON button... a 1 minute pause will occur then the stress test will begin

It will crash and halt the test if there is

A: Instability

B. You hit 80c

you have to check the GRAPHS (should be in the OCCT folder in your Documents) if you crash and not sitting right there to see what the temp was when it crashed.. if it was not 80c then it was instability that caused the crash.. that would indicate Vcore most likely

If it hits 80c but was stable you either have Vcore too high or your cooling is not sufficient for the speed/vcore you are trying to run, one of the two

In your case if you hit 80c since you did not change Vcore (CPU VOLTAGE) and only changed BCLOCK then the BCLOCK is too high. You need a better CPU heatsink to run higher BCLOCk

If you crash and temps did NOT exceed 80c then the QPI/DRAM VOLTAGE needs to be set to 1.35v and the DRAM VOLTAGE to 1.65v and try the test again

Those are 2 different BIOS settings, DONT mix them up...

Use RealTemp v 2.90 or above to watch temps at the same time you run OCCT or jsut to check the system from time to time

http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/3/1794507/RealTempBeta.zip

just make sure TJMAX is set to 100 in RealTemp and it will do the rest in displaying your temps

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpost.php?p=859600&postcount=1



Keep in mind, you CAN NOT damage the processor unless temps hit 100c and 80c is where the thermal limit system kicks in to slow the processor so we dont want to do 80c or higher.


If you do not hit 80c running OCCT you will never hit 80c running FSX.. probably 15-20c LOWER. We use OCCT to ensure we cant go over 80.


Use CPUz 1.49 or above to verify CPU and memory speed/timing

http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpuz_149.zip

its just unzip and run CPUz.exe.. check the CPU and MEMORY  tabs





hey COnGRATS! you overclocked!  You are no longer a virgin!

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Jan 22nd, 2009 at 5:10am

macca22au   Offline
Colonel
There are no old and bold
pilots
Melbourne, Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 892
*****
 
No longer a virgin, but pleased, as unlike the other activiites this brings a sense of achievement and a glow of lasting pleasure.

I used the OCCT test and the temp never once went above 71 with the cores loaded to the high 98-99%.  I was not surprised as I did some long flights earlier and the system remained stable.

I know, I know that fps means nothing but I do use it as a guide.  I get 25-35 plus over complex areas with add-on aircraft but I am still getting some stutters.  Does anyone have TBM and other numbers for the i7/GTX 280 combination that seem to work.  I am running my scenery sliders at VDense and Dense, and traffic at 20% each.

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Jan 22nd, 2009 at 9:03am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 

raise BCLOCK again to 160 and check temps in the load test. As long as it does not hit 80 you good to go

Based on BCLOCK 155 @ 3.41 the multiplier is 22



The CPUz tab MEMORY should show you your memory speed and memory timings. Check those and tell me what they are



TBM 70 should be fine but it can come up to 80 as well. That is a test and see situation

Bufferpools can go either way... Some can not use the reserved amount, others can however BP is not a cure all for every type of stutter in the sim. It typically only deals with large amounts of autogen trees and buildings and making turns over them.

I assume you saw the tuning guide

http://www.simforums.com/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=29041


With the Matrox you are still pushing the limits but at least now you have the muscle behind the screen resolution to drive it


You can also clock the video card a bit too. I am not sure what the base clocks are on the model card you have right now. GPUz will display those

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/





 
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Jan 25th, 2009 at 2:36am

raptorx   Offline
Colonel
There's too much confusion...
San Diego, CA

Gender: male
Posts: 434
*****
 
Well, I can't get my system stable at anything beyond 4.0GHz @ 1.4 vcore and 1.375 vQPI.  I've tried a few different multiplier/bclock combinations and nothing works.  Temps are no issue, nothing get's beyond 65 deg C so far.  Memory runs between 1600 and 1700 no problems according to hours of memtest.  So it's got to be the cpu.

I'm a little dissapointed in this chip now. Huh  I thought I would at least get to 4.2 GHz eventually w/o too much trouble.  All I'm going to get is 4.0GHz out of a 965???

-Jim
 

Rampage II Gene, i7 965 4GHz
Mushkin Redline DDR3 1600
XP x64 SP2
ASUS Matrix GTX285
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Jan 25th, 2009 at 11:13am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
who twisted your arm to buy the 965?

where did you see that there was any promise of getting anything out of the chip over 4Ghz? There is nothing promised to anyone using i7 they will get that far either.

are you aware those who bought a 920 and 940 dont get to see 1600+ and 1700 memory speeds?

it may be a combination of motherboard and memory or it could be thats just the luck of the draw on the slug you purchased.

One thing is for certain.. you ask the average 920/940 owner what temp they are seeing @ 4GHz and it isnt 65c

not sure exactly what you are unsatisfied with at this point..  OK, what if you made it to 4.2? what does that mean? does that mean 10 more frames in FSX? Would we be satisfied with 4.2 and be upset 4.5 was not obtainable?




Smiley

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #28 - Jan 25th, 2009 at 11:39am

raptorx   Offline
Colonel
There's too much confusion...
San Diego, CA

Gender: male
Posts: 434
*****
 
Well,

I certainly didn't expect to be taken out to the woodshed because of my comments about my chip.

Nick, why do you have to answer this like so?  I feel like you just told me to shut the hell up. Sad  I don't mean to be disrespectful of selfish.   but I thought you would at least try to figure this out with me a little more...I am on topic here.  

I knew what I was doing when I bought this chip and I realize I have more multipliers and more memory options.  I never said I was pissed off that I can't get any higher, just dissapointed...I can live with it.  I'm just trying to get the most out of this chip just like everybody else here.

With all due respect Nick you wrote tons to these other posters here and you just told me, I sadly feel, to shut up and go away. Cry

-Jim


 

Rampage II Gene, i7 965 4GHz
Mushkin Redline DDR3 1600
XP x64 SP2
ASUS Matrix GTX285
IP Logged
 
Reply #29 - Jan 25th, 2009 at 12:20pm

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
raptorx wrote on Jan 25th, 2009 at 11:39am:
Well,

I certainly didn't expect to be taken out to the woodshed because of my comments about my chip.

Nick, why do you have to answer this like so?  I feel like you just told me to shut the hell up. Sad  I don't mean to be disrespectful of selfish.   but I thought you would at least try to figure this out with me a little more...I am on topic here.  

I knew what I was doing when I bought this chip and I realize I have more multipliers and more memory options.  I never said I was pissed off that I can't get any higher, just dissapointed...I can live with it.  I'm just trying to get the most out of this chip just like everybody else here.

With all due respect Nick you wrote tons to these other posters here and you just told me, I sadly feel, to shut up and go away. Cry

-Jim








Woah!

Now back up

That post above was not a woodshed post!

I post to other people
to try and help them GET TO where you are
now stable and cool. If I had anything to add for you which I felt safe to suggest I would have. My 965 has seen up to 4.5 and let me tell you.. it was not safe at that speed and I took a huge risk in pushing that. Even 4.3 was too hot and pushing voltages too far for normal safe use. If I want to play in those areas I will need to change my cooling solution and risk damage over time so right now I stay at just over 4GHz but not by much.

If I was telling you to shut up and go away… I would have said:

Quit bitching and go enjoy your system

OK?

So do not put words in my post that do not exist Jim, please.

You expressed disappointment in the 965 model slug you purchased and that would indicate you expected more for the money. I was simply pointing out that what you see may be all you are going to get. Did you jack the Vcore up to 1.55 like I did? Go ahead, but you won’t be flying at that temp and I am not responsible for anything that may happen.

So what is it that you expected me to post? A miracle set of variables that would stabilize your proc and push another 2-300MHz out of it at below 80c? If I had that information Jim and I thought it would be safe for you to do I would have posted it.

Now, I am not sitting in front of your system and looking at the BIOS and how it is set up, and, I am not looking at the result of changes being made to attempt higher CPU speeds so I have no frame of reference to say if you are simply missing something or if the slug you have just happens to be a bit of a dog above 4GHz, but one thing is certain.. if you are not qualified to take that chip up above safe voltage limits and work out the clock based on the uber-clocking approach, you should not do it.


In that.. what I posted was in your best interest which is what I do for everyone here, equally





 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print