Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Buying a new pc, good enouth for fsx? (Read 595 times)
Sep 28th, 2008 at 12:35pm

Skybird1990   Offline
2nd Lieutenant
Fly FS

Posts: 1
**
 
Hi guys im buying a new pc on tuseday, just wanted to know if ths specs would run it on high with about 20fps

Creative X-FI Xtreme Audio 7.1 Soundcard
Pc Option 800 Watt Dual Fan Power Supply
Arctic Freezer 7 Cpu Cooler - Fitted. 
Gamers PC. Nvidia 9800. AMD AM2 Dual Core 64 X2. (6000 , 1 X Nvidia 9800GTX Plus 512MB , Coolermaster Elite Case  , Zalman 500W Heatpipe Cooled Power Supply Upgrade , Vista Basic & Disc , Asus M2-Crosshair Motherboard , 360GB Sata 2 Hard Drive , 2 X 2GB DDR 2 800 MHz , 19 " Widescreen Cibox 5M/S Monitor ) 

thanks Matt.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Sep 28th, 2008 at 12:40pm

Anxyous   Offline
Colonel
I can has cheezburger?

Posts: 2670
*****
 
Vista Basic? I reckon you need something else, XP or at least Home Premium.
 

...&&
&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Sep 28th, 2008 at 5:37pm

ShaneG   Offline
Colonel
I turned into a Martian!

Posts: 10000
*****
 
I'm gonna have to say : if you mean steady 20fps on high settings no.
                                  :if you expect occasional 20fps moments  yes.
expect more like 10-15fps variations. I run a comparable aystem but with XP pro, and this is what I get. If you can, swap the 9800 for a 8800gtx and go for a quad AMD, I have a similar AMD 2core and it just can't quite cope. My board supports the 4core AMD and I plan an eventual upgrade. And  1 or 2 more gigs of RAM wouldn't hurt either. If I knew what I know now when I built mine I would have gone a lot different! Also note, the Intel quad cores are the best for FSX at the moment. Wink Hope this helps some.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Sep 29th, 2008 at 12:18am

mjrhealth   Offline
Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Gosford, NSW Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 164
*****
 
Should be fine i have same setup, and there is little diff between the 9800 GTx and the 8800, not as far as fsx is concerned. I run at 30 FPS  only in heavy airports do i have any issues. By the way you can use an amd with 1066 mhz ram just need to mess with multipliers, and if you use 1066 mhz ram you wont actually be overclocking anything as long as motherboard supports it.
 

AMD P2 1090t CPU,4.1 GHZ. 8Gig DDr3 1600 MHz cas 9, ram, Nvidia GTX 560 ti 1 gig Video, Sound Blaster XFI Extreme audio
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Sep 29th, 2008 at 6:39am

usapatriot   Offline
Colonel
Please Upload Image To
SimV!
Miami, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 270
*****
 
Why would you downgrade from a 9800 to an 8800? FSX is Nvidia biased though, ATI cards don't run FSX nearly as well.
 

Antec 902 - i7 920 @ 4.0GHz - G.Skill 6GB DDR3 - Radeon 5870 1GB - Win 7 x64
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Sep 29th, 2008 at 7:13am

ShaneG   Offline
Colonel
I turned into a Martian!

Posts: 10000
*****
 
usapatriot wrote on Sep 29th, 2008 at 6:39am:
Why would you downgrade from a 9800 to an 8800? FSX is Nvidia biased though, ATI cards don't run FSX nearly as well.


In the hardware forum and on several graphics cards sites they claim the 8800gtx is better then the 9 series, I run an ATI so I feel the pain! Embarrassed
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Sep 29th, 2008 at 7:04pm

Wii   Offline
Colonel
Space

Gender: male
Posts: 2787
*****
 
I have an AMD Athlon 64 x2 4800+ 320gb hd 3gbs RAM(667) 8800GT and a 22" monitor and I run FSX on ultra high-high with 20-30 FPS steady. If that helps much Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Sep 29th, 2008 at 11:41pm

Mushroom_Farmer   Offline
Colonel
To the Sooper-Coop Fred
Indiana, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1976
*****
 
Don't see it in the specs ut is that Vista Home Basic 32-bit or Vista Home Basic 64-bit?
 

...&&&&"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made it flameproof." &&  Spinnaker Software chairman William Bowman, 1985
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Sep 30th, 2008 at 9:52am

Wii   Offline
Colonel
Space

Gender: male
Posts: 2787
*****
 
Mushroom_Farmer wrote on Sep 29th, 2008 at 11:41pm:
Don't see it in the specs ut is that Vista Home Basic 32-bit or Vista Home Basic 64-bit?

Basic is 32bit only Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Sep 30th, 2008 at 2:58pm

Mushroom_Farmer   Offline
Colonel
To the Sooper-Coop Fred
Indiana, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1976
*****
 
Wii wrote on Sep 30th, 2008 at 9:52am:
Mushroom_Farmer wrote on Sep 29th, 2008 at 11:41pm:
Don't see it in the specs ut is that Vista Home Basic 32-bit or Vista Home Basic 64-bit?

Basic is 32bit only Wink

You're a little bit confused. Vista Starter is the only OS in the Vista family supporting only 32-bit architectures. Everything from Home Basic through Ultimate support both 32-bit and 64-bit architectures.
  The problem with Basic 64-bit is it will only handle up to 8GB of RAM. And of course running any version in 32-bit mode will limit the user to 3GB of RAM. Many OEM systems with Basic installed are in 32-Bit. The retail version of Basic has both 32-bit and 64-bit on the disk. You cannot upgrade from the 32-bit version to 64-bit without doing a clean install.
 

...&&&&"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made it flameproof." &&  Spinnaker Software chairman William Bowman, 1985
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print