Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Payware
›
Payware
› Captain Sim 757 for FSX
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Captain Sim 757 for FSX (Read 633 times)
May 22
nd
, 2008 at 9:10pm
macca22au
Offline
Colonel
There are no old and bold
pilots
Melbourne, Australia
Gender:
Posts: 892
I am interested in buying the FSX version of the Cpt Sim 757 - however I haven't been able to find out
(no reponse as yet to a support email I sent them)
whether the model has an active FMS or do I need to wait for the extra layer to be completed and made available for purchase.
If there is not yet a functioning FMC how is LNAV managed - through the default GPS or something similar?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
May 23
rd
, 2008 at 10:19pm
Ferrari308guy
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 574
CS757 is pretty detailed a a very nice looking model. Went to their website and it looks like the FMS is for FS9 only at this time. LNAV is typically engaged by a button on the autopilot. There is no interaction with the default GPS, infact, there isn't even one on payware aircraft.
My only word of caution: If you are going to buy the Captain Sim 757, you had better have a VERY good computer. It is a terrible framerate killer, and I have yet to meet a person that is happy with the purcahse.
Hope this helps,
Ferrari
&&| Intel Q6600 2.9 Ghz | EVGA GTX260 896MB | 4GB 1066 Mhz DDR2 RAM | Nvidia 780i Mobo |
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
May 24
th
, 2008 at 1:46am
macca22au
Offline
Colonel
There are no old and bold
pilots
Melbourne, Australia
Gender:
Posts: 892
Thanks for that. Yes I know how LNAV is engaged, but without a functioning FMC I couldn't work out how a flightplan could be inputted, hence my reference to maybe them using the default GPS as a temporary substitute.
I'll see if they answer and explain it to me. I just thought that there may be a SimV member who has this version.
Thanks for the warning on framerates. I guess it comes down to, compared to what. The Level D 767 can bring the system to its knees, is the CS757 better or worse?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
May 25
th
, 2008 at 3:34pm
Ferrari308guy
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 574
I have the Level D, my computer can give me about 20FPS in the VC with it. CS757 will be much much worse of a frame-rate killer. If that's what it comes down to.
Just for an FYI, if you are thinking of getting (or already have), the PMDG 747 is about the same FPS hit as the PMDG747.
Ferrari
&&| Intel Q6600 2.9 Ghz | EVGA GTX260 896MB | 4GB 1066 Mhz DDR2 RAM | Nvidia 780i Mobo |
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
May 26
th
, 2008 at 7:44am
todayshorse
Offline
Colonel
'Ten Thousand Blister.....'
England
Gender:
Posts: 2806
I have a fairly old computer, its cetainly not up to the standards of some on here. Yet the Level D for me runs as smooth as anything, even in VC over 9dragons Kai Tak its still smooth. Bit of a hit but its hardly noticeable. The PMDG 747 i find takes a bit of a knock on my system, but its flyable from the VC. And seriously good in the 2d, which i tend to use mainly in the 747 for flight planning and so on.
Dunno about the CS 757 - ive always heard its a frame rate killer - but then i heard the same about the other two and they are fine. I guess it depends on what your running and how your running it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
May 28
th
, 2008 at 8:01am
krigl
Offline
Colonel
Flightsim did me in.
Gender:
Posts: 8255
I have the CS 757 for FS9 and don't have a big problem with frames. I have a Core2duo 6600 and an Nvidia 7900, 2 gigs of memory. Can't speak for the FSX one, depends how well they optimised it for FSX I guess...
If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens
...HERE
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
May 28
th
, 2008 at 11:04am
Tweek
Ex Member
krigl wrote
on May 28
th
, 2008 at 8:01am:
Can't speak for the FSX one, depends how well they optimised it for FSX I guess...
They haven't optimised it for FSX. It's a ported FS9 model, and as such, the frame rates are terrible. If it was a proper FSX model, it'd run as well as, if not better than the FS9 version does in FS9.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
May 28
th
, 2008 at 4:07pm
SubZer0
Offline
Colonel
KLNA
Gender:
Posts: 3882
I remember when I bought the CS 757... The frames melted like a snowcone in Arizona... What a shame
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware ««
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.