Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
No more traction control (Read 1861 times)
Nov 6th, 2007 at 8:46am

expat   Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!

Gender: male
Posts: 8499
*****
 
Michael Schumacher will be testing for Ferrari due to his experience of driving non traction control in F1. 

Shumacher and TC

However, as stated in the article, "F1 begins a new era without traction control and other driver aids", does anyone know what the other banned "driver aids" are? Fingers crossed it is flappy paddle gearboxes, but I am not holding my breath on that one.

Matt
 

PETA ... People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Nov 6th, 2007 at 11:23am

eno   Offline
Colonel
Why you shouldn't light
your farts!!
Derbyshire UK

Posts: 7802
*****
 
Flappy paddle is here to stay ....... its safer.

I think quite a lot of the electronic driver aids are going..... not checked yet so can't say which ..... though one of our more enthusiastic F1 fans will probably be able to list the lot.  Grin Grin Grin
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Nov 6th, 2007 at 11:57am

expat   Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!

Gender: male
Posts: 8499
*****
 
eno wrote on Nov 6th, 2007 at 11:23am:
Flappy paddle is here to stay ....... its safer.


No, it just makes it easier to drive. If the driver had to decide when he was going to change gear it would make overtaking (and that is why we watch) a thing of skill and judgment and not a computer controlled equation.


However, how long before the teams come up with something that beats TC. Rather than engaging when the wheels are about to spin or do spin what about limiting the RPM at a certain point in a gear because you know that the wheels will spin for example. 

Matt
 

PETA ... People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Nov 7th, 2007 at 4:42pm
CharlottesDad   Ex Member

 
TC can kick in at low revs too, for instance when in a slide out of a corner and works under braking as well.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Nov 7th, 2007 at 4:57pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
I reckon it'd be fun to issue all of the teams with a single chassis...


...a race with 22 identical Lotus 49s would seperate the men from the boys! Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Nov 8th, 2007 at 2:46am

Ashar   Offline
Colonel
Ottawa, Ontario

Gender: male
Posts: 4485
*****
 
I don't know jack about F1 cars, but nothing replaces the good old clutch for me Tongue Tongue
 

...
Blabbing Away at SimV Since June 8, 2004
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Nov 8th, 2007 at 5:00am

expat   Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!

Gender: male
Posts: 8499
*****
 
Ashar wrote on Nov 8th, 2007 at 2:46am:
I don't know jack about F1 cars, but nothing replaces the good old clutch for me Tongue Tongue


Now that is what is missing, three peddles and a gear stick. That would separate the Michael Schumacher's from the Taki Inoue's.

Matt
 

PETA ... People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Nov 8th, 2007 at 5:09am

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
expat wrote on Nov 8th, 2007 at 5:00am:
Ashar wrote on Nov 8th, 2007 at 2:46am:
I don't know jack about F1 cars, but nothing replaces the good old clutch for me Tongue Tongue


Now that is what is missing, three peddles and a gear stick. That would separate the Michael Schumacher's from the Taki Inoue's.

Matt


They wouldn't be able to fit in three pedals and a gear stick nowadays...


...or a normal shaped driver... Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Nov 8th, 2007 at 7:13am

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
Smiling as I return to see this. Although what does that say of the current driver line up? We need a retired guy to test this as the others dont have the experience. I knew this would happen the second he drove the car at Fiorano.
As for clutches and gear boxes,it is a proven safety fact now that the paddles are safer in the current climate of motor racing. If the cars were slower then theres no reason why the old H pattern box couldn't be brought back.

I see michael back and racing within a season or two, he made the fatal mistake of driving the car again

The loss of traction control is nothing major, both ferrari and Renault will have to adjust their cars a little balance wise on braking because of how they used their TC systems, Mclaren are perhaps going to have the biggest challenge on acceleration because their car is more front biased in terms of weight.
« Last Edit: Nov 8th, 2007 at 2:45pm by Craig. »  
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Nov 8th, 2007 at 7:27pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzbsI-1-SY
I thought this video works wellb for the topic and subject. A v10 engined F1 car, lapping a track with a couple of slow tight corners and no traction control. I dont really see a big differance to what we have now, with the V8's it'll probably be even less. The only minor differances were the slightly slower imputs on the throttle and the upshifts out of the slow corners being rather quick to keep the rears from spinning between 1st and 3rd gear. No powerslides that I've heard some people talk of. Roll Eyes

As a side note in response to ex-pats question, as far as I can tell the only other major change is the standard ECU (made by Mclaren I might note) the idea being people cant hide any sort of engine management systems that could replicate TC (we have Bennaton to thank for this one) and so the FIA can monitor all the teams with regards to Launch control and various other braking stability programs that might be hidden in there to aid with the loss of TC.

In the future I believe its been introduced or being introduced that cars will not be allowed any added winglets/bargeboards or additional aerodynamic devices on the cars (see Ferrari/toyota Wheel hubs)
The front and rear wings will be made thinner and I believe it was said flatter however they will be made wider,  the driver will be able to adjust the angle of the front wing upto 6 degrees from the cockpit, however only twice a lap (see standard ECU for how FIA will keep note) The rear wings width will decrease by 25cm down to 75 but will increase in height from 80 to 95cm
The rear diffuser will start from the rear axel instead of the current position of the front end of the rear wheels, but it can be raised to over 17cm's instead of the current 12.5cm.
I've just double checked this and these are the working groups proposals for 2009 which have in principle been accepted by the FIA. The result is 50% less downforce over the 2006 cars, and a 25% loss when following a car closely over the current 45% that is currently lost.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Nov 9th, 2007 at 1:31pm
CharlottesDad   Ex Member

 
Craig. wrote on Nov 8th, 2007 at 7:27pm:
... the driver will be able to adjust the angle of the front wing upto 6 degrees from the cockpit, however only twice a lap....


That will be interesting, however twice a lap should be more than enough anyway, take Silverstone as an example, I'd guess the only times you'd need to change the front wing angle would be along the Hangar Straight (less downforce) and maybe exiting Luffield on to the pit straight, same again.
At Monaco, up the hill to Casino Square and in the tunnel would be the only realistic places too.

On the flip side, at Monza it would be more downforce, maybe at the Lesmos and Curva Parabolica.

I'm beginning to like the idea...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Nov 9th, 2007 at 1:44pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
Quote:
Craig. wrote on Nov 8th, 2007 at 7:27pm:
... the driver will be able to adjust the angle of the front wing upto 6 degrees from the cockpit, however only twice a lap....


That will be interesting, however twice a lap should be more than enough anyway, take Silverstone as an example, I'd guess the only times you'd need to change the front wing angle would be along the Hangar Straight (less downforce) and maybe exiting Luffield on to the pit straight, same again.
At Monaco, up the hill to Casino Square and in the tunnel would be the only realistic places too.

On the flip side, at Monza it would be more downforce, maybe at the Lesmos and Curva Parabolica.

I'm beginning to like the idea...

The problem being with only being able to adjust it twice you cant pick two places to adjust it. Using the Silverstone example, if the driver adjusts the wing for hangar straight then he would need to add more wing for the luffield complex, there are the two uses for the lap used up.
Much like yourself I like the ideas on the table, but the wing adjustment I could only ever see being used in a simmilar fashion to the power boost button in champ car. Reduce the angle at the start of a straight for the pass then as you are alongside or just past, you set it back to the needed angle for the next corner.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Nov 13th, 2007 at 7:53am

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
Looks like Schumi was never away after the lunch break.

Top 11 (laatste update: 13:38)


Coureur Team Chassis Laptime Verschil Laps
1 Pedro de la Rosa McLaren MP4-22 1:23.119 26
2 Michael Schumacher Ferrari F2007 1:23.164 + 0.045 22
3 Heikki Kovalainen Renault R27 1:23.691 + 0.572 35
4 Gary Paffett McLaren MP4-22 1:23.791 + 0.672 17
5 Luca Badoer Ferrari F2007 1:23.879 + 0.760 36
6 Franck Montagny Toyota TF107 1:24.047 + 0.928 11
7 Sebastian Vettel Scuderia Toro Rosso STR2 1:24.559 + 1.440 40
8 Nick Heidfeld BMW Sauber F1.07 1:24.621 + 1.502 29
9 Nico Rosberg Williams FW29 1:24.689 + 1.570 22
10 David Coulthard Red Bull Racing RB3 1:25.032 + 1.913 18
11 James Rossiter Super Aguri F1 SA07 1:25.182 + 2.063 24

The last two numbers are laps completed Smiley
Ferrari have a new steering wheel, gone are the big screen and two smaller screens below it, they've been replaced by two small data screens at the top and 3 new dials have appeared instead. It's apparently caused some problems this morning costing them track time.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Nov 13th, 2007 at 3:17pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
As if there were any doubt. Smiley

1.  M.Schumacher   Ferrari              (B)   1:21.922   64
2.  Badoer         Ferrari              (B)   1:22.129   76
3.  de la Rosa     McLaren-Mercedes     (B)   1:22.687   63
4.  Kovalainen     Renault              (B)   1:22.802   81
5.  Kubica         BMW-Sauber           (B)   1:22.883   56
6.  Paffett        McLaren-Mercedes     (B)   1:23.008   46
7.  Nakajima       Williams-Toyota      (B)   1:23.187   66
8.  Coulthard      Red Bull-Renault     (B)   1:23.332   55
9.  Trulli         Toyota               (B)   1:23.624   46
10.  Heidfeld       BMW-Sauber           (B)   1:23.671   75
11.  Rosberg        Williams-Toyota      (B)   1:23.847   58
12.  Montagny       Toyota               (B)   1:23.861   61
13.  Vettel         Toro Rosso-Ferrari   (B)   1:24.048   77
14.  Zuber          Honda                (B)   1:24.065   77
15.  Bourdais       Toro Rosso-Ferrari   (B)   1:24.193   51
16.  Davidson       Super Aguri-Honda    (B)   1:24.246   70
17.  Rossiter       Honda                (B)   1:24.480   69
18.  Chandhok       Red Bull-Renault     (B)   1:24.896   39
19.  van der Garde  Force India-Ferrari  (B)   1:25.317   84
20.  Rodriguez      Force India-Ferrari  (B)   1:26.973   87

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Nov 13th, 2007 at 4:34pm
CharlottesDad   Ex Member

 
They can knock MS all they like, but no mistake, he's still got it  Cool
Nice to see Bourdais' lap time close to Vettel's, he'll be one to watch next year... and Paffettt did alright too.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print