Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Autos
› No more traction control
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
No more traction control (Read 1861 times)
Nov 6
th
, 2007 at 8:46am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Michael Schumacher will be testing for Ferrari due to his experience of driving non traction control in F1.
Shumacher and TC
However, as stated in the article, "F1 begins a new era without traction control and other driver aids", does anyone know what the other banned "driver aids" are? Fingers crossed it is flappy paddle gearboxes, but I am not holding my breath on that one.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Nov 6
th
, 2007 at 11:23am
eno
Offline
Colonel
Why you shouldn't light
your farts!!
Derbyshire UK
Posts: 7802
Flappy paddle is here to stay ....... its safer.
I think quite a lot of the electronic driver aids are going..... not checked yet so can't say which ..... though one of our more enthusiastic F1 fans will probably be able to list the lot.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Nov 6
th
, 2007 at 11:57am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
eno wrote
on Nov 6
th
, 2007 at 11:23am:
Flappy paddle is here to stay ....... its safer.
No, it just makes it easier to drive. If the driver had to decide when he was going to change gear it would make overtaking (and that is why we watch) a thing of skill and judgment and not a computer controlled equation.
However, how long before the teams come up with something that beats TC. Rather than engaging when the wheels are about to spin or do spin what about limiting the RPM at a certain point in a gear because you know that the wheels will spin for example.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Nov 7
th
, 2007 at 4:42pm
CharlottesDad
Ex Member
TC can kick in at low revs too, for instance when in a slide out of a corner and works under braking as well.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Nov 7
th
, 2007 at 4:57pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
I reckon it'd be fun to issue all of the teams with a single chassis...
...a race with 22 identical Lotus 49s would seperate the men from the boys!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 2:46am
Ashar
Offline
Colonel
Ottawa, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 4485
I don't know jack about F1 cars, but nothing replaces the good old clutch for me
Blabbing Away at SimV Since June 8, 2004
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 5:00am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Ashar wrote
on Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 2:46am:
I don't know jack about F1 cars, but nothing replaces the good old clutch for me
Now that is what is missing, three peddles and a gear stick. That would separate the Michael Schumacher's from the Taki Inoue's.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 5:09am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
expat wrote
on Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 5:00am:
Ashar wrote
on Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 2:46am:
I don't know jack about F1 cars, but nothing replaces the good old clutch for me
Now that is what is missing, three peddles and a gear stick. That would separate the Michael Schumacher's from the Taki Inoue's.
Matt
They wouldn't be able to fit in three pedals and a gear stick nowadays...
...or a normal shaped driver...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 7:13am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
Smiling as I return to see this. Although what does that say of the current driver line up? We need a retired guy to test this as the others dont have the experience. I knew this would happen the second he drove the car at Fiorano.
As for clutches and gear boxes,it is a proven safety fact now that the paddles are safer in the current climate of motor racing. If the cars were slower then theres no reason why the old H pattern box couldn't be brought back.
I see michael back and racing within a season or two, he made the fatal mistake of driving the car again
The loss of traction control is nothing major, both ferrari and Renault will have to adjust their cars a little balance wise on braking because of how they used their TC systems, Mclaren are perhaps going to have the biggest challenge on acceleration because their car is more front biased in terms of weight.
«
Last Edit: Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 2:45pm by Craig.
»
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 7:27pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzbsI-1-SY
I thought this video works wellb for the topic and subject. A v10 engined F1 car, lapping a track with a couple of slow tight corners and no traction control. I dont really see a big differance to what we have now, with the V8's it'll probably be even less. The only minor differances were the slightly slower imputs on the throttle and the upshifts out of the slow corners being rather quick to keep the rears from spinning between 1st and 3rd gear. No powerslides that I've heard some people talk of.
As a side note in response to ex-pats question, as far as I can tell the only other major change is the standard ECU (made by Mclaren I might note) the idea being people cant hide any sort of engine management systems that could replicate TC (we have Bennaton to thank for this one) and so the FIA can monitor all the teams with regards to Launch control and various other braking stability programs that might be hidden in there to aid with the loss of TC.
In the future I believe its been introduced or being introduced that cars will not be allowed any added winglets/bargeboards or additional aerodynamic devices on the cars (see Ferrari/toyota Wheel hubs)
The front and rear wings will be made thinner and I believe it was said flatter however they will be made wider, the driver will be able to adjust the angle of the front wing upto 6 degrees from the cockpit, however only twice a lap (see standard ECU for how FIA will keep note) The rear wings width will decrease by 25cm down to 75 but will increase in height from 80 to 95cm
The rear diffuser will start from the rear axel instead of the current position of the front end of the rear wheels, but it can be raised to over 17cm's instead of the current 12.5cm.
I've just double checked this and these are the working groups proposals for 2009 which have in principle been accepted by the FIA. The result is 50% less downforce over the 2006 cars, and a 25% loss when following a car closely over the current 45% that is currently lost.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Nov 9
th
, 2007 at 1:31pm
CharlottesDad
Ex Member
Craig. wrote
on Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 7:27pm:
... the driver will be able to adjust the angle of the front wing upto 6 degrees from the cockpit, however only twice a lap....
That will be interesting, however twice a lap should be more than enough anyway, take Silverstone as an example, I'd guess the only times you'd need to change the front wing angle would be along the Hangar Straight (less downforce) and maybe exiting Luffield on to the pit straight, same again.
At Monaco, up the hill to Casino Square and in the tunnel would be the only realistic places too.
On the flip side, at Monza it would be more downforce, maybe at the Lesmos and Curva Parabolica.
I'm beginning to like the idea...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Nov 9
th
, 2007 at 1:44pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
Quote:
Craig. wrote
on Nov 8
th
, 2007 at 7:27pm:
... the driver will be able to adjust the angle of the front wing upto 6 degrees from the cockpit, however only twice a lap....
That will be interesting, however twice a lap should be more than enough anyway, take Silverstone as an example, I'd guess the only times you'd need to change the front wing angle would be along the Hangar Straight (less downforce) and maybe exiting Luffield on to the pit straight, same again.
At Monaco, up the hill to Casino Square and in the tunnel would be the only realistic places too.
On the flip side, at Monza it would be more downforce, maybe at the Lesmos and Curva Parabolica.
I'm beginning to like the idea...
The problem being with only being able to adjust it twice you cant pick two places to adjust it. Using the Silverstone example, if the driver adjusts the wing for hangar straight then he would need to add more wing for the luffield complex, there are the two uses for the lap used up.
Much like yourself I like the ideas on the table, but the wing adjustment I could only ever see being used in a simmilar fashion to the power boost button in champ car. Reduce the angle at the start of a straight for the pass then as you are alongside or just past, you set it back to the needed angle for the next corner.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Nov 13
th
, 2007 at 7:53am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
Looks like Schumi was never away after the lunch break.
Top 11 (laatste update: 13:38)
Coureur Team Chassis Laptime Verschil Laps
1 Pedro de la Rosa McLaren MP4-22 1:23.119 26
2 Michael Schumacher Ferrari F2007 1:23.164 + 0.045 22
3 Heikki Kovalainen Renault R27 1:23.691 + 0.572 35
4 Gary Paffett McLaren MP4-22 1:23.791 + 0.672 17
5 Luca Badoer Ferrari F2007 1:23.879 + 0.760 36
6 Franck Montagny Toyota TF107 1:24.047 + 0.928 11
7 Sebastian Vettel Scuderia Toro Rosso STR2 1:24.559 + 1.440 40
8 Nick Heidfeld BMW Sauber F1.07 1:24.621 + 1.502 29
9 Nico Rosberg Williams FW29 1:24.689 + 1.570 22
10 David Coulthard Red Bull Racing RB3 1:25.032 + 1.913 18
11 James Rossiter Super Aguri F1 SA07 1:25.182 + 2.063 24
The last two numbers are laps completed
Ferrari have a new steering wheel, gone are the big screen and two smaller screens below it, they've been replaced by two small data screens at the top and 3 new dials have appeared instead. It's apparently caused some problems this morning costing them track time.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Nov 13
th
, 2007 at 3:17pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
As if there were any doubt.
1. M.Schumacher Ferrari (B) 1:21.922 64
2. Badoer Ferrari (B) 1:22.129 76
3. de la Rosa McLaren-Mercedes (B) 1:22.687 63
4. Kovalainen Renault (B) 1:22.802 81
5. Kubica BMW-Sauber (B) 1:22.883 56
6. Paffett McLaren-Mercedes (B) 1:23.008 46
7. Nakajima Williams-Toyota (B) 1:23.187 66
8. Coulthard Red Bull-Renault (B) 1:23.332 55
9. Trulli Toyota (B) 1:23.624 46
10. Heidfeld BMW-Sauber (B) 1:23.671 75
11. Rosberg Williams-Toyota (B) 1:23.847 58
12. Montagny Toyota (B) 1:23.861 61
13. Vettel Toro Rosso-Ferrari (B) 1:24.048 77
14. Zuber Honda (B) 1:24.065 77
15. Bourdais Toro Rosso-Ferrari (B) 1:24.193 51
16. Davidson Super Aguri-Honda (B) 1:24.246 70
17. Rossiter Honda (B) 1:24.480 69
18. Chandhok Red Bull-Renault (B) 1:24.896 39
19. van der Garde Force India-Ferrari (B) 1:25.317 84
20. Rodriguez Force India-Ferrari (B) 1:26.973 87
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Nov 13
th
, 2007 at 4:34pm
CharlottesDad
Ex Member
They can knock MS all they like, but no mistake, he's still got it
Nice to see Bourdais' lap time close to Vettel's, he'll be one to watch next year... and Paffettt did alright too.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos ««
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.