Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Payware
›
Payware
› any good payware c-17 models?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
any good payware c-17 models? (Read 1159 times)
Sep 26
th
, 2007 at 4:46pm
Ben R
Offline
Colonel
Audere Est Facere
ipswich
Gender:
Posts: 1196
Dont think there is actually..anyone know of any?
Ben
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Sep 26
th
, 2007 at 5:42pm
Isak922
Offline
Colonel
Consider yourself badgered!!!
Connecticut
Gender:
Posts: 1528
The Alphasim one is still Work in Progress. There is one other, but it's... well; Complete crap.
4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Sep 26
th
, 2007 at 8:33pm
Ashar
Offline
Colonel
Ottawa, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 4485
The only one I know of is the FSD one...
http://www.fsd-international.com/Hangar/T38/C17.htm
You get the T38 and C17 in a combo package...Check it out...
Alphasim's will be typical Alphasim quality...Decent model, not so decent VC, and so-so flight dynamics...
Blabbing Away at SimV Since June 8, 2004
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 1:51pm
Tweek
Ex Member
Ashar wrote
on Sep 26
th
, 2007 at 8:33pm:
Alphasim's will be typical Alphasim quality...Decent model, not so decent VC, and so-so flight dynamics...
Although I can't comment on the flight dynamics, from what I've seen of AlphaSim's latest offerings, their VCs are very good!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 3:27pm
Isak922
Offline
Colonel
Consider yourself badgered!!!
Connecticut
Gender:
Posts: 1528
Quote:
Ashar wrote
on Sep 26
th
, 2007 at 8:33pm:
Alphasim's will be typical Alphasim quality...Decent model, not so decent VC, and so-so flight dynamics...
Although I can't comment on the flight dynamics, from what I've seen of AlphaSim's latest offerings, their VCs are very good!
Agreed!
Alphasim has been pumping out some fairly high quality models lately, and they've made it known that they're working extra hard on the C-17 (Thus, why it's 3-4 months later than the anticipated release
)
4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 3:45pm
Lazerbeak
Offline
Colonel
[ch1055][ch1091][ch1
089][ch1090][ch1100]
[ch1073][ch1077][ch1
075][ch1091][ch1090]
[ch1085][ch1077][ch1
091][ch1082][ch1083]
[ch1102][ch1078][ch1
077] [ch1087][ch1077][ch1
096][ch1077][ch1093]
[ch1086][ch1076][ch1
099] [ch1087][ch1086]
[ch1083][ch1091][ch1
078][ch1072][ch1084]
...
A house.
Gender:
Posts: 712
Ashar wrote
on Sep 26
th
, 2007 at 8:33pm:
Alphasim's will be typical Alphasim quality...Decent model, not so decent VC, and so-so flight dynamics...
You obviously have not seen the WIP pics then...
Clicky.
Mind you, this is still a very early WIP, and already it looks stunning.
They're planning on this one being their best release yet, completely blowing everything they've made out of the water, so they're taking extra care with getting everything right. They're constantly putting the model back into development to get EVERY LAST detail 100% perfect, and the dynamics are being tested by real C-17 pilots.
IMO, Alphasim's releases have been getting better and better lately, to the point where all the payware aircraft I own are AS birds (with the exception of two from Captain Sim).
&&&&
The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
WORKERS OF THE WORLD, UNITE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 5:50pm
Ashar
Offline
Colonel
Ottawa, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 4485
Hmmm...That might be a rendering you know...But it still looks decent...It's just that Alphasim hasn't won me over in the past few years...LOL...
Blabbing Away at SimV Since June 8, 2004
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 8:36pm
Isak922
Offline
Colonel
Consider yourself badgered!!!
Connecticut
Gender:
Posts: 1528
Ashar wrote
on Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 5:50pm:
Hmmm...That might be a rendering you know...But it still looks decent...It's just that Alphasim hasn't won me over in the past few years...LOL...
The Raptor?
The Flankers?
B-1B?
Tu-160?
Even the new Eurofighter and SR-71!
All of those are amazingly high quality models!
Sure, some of their older planes aren't so great (Su-47 comes to mind), but it's usually a model you can't find anywhere else!
Sure, they may not be of perfect quality for the majority of their planes, unlike the CS 757 or PMDG 747 series; but they're still amazing in their own right!
4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 10:28pm
Ashar
Offline
Colonel
Ottawa, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 4485
Isak922 wrote
on Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 8:36pm:
Ashar wrote
on Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 5:50pm:
Hmmm...That might be a rendering you know...But it still looks decent...It's just that Alphasim hasn't won me over in the past few years...LOL...
The Raptor?
The Flankers?
B-1B?
Tu-160?
Even the new Eurofighter and SR-71!
All of those are amazingly high quality models!
Sure, some of their older planes aren't so great (Su-47 comes to mind), but it's usually a model you can't find anywhere else!
Sure, they may not be of perfect quality for the majority of their planes, unlike the CS 757 or PMDG 747 series; but they're still amazing in their own right!
I agree on only 2 of the packages above...The Flankers and the Tu-160...The B1B, I won't even bother with that...the Tu-160 can outperform it anyday
Blabbing Away at SimV Since June 8, 2004
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 11:04pm
Lazerbeak
Offline
Colonel
[ch1055][ch1091][ch1
089][ch1090][ch1100]
[ch1073][ch1077][ch1
075][ch1091][ch1090]
[ch1085][ch1077][ch1
091][ch1082][ch1083]
[ch1102][ch1078][ch1
077] [ch1087][ch1077][ch1
096][ch1077][ch1093]
[ch1086][ch1076][ch1
099] [ch1087][ch1086]
[ch1083][ch1091][ch1
078][ch1072][ch1084]
...
A house.
Gender:
Posts: 712
Ashar wrote
on Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 5:50pm:
Hmmm...That might be a rendering you know...But it still looks decent...It's just that Alphasim hasn't won me over in the past few years...LOL...
It is a rendering, but texture quality remains the same regardless. Speaking as someone who has had experience in both modelling (albeit not for FS) and texturing, I'd say they did some cracking work in this cockpit.
Also, I'd say their XB-70, F-117, Vampire/Sea-Vixen, and MH-53 are quite impressive packages by any standard, and the preview (non-rendered, in-game) shots of their upcoming Intruder and Scimitar are just as stunning.
Still, to each his own. I never like people trying to change my opinions, so I will not try to change anyone else's.
&&&&
The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
WORKERS OF THE WORLD, UNITE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Sep 28
th
, 2007 at 12:00am
Ashar
Offline
Colonel
Ottawa, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 4485
Lazerbeak wrote
on Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 11:04pm:
Ashar wrote
on Sep 27
th
, 2007 at 5:50pm:
Hmmm...That might be a rendering you know...But it still looks decent...It's just that Alphasim hasn't won me over in the past few years...LOL...
It is a rendering, but texture quality remains the same regardless. Speaking as someone who has had experience in both modelling (albeit not for FS) and texturing, I'd say they did some cracking work in this cockpit.
Also, I'd say their XB-70, F-117, Vampire/Sea-Vixen, and MH-53 are quite impressive packages by any standard, and the preview (non-rendered, in-game) shots of their upcoming Intruder and Scimitar are just as stunning.
Still, to each his own. I never like people trying to change my opinions, so I will not try to change anyone else's.
Can't argue with a pro...
I've never said all their products sucked...As in anything, there are always exceptions...And I completely agree with that last statement...
Blabbing Away at SimV Since June 8, 2004
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware ««
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.