Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Su-33/Admiral Kuznetsov by Alphasim (Read 550 times)
Mar 26th, 2007 at 7:17pm

Isak922   Offline
Colonel
Consider yourself badgered!!!
Connecticut

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
Anyone have it? Been thinking about getting it. The Su-27 series has always been one of my favorites, and the Su-33 is no different. Plus the Admiral Kuznetsov, means trapping and taking off of carriers is on a whole new level.

What I'm wondering, is what are you opinions of it? Should I go with the new SR-71 and Beale AFB instead?
 

4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Mar 26th, 2007 at 9:17pm
An-225   Ex Member

 
Wait...my favourite Russian fighter/multirole* (Su-33) and my favourite aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov where released without me knowing it? Hmmm...  Huh
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Mar 26th, 2007 at 9:38pm

Isak922   Offline
Colonel
Consider yourself badgered!!!
Connecticut

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
 

4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Mar 26th, 2007 at 9:55pm
An-225   Ex Member

 
Cheers mate.  Wink Well, if it has folding wings, its good enough for An-225. I haven't tried it but it does look tempting. However, you, must ask yourself what you are looking for. Do you want high and fast recon ops over Russia? Or do you want a fast plane with good manouverability and with the ability to do carrier ops? Do you want low level fun in the Grand Canyon? Or do you want the chance to see the ISS? All up to you. Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Mar 27th, 2007 at 12:40am

Isak922   Offline
Colonel
Consider yourself badgered!!!
Connecticut

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
Thing is... I really want both  Grin Only enough of the "Green Stuff" for one though. That's why I'm asking for opinions on both  Wink
 

4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Apr 3rd, 2007 at 4:45am

2992   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 515
*****
 
I would sggest you get Lock-on.
Lock-on is really cheap these days and you get the SU-33 and the SU-27 aswell as the Admiral Kuznetsov. The SU-33 comes with folding wings, tailhook and and of course carrier take-offs and landings are possible. You also get the option to do air to air refuelling. On top of all that there is also of course the A-10, the SU-25, Mig29 and the F-15. Lock-on is of coursea combat sim so you can exploit the full potential of the SU-33. All that fo 10-20 bucks;)
 

...&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Apr 3rd, 2007 at 12:07pm

Isak922   Offline
Colonel
Consider yourself badgered!!!
Connecticut

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
2992 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2007 at 4:45am:
I would sggest you get Lock-on.
Lock-on is really cheap these days and you get the SU-33 and the SU-27 aswell as the Admiral Kuznetsov. The SU-33 comes with folding wings, tailhook and and of course carrier take-offs and landings are possible. You also get the option to do air to air refuelling. On top of all that there is also of course the A-10, the SU-25, Mig29 and the F-15. Lock-on is of coursea combat sim so you can exploit the full potential of the SU-33. All that fo 10-20 bucks;)


I have LOMAC  Wink
 

4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Apr 3rd, 2007 at 1:56pm
Tweek   Ex Member

 
Isak922 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2007 at 12:07pm:
2992 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2007 at 4:45am:
I would sggest you get Lock-on.
Lock-on is really cheap these days and you get the SU-33 and the SU-27 aswell as the Admiral Kuznetsov. The SU-33 comes with folding wings, tailhook and and of course carrier take-offs and landings are possible. You also get the option to do air to air refuelling. On top of all that there is also of course the A-10, the SU-25, Mig29 and the F-15. Lock-on is of coursea combat sim so you can exploit the full potential of the SU-33. All that fo 10-20 bucks;)


I have LOMAC  Wink


Then perhaps your money is better spent elsewhere (the SR-71, as you mentioned). You're bound to get a better experience out of Lock On, as it's actually been designed for the task in hand (as opposed to flying airliners and GA), not to mention the superior flight engine - surely better with aircraft like the Su-27 and 33.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Apr 3rd, 2007 at 3:17pm

Isak922   Offline
Colonel
Consider yourself badgered!!!
Connecticut

Gender: male
Posts: 1528
*****
 
Quote:
Isak922 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2007 at 12:07pm:
2992 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2007 at 4:45am:
I would sggest you get Lock-on.
Lock-on is really cheap these days and you get the SU-33 and the SU-27 aswell as the Admiral Kuznetsov. The SU-33 comes with folding wings, tailhook and and of course carrier take-offs and landings are possible. You also get the option to do air to air refuelling. On top of all that there is also of course the A-10, the SU-25, Mig29 and the F-15. Lock-on is of coursea combat sim so you can exploit the full potential of the SU-33. All that fo 10-20 bucks;)


I have LOMAC  Wink


Then perhaps your money is better spent elsewhere (the SR-71, as you mentioned). You're bound to get a better experience out of Lock On, as it's actually been designed for the task in hand (as opposed to flying airliners and GA), not to mention the superior flight engine - surely better with aircraft like the Su-27 and 33.



While this is true, I'm not a fan of LOMAC. I much prefer FS2004's "Simplicity" compared to LOMAC.

I went ahead and got the Su-33. Very nice plane, Very easy to replicate all those stunts that the real things can pull off... Landing on the carrier, on the other hand, is a tad hard  Grin
 

4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print