Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
IMPORTANT No "clean installs" with VISTA upgrade (Read 948 times)
Jan 30th, 2007 at 3:18am

Keep It Simple   Offline
Colonel
USA

Posts: 495
*****
 
Before buying Vista, read this!
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2007/01/29/no_clean_installs_with_vista_upgrade_dis...

MR  Bill is making things difficult for us again!

It seems you wiil not be able to do a clean install of VISTA with the upgrade vers of VISTA.

Quote:
Microsoft now requires end users to have a genuine Windows installation before allowing an upgrade to Vista from inside the activated copy of Windows XP or Windows 2000


 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 6:38am

ctjoyce   Offline
Colonel
Funny how my lappy runs
FSX better than your
Tower
USA

Gender: male
Posts: 4022
*****
 
Old news....(yawn)

Cheers
Cameron
 

CTJoyce, Modding and voiding warranties since 2003&&Sheila's Specs:ASUS Striker Extreme 680i, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz, Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400C4 2GB, 2x eVGA 7900GT KO,  Western Digital 80GB SATA & 250GB SATAIII&&Vesper's Specs: Intel Core 2 Duo T7400, 2GB DDR2-667, GeForce Go 7950GTX 512MB, 160GB Hitachi SATA 5400RPM&&Hardware FAQ, Read it and be informed&&My little corner of the world&&Once You Know You NEWEGG&&Building a computer Part 2
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 7:17am

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
That's not good...

Considering the fact that a Vista upgrade probably means a MAJOR hardware upgrade too..

They're going to make you put XP on your brand new, dual-core motherboard/CPU and then activate it before you can upgrade  to Vista ?

Egad....

All of the sudden, LINUX and X-plane don't look so bad  Tongue  (I'm kidding of course, but it felt good to type that)
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 11:24am

Mobius   Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin

Posts: 4369
*****
 
Keep It Simple wrote on Jan 30th, 2007 at 3:18am:
MR  Bill is making things difficult for us again!

It seems you wiil not be able to do a clean install of VISTA with the upgrade vers of VISTA

Isn't that the point of an "upgrade"?
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 1:06pm

Keep It Simple   Offline
Colonel
USA

Posts: 495
*****
 
Mobius wrote on Jan 30th, 2007 at 11:24am:
Keep It Simple wrote on Jan 30th, 2007 at 3:18am:
MR  Bill is making things difficult for us again!

It seems you wiil not be able to do a clean install of VISTA with the upgrade vers of VISTA

Isn't that the point of an "upgrade"?


Perhaps.......
However, in the past, a WIN upgrade simply ment that you got a discount for having a previous version of the software and were still allow to use the previous vers.
Now you can't use the previous vers.

Wether this is right or wrong, people are buying the VISTA upgrade without knowing this and are in for a rude suprise. The new upgrade procedures should be made perfectly clear up front for the general public but, I undrestand it isn't.

Bottim line, the upgrade version of VISTA is not a money saver if it also cancels out your copy of XP and MS should make this perfectly clear so people can make an informed decision about what version to purchase.

I suspect that many people would pass on VISTA it they knew that to keep their XP install on another sys, they would either have to buy the full vers of VISTA or, buy another copy of XP.
Let' not loose site of the fact that VIStA is an expensive OS.

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 1:35pm

Mobius   Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin

Posts: 4369
*****
 
Where does it say it cancels out your previous version of Windows?
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 1:44pm

Keep It Simple   Offline
Colonel
USA

Posts: 495
*****
 
Mobius wrote on Jan 30th, 2007 at 1:35pm:
Where does it say it cancels out your previous version of Windows?


To use the VISTA upgrade, you have to first install XP and activate it.
Legally you can't activate it on a second sys if it is still installed on another sys.

This brings up anothe issue.
It you are building a whole new VISTA sys with different hardware. you will most likely have trouble activating XP on it and will have to do that PITA telephone activation which wiil cancel. out your old install.


 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 1:52pm

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 
Seems MS loves to make a hard time to everyone again  ,I think I'll stay with winxp, besides I think I don't have enough PC to use it,

what are the minimun specs for vista?, 1 terabyte Ram 3gz video memory 126bitsa at 600X, a Un-Invented prosesor double tripled core of 50ghz and sure 20 terabytes of hard disc space?.. Angry

BTW Vista means "To see" and I guess to see How much money your about to spend...

and I'm sure when everyone after make an inversment FSX won't be able top run decenly either on it.. Grin
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 2:14pm

Keep It Simple   Offline
Colonel
USA

Posts: 495
*****
 
Let's no loose site of the fact that most will want to do a "clean install" on a clean HDD.
For this you will have to get the full ver of VISTA for about $249US!

Now, what was that I heard..... FSX is optimised for XP? Wink Shocked
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 2:27pm

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 
Keep It Simple wrote on Jan 30th, 2007 at 2:14pm:
Now, what was that I heard..... FSX is optimised for XP? Wink Shocked



Now you call my attention


It should be ,I'm upset about somethings about MS ,Ill repeat this But many of you Doesn't remember win ME , many when to run for buy it, couple month latter I made a lot of money placing back win98.

FSX ,They release a software with an absurd minimun requirement, for an unexistance DIRECTX 10,and for unnexistance video card (In that moment) In my country that has a name  Lips Sealed

so They better do something about their own plataforms and games, because who knows one day soon or latter another competition could show anytime it could  be cooking by now, a perhaps MS someday will become the 2nd one, with this kind of things
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 2:38pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Keep It Simple wrote on Jan 30th, 2007 at 1:44pm:
Mobius wrote on Jan 30th, 2007 at 1:35pm:
Where does it say it cancels out your previous version of Windows?


To use the VISTA upgrade, you have to first install XP and activate it.
Legally you can't activate it on a second sys if it is still installed on another sys.





Legally, maybe not. In reality, it's what I did. Tongue
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 4:24pm
|Alex|   Ex Member

 
Yeah, thats with the UPGRADE version of Vista. If you buy a full version, there is nothing stopping you from doing a clean install  Roll Eyes

It's a bit like getting cable and then complaining that you have to buy a TV to plug it into...

Overraction.....?  Roll Eyes
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Jan 30th, 2007 at 4:48pm

Al_Fallujah   Ex Member

*
 


It used to be that you could use the upgrade version and thus, get a discounted version of the new OS, and it did not matter if the current OS was a valid copy or not. You could rip off someone else Win 98/NT/2000 and put a brand new legally purchased copy of XP in on top of it.

Obviously Microsoft wants to put a stop to that practice.

If you do not have a valid copy of an OS, then you SHOULD have to pay for the full install if you want it.
If you have a valid copy of 2000 or XP, then activate it, and upgrade. Whats the big deal?\

I am not a big M$ booster, but I do accept the fact that M$ is a business, and they are making and distribuing this product for the purpose of turning a profit. Bill Gates may have a charity, Microsoft is not its name.

I also accept that it is not profitable on for a software manufacture to make everything 100% backwards compatible.

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 12:48pm

Keep It Simple   Offline
Colonel
USA

Posts: 495
*****
 
Here is some really interesting info from MS.
Yes, MS as I read the same info on a different site (I forgot where) and it does indeed come from MS.

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5932
It allows you to do a full install of VISTA  without XP installed and activated using the upgrade version..

Here is one quote fron the article:
Quote:
"Per Microsoft's new licensing requirements for Vista, users are required to install a Windows Vista Upgrade from within Windows XP. When this occurs, the Windows XP license is forfeited and the Windows Vista installation process can take place."


The VISTA licensing requirements are a bit different than previous.

Personally, I don't remember ever reading that your WIN 9x license was " forfeited" when using the XP upgrade.

PS
I suspect that this "workaround"  (loophole) will be ended/closed with a  SP1 vers of VISTA.


 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Feb 1st, 2007 at 12:18pm

Chris_F   Offline
Colonel
Insert message here

Posts: 1364
*****
 
So in order to use the VISTA upgrade you have to actually use it to upgrade your OS?  I'd be kinda suprised if this WASN'T the case...
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print