Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
A little off topic sorry (Read 697 times)
Nov 6th, 2006 at 7:25pm

sonic   Offline
Colonel
North Carolina,  US

Posts: 820
*****
 
Sorry but I was wondering what is better overall combat sim 3 or Lockon.
 

&&Specs&&E6300, 3 gigs 800 Ram, 8800GT oc, 400gig Sata drive, Windows XP Pro 64 Bit..
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Nov 6th, 2006 at 7:56pm

PsychoDiablo   Offline
Colonel
Waddell  Arizona

Gender: male
Posts: 651
*****
 
do you like modern or historic? Lockon is good modern air combat, cfs3 is good historicly. also imo i like cfs3 graphics more than lock ons.
 

......&& &&"Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered automatic weapons." - General Macarthur
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Nov 6th, 2006 at 11:29pm

RitterKreuz   Offline
Colonel
Texas

Gender: male
Posts: 1253
*****
 
CFS3

Missiles are for little girls

its all about pure persuit air combat
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Nov 12th, 2006 at 10:14am

AvHistory   Offline
Colonel
Kinder & Gentler
NC, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 577
*****
 
Quote:
CFS3

Missiles are for little girls

its all about pure persuit air combat


I would respectfully disagree.  You can become quite competent in CFS3 in a few weeks; it takes about 6 months of real effort to get to the same level in Falcon 4 & its derivatives.

If you want to play guns you can; only its much harder in Falcon.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Nov 12th, 2006 at 10:38am

james007   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1514
*****
 
RitterKruez I disagree with you totally. Comparing this two Sims is like comparing a Apple with a Orange. They are representing different ares with differrent AC capabilities. Its basically impossible to compare.

I truely beleive that there is no best Sim. Its up to the user and what he like to see and experience while flying with the Sim.


Now as for your comment that Missiles are for little girls is totally wrong. There is no greater fear than knowing there is a Sam heading your way. You have to know and be highly train to know what your are doing to survive such a encounter. The pilots of today are as brave and skillful as any pilots of yesterday.  Its that greatfully they do not have any quality rivals.

As for me, I find the era of World war one and two plus the Korea arial history more romantic thus I enjoy flying in that era more.

But does not mean that the the pilots of today are less value or admired.



James007
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Nov 22nd, 2006 at 2:17pm

sonic   Offline
Colonel
North Carolina,  US

Posts: 820
*****
 
Ok i got both Lockon is well a little hard to say the least. lol Combat sim is my fav I guess from the history and all.
 

&&Specs&&E6300, 3 gigs 800 Ram, 8800GT oc, 400gig Sata drive, Windows XP Pro 64 Bit..
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Nov 22nd, 2006 at 2:39pm
Tweek   Ex Member

 
I have to say, Lock On does feel more realistic (despite having no experience flying modern jet fighters or vintage warbirds!). You can't just power up, take off, open fire and get an easy kill like you can in CFS3. If you tried that, you'd either give up trying to figure out what the hell you had to do, or stall and crash after your first sharp turn. Grin

Although CFS3 is fun, I think that Lock On is more immersive, and you get a greater feel of actually being a combat pilot, due to the level of work that you have to put in. Hard? Yes. Fun? Most definitely.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print