Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Current Flight Simulator Series
›
Flight Simulator X
› Space
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
Pages:
1
2
3
Space (Read 1656 times)
Reply #15 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 3:56am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Quote:
WRONG AGAIN!!! I suggest that you read up on aerodynamics and ballistics before questioning the sciences. Projectiles and space craft are affected by the friction of the air and gravity. They ARE NOT aircraft and follow ballistic science NOT aerodynamic OK!!!!!
Before trying to give lessons to anybody and making yourself ridiculous, I suggest you read some physics books about modelisation of forces, movements etc...
Then eventually, you could try to implement a simulator program to achieve your knowledge.
Finally, we may be able to discuss together in a more serious way.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 4:44am
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
If im correct Daube is saying that in the simulator it works as a convetional aircraft. Am i right there?
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 4:58am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Quote:
If im correct Daube is saying that in the simulator it works as a convetional aircraft. Am i right there?
Not exactely. I was speaking about flight modeling and general physics, not specifically about FS.
There is another simulator which is done with a real physic model, I never remember if it's Orbiter or XPlane, and lets you display the forces currently applied to the "craft" you pilot, either in space or in the atmosphere. It helps a lot understanding what really happens.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 5:00am
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
I heard that too, i believe it was X-plane.
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 5:17am
Bindoe
Ex Member
Quote:
Sorry you're wrong! Space craft don't fly!! They are projectiles. They DO NOT have "Normal flight" as you say. They follow parabolic trajectories and are entirely dependant on the thrust input which only increases the angle of the trajectory which in space and here on Earth is influenced by gravity. THEY DO NOT FLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vololiberista
Uh. It's called the X-15, A-12 (and its varients), Dynasaur, Aurora, Boeing X-43, ACTS, U2, Space shuttle and NASP.
Although some of them can't fly into space, they are all capable, or rumored to be capable of flying above 100 000 feet. The only ones that can't fly into space are the U2, and the A-12.
So there, it dosn't matter if the space ships are aircraft or space craft, because there are them.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 6:21am
vololiberista
Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia
Posts: 1042
If it has wings its an aeroplane and therefore flies in air! If a spacecraft doesn't have wings it can ONLY fly ballistically.
Andiamo in Italia&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 6:28am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Quote:
If it has wings its an aeroplane and therefore flies in air! If a spacecraft doesn't have wings it can ONLY fly ballistically.
Only problem is: as soon as you have an engine, even a single one, you're not ballistic anymore.
For example, a stone that you have thronw away is flying ballistic. Also, a missile wihtout wings that runs out of fuel flies ballistic. But while its engine works, it's not ballistic yet.
Now, to spaceships without wings, it's the same thing: If they have no engines at all, then they fly ballistic, that is like a stone. But if they still have their engines, then they do not fly ballistic.
And about what you certainely intended to say: a Spaceship in orbit is flying ballistic. A spaceship going to orbit or leaving the orbit is not ballistic anymore.
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 6:49am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
You two can argue & hurl insults at each other for as long as you like but it all comes down to this. If FSX has no default orbiter to base the "flight dynamics" on there's not much chance of simulated space flight being possible. The FS flight model has always been for conventional aircraft. I don't see that changing.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 6:52am
Ravang
Ex Member
Gender:
Thank You for answering my question. What have I done, lol
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 7:01am
Bindoe
Ex Member
Quote:
If it has wings its an aeroplane and therefore flies in air! If a spacecraft doesn't have wings it can ONLY fly ballistically.
What about the space shuttle? What about NASP?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 7:07am
Daube
Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)
Gender:
Posts: 5833
Quote:
You two can argue & hurl insults at each other for as long as you like but it all comes down to this. If FSX has no default orbiter to base the "flight dynamics" on there's not much chance of simulated space flight being possible. The FS flight model has always been for conventional aircraft. I don't see that changing.
That's right unfortunately. So far, we do not know if there is any possibility to simulate a rocket engine in FSX, nor the rocket orientation of the aircraft body, so those discussions are quite useless.
Let's hope the new SDKs will allow some gauges to do the trick...
Got bloom ?
Got mountains ?
Got damage ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 7:40am
vololiberista
Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia
Posts: 1042
Quote:
What about the space shuttle? What about NASP?
The Space shuttle has wings so when it is surrounded by air it acts aerodynamically BUT when it is in space it is nothing more than a ballistic missile. You CANNOT fly in space PERIOD
Andiamo in Italia&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 7:52am
Fozzer
Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.
Posts: 24861
Quote:
Thank You for answering my question. What have I done, lol
I'll tell you what you have done...
...
...you have opened a can of worms, allowed a selection of "Newbies" in, and released examples of the very worst of humanity into a Flight Sim Forum, to create alarm and despondency amongst the Regular Members....
....!
A rare occurrence, since the birth of Simviation...
...!
Paul...Now keeping well out of the various on-going FSX Forum arguments/slanging match...8)...!
P.S....off to the Sim V "Cafe" Forum for a nice, relaxing, cup of tea and a bun...
...!
Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 7:57am
Bindoe
Ex Member
Lifting bodies have no wings yet they fly? Are they aircraft? Or are they space craft?
YAY LOGIC!!11
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Oct 25
th
, 2006 at 8:11am
JBaymore
Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!
Gender:
Posts: 10261
I beleive that the [ENGINE] configuration file in fs2004 had the option of "rocket". If that is carried over and actually functions... that opens up add on development of low orbit spacecraft.
Why would Microsoft allow such altitudes in the sim engine if they did not intend there to eventually be access to those altitudes?
best,
...................john
Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M, Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X ««
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.