Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› Commercial Jets and The Sound Barrier
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
Commercial Jets and The Sound Barrier (Read 591 times)
May 11
th
, 2006 at 3:55pm
Ecko
Offline
Colonel
-
Denmark
Gender:
Posts: 4012
Hi guys!
One of my dads friends, who has no aviation knowlegde whatsoever, told me today that commercial jets often pass the speed of sound whilst cruising. He explained this was because of the high tailwinds they can get from the jetstream.
I know that commercial jets* cannot pass the speed of sound safely, but I don't know how to explain it to him.
Quite frankly, it's got me a bit confused too.. ???
The mach speed will go up when you get a tailwind, since the mach speed is related to the groundspeed, correct?
-Then how can you prevent an aircraft from going past mach 1 if you get a really
really
strong tailwind?
I know the design of modern day carriers greatly limits the speed near mach 1, but can it really prevent it?
I'm a little confused, help would be greatly appreciated. I don't need hour-long technical explanations, but a short, packed version would nice.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 4:35pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Quote:
The mach speed will go up when you get a tailwind, since the mach speed is related to the groundspeed, correct?
-Then how can you prevent an aircraft from going past mach 1 if you get a really
really
strong tailwind?
I know the design of modern day carriers greatly limits the speed near mach 1, but can it really prevent it?
I'm a little confused, help would be greatly appreciated. I don't need hour-long technical explanations, but a short, packed version would nice.
Simple. It isn't. Mach number is derived from the Indicated Airspeed or True Airspeed of an aircraft, not its Groundspeed. Hence the aircraft is not supersonic - ie the relative airflow into which the aircraft is flowing is not above the speed of sound.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 4:37pm
Tweek
Ex Member
Think about it, if it was true, all that matters is the indicated airspeed. I don't know myself, but like you said, it would break the sound barrier, if talking about the relative ground speed.
What would rip an airliner apart from overstressing (in this case, from speed), would be because of the sheer air resistance, caused by great speeds. If there is a strong tailwind, this will, in effect, blow the air away from the aircraft, and thus decreasing air resistance (and also air flow over the wings - indicated airspeed).
Think of it this way:
If you had a 100mph tailwind, and the plane was travelling at a actual airspeed of 150mph (not talking about airliners specifically here), then the indicated airspeed would be 50mph, and therefore the aircraft would more than likely stall, due to the lack of airflow over the wings, in the direction of the tail.
In other words, I don't think that the Mach gauge in an airliner would pass Mach 1, even though they could be travelling faster than the speed of sound.
...I think! At least that's my take on all this scientific malarky. Please correct me if I'm wrong!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 4:43pm
Ecko
Offline
Colonel
-
Denmark
Gender:
Posts: 4012
Quote:
Simple. It isn't. Mach number is derived from the Indicated Airspeed or True Airspeed of an aircraft, not its Groundspeed. Hence the aircraft is not supersonic - ie the relative airflow into which the aircraft is flowing is not above the speed of sound.
Thanks a lot Charlie, it made me that much smarter!
Thank you too Tweek, although you're pretty much saying the same as myself.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 4:47pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
If you had a 100mph tailwind, and the plane was travelling at a actual airspeed of 150mph (not talking about airliners specifically here), then the indicated airspeed would be 50mph, and therefore the aircraft would more than likely stall, due to the lack of airflow over the wings, in the direction of the tail.
I thnk you're a tad confused there Tweek. The tailwind could be 500 mph & the airspeed would still be 150. In this case the groundspeed would be 150 + 500 = 650 mph but the aircraft would not be supersonic.
In the same way a balloon has no airspeed at all. If there was no wind it would rise & fall vertically.
PS. The only supersonic commercial airliners to date were Concorde & the Tu 144.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 5:38pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Quote:
PS. The only supersonic commercial airliners to date were Concorde & the Tu 144.
...and the DC-8!
http://www.dc8.org/library/supersonic/index.php
M1.012 at 41,000ft!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 5:42pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Ah, I meant straight & level c/w passengers.
Quote:
After climbing to an altitude of 52,090 feet, the DC-8-42 series aircraft attained a maximum speed of Mach 1.012 or 660 mph while in a controlled dive through 41,088 feet.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 6:10pm
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
Not to mention conventional turbo-jets and turbo-fans cannot work when the incoming airflow is supersonic. Supersonic jets have to use a system of ramps and moving panels to slow the speed of the air down. That's all because the air in front of a supersonic shockwave is going supersonic, and behind it's subsonic, I can't quite remember exactly how it works, but airliners don't have that built into their engine intakes.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 6:29pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
We're in danger of getting too technical here. Going back to Ecko's original question I'll try to explain this as simply as possible. It might be easier to think of a boat on a fast flowing river. The water is the air & the river bank is the ground.
Let's say the river is flowing at 10 mph & our boat can do a maximum of 5 mph. If the boat is going flat out downstream it will be travelling at 15 mph (5 + 10) in relation to the river bank. Now turn the boat round & go upstream & it will actually be going backwards at 5 mph (5 - 10) in relation to the river bank - but it's still going forward at 5 mph through the water.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 7:04pm
TacitBlue
Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Gender:
Posts: 5391
To add to Dougs post:
If the airspeed indicator reads 600 knots, and you have a tailwind of 100 knots (like the jetstream) then your ground speed would be 700 knots. If sound travels at 661 knots, then yes, your ground speed would be above the speed of sound, but your airspeed would not.
P.S. I'm not that famillier with airliners, is 600 Knots a normal speed for one?
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y
Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 7:12pm
Crumbso
Offline
Colonel
The Sea Vixen - You aint'
never seen such a fox!!!
West Sussex, England
Gender:
Posts: 1794
Doug's right folks, you can test this in FS if you want a practical demonstration. Set the wind to one hundred knots and then take off into the wind and go 100kts you are stationary in ground speed but your airspeed is still 100kts.
Vice versa if you go the other direction your ground speed is 200kts but your airspeed remains the same. If you want to complicate matters you could start talking about huge gusts and acceleration times but the basic princeble is sound.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 8:10pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Here's a simple take on this: all the drama of exceeding the speed of sound is about going at that speed
relative to the air around you
. That's what really counts; a groundspeed of 800 knots or so is just a number, but "breaking the barrier" (which is really a barrier created by the airplane itself, as it deals with the peculiar effects of moving through air faster than sound waves) is something a little more interesting, and challenging.
And no, since the Concordes were retired, airliners do not "go supersonic". Almost, but not quite.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 8:49pm
Ecko
Offline
Colonel
-
Denmark
Gender:
Posts: 4012
I get it now, easy to explain really.
You're going faster than the speed of sound, but you don't "hit" the sound barrier cause the air around the aircraft is travelling fast also. That way the complications of supersonic flight doesn't affect the aircraft. The aircraft is over the speed of sound, but not over mach 1.
Thanks for the help guys!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 8:54pm
Chris_F
Offline
Colonel
Insert message here
Posts: 1364
Quote:
I get it now, easy to explain really.
You're going faster than the speed of sound, which is 340.29 meters per second, but you don't "hit" the sound barrier cause the air around the aircraft is travelling fast also. That way the complications of supersonic flight doesn't affect the aircraft. The aircraft is over the speed of sound, but not over mach 1.
Thanks for the help guys!
Kinda.
340m/s is only the speed of sound at sea level/standard temperature. The speed of sound changes with pressure, and thus changes with altitude. You can be traveling over 340m/s without traveling over the speed of sound even in still air. You just have to do it at altitude.
So that may be the confusion. Airliners do sometimes have a ground speed higher than 340m/s yet they do not exceed the speed of sound.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
May 11
th
, 2006 at 8:57pm
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
Yeah, over the ground you're going faster than the speed of sound, but like several posters said, the airflow around the aircraft you're flying in does not.
Remember what Rotty said: Groundspeed is just a number and it doesnt reflect wing performance at all
Also remember speed of sound decreases with pressure and temperature.
Edit: Chris F beat me to it
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.