I think they are done.  I'm not 100% sure though...

IRIAF has 40 out of 79 flying (according to iranian sources, US sources say that they can put 20 in the air if they have a good day).

But if you can still call these 'Grumman F-14' is another question. They are probably highly modified (and there is a very slim chance that there are some new ones)

Quote:


The final trap was made the 8th of february, 12:35 A.M., one hundred percent out of US service.

Quote:


Negative. It was designed soley for the US Navy. Besides, no other branch wants a beat up 30 year old jet.

Quote:


All of the above is my guess. Perhaps the Navy will salvage one or two and save them for airshows. Most likely drones, as that's what most outdated fighters are used for (F-106's, F-4's, A-7's, etc.)

theyre gone, but not officially retired...VF-31 was sent overseas for this stuff goin on with israel.

for some reason, the gov't thought the Superbug would be better than totally upgrading the tomcat. the A+++'s, B's, and D's have excellent radar, avionics and weapons packs, but their computers are old and outdated, and HUGE. there are more advanced packages on the 18E/F and even though the planes smaller, theres still plenty of room for upgrades. empty panels and racks and such. also, for what its worth, were not "technically" allowed to use phoenix missiles anymore, but..uh...yeah, anyway, the superbug cant carry them, but it can carry everything the tomcat and bombcat can, and more of it. (9 hardpoints).

an aside, the hornet has considerably less range than the tomcat, too. Texaco is making a killing off the VFA and VMFA squadrons. 

granted, the tomcats computers were among the first to have TB hard drives, but the superbugs have hundreds or thousands of terrabytes avaliable on their HD's(its classified, so im not sure). the tomcats radar was amazing, and is still classified, but its something over 200 miles (ill never tell), and relied on the E-2 to keep its eyes open for bogeys. with the superbug, their radar is linked to satellite, aegis cruisers, and a bunch of other stuff...

that means that with the replacement of the tommys with the bugs, E-2's are obsolete. and once the F-18G's come out, soon after, even the Prowlers will be grandfathered out or mothballed (probably the latter). 

the new navy is facing serious issues with this updating thing...our demand is gonna be smaller, and all of these tech developments will mean smaller and smaller carrier compliments. the new CVX's are only looking at about 3-3,500 berths, compared with the 6-6,600 with current flat tops.

i digress. theres rumors that some private companies MAY buy some tomcats as booster planes for rockets to go to space, but i have doubts. maybe we'll see them fly again one day. i hope so. long live the tomcat!

Its really sad i to see them go and the navy really dose not have any thing that can really replace them if you ask me. but missle tech has gottin a lot better and the threat of super sonic sovite bomber attacks on the fleet has well disapered for now although im sure there are some contries that could gives a run for are money. but the reall thing that did the tomcats in was there complexity to many man hours of mantince for every flight hour cant really recall numbers but it was several times that of the f-18.

Quote:


Remember, tankers do not shoot back, however Type 42 Destroyers tried and lost in the Faulklands Conflict. As I remember the UK lost 2 too theses weapons. They were launched at the maximum range and the aircraft were already on the way home when they hit.

Matt

@expat: The post wasn't about shooting sitting ducks with Exocets (which shooting at tankers is, even if you arm the crew with Stingers), it was about the fact that Iran at the absolute heights of the sanctions still could get hold of Exocets, and was able to modify the F-14A to carry the necessary electonics to carry them.

Remember that the only reason for selling F-14s to Iran was Soviet RECCE overflights (with Foxbats), and that at that time there was nothing else in the US arsenal that could touch the MiG-25RB (mission cruise M2.8, overdrive over M3.2). The F-14 was the best they could offer to cover their gulf assets at that time (2nd half of the 1970s).

Main problem in the gulf is subs (Shkval), fast attack boats (Shkval) and coastal batteries (Shkval, SS-19 'Granit' with conventional warhead). A single conventional load Granit is enough to sink a Nimitz class carrier.

Some sources say that they even took the exocet launcher from one of the frigates and put it on a truck, which was used in that attack too...