Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› What do you think?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
What do you think? (Read 325 times)
Mar 22
nd
, 2006 at 7:48pm
KDSM
Offline
Colonel
SimV Forum Flyer
Gender:
Posts: 1340
There is a debate on another forum about this vid some say its overweight and some say pilot is just trying to get airborne to avoid all the people.
what do you think?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Mar 22
nd
, 2006 at 8:13pm
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
The one thing one can tell for certain is that the pilot most definitely lost directional control of the aircraft not long into the takeoff roll. When that happens, a pilot has a decision to make-do I have enough airspeed to get into the air before I run off the runway?, or do I cut throttle and full brakes immediately? He tried to get into the air, and it sure as hell didn't work... that looked nasty. I hope the people were ok
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Mar 22
nd
, 2006 at 9:11pm
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Sadly, it was a medical emergency flight, with a sick child being transported with his mother. At the end of the accident, the pilot was still (barely) alive with burns over 90% of his body, and the mother and child had died.
The plane came down next to a (fortunately empty) school....
PIlot error? A possible sudden gust ? At the end of the day, a mercy flight turned tragedy....
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Mar 22
nd
, 2006 at 10:02pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
That was horrible to watch, but it's always a valuable learning experience...
My immediate impression is that it was probably not overweight, and I don't think he was veering to avoid the people near the strip. The density altitude there at that moment may have been quite high; it's amazing some times how much that can affect performance... might be a factor.
It looks like he was attempting a normal soft-field (in this case, rough-field) takeoff, which involves geting the plane airborne well below Vx, so as to minimize the takeoff roll on a rough or drag-inducing surface.
The next step after rotation is to immediately reduce the back pressure so the nose can come down and airspeed can increase, leading to a good airspeed for positive rate of climb.
I think what happened is that he gets the plane airborne at a very low airspeed, practically in a stall right away, and at this low airspeed and high power setting, the plane naturally wants to yaw left- which it does, with a vengeance. He either does not or cannot apply enough right rudder to counteract this (can't see it in this clip), and now the plane is forward-slipping at a very high A of A and very low airspeed. I'll bet the stall horn was going, if the plane was so equipped. Due to obstacles and people ahead, he was probably reluctant to let the nose drop when he should have.
Meanwhile, there appears to be a bit of a left crosswind (based on the eventual drifting of the dust generated by the plane's passage); this didn't help matters.
What happens next is unclear, because the plane moves far away from the camera, but it would not surprise me to hear he tried to retract the flaps early. He's nearly level, then suddenly the plane just sinks. That's exactly what would happen if you retract the flaps too early, especially at or near gross in a high density-altitude situation.
It should also be noted that it was probably a lot easier to get into that strip by himself than it would be to get out with passengers and medical cargo.... I don't know if he started his roll at the extreme end of the clearing, but every available inch would be absolutely necessary to pull that off...
On the basis of this footage alone, I think his fine intentions (his eagerness to get this kid help quickly, and his willingness to carry the child's very worried mother along when every pound was critical) became a distraction.
Very sad, but a heroic effort, so I'm reluctant to second-guess this pilot... but it just looks ill-planned.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Mar 22
nd
, 2006 at 10:06pm
flyboy 28
Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 13323
Quote:
... but it just looks ill-planned.
I agree. While tragic and probably a mistake, it really could have been prevented.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Mar 22
nd
, 2006 at 11:15pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
It started out looking like a good, text-book, soft-field takeoff. I think the crosswind was pretty significant because he started drift drastically to the right. I think the combination of the substantial right rudder you need right at lift off during these kind of take-offs.. combined with the crosswind doomed that flight. You not only let up on the back pressure, but, depending on trim/weight/CG.. you actuall fly nose down a degree or two while in ground effect until you can climb out of ground effect with the nose level. You lose a good 20% of your lift as you leave ground effect. If you try to climb out of ground effect before you're well over Vx.. you're coming back down,, with momentun.
We gotta second guess the pilot here.. or the discussion loses out. And if we learn from it, I'm sure he'd appreciate it.
A near gross-weight, soft-field takeoff into a significant crosswind with possible denisty altitude complications.
That's my guess.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Mar 23
rd
, 2006 at 12:38am
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
I'll have to re-watch the vid... maybe the part where I thought he was losing directional control he was already in the air.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Mar 23
rd
, 2006 at 12:44am
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
I think Rotty and Brett have it here, the combination of not bringing the nose back down after initial lift-off during a soft/short field takeoff can be very dangerous, as well as leaving ground effect before there was sufficient lift and forward speed. However, one thing I noticed is that he appears to have at least 20 degrees of flaps, but I always learned that for a short/soft field takeoff, you should only have 10 degrees of flaps. It almost seems that having that amount of flaps for a high altitude, short/soft field takeoff would hurt more than it would help as your angle of attack would be increased alot, maybe past the point of stall. Think of when you are landing and you are a little high on approach, you drop another notch of flaps, which allows you to increase your descent angle, without increasing your airspeed (which is the definition of the purpose of flaps). So I think it is mostly pilot error, the airplane seemed to be doing everything correctly, and the weather wasn't bad (if you look at the trees and other things, it doesn't seem too windy) and the aircraft was just overloaded, and it wasn't able to maintain the climb once out of ground effect.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Mar 23
rd
, 2006 at 1:03am
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
You're right, Beef.. he was off the runway before he was airborne. The crosswind'll do that on a soft field... Crosswind, soft-field takeoffs are a handful 'cause you gotta get that extra rudder in before you can dip a wing and crab..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Mar 26
th
, 2006 at 11:37am
rich747
Offline
Colonel
Punk in Drublic
UK, Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 213
What T**t. enought said.
But seriously those blokes in front lost their macho persona pretty quick as most people would in that sitaution
Where's the challenge in landing with wheels?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Mar 26
th
, 2006 at 11:59am
Tweek
Ex Member
Quote:
But seriously those blokes in front lost their macho persona pretty quick as most people would in that sitaution
What do you expect? There was a plane heading straight towards them, at a lower altitude than they were...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Mar 26
th
, 2006 at 12:00pm
rich747
Offline
Colonel
Punk in Drublic
UK, Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 213
Good point, I would have been outta there in a shot
Where's the challenge in landing with wheels?
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.