Search the archive:
 YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
  Simviation Forum › Current Flight Simulator Series › Flight Simulator X › What aircraft would we like to see in FSX?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print
What aircraft would we like to see in FSX? (Read 11160 times)
Reply #75 - Jan 20th, 2006 at 5:30pm
cheesegrater   Ex Member

 
I would like to see the 182RG come back. Also, some 50s, 60s, and 70s air liners would be great. 707 maybe? Definately a A320 - too many Boeings! De Havilland Comet would be nice to. The Century of Flight wasn't really a Century of flight. There was a big gap around 1950 - 1970. I would also like to see the Concorde return. DHC-2 would be nice too.
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #76 - Jan 20th, 2006 at 5:35pm

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
 *****
 
Quote:
I would also like to see the Concorde return


Why? They don't fly it anymore.

Quote:
Definately a A320


I think Boeing endorses MS. That's why all the 73X's
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #77 - Jan 24th, 2006 at 5:42am

MeTriX   Offline
Colonel
Mirage F1AZ
Perth, Australia

Gender: male
 Posts: 94
 *****
 
Quote:
Why? They don't fly it anymore.


Is that really a factor?  ???

FS Insider always features Boeing news, so they must work well together. As for the 787, I think that it would be the new addition to Boeing aircraft in FSX, maybe the 747-8 as well! Wink   
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #78 - Jan 24th, 2006 at 8:40am

Fitter   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Gender: male
 Posts: 4263
 *****
 
And I also would like to see a dynamic Tower view.... 8)
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #79 - Jan 24th, 2006 at 12:29pm

wealthysoup   Offline
Colonel
Newtownards, Northern Ireland

Gender: male
 Posts: 825
 *****
 
Quote:
Why? They don't fly it anymore.


as far as im aware they donty fly the 1903 wright flyer anymore either and its still included in fs
Wink
 
My PC specs:&&AMD Athlon 64 3200 (@ 2.2ghz)&&Asus K8v se deluxe motherboard&&1.5gb pc3200 RAM&&128mb palit geforce 6600gt&&200gb+80gb hard drives&&21 inch CRT&&5.1 creative surround sound speakers
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #80 - Jan 25th, 2006 at 3:05pm

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
 *****
 
Heavys....A beatiful & more realistic flight dinamics 747 with a VC and also something from airbus
 
...

Venezuela
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #81 - Jan 25th, 2006 at 9:54pm
cheesegrater   Ex Member

 
A Piper Warrior would be nice for the people who don't like Cessnas but I think that might be asking for too much.
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #82 - Jan 25th, 2006 at 10:59pm

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
 Posts: 6920
 *****
 
Since M$ will be focused on backwards compatibility, you have a good chance of using any of the default FS9 aircraft [the ones that you like] in FSX since M$ made those default planes. And if you don't have FS9 when FSX comes out, then there will be those who will post the defaults on SimV. Grin

That way, you can all still enjoy your favorite default plane until the addon developers start rolling in the new FSX addons. Wink
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #83 - Jan 25th, 2006 at 11:10pm
<Ramos>   Ex Member

 
Quote:
Since M$ will be focused on backwards compatibility, you have a good chance of using any of the default FS9 aircraft [the ones that you like] in FSX since M$ made those default planes. And if you don't have FS9 when FSX comes out, then there will be those who will post the defaults on SimV. Grin

That way, you can all still enjoy your favorite default plane until the addon developers start rolling in the new FSX addons. Wink



does that mean 2002 a/c also? y'think, or just the latter models for FS9?
you know what would be nuts, and save space ont he DVD, is have no default aircraft Wink. not a bad idea, except for the people who aren't really into the flight sim community, which is rare considering most people crack after the first 2-5 weeks of fly the same a/c over and over.

SmileyRamos
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #84 - Jan 25th, 2006 at 11:24pm
cheesegrater   Ex Member

 
People would be super pissed off - "I bought FSX and I can't even fly a plane!"

Including some defualt planes is a must because not everyone who flies FS downloads planes. Also software should work right out of the box.
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #85 - Jan 26th, 2006 at 12:02pm

simonmd   Offline
Colonel
Airliner Lover!
s wales, UK

Gender: male
 Posts: 1876
 *****
 
Quite, as I said, there should be at least one of each type for default, any more specific medels required can be downloaded at a future date.

Quote:
Why? They don't fly it anymore.

Eh? Vickers Vimy, Wright Flyer, Curtis Jenny, etc, etc.
 
...&&This months's screenshot contest entry> http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1197692798
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #86 - Jan 26th, 2006 at 12:14pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
 *****
 
Quote:
Eh? Vickers Vimy, Wright Flyer, Curtis Jenny, etc, etc.


There is still an airworthy Vimy (replica) which flew the Atlantic last year, and there are several airworthy Curtiss Jennys
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #87 - Jan 26th, 2006 at 2:47pm

simonmd   Offline
Colonel
Airliner Lover!
s wales, UK

Gender: male
 Posts: 1876
 *****
 
Alright, split hairs if you want.  Roll Eyes The point is that it's pretty irelavent as to whether a simulated AC does fly in real life. MSFS is to help us replicate things that we can't genuinely do in real life anyway. Lets be honest, if I was lucky enough to live in an area where I was able to jump in my own Cessna and do some leasure flying just for the hell of it, I wouldn't be typing this now!

So, flying a Cessna 172 or a Concorde. Both are impossible for me in real life and that's what MSFS is for!
 
...&&This months's screenshot contest entry> http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1197692798
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #88 - Jan 26th, 2006 at 3:02pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
 *****
 
Quote:
Alright, split hairs if you want.  Roll Eyes The point is that it's pretty irelavent as to whether a simulated AC does fly in real life. MSFS is to help us replicate things that we can't genuinely do in real life anyway. Lets be honest, if I was lucky enough to live in an area where I was able to jump in my own Cessna and do some leasure flying just for the hell of it, I wouldn't be typing this now!

So, flying a Cessna 172 or a Concorde. Both are impossible for me in real life and that's what MSFS is for!


Indeed, I was just straightening a few facts, and I quite agree with what you are saying... Wink Smiley
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #89 - Feb 6th, 2006 at 3:04pm

TheBod1357   Offline
Colonel
Chip an' a chair
Omaha, NE

Gender: male
 Posts: 162
 *****
 
Maybe it will include planes that never flew in the first place then? Cheesy Like the attempts at powered flight before the Wrights? That would be a surprising change from the normal, and rather unexpected as well. Cheesy
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
  « Home ‹ Board Top of this page

Simviation Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5 AE!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge