Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print
What aircraft would we like to see in FSX? (Read 11162 times)
Reply #105 - May 7th, 2006 at 12:01pm

machineman9   Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England

Gender: male
Posts: 5255
*****
 
i think some fighter jets would be good. maybe theyll give use 15 discs this time isntead of 4 and have all the planes in the world!!!
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #106 - May 8th, 2006 at 11:42am

TheBod1357   Offline
Colonel
Chip an' a chair
Omaha, NE

Gender: male
Posts: 162
*****
 
That might cause some hardrive issues... Tongue

And remember that this is not combat flight sim, so dont get your hopes up on default fighters, instead, proceed to worship 3rd party a/c developers
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #107 - May 9th, 2006 at 4:49am

chiptas   Offline
Colonel
Get some!
Brisbane Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 410
*****
 
Re: Svenpurple7
What? the thousands of freeware and payware a/c provided by 3rd party developers not good enough for you? 


No they are not. A huge majority of them dont work. Maybe the download section needs to be divided into crap that will waste your time, and stuff that actually works. Grin
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #108 - May 10th, 2006 at 11:59am

TheBod1357   Offline
Colonel
Chip an' a chair
Omaha, NE

Gender: male
Posts: 162
*****
 
I somewhat agree with that, except it is just as easy to ask the opinions of others in the "Aircraft Wanted" section. But it would be nice to have some sort of shortlist of high quality aircraft downloads, I know there are also threads about this very topic, and there are notices on the main page of popular new downloads, but a more organized list of sorts, that is updated frequently, maybe sorted for easier finding of specific crafts.

But for now, just searching around works for me.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #109 - May 10th, 2006 at 3:37pm

Harold   Offline
Colonel
Knowledge Is Power
EHTE

Gender: male
Posts: 5998
*****
 
Quote:
What he said!



And I second that!  Grin I never use and of the default birds in FS9 anyways. If Microsoft would raise the standard a little maybe I would be convinced to do so ...
But if I had to pick one ... it would be an A380 or the AN-225.

Ever since Sesamestreet I'm into BigBirds lol  Grin  Grin
 

...

Dell Dimension 8300 | P4 3.2 Ghz. | 2 GB RAM | 150 GB WD Raptor | Gainward 7800 GS+ 512 | FS-GS

click here to read my Studio V interview
IP Logged
 
Reply #110 - May 10th, 2006 at 3:39pm

Crumbso   Offline
Colonel
The Sea Vixen - You aint'
never seen such a fox!!!
West Sussex, England

Gender: male
Posts: 1794
*****
 
Well just go to the screenshot forums and see what is kicking around there most often and you'll see what is good.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #111 - May 10th, 2006 at 3:52pm

Harold   Offline
Colonel
Knowledge Is Power
EHTE

Gender: male
Posts: 5998
*****
 
Quote:
more than having more aircraft...I would love to see a detail model complete with virtual cabin and more detail virtual cockpit (so we rely no more on panel)


Rather than having more aircraft to fly with it might also be nice to have more and realistic AI planes. But Microsoft will probably have lots of logo copyright lawsuits with all these airlines ... and God knows, they already have so many  Grin
 

...

Dell Dimension 8300 | P4 3.2 Ghz. | 2 GB RAM | 150 GB WD Raptor | Gainward 7800 GS+ 512 | FS-GS

click here to read my Studio V interview
IP Logged
 
Reply #112 - May 10th, 2006 at 7:16pm

simonmd   Offline
Colonel
Airliner Lover!
s wales, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 1876
*****
 
They don't use real airline names because they would want royalties or something for appearing in the sim. There are plenty of repaints available for the default aircraft available in real world colours.

The comment about some Freeware planes being 'crap' is out of order. They are FREE for goodness sake!

I have literaly hundreds of freeware downloads of all types and have NEVER found one that didn't work. Yes, some were harder to install than others but when you consider the amount of time that goes into a decent freeware AC, you can't complain. There are many that could easily be payware and there are some that are no better than the default but all it's cost you is a bit of time to download and try it out. For me, half the fun of FS9 is the joy of finding something special or getting something working properly. Without such a variety of freeware AC on Simviation, AVSIM, etc. I'm sure many FS9 copies would be gathering dust by now.


Back to the original question, again, i'll say that all is required is one of each type of AC (GA, commercial jets/prop, helicopter, etc.) purely so new users can 'find their feet' and for multiplayer compatibility issues. Any specific AC we wish will be created by the third party freeware and payware designers.
 

...&&This months's screenshot contest entry> http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1197692798
IP Logged
 
Reply #113 - May 11th, 2006 at 3:38am

Harold   Offline
Colonel
Knowledge Is Power
EHTE

Gender: male
Posts: 5998
*****
 
Very true. I too have hundreds of freeware add-ons and the ones that don't work is probably my inability to install these properly  Grin

And I agree that there are some very good quality freeware planes (Posky, Meljet, iFDG etc.) and scenery addons (NL-2000, VOZ 1.1 and what about the great BlueSphere Project? etc.) not to speak of loads of fantastic utilities like SkyWorld, FlusiFix, FSAutostart, etc.

And also true is the fact that without these (amongst others) lots of FS9 copies would end up gathering dust and that too would be a shame because it such a great game (BTW: is it still a game?)

One of each ... hmm ... with all these add-ons available on this great website (does anyone notice my subtle sucking up??  Grin) that might not be a bad idea actually.
 

...

Dell Dimension 8300 | P4 3.2 Ghz. | 2 GB RAM | 150 GB WD Raptor | Gainward 7800 GS+ 512 | FS-GS

click here to read my Studio V interview
IP Logged
 
Reply #114 - May 11th, 2006 at 1:28pm

TheBod1357   Offline
Colonel
Chip an' a chair
Omaha, NE

Gender: male
Posts: 162
*****
 
I honestly dont fly too many 3rd party aircraft. I download them like there is no tomorrow though. But my current system cannot handle most of the higher quality downloads, and it just really detracts from the flying experience when you get less than 10 FPS. And I just plain love to fly, so the defaults serve my needs just fine Smiley. But I love to download my favorite planes and fly them around a little, just to appreciate them. But after that they pretty much dont get used too much, just dont have a nice enough system. But I never cease to be amazed at the beautiful and just plain awesome things that 3rd party designers do. Thats what keeps me downloading.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #115 - May 11th, 2006 at 9:38pm

SR-71Maverick   Offline
Colonel
Miami, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 651
*****
 
I would love to see a good X-35B model that is able to take off and land vertically without having to move forward.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #116 - May 13th, 2006 at 7:04pm

chiptas   Offline
Colonel
Get some!
Brisbane Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 410
*****
 
Thanks for the tips on sorting the good 3rd party from the bad. I have had a bit of a think about this. Installing 3rd party is a learning curve , i'm getting better , if microsoft spent as much time on aircraft as the 3rd party guys do the cost would be huge, so let microsoft make the bones and leave the meat to the 3rd party developers, thank you to all the guys who spend so much of there own time making good quality add on's.
Cheers  Grin
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #117 - May 13th, 2006 at 7:11pm
Lovetoflyhelis   Ex Member

 
i would like to see alot more "hard" textures

maybe an airborne runway too Smiley

if any of u have seen "skycaptain and the world of tomorrow" you know what i mean
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print