Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Errmm.... Air Force One? (Read 336 times)
Oct 24th, 2005 at 4:02pm

Alphajet_Enthusiast   Offline
Colonel
Belgae Gallorum Fortissimi

Gender: male
Posts: 3144
*****
 
I think the movie was Air Force One...
I found the movie a big laugh!

This is the movie where the president's plane is evacuated by a Herk at a few feet above sea level.

Did anybody notice how the president etc. slid down the wire to the Herk forward, right against the relative wind? In real life, totally impossible.

The movie is full of nice surprises like this! Grin

Oh and I watched this other movie about an airplane in distress where they got a AH-1 Cobra to fly in formation with a 747 and shoot holes in the horizontal stabilisers, and they performed some water air to air refuelling I think with a 707 in order to fill the nose gear bay with water and bring the nose of the airplane down. And the 747 had a glass cockpit and an engineer's panel as well as some totally invented other screens that dont exist.

How do they come up with it?  ??? Grin Grin Grin Grin

These movies are worth the laugh. I suppose they are pretty impressive to people who know nothing about airplanes, though...
Smiley

Anybody watch these?
 

...
Macbook Pro | Nvidia Geforce 8600M GT | 2GB Ram | 2.6GHz Intel Core 2 Duo | Mac OSX 10.5 Leopard
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Oct 24th, 2005 at 4:18pm

TacitBlue   Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5391
*****
 
Have you seen the one where these special ops/commando type guys board a 747 in flight through a docking tube type thing from the back of an F-117? They advertised it as a STEVEN SEGULL movie with STEVEN SEGULL in it and all kinds of STEVEN SEGULL stuff happening, but then he dies in the first ten minutes. Roll Eyes Oddly enough, the movie actually got slightly better after that. Still, it reeked of cheesiness. I was actually angered by the fact that they thought it was possibe for 5 people to sit in the back of a nighthawk. Can a 117 even go fast enough to catch a 747?
 

...
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y

Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Oct 24th, 2005 at 5:28pm
Tweek   Ex Member

 
Also on Die Hard (I think it's one of them, though I'm really not sure) where they're fighting on the wing of a plane...whilst the plane is taking off! Despite the fact that the plane takes a good minute-two minutes to take off, at that speed, I don't think you could stand unaided on the wing of any plane!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Oct 24th, 2005 at 6:18pm

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
Quote:
Despite the fact that the plane takes a good minute-two minutes to take off

Not a plane in the world that takes that long to takeoff.

Yeah some of them really are funny for people who know their stuff Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Oct 24th, 2005 at 7:30pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
as a referance a fully loaded DC10 on a long haul flight takes roughly 45 seconds to get airborne from a stand still. Or so i have timed. So a 747 shouldn't be much differant if at all. The majority of take off time is just getting moving, once your really going like anything its not that tough to keep going faster.
Impossible to transfer between two moving aircraft? Maybe not. No doubt its been done somewhere. It wouldn't be pleasant but in the highly unlikely event it would need to be done, i doubt to many would complain.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Oct 24th, 2005 at 8:14pm

Sytse   Offline
Colonel
Virtual Red Arrows
The Netherlands

Gender: male
Posts: 3590
*****
 
I kinda like the autopilot in 'Airplane'...  Grin
...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Oct 24th, 2005 at 8:20pm

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
Quote:
Impossible to transfer between two moving aircraft? Maybe not. No doubt its been done somewhere. It wouldn't be pleasant but in the highly unlikely event it would need to be done, i doubt to many would complain.

But he does have a point about AF1, for some reason I never picked up on it, but it would be impossible to move against the relative wind at 200 kts (just saw it the other day they matched at 200kts)
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Oct 24th, 2005 at 8:54pm

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
*****
 
It's called Hollywood. Deal with it.. Roll Eyes
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Oct 25th, 2005 at 2:33am

Alphajet_Enthusiast   Offline
Colonel
Belgae Gallorum Fortissimi

Gender: male
Posts: 3144
*****
 
Quote:
Impossible to transfer between two moving aircraft?

Probably not... Smiley

Quote:
into the relative wind
considering this is a jet at cruise speed... (and I think it even impossible for cessna speed!)
...Impossible...  Wink
 

...
Macbook Pro | Nvidia Geforce 8600M GT | 2GB Ram | 2.6GHz Intel Core 2 Duo | Mac OSX 10.5 Leopard
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Oct 25th, 2005 at 6:51am
Heretic   Ex Member

 
Quote:
It's called Hollywood. Deal with it.. Roll Eyes


Word.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Oct 25th, 2005 at 2:44pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
Quote:
considering this is a jet at cruise speed... (and I think it even impossible for cessna speed!)
...Impossible... 

It wasn't at cruise speed the speed was reduced to whatever it was Beef said.
You dont go side to side anyway the aircraft you would be leaving would need to be infront of the aircraft your transferring to and slightly above so you slide downwards. The basic science of gravity suggests you cant travel upwards like that.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Oct 26th, 2005 at 5:52pm

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
Quote:
Have you seen the one where these special ops/commando type guys board a 747 in flight through a docking tube type thing from the back of an F-117? They advertised it as a STEVEN SEGULL movie with STEVEN SEGULL in it and all kinds of STEVEN SEGULL stuff happening, but then he dies in the first ten minutes. Roll Eyes Oddly enough, the movie actually got slightly better after that. Still, it reeked of cheesiness. I was actually angered by the fact that they thought it was possibe for 5 people to sit in the back of a nighthawk. Can a 117 even go fast enough to catch a 747?


My favorite Segall movie... because he dies  right away.
Smiley
 

...
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print