Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› A 'silent' Airliner?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
A 'silent' Airliner? (Read 334 times)
Sep 11
th
, 2005 at 2:26am
Wing Nut
Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!
Gender:
Posts: 14173
Engineers plan out "silent" airliner of the future
Interesting concept, but I don't know if it'll fly...
HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives
If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Sep 11
th
, 2005 at 5:43am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Can't put my finger on it but this looks strangely familiar.
It seems to me that the biggest problem with aircraft noise has always been during take-off & landing. Reducing that could only be achieved by reducing the noise of the engines. Modern turbofan engines are already a huge improvement on the conventional gas turbines of a few years ago. Airliners like the BAe 146 (Avro RJ) are already known as "hush jets" & allowed to operate from environmentally sensitive inner-city locations like London City Airport. I think it might be more sensible & far cheaper to develop that concept.
http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/avrorjx/
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Sep 11
th
, 2005 at 7:40am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
planes like the 777 are already rather quiet anyway even on take-off. The small jets are easy to keep quiet problem is the bigger the plane the bigger the engine, thus more noise, this design works on 4 smaller engines, well ok, but they will still have to be bigger than the current quiet engines, and the more you have the more noise anyway.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Sep 19
th
, 2005 at 2:43am
Boss_BlueAngels
Offline
Colonel
I fly airplanes upside
down for fun.
Snohomish
Gender:
Posts: 696
Thinking of Boeing's BWB?
It's been on the drawing board for many years now.
And the thing with silencing the engines is that the heat difference is what causes the loud noise. Or so I've been told. That's why a jet in AB is so much louder than when it is just at mil power. And the F-117's are very quite dispite they have the same engines as F/A-18's (minus the AB) but have the divices that help to disipate heat.
The day is always better when you're flying upside down.&&&&
www.fight2flyphoto.com&&&&Canon
RebelXT&&Canon 18-55mm&&Sigma 10-20mm F/4-6.3&&Sigma 100-300mm F/4-6.3&&Sigma 50-500mm F/4-6.3
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Sep 19
th
, 2005 at 2:55am
SilverFox441
Offline
Colonel
Now What?
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Gender:
Posts: 1467
The concept goes even further back...Barnes Wallis proposed his "Swallow" as far back as the 1950's/1960's.
Of course...that design would not have been quiet. A variable geometry hypersonic airliner with no control surfaces.
Steve
(Silver Fox)
Daly
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Sep 19
th
, 2005 at 12:32pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Quote:
Can't put my finger on it but this looks strangely familiar.
Quote:
The concept goes even further back...Barnes Wallis proposed his "Swallow" as far back as the 1950's/1960's.
Of course...that design would not have been quiet. A variable geometry hypersonic airliner with no control surfaces.
I was about the say the same thing. I might see if I can find a picture of the thing. I believe it was quite extensively wind tunnelled...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Sep 19
th
, 2005 at 1:24pm
EirePlane
Offline
Colonel
London, UK
Gender:
Posts: 930
Quote:
And the thing with silencing the engines is that the heat difference is what causes the loud noise. Or so I've been told.
According to a documentary I saw on the BAE 146, the engines are quietened by blasting a jet of cool air into the gases coming out of the rear of the engine (or something like that) thus making it quieter.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Sep 19
th
, 2005 at 1:39pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
The Barnes Wallis Swallow was basically a variable geometry or swing-wing jet airliner developed from his WWII research under the code name Wild Goose. I've never seen a drawing or artist's impression as I think this was the name of the project & covered various designs. Another interesting idea was the method of control by rotating the engines (or the exhaust nozzles).
Unfortunately this was never developed beyond the model stage as it was many years ahead of its time.
Barnes Wallis with a model of the Swallow.
http://www.1940.co.uk/history/article/wallis/wallis.htm
I might be confusing this 'new' project with several other drawings & models I've seen over the years, even from TV series like Thunderbirds. Basically the lifting body or 'blended wing' is an extension of the flying wing concept so I see no reason why it wouldn't fly. The Horten Brothers in Germany & Jack Northrop in the US were working on very similar concepts even before WWII.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Sep 20
th
, 2005 at 12:15am
SilverFox441
Offline
Colonel
Now What?
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Gender:
Posts: 1467
We really need an FS10 Swallow don't we?
Steve
(Silver Fox)
Daly
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Sep 20
th
, 2005 at 10:29pm
Triple_7
Ex Member
I like the concept of a wing shaped airliner...something different for once....But i would not want to fly on a plane without windows and or limited windows. I like to look out and dont want some cheap "virtual window". I want the real deal
As for the steeper decents...if its quieter then why ??? Its not that fun being in a jet that takes dives on its way down...Had that on a TWA DC-9 a few years ago and was not by any means comfortable
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.