Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
Munich 1938 - Appeasement or buying time? (Read 2155 times)
Reply #15 - Sep 20th, 2005 at 1:59pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
How was Churchill being ruthless?  I sum Churchill up with his "We will fight them on the beaches" speech.  That doesn't smak me as being ruthless.

That was early on in the war. Some would still call some of his later decisions ruthless today. Dresden for example. This was not purely down to 'Bomber Harris' although he was made the scapegoat & took all the blame. This couldn't have been done without the highest authority. I suspect that Churchill himself was the one who suggested it. Then there was the forced repatriation of Russian PoWs during & after WWII, knowing that they would suffer terribly. http://www.libertyhaven.com/countriesandregions/exurss/repatriationtosu.shtml

Both were done to placate Stalin but I could quote many more examples. Churchill was ruthless alright. This was full-scale war & he had to be. I don't know what we would have done without him as I can't think of anyone who could have replaced him.

PS. I missed your edit. Quote:
But then again, if I recall correctly, his role during WWI as part of the admirality did smack of cold and calculating, not regarding the lives of men he made decisions for.  I see your point.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Sep 20th, 2005 at 2:48pm

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
Hagar,

You've made your points well, especially about Dresden.
 

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Sep 20th, 2005 at 3:32pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
If Churchills decision to send the Royal Navy to sink the French fleet in 1940 wasn't ruthless then I don't know what is. And then there was his suggestion after the war what to do about the german high command and their war crimes...

"My suggestion, is to take every officer above the rank of Colonel, and shoot them."
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Sep 20th, 2005 at 5:44pm

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
Quote:
If Churchills decision to send the Royal Navy to sink the French fleet in 1940 wasn't ruthless then I don't know what is.


Wasn't that after France fell and Churchill was concerned that the French fleet would be used against the Royal Navy?  That doesn't sound ruthless to me.
« Last Edit: Sep 21st, 2005 at 10:04am by dcunning30 »  

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Sep 21st, 2005 at 3:50am

H   Offline
Colonel
2003: the year NH couldn't
save face...
NH, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 6837
*****
 
Quote:
Wasn't that after France fell and Churchill was concerned that the French fleet would be used against the Royal Navy?  That doesn't sound ruthless to me.
It's common to scuttle one's own ship so the enemy can't use it, anyway. Um, Germans at Scapa Flow ????
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Sep 21st, 2005 at 5:04am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
It's common to scuttle one's own ship so the enemy can't use it, anyway. Um, Germans at Scapa Flow ????

It's a long time since I read about this but I suggest the situation was completely different. I don't recall any German sailors losing their lives when the fleet was scuttled at Scapa Flow in 1919, long after the Armistice & on the orders of its own commanding officer, Rear Admiral von Reuter. The French fleet at Mers-el-Kebir, French North Africa, was attacked in harbour after an ultimatum from Admiral Somerville. I don't think the Royal Navy had any sense of pride in attacking their former comrades after the French commanding officer Admiral Gensoul refused to cooperate. This is the ultimatum:*
Quote:
"It is impossible for us, your comrades up to now, to allow your fine ships to fall into the power of the German or Italian enemy. We are determined to fight on until the end, and if we win, as we think we shall, we shall never forget that France was our Ally, that our interests are the same as hers, and that our common enemy is Germany. Should we conquer we solemnly declare that we shall restore the greatness and territory of France. For this purpose we must make sure that the best ships of the French Navy are not used against us by the common foe. In these circumstances, His Majesty's Government have instructed me to demand that the French Fleet now at Mers el Kebir and Oran shall act in accordance with one of the following alternatives;

(a) sail with us and continue the fight until victory against the Germans and Italians.

(b) Sail with reduced crews under our control to a British port. The reduced crews would be repatriated at the earliest moment.

If either of these courses is adopted by you we will restore your ships to France at the conclusion of the war or pay full compensation if they are damaged meanwhile.

(c) Alternatively if you feel bound to stipulate that your ships should not be used against the Germans or Italians unless these break the Armistice, then sail them with us with reduced crews to some French port in the West Indies - Martinique for instance - where they can be demilitarised to our satisfaction, or perhaps be entrusted to the United States and remain safe until the end of the war, the crews being repatriated.

If you refuse these fair offers, I must with profound regret, require you to sink your ships within 6 hours.

Finally, failing the above, I have the orders from His Majesty's Government to use whatever force may be necessary to prevent your ships from falling into German or Italian hands."
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Destruction-of-the-French-Fleet-at-Mers...


These are the basic facts of the situation with a very interesting conclusion. There's no doubt that many people, including the Royal Navy, consider this to have been a very ruthless decision by Winston Churchill.
Quote:
In June 1940, the only fleet large enough to have a chance  of threatening the Royal Navy was that of France. France's surrender posed the possibility that this might fall into German hands, and Churchill acted ruthlessly to prevent that happening, ordering his admirals to neutralise the French ships at all costs and at great speed. One admiral, in Gibraltar, protested at these orders - he was later sacked. Another, in Alexandria, ignored them and successfully spent several days negotiating a French disarmament. In Oran, North Africa, a third, carried the orders out to the letter, and this, combined with the inflexibility of his French opposite number, led to the attack by the Royal Navy on the French base of Mers-el-Kebir on the 3rd of July 1940. Three French battleships were put out of action and over a thousand sailors died on them.

This was the decisive battle of 1940 that saved Britain from the possibility of invasion. With the Navy safe, the Battle of Britain could have been lost and invasion would probably still not have been possible. In fact it was won, and for obvious reasons became the symbol of that period. Meanwhile, Mers-el-Kebir was forgotten.
http://www.open2.net/thingsweforgot/prog_one.html


*PS. I can almost hear Winston Churchill saying those words. It's quite likely he wrote that ultimatum himself.
« Last Edit: Sep 21st, 2005 at 10:21am by Hagar »  

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Sep 21st, 2005 at 5:26am
Heretic   Ex Member

 
Quote:
I've never read it myself (maybe I should) but I don't know where you got that idea. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0395925037/102-1142458-5784940?v=g...


It's illegal in Germany.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Sep 21st, 2005 at 5:37am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
It's illegal in Germany.

Ah, thanks Bjorn. I suspected that might be the case.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Sep 21st, 2005 at 10:08am

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
Quote:
It's illegal in Germany.



I once read the swastika is illegal in Germany as well.  I thought about that in respect to flight sim games modelling Luftwaffe aircraft withswastika's on the tail.  Is there any truth to this, or was this just a silly notion?
 

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Sep 21st, 2005 at 10:31am
Heretic   Ex Member

 
Quote:
I once read the swastika is illegal in Germany as well.  I thought about that in respect to flight sim games modelling Luftwaffe aircraft withswastika's on the tail.  Is there any truth to this, or was this just a silly notion?


Yup, the swastika is illegal here indeed. German repainters/aircraft developers widely respect that limitation, but foreign developers can paint whatever they want on german planes.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Sep 21st, 2005 at 12:45pm

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
Quote:
Yup, the swastika is illegal here indeed. German repainters/aircraft developers widely respect that limitation, but foreign developers can paint whatever they want on german planes.


So if you download a Ju87 from simviation, and it has a swastika on the tail, you're still legal because it wasn't made in Germany?

Also, what about museums?  The museum of science and industry in Chicago has a Ju87 hanging from the ceiling, swastika on tail and all...

Also, the same museum has the U505.  I haven't been in it for some time, though.  Last time I was there, they were building an enclosure for it to protect it from the elements.
 

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Sep 21st, 2005 at 2:11pm
Heretic   Ex Member

 
Well, showing the swastika in public is illegal here, but as long as nobody of the authorities finds out, you can have it at home. Not sure if there's an exception for museums and historical books.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Sep 21st, 2005 at 8:25pm
Flt.Lt.Andrew   Ex Member

 
Sad times indeed.
I beleive that it was Stalin, Woodlouse, who stated that all those above the rank of Colonel should be shot...in fact he thought the whole OKW should be liquidated.
Its good, I think, that such an ultimatum was given to the French, as they quite obviously hadnt the sincerest intention of fighting, I can say that quite confidently after reading the book "For Your Freedom and Ours" (Lynn Olsen and Stanley Cloud) on Polish pilots in WWII- their encounters with French pilots were saddening, with the French pilots drinking instead of fighting.  Roll Eyes

Neville Chamberlain did what he thought was right. He wouldn't hav e done it for any other reason. In fact, he truly believed he could have peace.
It is sad that this peace was so short, but really, who's gonna stop a mad man with a combover a toothbrush moustache, evil eyes and a policy called "Lebensraum"? I mean really, lets think here!


A.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #28 - Sep 22nd, 2005 at 3:56am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
Sad times indeed.
I beleive that it was Stalin, Woodlouse, who stated that all those above the rank of Colonel should be shot..

It was probably Churchill although I can't find a source quoting those exact words. Both Churchill & Anthony Eden opposed the idea of the Nuremburg trials. Quote:
The inclination of the British government and of the prime minister, Winston Churchill, in particular, was simply to shoot Axis leaders out-of-hand, as outlaws, once they were caught.

Neither the Soviet nor the American government was happy with the British suggestion. Though both states shared the view that they faced an evil regime, they both favoured some formal process of law, the Soviet Union because it was felt necessary to display publicly the guilt of the accused, the United States because there existed powerful voices in Washington decrying the idea that democratic states should simply murder their enemies. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/wwtwo/war_crimes_trials_01.shtml


Quote:
who's gonna stop a mad man with a combover a toothbrush moustache, evil eyes and a policy called "Lebensraum"? I mean really, lets think here!

It's all very well to ridicule his appearance but that type of moustache was popular at the time. It might be difficult to understand now but from what I've read about him Adolf Hitler did not appear mad to ordinary German people, many of whom idolised him. Hitler had many good ideas which put Germany back on its feet after years of depression, restoring a sense of pride. He had a very charming side & a hypnotic personality. Apparently most people who met him came under his spell. You have to understand that to appreciate what this was all about.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #29 - Sep 22nd, 2005 at 10:52am

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
Quote:
It's all very well to ridicule his appearance but that type of moustache was popular at the time.


I imagine after WWII, the name Adolf probably came into an abrupt disuse.  I imagine there probably aren't very many Adolfs running around in Germany these days.


Quote:
It might be difficult to understand now but from what I've read about him Adolf Hitler did not appear mad to ordinary German people, many of whom idolised him. Hitler had many good ideas which put Germany back on its feet after years of depression, restoring a sense of pride. He had a very charming side & a hypnotic personality. Apparently most people who met him came under his spell. You have to understand that to appreciate what this was all about.


I can understand that.  History Channel has a show that discusses such a theses that Hitler ended up becoming a drug addict by his doctor.  He had stomach ailments, so his doctor treated that with drugs, he increasingly became fatigued, so his doctor prescribed stimulants for that, and the big whopper, the show suggested he had advanced stage of syphilis, which we all know, if left untreated, can make you go mad.
 

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print