Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› Discovery to fly Tuesday?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Discovery to fly Tuesday? (Read 762 times)
Jul 22
nd
, 2005 at 7:25am
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
That's the plan... countdown to resume Saturday, with a launch scheduled for 10:39 EDT Tuesday. Got my fingers crossed already.
Go Discovery!!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jul 22
nd
, 2005 at 1:01pm
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
Here I was thinking we'd have to wait till September...
Good luck fellas!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jul 22
nd
, 2005 at 1:19pm
TacitBlue
Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Gender:
Posts: 5391
If it doesn't fly, NASA will officially crawl under a rock.
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y
Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jul 22
nd
, 2005 at 3:34pm
DJ_Zephyr
Offline
Colonel
MiX iT uP!
New Port Richey, FL
Gender:
Posts: 219
Damn Shuttle... been around since the 70s, hasn't it? And it's glitches are starting to bare their ugly teeth. Isn't it about time to design something new?
Anyway, godspeed to the Discovery!
AMD Athlon X2 4200+ dual-core- 2.2ghz per core
MSI GeForce 9400 GT- 550mhz core, 512mb VRAM
2gb DDR RAM, dual 17" monitors (one Acer panel, one KDS boat anchor)
Windows 7 Home Premium, DirectX 11, Realtek HD w/ Logitech X530 speaker set, Logitech G110 keyboard
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jul 22
nd
, 2005 at 7:31pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Ditto that (although you shouldn't assume that this latest glitch couldn't have occurred when Discovery was brand new)... I feel it's time has come and go, but it's still the only existing spacecraft that will do what's needed to complete the ISS. Once that's done, an all-in-one shuttle/laboratory/satellite service vehicle won't be needed, and smaller, simpler designs, built specifically for one of those purposes, should become the norm. Maybe a non-government group will get a shuttle service going in the near future, and NASA can save a ton of money booking seats for their station crews the way they'd book airliner flights today. I'd also really like to see orbit-only vehicles stationed at the ISS someday; that might be an efficient way to service or retrieve satellites... or maybe even aid in the assembly of a starship, in orbit. Lots of possibilities, once we establish a solid platform in orbit.
But yes, for now... I can't wait to see her launch and come home again. With all their faults,these orbiters are remarkable ships.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jul 22
nd
, 2005 at 7:38pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
I think the weather might have the final word.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jul 22
nd
, 2005 at 9:31pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Quote:
I think the weather might have the final word.
As it should... they're a lot more conservative about that since they lost
Challenger
. Heard there's a chance of storms (typical there this time of year), but those summer boomers also typically blow through quickly down there. Gotta think positive!!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jul 22
nd
, 2005 at 10:04pm
gn85
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 139
Quote:
Damn Shuttle... been around since the 70s, hasn't it? And it's glitches are starting to bare their ugly teeth. Isn't it about time to design something new?
Anyway, godspeed to the Discovery!
I thought it was the early 80s.
I think the space shuttles have served remarkably well and done all that was asked of them. What exactly was the service life for the orbiters supposed to be?
I've got my finger's crossed for Tuesday!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jul 23
rd
, 2005 at 9:08pm
Jimbo
Offline
Colonel
Jimbo's Flight Simulation
Tours
South Yorkshire, UK
Gender:
Posts: 3052
So it decides to!
I was at cocoa beach the other wednesday waiting for it to go off. Travelled from Orlando down to Titusville to watch it...
, back in the uk now though...
P.s if you look on the PHOTO section a little later tomorow, i have a lot of posts coming up with the full length of my trip, including kennedy space centre.
Thanks
Jimbo
..Jimbo's Tours, MORE info in the MULTIPLAYER SECTION
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jul 24
th
, 2005 at 11:50am
Jared
Offline
Colonel
I'd rather be flying...
Uniontown, Ohio
Gender:
Posts: 12621
I agree it is time to come up with a newer space vehicle.
The space shuttle has been around for quite awhile and has served a purpose but I think it is time to start thinking about a smallerf more effecient launch vehicle.
Thinking about it the shuttle is a rather large vehicle that has largely been used to transport people and supplies back and forth from the space station.
A smaller vehicle could therefore be used to serve this purpose, while still using the shuttle for missions havig large payloads?
Just my two cents..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jul 24
th
, 2005 at 9:09pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Quote:
I agree it is time to come up with a newer space vehicle.
The space shuttle has been around for quite awhile and has served a purpose but I think it is time to start thinking about a smallerf more effecient launch vehicle.
Thinking about it the shuttle is a rather large vehicle that has largely been used to transport people and supplies back and forth from the space station.
A smaller vehicle could therefore be used to serve this purpose, while still using the shuttle for missions havig large payloads?
Just my two cents..
Well, the Russians have been providing just that for basic crew and supply transfers (despite the large boosters, the spacecraft themselves are pretty small and simple compared to US shuttles).
But the Shuttles are also being used to haul large station components into orbit (while also moving crews and supplies), something no other ship can do right now. And they're more reusable than the Soyuz systems ( I don't think even the Russian crew capsules are reused).
Sure, you could use spent upper stages of large rockets, etc. as station modules, but then you're talking about a really big launch vehicle. For now, it just makes sense to continue using the Orbiters for this kind of task. When it's time for just moving people and supplies back and forth, they really won't be needed anymore.
I'm sure there is plenty of planning at NASA now for a smaller, simpler next-gen shuttle, but they're having enough trouble maintaining funding for the existing fleet, and are also pretty busy with some very ambitious and productive deep-space probes.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 10:59am
gn85
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 139
<<APPLAUSE>>
We have lift-off!! Looked awesome. That was a spectacular view from the camera on the ET. Fantastic!
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.