Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Poll Poll
Question: Which do you prefer?

AMD    
  21 (75.0%)
Intel    
  7 (25.0%)




Total votes: 28
« Created by: Corsair Freak on: Jul 10th, 2005 at 8:46pm »

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
AMD or Intel? (Read 673 times)
Reply #15 - Jul 16th, 2005 at 5:29pm

Saitek   Offline
Colonel
UK

Gender: male
Posts: 7555
*****
 
One of the great long running arguments. I can't vote as I don't know. I have both and both do the job well.  Smiley
 

Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W

Flying FSX with Saitek's pro flight range:
Radio
Switch panel
Auto-pilot
Yoke and throttle quad
Pedals
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Jul 16th, 2005 at 10:07pm

ctjoyce   Offline
Colonel
Funny how my lappy runs
FSX better than your
Tower
USA

Gender: male
Posts: 4022
*****
 
Just go with something that has HT tech. The nice thing about this is that you get dual core  preformance, however at a single core price. Its very convienient because windows allous you to decide which "core" you run on.
 

CTJoyce, Modding and voiding warranties since 2003&&Sheila's Specs:ASUS Striker Extreme 680i, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz, Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400C4 2GB, 2x eVGA 7900GT KO,  Western Digital 80GB SATA & 250GB SATAIII&&Vesper's Specs: Intel Core 2 Duo T7400, 2GB DDR2-667, GeForce Go 7950GTX 512MB, 160GB Hitachi SATA 5400RPM&&Hardware FAQ, Read it and be informed&&My little corner of the world&&Once You Know You NEWEGG&&Building a computer Part 2
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Jul 16th, 2005 at 11:10pm

the_autopilot   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 1359
*****
 
Quote:
Just go with something that has HT tech. The nice thing about this is that you get dual core  preformance, however at a single core price. Its very convienient because windows allous you to decide which "core" you run on.


LMAO. That is the stupidest statement I have ever heard, no offense.

Hyper threading does not give you dual core performence. Not even close.

Hyperthreading simply allows a CPU to emulate another 'CPU'. This other virtual CPU uses unused resources to run another thread. Since most of the time, a CPU will not use 100% of its resources. For example, lets say a game uses 60% of your CPU. The other 40% does nothing, thats a waste. Hyperthreading allows another program or thread to recognize that 40% as a CPU and 'use' it as if it were another physical CPU. If your games uses 100% CPU, hyperthreading does nothing. Hyperthreading is a more efficient use of CPU resources, thats all.

But if you have a dual core and a game uses 100% CPU of one core, you still have another core available to you.

BTW, like dual cores, the OS must support hyperthreading and the application must make use of it.
 

Link to sig:&&Click here&&(Cannot post signature here due to current forum restrications on linked images).
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Jul 18th, 2005 at 8:07pm

GunnerMan   Offline
Colonel
Not the trees!
In The Cockpit

Gender: male
Posts: 1488
*****
 
Also AMD is whooping Intels ass with the new chips especially the X2s, 20% increase in almost all categorys tested and at WAY less power use. So if your doing anything with your computer get AMD.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print