Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
cfs4? (Read 1502 times)
Reply #15 - Oct 6th, 2004 at 10:09am

Wing Nut   Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender: male
Posts: 14173
*****
 
NOOOOOOO!!!!!!  I've said this before and I'll say it again.  FS is a civilian flgiht simulator.  The purpose is not to kill or crash or anything else.  It is for enjoying the thrill of flying and for having the oppurtunity to fly a plane you wouldn't get to in real life.  Making it anything else would diminish it.  Whatever they do to CFS, changing FS in the way you describe would destroy it.
 

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Oct 6th, 2004 at 4:19pm

Stratobat   Offline
Colonel
To fly... Or not to fly?

Posts: 1165
*****
 
Quote:
Working military bases could be included alongside the civil ones.


The only problem with that is that some earlier Military Bases have since become Civil Airports Grin

Regards,
Stratobat
 

...&&&&'If the literal sense makes good sense, seek no other sense lest you come up with nonsense'
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Oct 7th, 2004 at 12:12am

Mathias   Offline
Colonel
Toy Maker
Germany

Gender: male
Posts: 558
*****
 
The correct airports for the correct period would be the smallest problem. Actually that can allready be done since FS scenery supports dates, hence the Berlin Wall.
Problem would be performance, FS couldn't handle all the objects required for a decend combat sim, in particular since the bgl code is comparably pretty darn old and slow.
I think CFS3 was a move into the right direction, just half-hearted finished.
 

Mathias&&...
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print