Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Specific Aircraft Types
› Goodbye 747?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
Pages:
1
Goodbye 747? (Read 1649 times)
Aug 14
th
, 2004 at 2:24am
Wing Nut
Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!
Gender:
Posts: 14173
I'm sure it'll at least be around in cargo mode forever. I wonder what this means for the A380?
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usatoday/20040813/bs_usatoday/isthisold...
HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives
If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Aug 14
th
, 2004 at 4:09am
Mr. Bones
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 4304
if they think it's gonna be hard to fill an entire 747...what are they expecting for the A380 then?
i think the Jumbo will be still be around for a while. it's hard to imagine they are rare at the big airports, but someday they will. i think (and hope) that will take some time to happen!
Raw power...the J-58.&&
&&&&
My Anet collection.
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Aug 14
th
, 2004 at 5:11am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
The 747 is doing well in the asia routes domestically and internationally as well as the australia routes. Just because the US carriers arnt using it as much doesnt mean its by any means loosing popularity. There are actually plans for a 747 Advanced using the 7E7's technology which if it comes into production will easily match and perhaps beat the A380. Remember America isnt the sort of market for these planes like the Eastern routes are, which is where the A380 is selling well, they like their big planes flying the short haul routes, instead of frequency they go for fewer but higher passenger number flights, which is what is needed to start reducing traffic in the sky
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Aug 14
th
, 2004 at 5:19am
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
The 747 is beginning to show its age a little. Personally I think what will happen is that super-jumbos like the A380 will do the long hauls like the Atlantic and Pacific runs, but there will be less flights per day by the big carriers. This means they can still fill a plane, and make the same profit but spend less on fuel, and bring down maintenance costs as there will be less airframe/engine hours throughout the fleet.
Alas its the law of economics...
Ozzy
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Aug 14
th
, 2004 at 8:32am
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
The 747's days are soon numbered.
Craig is talking about a re-make of the 747, similiar to what Mcdonnell-Douglas did for the MD-11, and what Boeing arranged for the 737NG wings andf its avionics (777 downgraded software)
But the truth is, Boeing has optimized every little inch of that aircraft to the max. As an airframe it can't compete head-to-head with the A380 when it comes to efficiency - no matter what Boeing does to it.
That's why I think the 7E7 was a wise move by Boeing
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Sep 1
st
, 2004 at 7:35am
GWSimulations
Offline
Colonel
I am a developer, if you
want an addon, just ask*
UK
Posts: 746
Boeing should change the cockpit layouts in all their current production aircraft, so as they are as simmilar as possible to the 7E7. That will help them to regain the advantage that airbus have held. (eg: 737 pilots qualified to fly 717, 747, 757, 767, 777, 7E7, in the same way that A320 pilots can fly A319, A318, A330, A340, A380.)
GW_Simulations&&
http://www.freewebtown.com/gwsimulations&&Founder
& President, Advanced UK Scenery Project (AUKSP)&&
http://www.ukscenerydesign.co.uk/auksp&&Classic
Aviation&&
http://classicaviation.12.forumer.com/index.php&&&&*See
the GW_Simulations Website for more details.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Sep 1
st
, 2004 at 8:05am
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
Quote:
Boeing should change the cockpit layouts in all their current production aircraft, so as they are as simmilar as possible to the 7E7. That will help them to regain the advantage that airbus have held. (eg: 737 pilots qualified to fly 717, 747, 757, 767, 777, 7E7, in the same way that A320 pilots can fly A319, A318, A330, A340, A380.)
And that will be impossible I think.
Airbus has the advantage that all of their aircrafts have the same philosophy. They were designed with that in mind from the get go.
Boeing's older designes did not share many commonalities so making all of their cockpits identical would cost HUGE amounts of money.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Sep 1
st
, 2004 at 1:48pm
Sobby
Offline
Colonel
Scotland
Gender:
Posts: 676
GET RID OF THE 747
BRING BACK CONCORDE 8)
NO MORE BIG SLOW JETS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Sep 2
nd
, 2004 at 9:47am
Chris_F
Offline
Colonel
Insert message here
Posts: 1364
As an airline passenger I want to fly direct to where I want to go, and I want to fly at a time that's convenient for me. Given that I'm a typical customer and not everyone wants to go the same place at the same time, I think the future of the industry is smaller aircraft. The 747 will stick around so long as there are a LOT of people that want to go the same place, but as airlines move away from hubs and towards direct flights its application will continue to decline.
I think the A380 is a bad move for Airbus. They may succeed in beating the 747 for market share, but the market is evaporating. The 7E7 is a wise move for Boeing: make an airplane that allows airlines to do what their customers want them to do: fly direct, fly lots of flights, charge as little as possible. The equation means we will see more application for smaller aircraft.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Oct 12
th
, 2004 at 12:55pm
chomp_rock
Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.
Gender:
Posts: 2718
And I as a frequent airline passenger abhor the Idea of being on the same plane as 549 other passengers! I know alot of people who share the same sentiments. I'd rather be able to catch one of 10 flights every day with a smaller plane (like the 7E7 or even the 747) that has a higher ticket price than only be able to catch one of 2 flights with a lower ticket price (as per the A380). Those are just rough estimates of the number of flights per day but I think they are pretty darn close to what the real thing will be. I'd hate to miss a flight that only runs twice or three times a day
.
AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Oct 12
th
, 2004 at 1:26pm
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
New one is coming... still a few meters left on the front and back if you take a look at the 'maximum size' chart
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Oct 12
th
, 2004 at 8:19pm
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
Quote:
New one is coming... still a few meters left on the front and back if you take a look at the 'maximum size' chart
Could you please be more specific, new what?
Concorde, Boeing, Airbus?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Oct 12
th
, 2004 at 9:12pm
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Quote:
Could you please be more specific, new what?
Concorde, Boeing, Airbus?
I just can't wait for Antonov to step in and tell these upstarts how to build a really big passenger plane. Airport turnaround will be fast since all passengers will be pre-loaded into a passenger container. When it arrives it you slide the one passenger container out and slide the other one in .
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Oct 14
th
, 2004 at 4:24pm
Ben_M_K
Ex Member
Is that true? ???
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Oct 21
st
, 2004 at 9:32am
chomp_rock
Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.
Gender:
Posts: 2718
lol, no
AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Oct 21
st
, 2004 at 9:55am
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
IN a certain manner - the concept was tried and, at least given the technology of the day, was found unworkable.
Reference - XC-120 Fairchild "Pack Cargo Carrier".
Basically, the C-119, with modified landing gear, and a large belly pod that would be slid under the main (abbreviated) central fuselage.
THe main problem was handling the pod on the ground.
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Oct 23
rd
, 2004 at 4:03pm
Georf
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 136
My grandmother has been on a concorde! a compotiton to go on one
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types ««
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.