Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Airliner comfort ratings (Read 853 times)
Jul 31st, 2004 at 10:15pm

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
Well, I've ridden on quite a few of commercial airliners in service and I've come up with a rating scale of 1-5 in comfort and a comment or two in parentheses, here it is:

Airbus A300: 3 (noisy) (cramped)
Airbus A310: 4 (noisy)
Airbus A319: 2 (noisy) (cramped)
Airbus A321-200: 4 (noisy) (cramped)
Airbus A330-300: 3 (noisy) (cramped)
Airbus A340-300: 3 (noisy) (cramped)


Boeing 707-320: 4 (noisy)
Boeing 717: 4
Boeing 727-200: 3 (noisy)
Boeing 737-200: 3 (noisy)
Boeing 737-400: 4
Boeing 737-900: 5
Boeing 747-200: 4
Boeing 747-400: 5
Boeing 757-200: 5
Boeing 767-200: 5
Boeing 777-200: 5

BAC/Aerospatiale Concorde: 5 (very noisy)


Fokker F-70: 4
Fokker F-100: 4

Ilyushin Il-96: 2 (noisy) (cramped)

McDonnell Douglas DC-9: 4
McDonnell Douglas MD-80: 4
McDonnell Douglas DC-10: 4
McDonnell Douglas MD-11: 4

Tupolev Tu-134: 2 (noisy) (cramped)
Tupolev Tu-154: 3 (noisy) (cramped)

Feel free to add your own ratings of these and other airliners, no private jets or GA aircraft please!

 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Aug 1st, 2004 at 4:03am

Ivan   Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender: male
Posts: 6058
*****
 
add 'Cramped' by all for me....   Sad
 

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Aug 1st, 2004 at 7:18pm

Iroquois   Offline
Colonel
Happy Halloween
Ontario Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 3244
*****
 
I think it all depends on the airline wether it's cramped or not. The A320 is noisy espcially with the CFM engines.

I heard somewhere that cramped airliners may become a thing of the past. Apparently airlines (esp. in Europe) are now seeking repeat customers instead of cramming in as many as physically possible. With a lot of people still nervous about flying, getting people to keep comming back is a must.
 

I only pretend to know what I'm talking about. Heck, that's what lawyers, car mechanics, and IT professionals do everyday. Wink&&The Rig: &&AMD Athlon XP2000+ Palomino, ECS K7S5A 3.1, 1GB PC2700 DDR, Geforce FX5200 128mb, SB Live Platinum, 16xDVD, 16x10x40x CDRW, 40/60gb 7200rpm HDD, 325w Power, Windows XP Home SP1, Directx 9.0c with 66.81 Beta gfx drivers
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Aug 1st, 2004 at 10:54pm

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
It seems that almost any plane with CFM engines is noisy, but none are as noisy as the Concorde  Grin.
 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Aug 3rd, 2004 at 2:11am

monkeyboy726   Offline
Colonel
Wazzup

Posts: 25
*****
 
i've only flown coach but it's always cramped. few months ago flying back from honolulu in a 767-300 (i think) i had the middle seat in the middle row. being only 5' 8" im not as tall as others.. but it only took an hour before my legs started spasming from the lack of space. my knees were pushed against the seat in front the whole time.. while first class a few rows in front has fully reclining seats  Grin lol.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Aug 3rd, 2004 at 9:11am

Saratoga   Offline
Colonel
757/767 Captain   Major,
USAF
Dallas-Ft. Worth Intl. (KDFW)

Gender: male
Posts: 571
*****
 
Pilot's ratings (with 5 being best)

727-200ADV - 5
737-(100 through 900) - 5
A-320 - 5

5s for anything you can fly of course! Grin
 

Pilot for a major US airline certified in the: EMB-120, CRJ, 727, 737, 757, 767, and A-320 and military, T-38, C-130, C-141, and C-5 along with misc. other small airplanes. Any questions, I'm here for you.
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Aug 3rd, 2004 at 9:22am

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
start with airbus. i am 6'1 with very long legs(just as a note)
A320: 2 (very cramped and sounded and felt like it was going to shake apart)
A330: 4 (a little cramped because of the PTV box, but quiet)
Boeing. 707, 5 (was only 4 at the time so dont remember much)
727: 4 (cramped but well worth it, noisey but only because i was in the last row)
737: 4 (not to bad, little noisey)
747: 5 (nothing to complain about here, since i was younger the leg room was pleanty)
767: 2 (stuck in the middle, no leg room)
777: 5 (cant say a single thing bad about the aircraft)

MD
DC9/ MD88: 3, (not to noisey but a little cramped)
DC10: 4 (this get a 5 if you get a bulkhead seat, but even my baby has its problem with leg room in my case)
MD11: 3 (Maybe its just KLM but the leg room on this was absolutly awful)

L1011: 4( was a young kid so pleanty of leg room)

ERJ 145: 3 (noisey and lacking in overhead room)
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Aug 3rd, 2004 at 9:26am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Chomp. I'm not sure how your rating system works. Is 1 best or worst?

As others have pointed out, I think that comfort depends on the airline rather than the aircraft. The noise level will depend on where you're seated.

I've only ever travelled Economy class. The noisiest airliner I've been on was a Comet 4B, operated by a subsidiary of British European Airways (BEA) as it was then. I don't remember it being particularly uncomfortable although the fuselage was more cramped with less headroom than modern airliners. A Dart Herald comes close 2nd. On the outward journey we sat in line with the props. It was much quieter sitting near the back on the return.

By far the best & most comfortable journey was also the longest - on a Singapore Airlines 747-400 from Heathrow to Changi, Singapore (& back). I can't fault it.
One trip from London to New York on an AA 767 was unusual in that there were so few passengers we each had a whole row of seats to ourselves. It was different on the way home. Wink
The 767 was very noisy on take-off (we were seated near the back) but once the engines were throttled back it's the quietest airliner I've ever been on.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Aug 3rd, 2004 at 9:31pm

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
5 is the best 1 is the worst and all are rated from economy class seats.
 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Aug 5th, 2004 at 11:13pm

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
New addition:
Embraer ERJ-145: 5
 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Aug 15th, 2004 at 9:56pm

Nexus   Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...

Gender: male
Posts: 3282
*****
 
737-300= 5+
737-400= 5+
737-500 = 5+
737-600= 5+
737-800 = 5+

744= 4
767= 4
777= 5

F50= 3 (it has some weird charm to it, but it's ugly looking, more spacious than it looks)

Q400= 2 (hush kits, please?)

DC9= 3 (sat right at the engine, noisy)
MD87= 4
MD82= 4
DC10-30 = 4.5 (just for Craigy)  Kiss

A320= 4
A321= 5
A330= 4

Saab 340= 3 (small!)

I tried to rate them in an objective manner, don't know if I suceeded though Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Aug 23rd, 2004 at 3:29pm

Sobby   Offline
Colonel
Scotland

Gender: male
Posts: 676
*****
 
767-200=2 Nosiy Cramped
MD-80=5
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Sep 3rd, 2004 at 1:23pm

GWSimulations   Offline
Colonel
I am a developer, if you
want an addon, just ask*
UK

Posts: 746
*****
 
VC-10 2
Noisy, some have backward facing seats. Sad
 

GW_Simulations&&http://www.freewebtown.com/gwsimulations&&Founder & President, Advanced UK Scenery Project (AUKSP)&&http://www.ukscenerydesign.co.uk/auksp&&Classic Aviation&&http://classicaviation.12.forumer.com/index.php&&&&*See the GW_Simulations Website for more details.
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Sep 3rd, 2004 at 1:33pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
5 is the best 1 is the worst and all are rated from economy class seats.

I'm sorry. But the words Concorde and Economy don't seem to go together too well. Tongue Grin
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print