Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
AMD Athlon vs Pentium IV (Read 278 times)
Mar 27th, 2004 at 8:26am
BiggBaddWolf   Ex Member

 
I am thinking about buying another computer and was just wondering which processor seems to work best with FS 2004, the AMD or the Pentium IV? I am currently using the latter, and just wondered if there was much of a difference between the two.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Mar 27th, 2004 at 8:42am
asda_price   Ex Member

 
Hi there BiggBaddWolf.

For me, it's a matter of err... 'personal preference'.  Grin
Some people prefer and Athlons over Pentiums and some people prefer Pentiums over Athlons. As you can see from my sig, I prefer Pentiums, because they seem to handle games better. It really is up to you: if you want performance, then go for the AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 or Athlon 3400+XP. If you want quality, however, then, (like me), go for the Intel Pentium 4EE 3.4 GHz HT. You will need a good GPU to do processors like these justice, however!

Hope this helps,
Asda Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Mar 27th, 2004 at 10:51am

Brett_Henderson   Ex Member
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
*****
 
Quality ?  Hmmmm.  If there were any question as to AMD quality... They'd have been run out of business a long time ago. Simple fact:  Given a set dollar to spend.. you'll end up with more CPU buying AMD, than Intel..
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Mar 27th, 2004 at 10:07pm

nickle   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
San Diego, Ca

Gender: male
Posts: 342
*****
 
Test of 65 CPU's:

http://www20.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/index.html

What you expect is not always what you get.  REM: MB is the first consideration.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Mar 28th, 2004 at 1:39am

Delta_   Offline
Colonel
Woah!
London, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 2032
*****
 
I would recommend AMD because you get more for your money.  The quality of the processors are equal to Intels.  In games AMDs are by far the fastest, because of 3Dnow and 3Dnow extended, also their architecture is better. Hence the reason they can be at a lower clock speed and still beat a P4.  I was in Game a while ago and was reading sytem requirements for a few games, and noticed a few of them had taken into consideration for AMD and Intel processor rather than general.  The recommended requirements were, P4 2.4GHz or Athlon 1500+.  I can not remember which game it was but i will have another look to see if i can find it.
 

My system:Intel Q6600@3.6GHz, Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR2-6400 (4-4-4-12-1T) , Sapphire 7850 OC 2BG 920/5000, X-Fi Fatality, Corsair AX 750, 7 Pro x64
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Mar 28th, 2004 at 9:33am

Jared   Offline
Colonel
I'd rather be flying...
Uniontown, Ohio

Gender: male
Posts: 12621
*****
 
My mom has Intel in her system, my computers have all had AMD...

My computer runs without problems, while hers is always giving her problems...

Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Mar 28th, 2004 at 10:52am

Delta_   Offline
Colonel
Woah!
London, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 2032
*****
 
I found a game which is similar to what i was talking about, Commandos 3.  It says recommended Intel P4 2.0GHz or AMD equilivalent, the XP2000+ (which is 1.7GHz)
 

My system:Intel Q6600@3.6GHz, Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR2-6400 (4-4-4-12-1T) , Sapphire 7850 OC 2BG 920/5000, X-Fi Fatality, Corsair AX 750, 7 Pro x64
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Apr 1st, 2004 at 7:40pm

Daz   Offline
Colonel
in the morning im making
WAFFLES!
Leeds, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 1171
*****
 
yeah AMD seems to be more of a gamers cpu and tends to be cheaper than the equivalent pentium. thing to watch out for on amd cpu's is the heat. my old thunderbird 1.4 chip ran very hot even with a decent fan on it.. my new system runs a lot cooler but havent had a single problem with it yet

 

AMD athlon XP2800+ @2.34ghz&&Epox 8RDA3G 400 fsb, 8x AGP&&1024MB DDR400 PC3200&&XFX 256MB FX5950 Ultra (oc 525/1.04)&&40 gig maxtor 7200rpm&&80 gig seagate baracuda 7200rpm&&
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print