Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
9600pro to 9800xt.....no fps change!  Help. (Read 911 times)
Reply #15 - Feb 2nd, 2004 at 10:06pm

nickle   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
San Diego, Ca

Gender: male
Posts: 342
*****
 
THG tests have shown that AGP 4x to 8x is a small improvement.
Your problems are certainly not in the system, RAM or card.
It is in the settings.
Same old frame rate issue.

Try modest 1152X864X16 settings.
4X FSAA and AAF.
One click down on mip etc from High Quality.
Bilinear.

App settings modest.  Don't max sliders.
24 Frame rate setting (COF).

Adjust from there.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Feb 2nd, 2004 at 10:44pm

JBaymore   Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!

Gender: male
Posts: 10261
*****
 
Nickle,

Thanks for the thoughts.... but when there is AA and AAF available on the card, that hardware does it FAR better than the software stuff in the sim itself ever could.

Already at 1024x768x32 resolution...... at only 75 Hz.

If I shut AA and AF off on the card and run it in the sim instead.... the framerates drop significantly.

And as to "reducing settings"......... won't go there unless I absolutely have to.

I am still pretty appaled that the 9800XT gets this kind of terrible performance inprovement.  See the benchmark tests graph in another thread here...... it is about double the 9600pro on those tests....yet almost no change in ther framerates.

best,

............john
 

... ...Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M,  Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Feb 3rd, 2004 at 4:15am

Silver1SWA   Offline
Colonel
Morgan Hill, Ca. (SF Bay Area)

Gender: male
Posts: 703
*****
 
No seriously JBaymore, there is definately something wrong here and I would NOT blame that card or your decision...something is obviously fishy.  You should be getting much better out of that system and card.  I am stumped man, I'm sorry.

All I can think of is if at all possible could you list the exact items that your rig constists of?  I mean, what kind of motherboard, hardrives, RAM (brand/model of each),  etc.?  There is a lot to pay attention to when it comes to your system ACTUALLY handling the hardware at the correct speeds they should be running at.  For example, a processor's FSB is very dependent on the speed of your RAM and so on.  It seems this could all add up and be causing less than desireable results and much of your hardware may be running well below full performance capacity.
 

P4 3.20Ghz 800Mhz FSB&&1 GB PC3200 400Mhz DDR RAM (Dual Channel)&&Nvidia GeForce 6800GT 256MB 8X AGP&&SB Audigy MP3+&&Win XP Pro
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Feb 5th, 2004 at 1:26am

fido   Offline
Colonel
Oklahoma

Gender: male
Posts: 419
*****
 
Hey JBaymore:
I am writting to let you know you are not alone, I just built a new system that consists of an AMD Athlon 64Bit 3200+, 1 Gig of DDR, a 160Gig HDD, and a GeForce4 5900 with 128 Mb DDR. The point is I only got about 3-5 FPS increase from my old Pentium 600, 512Mb RAM, GeForce 4 440MX setup.  Hope you don't mind my butting in on your post, but if you find out anything let me know, like you it's driving me nuts.

Fido ???  ???  ???
 

A day at the office for my Dad (Ie Shima 1945)&&&&http://simviation.com/yabbuploads/CopyofDRAGONANDHISTAIL1SIMV.jpg&&&&May the sun be always at your six o'clock.
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Feb 5th, 2004 at 11:48am

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
Hey Fido,

Your system is not right at all. You should be getting at least 4 times the frame rates of your old system, and probably more. Check your Bios configuration and make sure you installed the AGP driver for the mainboard.
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Feb 5th, 2004 at 5:44pm

JBaymore   Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!

Gender: male
Posts: 10261
*****
 
Congo,

There are a number of people who have NOT experienced the higher framerates that one would EXPECT when compared to those which are obtained by people with lower end systems.  It is totally baffling....and seems to have everyone scratching our collective heads.

So far, no one seems to have figured out what the critical issues actually are.  So it appears that it is a combination of things that affect the performance and they are synergistic .....either for the positive....or for the negative.

I've been on this quest ever since ACOF was released.

best,

.................john
 

... ...Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M,  Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Feb 5th, 2004 at 7:58pm

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
It certainly is baffling.

I've owned 6 graphic cards in 3-4 years and always experienced a direct correlation between the relative power of the video engine and it's display performance, (ie. Frame Rates.).

This has been the case while using FS95, FS2000, FS2002, and FS2004. (as well as numerous other display dependent programs.)

There have been a couple times when performance was lousy, but the usual methods sorted it.

Unfortunately, I haven't the resources to run out and buy a $600 dollar video card, because that's what the good ones (like R 9800's and FX5900's) cost here in Australia, so, I haven't been able to test those.  Cry

Back to basics:

I'll include the following, just fob it off if you think I'm mad. But I like to test the graphics on a system at the very first opportunity, this is easier said than done, and it's impossible to do if you don't install your own operating system.  Any Pre-Installed system could have any number of errors beyond your control.


When I install an operating system from scratch, I like to repartition the drive. This rids the drive of just about everything - wipes it cleaner than a format!

I use a Win'98 startup disc and the old "fdisk" command to partition the drive to FAT32, enabling large disc support. It's not fancy, but it works.

A little bias here:  Partitioning a drive this way installs a FAT32 file system, not NTFS. If you require an NTFS file system, installing windows will give you that option.

NTFS file systems are tricky and not for the novice in my humble opinion. So, go FAT32 unless you're sure.

Next, after a reboot, I send the "fdisk /mbr" command to write the master boot record. Reboot.

Then, I format using "format c: /u/c". This does an unconditional format with error checking. Next, "format c: /q" a quick format of the same drive. I repeat the format procedure for each drive.

At this stage, if there have been no errors, I'm satisfied the drive is ready for an operating system to be installed.

Next, it's a good idea to go back to the BIOS and double check that all the settings are correct; the front side bus speed, CPU multiplier, RAM speed and latency, AGP settings, graphics aperature, and all hardware devices and ports are enabled.

Hook up any peripherals you have drivers for.

Now, the operating system should install with minimal if any errors. If you get a lot of errors on installing windows, it's usually a sign of trouble to come in my experience, and it may be wise to start again at the format stage.

Install Windows.

Some versions of Windows like XP will ask if you wish to reformat the drive to an NTFS partition, unless you want that, skip it and go with what you have.

It's recommended that the mainboard drivers are installed before anything else.

With XP at least, you'll be inundated with devices trying to install. If you know how to do it later, cancel those installations. If you don't know how, then let windows install the drivers.

The mainboard drivers cover IDE, sound, AGP acceleration, LAN, hardware bridges and heaven knows what.

It's a good thing to get them on the system first so the rest of the hardware is at least installing to a correctly installed mainboard.

These drivers are the ones on the setup disc that came with your motherboard. There is usually a pretty straight forward front end program to do this, with either a selection of items to choose from or a mass install program.

BEFORE getting on the internet:

Install a known working video driver for your video card.

Install the latest DirectX. Tweak the video settings using the driver settings.

Test the system's graphics  first, using a known benchmark utility that is familiar to you. If not, Install Flight Simulator and ONLY adjust the screen resolution to suit. If you make other adjustments, LEAVE THEM ALONE until you get your system fully installed. This will Provide you with a benchmark utility.

If you use the default settings, you can always return to defaults for a useful comparison.

If you change ANY settings in FS, and do a comparison, the results will be useless.

Press FLY, or go to the default flight, Shift + Z for Frame rates. DON'T MOVE! Don't fly! Don't change Views! Write down the average of what you see, and use this as a comparison for later.

Install the rest of your Software/ Hardware, checking Flight Sim's FPS periodically as before (same view, everything), or use your favorite benchmark tool.

This will help you see when or if something has caused a problem hopefully.

If you're Frame Rates are less than acceptable from the start, you haven't got to go back very far to trace the culprit, It may be a conflicting driver with some other hardware, anything is possible. I've even had to remove a PCI card out of slot 5 to solve a problem, even though slot 5 was perfectly ok. It just conflicted.

One of my worst cases was where my Soundcard Drivers were at odds with my system, causing a massive degradation in FPS, this took me ages to figure out, but upon reinstalling the sound card, everything went back to normal.

I hope this helps someone.

good luck
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Feb 6th, 2004 at 8:59am

JBaymore   Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!

Gender: male
Posts: 10261
*****
 
Congo,

Thanks for the extensive reply.

Unfortunately...... pretty much "been there done that".

The one thing I have not yet done is start uninstalling hardware one piece at a time.  THAT is not a project that I am looking forward to.  There are no conflicts showing (in Device screens) nor errors coming up, and Dxdiag shows every test as fine.  So if there is a "conflict" it is something that does not let WinXP "know" it.


best,

..................john
 

... ...Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M,  Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Feb 6th, 2004 at 8:53pm

Silver1SWA   Offline
Colonel
Morgan Hill, Ca. (SF Bay Area)

Gender: male
Posts: 703
*****
 
John,

What kind of hard drives do you have, and how do you have them configured?  I recomend if you havent done so already, take your fastest hard drive, and create a 10 gig partition and install windows on that partition and leave it alone and use it for nothing else.  Unfortunately, you would have to be willing to lose all the data on that disk as you'd have to format in order to create partitions.  Anyway, having the operating system running on it's own partition allows for a much smoother and somewhat faster OS as it is recognized as being on its own drive.  Often with such large hard drives, especially when full, they will run very slow because of the clutter of data it has to sort through.  It's all a matter of efficiency.  Just a thought.
 

P4 3.20Ghz 800Mhz FSB&&1 GB PC3200 400Mhz DDR RAM (Dual Channel)&&Nvidia GeForce 6800GT 256MB 8X AGP&&SB Audigy MP3+&&Win XP Pro
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Feb 6th, 2004 at 9:00pm

fido   Offline
Colonel
Oklahoma

Gender: male
Posts: 419
*****
 
Hey Guys:

I downloaded thre latest drivers from NVIDIA,(5.3.0.3) thing are better now, when I fly over Seattle my frame rates are up to 18.5 at 1024/768, this is much better than before but still less than I had hoped. I have flown out of an empty field and had frame rate jump up to 29FPS so maybe I shouldn't complain. I want to thank you all for your helpful suggestions. By the way I am still not sure if my AGP drivers are up to date because they is no seperate listing for them in on my driver disk. Should these drivers be avalible at my MOPBO's web site?

Fido Grin Grin

P.S. I had to use NTFS I hope I didn't screw it up, I let Windows handle it, ya , I let Windows do it, I hope that is not a bad omen. Grin Grin
 

A day at the office for my Dad (Ie Shima 1945)&&&&http://simviation.com/yabbuploads/CopyofDRAGONANDHISTAIL1SIMV.jpg&&&&May the sun be always at your six o'clock.
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Feb 6th, 2004 at 10:33pm

Silver1SWA   Offline
Colonel
Morgan Hill, Ca. (SF Bay Area)

Gender: male
Posts: 703
*****
 
That's great man.  Unfortunately this is a topic about an ATI card issue.  Nvidia "fixes" don't really apply.
 

P4 3.20Ghz 800Mhz FSB&&1 GB PC3200 400Mhz DDR RAM (Dual Channel)&&Nvidia GeForce 6800GT 256MB 8X AGP&&SB Audigy MP3+&&Win XP Pro
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Feb 6th, 2004 at 11:38pm

JBaymore   Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!

Gender: male
Posts: 10261
*****
 
Silver,

I have two hard drives.....Western Digital 7600 's ......one 40 gig C drive that the Win XP home boot system is installed on, and one 120 gig E drive that holds FS2004 (and other data stuff).  (The D drive is the CD ROM / burner.)

They are formatted NTFS.  The 40 gig C drive has over half the space free.  The 120 gig E drive has 85 percent free.  Both are kept defragged.  HD controller is 82801DB Ultra ATA/IDE controller, pri and sec.

As to "reading" speed from the hard drive.... I have  "full install" of ACOF.  I also have 1 gig of RAM.  And I have tried setting the swap paging file everything from "windows managed" to massively huge.  NO change in frame rates.  I don't see excessive drive access when I am flying.


best,

.................john
 

... ...Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M,  Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Feb 14th, 2004 at 12:50pm

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
I don't know if you resolved anything yet JBaymore, but have you still got your old card?

I was thinking, maybe pop it back in and see if it still performs the same as it used to. In case something mucked up in the change over of the cards, maybe that will help sus the prob.

A stab in the dark lol.
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print