Bird, am I right that this is a replacement scenery?
If so, I can only remind you what I said earlier about the AFCAD height parameter.
I spent some time messing about with AFCAD2 trying to create aprons and taxiways for Tak04. Suffice to say that my scenery is currently FSSC with just an AFCAD file for parking and taxi routes.
You
might be able to get some joy if
1. you check the exact height of the default scenery
2. you set that height exactly in any FSSC file you might be using
3. also the same height in the AFCAD2 file
Try reading this
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=123&topic_id=16858&mesg_i...Apologies to Pete for linking to another forum - hope he doesn't mind - but it's the only way I can see to give the right advice.
Roger
PS I
still think it's a bit premature to be using AFCAD for total scenery design UNLESS maybe it's a completely new facility. I know that view was not shared but it ain't done me no harm so far!
No updates have been produced yet for AFCAD, Airport or FSSC that use the knowledge base in the new scenery SDK. When they have been then I think all will be well.
Experiments I have done creating new airports using XML coding have worked fine with AI but although I know others are experimenting like crazy with XML exclusions etc to create modified existing airports, I don't yet know what the results have been and I may need to do some work of my own.
I suspect knowing how the new XML approach stitches levels together (even when you don't want it to unfortunately based on my experiments), it will overcome your problem.
However, creating aprons by manually coding each point will be incredibly tedious - I have just done a a few simple taxiways and parkings by hand and it took ages. That is why we have to wait for the genius Mr Swordy to work his magic and that's why I said originally it was presently a bit premature....
But that's just my view and now you can see the reasons why. I know others may not agree but that's up to them, and for you to decide where you stand. After all you're the one with the problem that no-one including the venerable Arno Gerretson knows the answer to just yet.
Oh well ???