Not as much as Meljet. I still fly POSKY stuff but I've stopped using Meljet even though they're very nice.
Personally I find all the visual toys like opening everything very childish. When are you supposed to look at them? This is a flightsim, not a sit-on-the-ground-and-play-with-little-doors-opening-and-closing sim.
If designers want to make planes with all that stuff they might think about doing 2 models - one for the kids who like to play with gimmicks and one for the serious flyers.
Just a thought for the people who this will upset.
Everyone complains about frame rates and everyone wants better, more detailed, more life-like scenery.
Surely anyone can see that when you're flying a plane with all these features that you're not using at the time, you're paying a FR hit even though all you're doing most of the time is flying a panel. Then if you try to fly the same plane into a detailed scenery you pay yet another FR hit.
Which is the most worth it? I'd say the scenery because that's what I see most as a sim pilot. So I go for the best scenery I can get and simple well-designed, well painted aircraft with good panels.
I don't give a **** that when I've finished maybe a 2 hr flight with all the IFR trimmings that when I've parked up I can then see a little door open.
C'mon get a life! My wife thinks I'm crazy enough as it is with a hobby like this without seeing me doing that
Pages: 1
