Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Old Flight Simulator Series
›
FS 2002
› Descend rate on final
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Descend rate on final (Read 367 times)
Nov 18
th
, 2003 at 4:48am
Poseidon
Offline
Colonel
Athens, Hellas
Gender:
Posts: 412
Hi, is there som eformula to define my descending rate during final approach as a result of ground speed, altitude and distance from the runway?
Ok we say that 700 FPM is the ideal for a 737 (for example) but flying IFR plan with final VFR landing, sometimes they give me clearance in 3000 ft and 7 miles from the runway and other times 2200 ft and 8 miles from the runway.
I could also define a formula myself (using some trigonometry) but I am not sure about the concept of ground speed. Is it the projection of speed on the ground or it is just ignoring the air resistance? In the second case even if the air resistance is ignored and the indicated airspeed is constant, the ground speed would inscrease when descending because the descending path is longer than a straight one.
Thanks for any help.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Nov 18
th
, 2003 at 5:49am
packercolinl
Offline
Colonel
Any more laid back I'd
be asleep!
Posts: 1049
There are any number of variables that are going to affect your approach. All have to be factored in to acheive a good landing.
FS provides some information in the introductory pages
for various aircraft and once you know the aircraft you are flying you won't have any problems.
It is practice and more practice like anything else. Pick an aircraft you like and learn to fly it. Find out its capabilities and use it til you know it backwards.
And yes you can and should be doing the mental calc. once you know the aircraft so you can respond appropriately to to ATC instructions
Cheers.
White on White fly all night.&&&&Red on White you're alright.&&&&Red on Red you'll soon be dead.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Nov 18
th
, 2003 at 11:04am
OTTOL
Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)
Gender:
Posts: 918
Quote:
Ok we say that 700 FPM is the ideal for a 737 (for example) but flying IFR plan with final VFR landing, sometimes they give me clearance in 3000 ft and 7 miles from the runway and other times 2200 ft and 8 miles from the runway.
You're talking about two different things here. (1) Descent Rate (2)ATC assigned altitude Once you are on profile(an imaginary line extending upward from the approach end of the runway at 3.5 degrees) You can use an ILS, a visual indicator(VASI/PAPI) or just plain old unguided visual descent. The rate required can be quickly determined by taking the airpseed, halving it and adding a zero. IE: 120kts 120/2=60 (60 add a zero) =600fpm The altitudes you mentioned are assigned in accordance with terrain, the applicable approach(whether you are IFR or not), noise abatement, approach corridors for other airports or any of a number of other factors. To bring these two together: usually you would be assigned an intercept altitude and once you join the glideslope or VASI, use the descent rate previously mentioned, to maintain a proper descent rate.
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Nov 18
th
, 2003 at 11:10am
Travis
Offline
Colonel
Cannot find REALITY.SYS.
Universe halted.
Dripping Springs, TX
Gender:
Posts: 4515
I never have like instrument approaches! (I hardly go out if the sun isn't) I usually just:
Find runway.
Land on runway.
Take off.
Repeat.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Nov 19
th
, 2003 at 4:12am
Poseidon
Offline
Colonel
Athens, Hellas
Gender:
Posts: 412
Well flying IFR with VFR approach and the last instruction I receive from the control is to maintain 3000 ft, turn towards the runway and then they give me clearance for visual approach, isn't this the intercept altitude? If I am not wrong this means after this point I have to start the final approach (always in case of no ILS). My point is that this sometimes happens in 3000 ft at 6 miles from the runway and other times 2200 ft at 7 miles. Obviously if I have to descent immediately I have to use a different descent rate in the two cases. Having ni ILS how can I decide when to start the final except pure visual? At what altitude/distance I should start the descent using the "Speed/2*10" formula mentioned berore?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Nov 19
th
, 2003 at 11:53am
Fredgirardo
Offline
Colonel
Montreal
Gender:
Posts: 144
Hi everybody,
I have like the little formula mentionned above. I am exited to try it. But I still have the same question than Poseidon in his last answer: Without any DME, when we start to descend of final approach?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Nov 20
th
, 2003 at 8:17am
OTTOL
Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)
Gender:
Posts: 918
Fredgirardo, in real life, once your "cleared for the visual", it's at the pilots discretion to SAFELY descend. If you were on an ILS, and then "break out", even if you can see the runway, I would continue to use the glideslope for guidance. If it's a localizer/VOR with DME or just an airport with a VOR/DME, you can start your descent using the 3:1 rule. Altitude X 3= Descent point or Descent profile. If I'm at 8,000 feet (above field elevation), I want to begin my descent at appx. 24 miles. At 2,200 feet appx. 7 1/2 to 8 miles.
Quote:
My point is that this sometimes happens in 3000 ft at 6 miles from the runway and other times 2200 ft at 7 miles. Obviously if I have to descent immediately I have to use a different descent rate in the two cases.
When you're "cleared for the visual", at this point, it becomes the pilot's responsibility to determine a SAFE descent point. What I am saying though, and we do this in the "real deal", even when we are cleared for a visual approach, we still use approach guidance(glideslope, DME stepdowns, PAPI/VASI). At some airports, this is MANDATORY, and is stated as such on the plate. Laguardia, Teterboro and Orlando(ORL) are approaches that come to mind. At all of these airports, you must maintain the approach, even in visual conditions. I don't know if your misunderstanding the clearance. "cleared for the visual" does NOT mean immediately begin a descent. Unless your in one of the MANDATORY situations previously mentioned.
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002 ««
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.