Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
AMD to P4 an Upgrade or Not? (Read 713 times)
Jun 22nd, 2003 at 6:19pm

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
I've got a Soltek Nforce2 mainboard, an XP2600+ clocked at 2.2ghz, 1024mb of Dual Channel PC2700 ram running nice on a 170mz fsb (340mhz @ DDR). The whole thing benchmarks just over all similar setups I've seen posted. (slight o/c)

Intel are tempting me away with the memory bandwith specs which doubles on Intel i865PE or i875 chipset mainboards. These boards support an 800mhz FSB with apparent easy overclock options on air cooling.

Is it reasonable for me to believe that I should get a budget based system using an overclocked 2.4gig P4 on an i865PE or i875 chipset mainboard running 1024mb of dual channel DDR400?

Buying a P4 3ghz CPU is not an option if this is to be a budget system.

Or isn't there any practical advantage?

I don't want to start a fued between AMD and Intel supporters, I just need to know if the above is practical in real computing. It looks ok on paper.
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jun 23rd, 2003 at 1:43am

Selbio   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Gender: male
Posts: 503
*****
 
Congo,

I'm not a computer expert but I read your otherpost and I have to say that you have a good system that will alst you for awhile. If I were you I wouldn't upgrade just now. I'd wait a few months and then get a P4 3.06GHZ or above, maybe by six months prices have gone down.

I have:
AMD XP 2600+ 333fsb
1024MB PC 2100 Dual Channel(I know that I should get the ddr 333 or 400 but I'm just going to leave like it is for awhile)
40gb IBM 7200 ATA 100
20gb WD 5400 ATA 100
Nvidia GF 4 TI 4200 64mb
Sound Blaster Live! 5.1 sound card
WIndows XP Home Edition

All the games I have run very smooth on this config.
So I'm not going to upgrade until they put out something that doubles my configuration.
 

Best Regards,&&Selby&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jun 23rd, 2003 at 7:23am

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
a p4 2.0 ghz is far superior to an XP2600 (512k l2cache) and it has a bus speed of 400 (or opt. 533MHz) a p4 2.2 is no better than a 2.0 and a 2.4 is a marginal (no noticable framerate changes).
 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jun 23rd, 2003 at 1:07pm

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
Ummm, well Piper, not according to this respected benchmark.

...


It didn't have a 2gig P4 in the list so I placed a 2.4gig just under my XP2600.

Note I also clocked back to stock settings for this test.

Also note the speed range of the other listed cpu's.

I went ahead and bought a gigabyte 8IPE 1000 pro mainboard and a 2.4gig P4c 800mhz cpu.

I've got to build another system for a client (this guy is gonna get one heck of an office PC!), so I should be able to report on the results when It's all done.

I'm hoping the 800mhz FSB speed and the Hyperthreading technology of the pentium will show some positive result against the poor old XP2600.   Grin

Selbio, you are right, I don't need to upgrade, but I'm gonna see which system I like best and decide which to keep. (all this started at the garbage dump 2 1/2 yrs ago scrounging for PC parts  Tongue)

I had a 5.1 soundcard in to start with, but it wouldn't get my gameport MS FFB joystick going in the games, so, I enabled the onboard gameport, and that caused conflicts in my in-game comms I think, so I pulled the Soundblaster out and now run entirely on the onboard sound which seems fine. (AC97 Codec 6 channel sound)
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jun 23rd, 2003 at 11:39pm

Selbio   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Gender: male
Posts: 503
*****
 
Quote:
a p4 2.0 ghz is far superior to an XP2600 (512k l2cache) and it has a bus speed of 400 (or opt. 533MHz) a p4 2.2 is no better than a 2.0 and a 2.4 is a marginal (no noticable framerate changes).


I don't doubt that. I had an AMD XP 2400+ but it messed up. Going from a 2400+ to a 2600+ made performance drop, the only differnce is that the 2400+ ran at 55-58 C and the 2600+ runs at 31-34C. As you see I had no choice but go ahead and get a 333FSB processor.

Next Upgrade will a Pentium 4 of some kind, I'd say something like a 3.06GHZ. AMD processors are good but the fact the a 2600+ 333 runs at 2.08 just bothers me, that processor should run at 2.60 or close. Look at the 3000+. It runs at 2.17 just like the 2700+ except it a different chip I beleive and it has more cache. That 3000+ should be running at 2.8 or 3.0GHZ. Besides AMD run hotter than pentium processor.

No pun intended for AMD users but I'm done with AMD.
 

Best Regards,&&Selby&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jun 24th, 2003 at 5:19am

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
Ok, overnight post brought me my new rig this morning, so here are the results.

First the new Pentium4 2.4ghz cpu speed comparison with my xp2600 below it.

...

Next is the memory bandwidth benchmark.

...


And then I overclocked the front side bus speed in BIOS to give me an instant 3ghz pentium!  Grin  And I got these results!!

W O O   H O O ! ! !

...


Before I overclocked the new rig, I did a bit of research and found I had to reduce my ram speed so that when I upped the bus speed, my RAM speed would be the same as it is now at 333mhz. Well, I'm glad that worked!

I haven't seen the temperature get over 34*C yet, but I'll keep trying! (what's that burning smell?)

That's it. No special fan, heat paste or nothing. There has to be a catch.

Alas! Even though this rig is testing faster in the specs, I still can't get as good a 3D Mark 2001 score with it as my old AMD system, which is disturbing me. Any thoughts on that?

Also, this new system was designed for PC3200 or 400mhz ram which I haven't bought for it yet. So there is more potential yet.
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jun 24th, 2003 at 11:07am

Selbio   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Gender: male
Posts: 503
*****
 
Congo,

Before you overclocked your new P4 cpu how hot did it run?
 

Best Regards,&&Selby&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Jun 25th, 2003 at 10:17am

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
2 to 4* cooler I think, it's hard to tell because I have to quickly reboot to bios for a temp reading, as all my temperature sensing software has gone nuts on this system.   Cry

I haven't really sussed the new rig out properly yet, if I run into any snags I'll post it back here.

Anyway, I wound it back, where I will keep it unless I'm using FS2002 or some other such monstrous program that seems to know no bounds.   Roll Eyes
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Jun 25th, 2003 at 11:19pm

Hogans_Alley   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 90
*****
 
??? ??? ???

I'm a ittle confused about the lettering and numbering which describe the specification and performance of the various computer components especially the motherboards, the memory and the CPU. Perhaps one of you guys can explain. also please tell me which do you recommend.
1.   Go AMD or P4?
2.   Are the manufacturers for Asus, ABit,Intel, ECS, MSI relatively good?
3.   I presently have an IWill KK266 motherboard measuring 305 mm x 235 mm which supports the ATX Form factor. I would like to keep my existing case. If I buy a new motherboard with the same dimensions, it should fit in my existing case, correct? I do have a 400W power supply.
4.   What do you think of mobos which support 8 ATAPI drives.
5.   What is the criteria by which a mobo will support memories. For example:  What FSB will support a PC2100, PC2700, DDR 400, DDR 333, RAMBUS 800 MHz?
6.    Lastly what would be the recommended specification for a bundle at around 2.4 - 2.8 GHz speed. I presently have 1.2 GHz.
Or I should keep my rig for awhile. I have no problem with my Flight Sim games thus far except CFS3 which gave me problems. I returned the soft ware.

Thanks gents ( and lady)

Hogans Alley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Jun 26th, 2003 at 1:01am

Selbio   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Gender: male
Posts: 503
*****
 
Well,

Q1. It depends on what you like. AMD are very fast although I have heard that the new 3200+ wasn't as good as they expected(So I've heard). I currently have an AMD XP 2600+ processor and next time I upgrade or build a new pc I'll go for the P4 3.06GHZ CPU and one of those 800Mhz FSB motherboards.

Q2 I had an Asus A7S333 sis745 chipset motherboards and it was very stable, I liked it. I have an MSI K7N2 with the Nvidia Nforce2 chipset and I like it even more.  I'm guessing ABit,Intel, ECS are good as weel.

Q3 Yes they should fit the same case. I have had three motherboard in the past 4 months and they all fit the same case as long as they are ATX form factor.
Heck I even put a Micro atx(3 PCI slots) motherboard in an ATX form factor case and it fit just fine, I had plenty of room left in there. Just don't try an atx(5-6 PIC slots)motherboard in a micro atx case, that may not work.

Q6 Do you really feel like you need to upgrade? I don't keep up with upgrades that much unless I have to.
If I have the money I would upgrade to something that doubles the currently configuration I have at the time of upgrading.
 

Best Regards,&&Selby&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Jul 7th, 2003 at 3:16am

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
Well, after a couple weeks on the new Pentium PC,
having shelved the AMD - nForce2 computer temporarily,
I am still not convinced that one is any better than the
other.

Overclocking the Intel system didn't have much affect on my frame rates in FS2002.

The AMD system still has slightly smoother and faster graphics.

Benchmark tests show the Pentium is technically more capable especially in memory bandwidth.

Comparisons- both systems were tested using:
Seagate 7200rpm 80gig Hard Disk,
1024mb PC2700 DDR RAM and also, 512mb PC3200 RAM.
Both RAM sets were Kingston "Value Ram" in DUAL
CHANNEL configuration and were tested seperately of
course.

A Mercury GeForce4 TI4200 128mb 8x AGP was used as
the Graphics card.

AMD system:  Athlon XP2600+ cpu, nVidia nForce2 chipset mainboard. Front side bus speed equivalent to 333mhz @ Double Data Rate.

1. cheaper to buy CPU and mainboard
2. superb graphics
3. very fast computer in use

4. noise levels (CPU fan)  higher
5 higher CPU operating temperature


Intel Pentium system:  P4 2.4ghz with Hyperthreading
on an Intel i865PE chipset mainboard. Front side bus speed equivalent to 800mhz @ Double Data Rate.

1. More expensive to purchase CPU and mainboard
2. Graphics nearly on par with AMD system
(this judgement is based on actual gaming experience
rather than benchmarking results.)
3. very fast system in use

4. Quieter CPU fan
5. Lower CPU operating temperature
6. General system heat increase when overclocked to
   3.0ghz (cpu), and 1.0ghz (fsb)
  (This heating became a worry as i had no extra case
    cooling or any fans other than stock manufacturer
     supplied fans on the CPU, mainboard chipset and
     video card. The case was left open during the tests
      in a cool room.)
7. Memory bandwidth dropped dramatically with 512mb
of PC3200 @ 400mhz installed rather than the 1024mb
of PC2700 @ 333mhz in the Pentium system.

Conclusion..............

Both these systems seem very good and the price difference isn't great.

My greedy side says go for the high spec Pentium, but my gaming experience slightly favours the AMD rig.

-------------------------------------------

What you get for your money:

Mainboard, CPU and fan, 1024mb PC2700 ram, 80gig serial ATA Hard Disk, Samsung SyncMaster 17" monitor
(you will need a case/power supply and any peripherals)

The parts bought COD today cost me $1420 Aussie dollars or $968 US dollars for the Intel rig and $1203 AU or $823 US dollars for the AMD setup.

It's a tough call .............     8)

...
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print