Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Poll Poll
Question: Which do you Prefer



« Created by: Iroquois on: Apr 21st, 2003 at 3:46pm »

Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Payware Vs Freeware (Read 1511 times)
Apr 21st, 2003 at 3:46pm

Iroquois   Offline
Colonel
Happy Halloween
Ontario Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 3244
*****
 
When it comes to addons for flight sim, is payware actually better than freeware?
I personally think freeware is better and here's my argument for it. Now I know that it takes a lot of time to make addons but programs like gmax are free anyway so there are basically no extra costs. Next why buy addons for a sim that will be obsolete in a few months, and you know how M$ works, there's no guarentee that it will work in the next sim in the line. Lastly, a lot of freeware is just as good if not better that payware. Look at people like Project Opensky, great stuff for free.
 

I only pretend to know what I'm talking about. Heck, that's what lawyers, car mechanics, and IT professionals do everyday. Wink&&The Rig: &&AMD Athlon XP2000+ Palomino, ECS K7S5A 3.1, 1GB PC2700 DDR, Geforce FX5200 128mb, SB Live Platinum, 16xDVD, 16x10x40x CDRW, 40/60gb 7200rpm HDD, 325w Power, Windows XP Home SP1, Directx 9.0c with 66.81 Beta gfx drivers
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 3:59pm

foo_fighter   Offline
Colonel
The Heavier Than Air 1st
Flight  Centennial
Sao Jose dos Campos, Sao Paulo

Gender: male
Posts: 1610
*****
 
Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin

Unnecessary to ask me LOL LOL LOL


I ll always support FREEWARE


 

JUST ONE WORD: FREEWARE! The more free it is, the more shall I fly!&&
Nice Flights 4 Every1
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 4:08pm

BFMF   Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender: male
Posts: 19820
*****
 
I've stuck with Freeware. I did buy Flight1's Cessna 421, and I don't regret it. Grin

There are a few payware groups like Flight1, Lago, and Bill lyons that build packages that are worth buying.

If only I had more money Sad
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 4:35pm

BE58D   Offline
Colonel
KCCR
Antioch, California

Gender: male
Posts: 1505
*****
 
I totally support FREEWARE, but like Andrew says... there are packages out there worth buying!

I have several payware aircraft...

BELL 407 By Rey Lopez
CESSNA CARDINAL By Flight1/Dreamfleet
CESSNA 421 By Flight1
PIPER SENECA By FSD-International
PIPER CHEYENNE By FSD-International
PIPER ARCHER By Dreamfleet
ROCKWELL COMMANDER C115TC By FSD-International

There are far more good FREEWARE aircraft than that of PAYWARE, but most of the time, those that design the FREEWARE stuff, don't build a lot of GA (General Aviation) aircraft that some of us look for... So, we resort to payware to get the ones we want!
 

HP Pavillion = p7-1233w
3.20GHz Processor
8GB of RAM (expandable to 32GB)
Radeon 7560D - 4059MB
1TB SATA Internal Hard Drive
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 5:10pm

Fozzer   Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.

Posts: 24861
*****
 
I haven't purchased any aeroplane packages, but I have purchased special utilities which are not produced by anyone else.
The packages are produced by teams of people, have their own dedicated web sites and are fully supported with regular up-grades.
That's why I think they are worthy of purchasing and I am very satisfied with them.
That's not to say that I don't fully appreciate all the sterling work that the free-ware designers put into their products. My thanks to them also.
The poll doesn't include my decision, which would have to be both, free-ware and pay-ware.

Cheers...
Paul.
(England).
 

Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 5:43pm

Kevin@ProjectAI   Offline
Colonel
Illinois, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 38
*****
 
Maybe think of our hobby like this.

There are tons of freeware programs available.  Many of which I have, including ProjectAI which I also spend a lot of time working for.   Grin

Take ProjectAI, add the talent and financial support of a group such as Flight1 and you have a freeware product that is souped up to the max.

Now, my intention is not to advertise an  upcoming product, but merely to get you to see what a popular freeware group can add to one of the most popular retail merchants.

It seems to me that now, we have the best of both worlds.
You can fork out a few bucks for a really nice add-on, or keep using one of this hobbies most downloaded freeware add-ons around.

Freeware and payware can live together in this hobby.

KJ
 

Visit www.ProjectAI.com for all your AI needs.&&Stop by www.FSGateway.com for the latest in flight simming news.&&FSGateway, home to the Flight Sim Veterans Club Tips and Tricks.
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 5:45pm

Oz   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 896
*****
 
In my opinion, freeware beats payware, both in moral sense and (sometimes..depends) in quality. It all depends if the designer wants to use the money to fund an organization like the Vulcan, or they just wanna use it to pay off their own debts. Freeware designers dont care bout all that, they just do it for fun, so they could fly the aircraft they would like to see in FS. In some cases, freeware designers do as much or more work than payware makers. Freeware example:

He-111
...


Meljets 777
...

What makes an add-on payware is basically more model configurations (e.g.: drop tanks, clean, bomb payload..) more paint schemes, a good DVC, and a very nice model overall. Anyhow, i dont think more additions to a model or more paint schemes or spending much time making something in a FREE program like Gmax is not a very good enough excuse to make payware. Personally, i wouldnt like to pay for an add-on that cost almost half what the game costs.There are groups out there that do much more than this and they make freeware. Again, it only depends on the designer.

BTW, this is just my opinion Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 5:46pm

ysteinbuch   Offline
Colonel
A little turbulence doesn't
hurt!
Croton-on-Hudson, NY

Gender: male
Posts: 742
*****
 
I've bought a few items, such as Piper Archer, Cessna 421, Emma Field and Flight Deck Companion. All get good reviews and I concur. I also have a few paid items that I regret buying. Many of the freeware products I got are very good. But I also have been disappointed when some of the free planes did not come with panels. The Archer payware, on the other hand, has an extremely detailed panel -- more so than any of the default aircraft. For me, therefore, it's a matter of reading reviews, both of freeware and payware, before making purchases. I know that many of us are on a budget, but spending $30 or so for a solid product is not really  exorbitant.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 5:48pm

FSTipster   Offline
Colonel
There are no stupid questions,
only stupid answers
U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 1514
*****
 
As Fozzer said, there are some things that you can only get payware (Radar Contact V3 has no freeware equivalent that I'm aware of, certainly not of the same standard anyway).

That aside, I agree with orenada635's original comments.

The quality of freeware these days is often exceptionally high. The Falcon 50 by Yannick (sorry Yannick - I've forgotten your surname Sad) is one of the first examples I can ever remember of a freeware aircraft that beat the pants off anything freeware or payware about at the time.

The Meljet series, The recently released outstanding Gazelle helicopter, David Brice's imminent Eurofighter Typhoon. These are all examples of freeware that I personally think just can't be beaten.

Looking at the same side of the coin, but from a different perspective, you can also get caught out with some payware. If you're ever bored, take a trip to Abacus's site and download one or two of their free trials (For God's sake don't buy any of their aircraft until you've tried them first.)

I've nothing personal against Abacus beyond the fact that most of their so-called FS2002 aircraft are nothing of the kind. Not everything there is bad, but I'll bet my P.C. that there's nothing in the way of payware aircraft up there that you can't find a better freeware equivalent of. As I've said before, it's to their credit that they allow a trial first.
Most payware companies don't. You buy it, and then, if you're unlucky, you discover it's no where near as good as you expected, by which time it's too late.

If you're going to go payware, search the forums first is my advice. Get opinions from people who already have the product you're looking for, and ask about the support, updates, and after-sales service in general.
 

...&&
Click the banner to visit the site
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 6:08pm

zcottovision   Offline
Colonel
YaBB 1G - SP1 loves me!
N. Ireland / EGAC

Gender: male
Posts: 598
*****
 
I've never bought any payware for FS2002, due to being a cheap student and enjoying the freeware more. There's a lot of seriously good freeware addons out there, and whilst there's a lot of good payware addons, I don't have to pay for the freeware ones....!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 6:52pm

BE58D   Offline
Colonel
KCCR
Antioch, California

Gender: male
Posts: 1505
*****
 
Oz has a point, but in the same note... Those that are freeware designers should maybe take note, and build aircraft that others desire.  If it weren't for us desiring to fly the simulator, M$ wouldn't have a market for the FS.  In the same note, those that charge for aircraft, scenery, etc. know that they have a market because a lot of the freeware designers tailor to what they want and not what others want... I don't know how many countless times I have seen the same airplane/helicopter uploaded, but by different designers.  Who wants to have 45 different versions/designers of a DASH-8?  I sure the hell don't!  Let's have something different for a change, even if it means paying for it!!!

I still and always will support freeware, but sometimes there is no other alternative other than payware!
 

HP Pavillion = p7-1233w
3.20GHz Processor
8GB of RAM (expandable to 32GB)
Radeon 7560D - 4059MB
1TB SATA Internal Hard Drive
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Apr 21st, 2003 at 11:03pm

Mikel   Offline
Colonel
GA and Rotory Wing!
Dallas, TX, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 260
*****
 
This is my opinion: I have several addon aircraft ranging from the Cessna 421 to most of the FSD aircraft to some of Bill Lyons works, all are great in different aspects, and I have no regrets on any of them. I usually wait and hear what others think before buying so I haven't made a bad purchase....yet. I have some great freeware that I WOULD have paided for. I see absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to sell your hard work, I know how much work goes into FS design, even more so with the new features everyone, that doesn't design, expects, so I don't complain about anyone selling it, Lord knows they are not getting rich, more than likely making up the cost on the bandwidth from a ton of hits on their site to download the product.

Most people I know spend $20-$100 a night when they go out with a date or girlfriend, what is different from that than paying for something you are going to use more than once in FS????

When you think about the amount of aircraft you BUY when you BUY the sim compared to the huge amount that you can (and probably have) d/l, you are getting an amazing bargain, so the whole argumant about 'an addon that is 1/3 the price of the sim" is rubbish and a copout.

Bottom line, I understand budgets and not having the money, so it basically comes down to either to not buy addons (for whatever reason) or do purchase one, it is choice, and everyone has one!

My 2 cents!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 1:22am

fisharno   Offline
Colonel
Your basic Forum Rat
Reno, Nv

Gender: male
Posts: 626
*****
 
Freeware. Without a doubt.
I look at it like this: The designers out there upload their projects, whether it's an aircraft, or panel, or anything that someone makes available to share with others. They're doing the FS community a great favor. They don't ask for anything in the way of payment. A precious few only ask for simple considerations when downloading and using their files. As for payware, say, FS Nav, for example. I've used it since FS98. When the 4.X versions came out, it went payware. I bought it because, in my eyes, it was tried and true, and worth every penny. I can honestly say that I'll find out all I can about a piece of software, before I'll spend my money on it.

About the freeware authors:
When was the last time any one of us actually e-mailed the author of some aircraft we downloaded, just to say, "Thanks"? Or to let him or her know that we appreciate the time they spent. Even when a download dosen't quite live up to your expectations, send the dude a note, and let him know why. Or offer up some CONSTRUCTIVE criticism.

If I was a designer, and folks used my stuff, I'd sure like to get just a plain "Thank You" from the people who matter.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 1:52am

JerryKGSP   Offline
Colonel
US

Gender: male
Posts: 129
*****
 
I am fairly new to FS having only bought MS2002 in January, now having more time on my hands to play it.  I bought the FS95 and skipped up to now.  I was amazed at the progress that has been made since that version and frankly I am impressed with everything that you can do with FS2002.  As most newby's, I began to fly the included aircraft but soon realized that I wanted better and more real depictions of aircraft.  at first I downloaded some freeware but had some problems with the panels and gagues.  I also purchased the standard FS02, but would have gotten the FS02pro if I had known more about the panels etc because of the extra aircraft included.  Next, I thought that I would try to purchase some and did.  Most of the payware was easier to install and generally worked the first time playing them.  Also, the documentation of the payware has been better for the most part. 

I like both freeware and payware but now am very careful of the freeware that I download to make sure that it has panels and gauages and enough instructions if it is a different AC to be able to fly it.  I also generally stick with more experienced designers because I have found that those AC load and operate better.  So, I would encourage freeway designers and developers to go the extra mile and make the set up as easy as possbile and include adequate intructions. If they are inexperienced, I would encourage them to get help for the set up and documentation of the AC.  I have some freeware AC in my Hanger just waiting until I have time to be able to make them work.  Another thing that sometimes helps me make the decsion to downlaod freeware is if the panel is complete.  Having the standard version of FS02 I have DL AC to only find that they required some gauges from the Baron or Concord,  very frustrating. 

I think that there is room for both freeware and payware and I am sure that it will get better and better as the hobby continues to develop and new programming and computer advances occur. 

Also, this forum has been the most help to me as I am learning FS.  The folks here have more answers and never tire of answering what even sometimes seems like stupid and repetative questions.   Keep up the good work for FS!!! Grin
 

windows XP Pro SP2&&FS9.1,     Saitek Cyborg EVA Joystick&&Aopen mb AX4C Max&&Logiteck MX laser 1000 mouse&&Intel Pentium 4 - 2.8 Ghz w/HT OC 3.0&&DDRam 2024 gb pc3500&&GeForce 7600 GS 512mb&&C: WD 120 gb HD, D: WD 180 gb HD&&Viewsonic 22" LCD&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 2:44am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Like everything else it's a matter of preference. It depends what you want. Most people nowadays seem to demand those huge complete packages rather than take a little extra effort in downloading things like panels & sounds separately. This was always the best part of this hobby for me. It got me interested in the development side of things using the many excellent Freeware utilities.

Please remember this. The quality is not necessarily better simply because it costs money. Quality varies considerably depending on the skill & talent of the team members involved. With addon aircraft the main difference between Freeware & Payware is that one is a labour of love while the other is created to a deadline for a particular purpose. I've have no objection to Payware per se but never saw the need to puchase a payware aircraft. I also mess around creating my own aircraft & scenery so maybe I'm biased.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 2:53am
Bazza   Ex Member

 
Interesting comments and as usual everyone is correct
doing it they way they want to.

I've simmed since pre FS95 and have never purchased a single program.    Why ?  -  mainly because I haven't needed to.   Some of the most enjoyment I've had over recent times was creating two special planes out of other peoples brilliant work - a panel here, the correct recorded sounds, the right paint job for my part of the world and so on.   It took a fair bit of surfing to find all the right downloads but that was half the fun.    The other point I consider relevant is that while I enjoy my simming, I do have a life out there, and there's only so much time to fly so many planes.    Following a recent
hard-drive crash, I'm rebuilding but this time I'm being much more selective in what planes I chose, and how many.

Put me down as a Freeware fan.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 3:20am

SilverFox441   Offline
Colonel
Now What?
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 1467
*****
 
As a designer...I see both sides, but I feel that many miss an important point. Both payware and freeware have valued places in the FS community.

Payware serves to offer what the community wants or needs. It's market driven, how else can they make money on it?

Freeware is built for the designer. Period. Full stop. End of sentence. Freeware designers build as part of their hobby, the resulting project might be of interest to you...but they did it because they wanted it. They might want to build a plane that no one else may ever want to fly.

To address the point that people shouldn't charge when GMax is free........well, that's nuts. First off, I have a receipt for my copy of FSDS V2, I don't even use GMax. I paid for it. I also paid for the copy of the Corel graphics package that does my painting and blueprint work. Add to that the time and effort that goes into a plane these days....500 to 1000 hours, easy. Unless you are willing to call your boss and happily agree to work the next 1000 hours for no pay...don't begrudge others receiving their due for their work.

I'm not a payware designer...I don't feel I'm good enough and wouldn't feel right about it. Someday something of mine might have a pricetag, but I hope that day isn't soon. You see, if I got paid to build something for someone...I'd probably have to find something else to do as my hobby. Smiley
 

Steve (Silver Fox) Daly
&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 3:42am

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
Personally I'm a freeware man, but in some cases I think that payware is worth it. TLUKs Lightning, and PSSs Avro Vulcan. But on the whole I'm tighter than a ducks bottom! Mind you 4 of my most flown aircraft are freeware!

Ozzy
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 8:52am

foo_fighter   Offline
Colonel
The Heavier Than Air 1st
Flight  Centennial
Sao Jose dos Campos, Sao Paulo

Gender: male
Posts: 1610
*****
 
Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin


Mikel

definitly I ever never spent US$ 100 in one night! Geeez!! that's not me at all!
(but that's ok if somelse can d this, nothing against)
the major point here is that some guys break their bcks working hard in order t GIVE us the very best, at leaast the best they can do! so, I ask, why charge at all? or why bill us THAT prices?? think sometimes th a/c's don't reflect the reality and other country realities - that's another consideration to be made!
 

JUST ONE WORD: FREEWARE! The more free it is, the more shall I fly!&&
Nice Flights 4 Every1
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 11:14am

codered   Offline
Colonel
Flight Plan Closed?

Posts: 1622
*****
 
I have purchased payware because they are worth the money and there are no freeware packages for them.  How many versions of United airlines can one handle.  There has got to be twenty different versions of the same airliner!  There are some great people that have created wonderful freeware (AC520, etc.), and I give them my full support.  Sometimes it is nice to fly something that is unique like the payware aircraft.  Besides, people work very hard on these projects why shouldn't they be compensated with more than a pat on the back....
 

Windows XP SP1&&Motherboard: Epox 8RDA + main board&&Processor: AMD XP2500 Barton CPU&&Memory: PC2700 1gb Geil DDR&&Hard Drive: SEA HDD IDE 40GB 7M 40GPP&&Hard Drive: Western Digital 40gb 8mb cache&&Monitor 15 LCD Flat Panel Display (15 viewable)&&Video Card: ATI Radeon 9500 Pro&&Sound Card: Creative Labs Audigy 2
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 11:24am

fisharno   Offline
Colonel
Your basic Forum Rat
Reno, Nv

Gender: male
Posts: 626
*****
 
I have to agree with Silverfox.

I bought FS Panel Design Studio, simply as an extention of my hobby. I couldn't find panels equipped the way I wanted, so now I can just make my own. But, if it wasn't for the freeware designers, I would have never been inspired to try my own.
Freeware does, indeed, drive the payware market.

Look at the SimMarket.com:

http://simmarket.com/

90% of the software for sale on the front page was at one time freeware. Or at least the concepts were originally freeware.

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Apr 22nd, 2003 at 4:38pm

Paz   Offline
Colonel
USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1922
*****
 
I love freeware and extend my Thanks to all the designers who share their creations with us, if I had the patience and know-how, I would like to get into creating freeware myself, I can't wait to  check simviation everyday to see what new freeware has been uploaded.
I also purchased Flight1 greatest airliners 737-400,  I use that add-on quite a bit and in my opinion it was very well worth the price.
It's nice to be able to shop for something new to add to FS2002 without spending any cash, especially if you're layed off from work and don't have the funds to invest in pricey add-ons.
My hat goes off to the freeware designers.
 

&&Still no linked images allowed around here Paz! Naughty...&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Apr 23rd, 2003 at 5:39pm

phil509   Offline
Colonel
are we there yet?
Geneva,Ohio USA

Gender: male
Posts: 162
*****
 
Freeware.Im far to anal retentive to cough up for anything I dont absolutely have to.IE; I still use a dial up modem,stock graphics card,and a grindingly slow 900mhz machine with a nearly full 20gig HD-works just fine for now.Besides,I'd have to really think about it to recall a free download,out of countless, that I thought was crap.My concern is;how long before the flightsim world goes the way of Napster?How long will the"free lunch"last? 8) Roll Eyes
 

To bad I cant make a living out of this,but it would probably kill me.
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print